Development of a Novel Double Antibody Sandwich Quantitative Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Antigen

✅ 全文

新型双抗体夹心定量酶联免疫吸附试验检测猪流行性腹泻病毒抗原方法的建立

作者 Baochao Fan; Jie Sun; Lin Zhu; Jinzhu Zhou; Yongxiang Zhao; Zhengyu Yu; Bing Sun; Rongli Guo; Kongwang He; Bin Li 期刊 Frontiers in Veterinary Science 发表日期 2020 ISSN 2297-1769 DOI 10.3389/fvets.2020.540248 类型 原创研究 (Original Research)

📄 英文摘要 English Abstract

EN

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) causes acute diarrhea and dehydration in sucking piglets with a high mortality rate. Here, we developed a double antibody sandwich quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-qELISA) for detection of PEDV using a specific monoclonal antibody against PEDV N protein and anti-PEDV rabbit serum. Using DAS-qELISA, the detection limit of recombinant PEDV N protein and virus titer were approximately 1 μg/L and 102.0 TCID50/mL, respectively. A total of 90 intestinal and 237 fecal samples were then screened for the presence of PEDV using DAS-qELISA and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). DAS-qELISA had a high specificity of 98.1% and sensitivity of 93.5%. The accuracy rate between DAS-qELISA and RT-PCR was 95.7%. More importantly, the viral antigen concentrations remained unchanged before and after one inactivated vaccine preparation by using the DAS-qELISA. These results suggest DAS-qELISA could be used for antigen detection of inactivated vaccine samples and clinical samples. It is a novel method for diagnosing diseases and evaluation of the PEDV vaccine.

📄 中文摘要 Chinese Abstract

中文
猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)可引起仔猪急性腹泻和脱水,死亡率较高。自2010年12月以来,中国猪场再次大规模暴发严重腹泻,仔猪发病率为80%~100%,死亡率为50%~90%。猪流行性腹泻无法仅凭临床症状和病理组织学病变进行准确诊断,需在实验室中进行鉴别诊断。RT-PCR等传统检测方法需要专业设备和经验丰富的技术人员,而免疫层析法灵敏度低且无法定量。酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)是一种灵敏、特异且便捷的大分子蛋白、细菌和病毒检测方法。

📋 英文结构化总结 English Structured Summary

全文整理

EN

Header:

Background Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) causes acute diarrhea and dehydration in sucking piglets with a high mortality rate. Since December 2010, a large-scale outbreak of severe diarrhea has re-emerged in swine farms of China, with 80–100% morbidity and 50–90% mortality in suckling piglets. PED cannot be accurately diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and histopathological lesions, and differential diagnosis is necessary to identify PEDV in the laboratory. Conventional detection methods such as RT-PCR require specialized equipment and experienced technicians, while immunochromatographic assays have low sensitivity and are not quantitative. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a sensitive, specific, and convenient method for measuring macromolecular protein, bacteria, and virus.

Header:

Methods The double antibody sandwich quantitative ELISA (DAS-qELISA) was developed using a specific monoclonal antibody (MAb) against PEDV N protein and anti-PEDV rabbit serum. Recombinant N protein of PEDV variant strain AH2012/12 was expressed in *Escherichia coli*, purified, and used to immunize mice and rabbits to obtain monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. A high-affinity MAb was used as capture antibody, and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled rabbit polyclonal antibody was used as detection antibody. A total of 90 intestinal and 237 fecal samples were screened using DAS-qELISA and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) for comparison.

Header:

Results Using DAS-qELISA, the detection limit of recombinant PEDV N protein and virus titer were approximately 1 µg/L and 10².⁰ TCID₅₀/ml, respectively. DAS-qELISA had a high specificity of 98.1% and sensitivity of 93.5%. The accuracy rate between DAS-qELISA and RT-PCR was 95.7%. More importantly, the viral antigen concentrations remained unchanged before and after one inactivated vaccine preparation by using the DAS-qELISA.

Header:

Data Summary The detection limit of recombinant PEDV N protein was approximately 1 µg/L, and the detection limit of virus titer was approximately 10².⁰ TCID₅₀/ml. Among 90 intestinal and 237 fecal samples tested, DAS-qELISA showed a specificity of 98.1% and sensitivity of 93.5%, with an accuracy rate of 95.7% compared to RT-PCR.

Header:

Conclusions These results suggest DAS-qELISA could be used for antigen detection of inactivated vaccine samples and clinical samples. It is a novel method for diagnosing diseases and evaluation of the PEDV vaccine.

Header:

Practical Significance DAS-qELISA can be applied for detecting PEDV antigens in diarrheal samples from piglets naturally infected with PEDV and in inactivated vaccine samples, providing a quantitative, sensitive, and specific tool for disease diagnosis and vaccine evaluation in the swine industry.

📋 中文结构化总结 Chinese Structured Summary

中文

背景:

猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)可引起仔猪急性腹泻和脱水,死亡率较高。自2010年12月以来,中国猪场再次大规模暴发严重腹泻,仔猪发病率为80%~100%,死亡率为50%~90%。猪流行性腹泻无法仅凭临床症状和病理组织学病变进行准确诊断,需在实验室中进行鉴别诊断。RT-PCR等传统检测方法需要专业设备和经验丰富的技术人员,而免疫层析法灵敏度低且无法定量。酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)是一种灵敏、特异且便捷的大分子蛋白、细菌和病毒检测方法。

方法:

本研究利用针对PEDV N蛋白的特异性单克隆抗体(MAb)和抗PEDV兔血清,建立了双抗体夹心定量ELISA(DAS-qELISA)。将PEDV变异株AH2012/12的重组N蛋白在大肠杆菌中表达并纯化后,用于免疫小鼠和兔以制备单克隆抗体和多克隆抗体。以高亲和力单克隆抗体作为捕获抗体,以辣根过氧化物酶(HRP)标记的兔多克隆抗体作为检测抗体。共收集90份肠道样本和237份粪便样本,分别采用DAS-qELISA和逆转录PCR(RT-PCR)进行检测比较。

结果:

DAS-qELISA对重组PEDV N蛋白和病毒滴度的检测限分别约为1 µg/L和10².⁰ TCID₅₀/ml。DAS-qELISA的特异度为98.1%,灵敏度为93.5%。DAS-qELISA与RT-PCR之间的一致率为95.7%。更重要的是,利用DAS-qELISA检测发现,病毒抗原浓度在灭活疫苗制备前后保持不变。

数据总结:

重组PEDV N蛋白的检测限约为1 µg/L,病毒滴度的检测限约为10².⁰ TCID₅₀/ml。在检测的90份肠道样本和237份粪便样本中,DAS-qELISA的特异度为98.1%,灵敏度为93.5%,与RT-PCR的一致率为95.7%。

结论:

上述结果表明,DAS-qELISA可用于灭活疫苗样本和临床样本的抗原检测,是一种用于疾病诊断和PEDV疫苗评估的新型方法。

实际意义:

DAS-qELISA可应用于自然感染PEDV的仔猪腹泻样本及灭活疫苗样本中PEDV抗原的检测,为养猪业中疾病诊断和疫苗评估提供了一种定量、灵敏且特异的检测工具。

📖 英文全文 English Full Text

EN

ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 26 October 2020 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.540248

Development of a Novel Double Antibody Sandwich Quantitative Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Antigen Baochao Fan 1,2,3,4 , Jie Sun 1,2,3,4 , Lin Zhu 1,2,3,4 , Jinzhu Zhou 1,2,3,4 , Yongxiang Zhao 1,2,3,4 , Zhengyu Yu 1,2,3,4 , Bing Sun 1,2,3,4 , Rongli Guo 1,2,3,4 , Kongwang He 1,2,3,4* and Bin Li 1,2,3,4,5* 1

Edited by: Jesus Hernandez, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), Mexico Reviewed by: Venkatramana D. Krishna, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, United States Dongbo Sun, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, China *Correspondence: Kongwang He Kongwanghe@126.com Bin Li libinana@126.com Specialty section: This article was submitted to Veterinary Infectious Diseases, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science Received: 07 April 2020 Accepted: 01 October 2020 Published: 26 October 2020 Citation: Fan B, Sun J, Zhu L, Zhou J, Zhao Y, Yu Z, Sun B, Guo R, He K and Li B (2020) Development of a Novel Double Antibody Sandwich Quantitative Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Antigen. Front. Vet. Sci. 7:540248. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.540248

Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China, 2 Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Ministry of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China, 3 Jiangsu Co-infection Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and Zoonoses, Yangzhou, China, 4 Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China, 5 School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) causes acute diarrhea and dehydration in sucking piglets with a high mortality rate. Here, we developed a double antibody sandwich quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-qELISA) for detection of PEDV using a specific monoclonal antibody against PEDV N protein and anti-PEDV rabbit serum. Using DAS-qELISA, the detection limit of recombinant PEDV N protein and virus titer were approximately 1 µg/L and 102.0 TCID50 /ml, respectively. A total of 90 intestinal and 237 fecal samples were then screened for the presence of PEDV using DAS-qELISA and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). DAS-qELISA had a high specificity of 98.1% and sensitivity of 93.5%. The accuracy rate between DAS-qELISA and RT-PCR was 95.7%. More importantly, the viral antigen concentrations remained unchanged before and after one inactivated vaccine preparation by using the DAS-qELISA. These results suggest DAS-qELISA could be used for antigen detection of inactivated vaccine samples and clinical samples. It is a novel method for diagnosing diseases and evaluation of the PEDV vaccine. Keywords: PEDV, quantitative ELISA, antigen detection, intestinal and fecal samples, evaluation vaccine

INTRODUCTION Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is the causative agent of porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED), has caused huge economic losses to the swine industry all over the world (1, 2). Since December 2010, a large-scale outbreak of severe diarrhea has been re-emerged in swine farms of China, with 80–100% morbidity and 50–90% mortality in suckling piglets (3, 4). Increasing evidence suggests that this large-scale outbreak of diarrhea may be caused by highly virulent PEDV variants (5, 6). In May 2013, PED outbreaks suddenly emerged in the United States and spread rapidly throughout the country, as well as to Canada and Mexico. These outbreaks also caused high mortality rates in newborn piglets (7–9).

Frontiers in Veterinary Science | www.frontiersin.org 1 October 2020 | Volume 7 | Article 540248 Fan et al. Quantitative ELISA Detection of PEDV

as previously described (25, 26). The Vero-81 (ATCC No. CCL81) cell line was cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) supplemented with antibiotics (100 units/ml of penicillin, 100 µg /ml of streptomycin, and 0.25 µg /mL of amphotericin B; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Tianhang, China). Vero cells were maintained in DMEM containing 10 µg/ml trypsin and used to propagate PEDV. When obviously cytopathic effects were observed, the infected cell cultures were freeze-thawed, and cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 4,000 × g for 5 min at 4◦ C. The supernatant was collected and stored at −80◦ C until use. SP2/0 cells were obtained as described previously (27), and were maintained in RPMI 1,640 medium with 10% FBS. Porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), porcine rotavirus (RV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), classical swine fever virus (CSFV), porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), and porcine pseudorabies virus (PRV) were conserved in the laboratory and used to determine the specificity of DAS-qELISA. The PEDV N protein was expressed and purified as described previously (28). Briefly, the N gene was amplified from PEDV strain AH2012/12 by RT-PCR with the following primers: forward: 5′ -TTTGGATCCGCTTCTGTCAGTTTTCAGGATC3′ (BamHI site underlined); reverse: 5′ -CCGCTCGAGTTAATTT CCAGTATCGAAGATCTCG-3′ (XhoI site underlined). The amplicon was then digested with restriction enzymes BamHI and XhoI and ligated into the prokaryotic expression vector pET-28a, resulting in recombinant plasmid pET28a-N. E. coli BL21(DE3) cells carrying pET28a-N were grown in LB media containing kanamycin (25 mg/ml) at 37◦ C to A600 = 0.6 and then induced with 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 37◦ C for 5 h. The recombinant PEDV-N protein with 6 His-tag (rPEDV-N) was expressed as soluble protein after induction. And the protein was purified by Ni2+ affinity chromatography (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and verified by SDS-PAGE.

PEDV belongs to the Alphacoronavirus genus within the Coronavirinae subfamily of the Coronaviridae family (1, 10). PEDV, like other coronaviruses, contains a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome of about 28 kb. The virus produces a number of sub-genomic mRNAs, which encode for various non-structural and structural proteins within infected cells. The virus particles include spike (S) protein, envelope (E) protein, membrane (M) protein, and nucleocapsid (N) protein (11). The S protein is responsible for induction of neutralizing antibodies, specific receptor binding and cell membrane fusion (12). Moreover, according to the analysis of PEDV variability, the virus was found to be constantly mutating, and the amino acid mutations of PEDV pandemic strains were mainly located in the N-terminal domain of S1 (13). PED cannot be accurately diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and histopathological lesions (14–17). Due to similarities between causative agents of diarrhea, differential diagnosis is necessary to identify PEDV in the laboratory (17, 18). The conventional detection method of PEDV is reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and some RT-PCR alternatives have been developed, such as TaqMan-based real-time RT-PCR, reverse transcription loopmediated isothermal amplification, and nanoparticle-assisted PCR assay (19–22). However, RT-PCR requires specialized laboratory equipment and experienced technicians. Moreover, optimization of the reaction system and conditions are laborious and complicated processes, which bear the risk of false-positive results due to laboratory contamination. An immunochromatographic assay was also developed to detect PEDV antigens. Unfortunately, this method has a low sensitivity, is not quantitative, and is unsuitable for high-throughput antigen detection (23). A new functionalized nanoparticle-based PCR method specific for PEDV was recently developed. However, as a new method, the reaction system and conditions are not yet optimized and could take time (24). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a sensitive, specific, and convenient method for measuring macromolecular protein, bacteria and virus. The method uses stable reagents and inexpensive equipment, and the results are accurate and reproducible. In our study, we obtained monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies by immunizing mice and rabbits with purified recombinant N protein of PEDV variant strain AH2012/12 expressed in Escherichia coli. A double antibody sandwich quantitative ELISA (DAS-qELISA) was then established using a high-affinity monoclonal antibody (MAb) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled rabbit polyclonal antibody as capture and detection antibodies, respectively. The assay demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity and could be used to detect PEDV antigens in diarrheal samples from piglets naturally infected with PEDV and inactivated vaccine samples.

Ethics Statement All animal experiments were performed with the approval of the Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences Experimental Animal Ethics Committee (No. NKYVET 2015-0126). Efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and reduce the number of animals used.

Recombinant N Protein Immunization Protocols of Animals The immunization protocol followed conventional subcutaneous injection with slight modification (27). Briefly, 4 to 6-weekold female BALB/c mice were subcutaneously immunized with 0.1 mg of purified recombinant PEDV-N protein emulsified with complete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), followed by two subcutaneous immunizations with 0.1 mg of rPEDV-N in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant every 4 weeks. Four female adult (12-week-old) rabbits were also immunized according to the mice immunization protocol. However, the dose of immunization was ten-fold higher than that used in mice. Blood samples were collected from tail vein of mice or ear vein

MATERIALS AND METHODS Viruses, Cell Culture, and Preparation of PEDV N Protein PEDV strain AH2012/12 (GenBank accession number: KU646831) was isolated and maintained in our laboratory, Frontiers in Veterinary Science | www.frontiersin.org

2 October 2020 | Volume 7 | Article 540248 Fan et al. Quantitative ELISA Detection of PEDV

4◦ C overnight. After blocking, serially diluted PEDV-infected culture supernatants or uninfected controls were added into the wells in duplicate, and the plates were placed at 25◦ C in a dark environment for 45 min. After washing, HRP-labeled polyclonal antibodies were added at a working concentration, and plates were incubated at 25◦ C for 45 min. Then, the wells were washed with PBS with 0.5% Tween 20, and added

of rabbits on the 7th day after each booster immunization. The antibody titers were detected by indirect ELISA.

Preparation and Identification of Monoclonal Antibodies (MAbs) Against PEDV N Three days prior to cell fusion, mice were boosted with 0.1 ml rPEDV-N solution (0.5 mg/ml). Mice were then bled and serum samples were collected and the antibody titers against rPEDVN were tested by ELISA with rPEDV-N as the coating antigen. The mouse with the highest antibody titer was euthanized and its spleen was collected. The fusion of B lymphocytes with mouse myeloma cells was carried out as described previously (29). The resulting hybridoma cells were plated in 96-well plates and cultured in HAT selection medium (DMEM containing 20% FBS, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 mM hypoxanthine, 16 mM thymidine, and 400 mM aminopterin). The antibody titers of hybridoma supernatants against N protein were screened by indirect ELISA. Positive clones were subcloned and rescreened. MAbs with high antibody titers were then purified from ascites using the octanoic acid/saturated ammonium sulfate precipitation method and subsequently purified by protein G-sepharose columns. Isotypes of obtained MAbs were determined by using a commercially mouse MAb isotyping kit (Zymed Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

FIGURE 1 | The purification and identification of the recombinant N protein. (A) The purification of the rPEDV-N protein. The MK lane represents a marker, the LS lane represents injection sample, and the FT lane represents the outflow liquid with not binding. The 40, 80, 200, and 500 lanes represent the eluents with imidazole concentration of 40, 80, 200, and 500, respectively. (B)The western blot identification of rPEDV-N protein. The T lane represents purified rPEDV-N protein, and the C lane represents the lysates of E. coli BL21 cells.

Seven days after the final injection, the rabbit with the highest antibody titer was anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 10% chloral hydrate to collect whole blood and obtain the serum. The rabbit serum antibody titer reached 1:243,000. The antibody was purified from the serum by using octanoic acid-saturated ammonium sulfate precipitation and protein Asepharose columns, and was desalinated over a Sephadex G-25 column. The purified polyclonal antibody was stored at −70◦ C. The antibody titers were assayed by indirect ELISA.

TABLE 1 | The selection of pairing antibodies. mAbs No.(#)

Selection of Antibody Pairs The purified rabbit polyclonal antibody was labeled with HRP (Sigma-Aldrich). Each prepared MAb against PEDV N protein was coated onto wells of a 96-well microtiter plate (Costar, Corning, NY, USA). rPEDV-N (1µg/ml) or positive sample (PEDV culture supernatant) was used as the sandwich antigen, and HRP-labeled rabbit polyclonal antibody was used as the detection antibody to perform DAS-ELISA for antibody pairing. As a negative control, the sandwich antigen was replaced with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The test results are expressed as OD450 values. The best antibody pairs were obtained according to the recorded result.

Establishment and Optimization of DAS-qELISA We next selected the best combination of capture mouse MAbs and detection polyclonal antibody for PEDV antigencapture ELISA. Briefly, microplates were coated with 100 µl/well of each capture MAb at a concentration of 2 µg/ml at

Frontiers in Veterinary Science | www.frontiersin.org 3 Mean OD450 rPEDV-N protein (1 µg) Viral supernatant Negative 2 3.877 0.745 0.445 3 3.766 0.553 0.411 5 3.829 1.5 0.374 7 3.822 0.562 0.477 9 3.884

1.45 0.413 13 3.818 1.249 0.446 14 3.839 0.724 0.432 16 3.894 3.69 0.223 19 3.904 0.877 0.252 20 3.348 0.576 0.317 21 3.838 0.559 0.419 22 3.343 0.625 0.358 23 3.89 0.51 0.334 25 3.359 0.824 0.251 26 3.868

1.263 0.228 27 3.369 0.463 0.305 October 2020 | Volume 7 | Article 540248 Fan et al. Quantitative ELISA Detection of PEDV TABLE 2 | The results of specificity assay. Virus PEDV TGEV RV PRRSV CSFV PCV2

PRV Mean OD450 values 1.086 0.113 0.111 0.112 0.1 0.101 0.11 PEDV-N concentration(µg/L) 26.45 −0.53 −0.64 −0.59 −1.1 −0.94 −0.65

The different pathogens were inactivated by treatment with 1% Triton X-100 and 0.3% TNBP for 2 h at RT, and then detected by the DAS-qELISA at optimum conditions.

culture supernatant was centrifuged by using one ultrafiltration membrane reactor with molecular weight cutoff 100 kDa (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) to remove free N protein. The purified virus was diluted with the same volume of medium and titrated by TCID50 . Acquired105.74 TCID50 /ml purified PEDV solution was inactivated by treatment with 1% Triton X-100 and 0.3% TNBP for 2 h at RT, and was serially diluted 2- or 10-fold, assayed by DAS-qELISA, and absorbance measured by the ELISA plate reader. To evaluate the specificity of DAS-qELISA, suspensions of TGEV, RV, PRRSV, CSFV, PCV2, and PRV were selected for testing. PEDV-positive viral suspensions and PEDV-negative samples from non-infected (mock) cell debris were also evaluated by DAS-qELISA.

TABLE 3 | The assay of standard rPEDV-N protein by using DAS-qELISA kit. rPEDV-N concentration(µg/L) Mean OD450 values 32 1.60 16 0.89 8 0.53 4 0.35 2 0.26 1 0.22 0 0.17

two-fold serially diluted standard rPEDV-N protein with concentrations of 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, and 0 µg/kgL was assayed by using DAS-qELISA. Duplicability Test

3,3′ ,5,5′ -Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) solution. Fifteen minutes later at 25◦ C, sulfuric acid (2 M, 100 µl/well) was added to stop the reaction, and the absorbance at OD450 was measured.

The duplicability test was carried out as described previously (31). Briefly, the intra-batch assay was determined by detecting each sample in microplates coated with capture MAb by DASqELISA in three parallel wells. These samples were also detected by DAS-qELISA in microplates coated with different batches of capture MAbs for inter-batch assay. All tests were repeated three times. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (%CV) were calculated by the following formula: %CV = (standard deviations (SD)/mean OD450 of eight samples) × 100%.

DAS-qELISA Positive and Negative Cut-Off Values A total of 40 PEDV negative fecal and intestinal samples were obtained from healthy piglets. These samples were diluted with PBS (0.01 M, pH 7.2) to obtain a 10% suspension (v/v), clarified by centrifugation at 2,000 g for 10 min, the supernatant was treated with 1% Triton X-100 and 0.3% tri-n-butyl phosphate (TNBP) for 2 h at room temperature (RT) to inactivate the virus (30), and then was detected by the established DAS-qELISA with the determined optimal conditions. The cut-off value at OD450 to identify a PEDV-positive sample was calculated based on the following formula: positive and negative cut-off value = negative sample mean + 2 standard deviations (mean + 2SD).

Comparison of DAS-qELISA and RT-PCR A total of 90 intestinal and 237 fecal samples obtained from different pig farms were processed as described above, and were screened for the presence of PEDV using DAS-qELISA and RTPCR. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated by the following formulas: sensitivity = true positive/(true positive + false negative) × 100%; specificity = true negative/(true negative + false positive) × 100%; accuracy = (true positive + true negative)/(true positive + false positive + true negative + false negative) × 100%. The agreement between RT-PCR and DAS-qELISA techniques was measured with the kappa statistic value (32).

Detection Limit and Cross-Reaction of DAS-qELISA To evaluate the sensitivity of DAS-qELISA, plates were coated with mouse MAbs and incubated overnight at 4◦ C. Then, the plates were blocked with PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin and 100 µl of 0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 16.0, and 32.0, µg/L diluted rPEDV-N protein standard with PBS was added, then the plates were incubated for 45 min at 25◦ C. After washing, 100 µl diluted rabbit HRP-labeled anti-PEDV-N polyclonal antibody was then added, and plates were incubated at 25◦ C for 45 min. Plates were then washed, and 100 µl of TMB solution was added. After incubating at 25◦ C in the dark for 15 min, sulfuric acid (2 M, 100 µl/well) was added, and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm to determine the standard curve. In order to determine the detection limit of virus titer. The PEDV-infected

Frontiers in Veterinary Science | www.frontiersin.org

Preparation of Vaccine Antigens and Formulation of Inactivated PEDV Vaccine The supernatant of Vero cells containing PEDV strain AH2012/12 was obtained as described above. And the virus titer was tested and adjusted to 106.0 TCID50 /ml. Then it was inactivated with 0.1% formaldehyde at 37◦ C for 48 h. A vaccine was prepared by mixing the inactivated PEDV vaccine antigen in an equal volume of Montanide ISA 201 adjuvant (Seppic, Paris, France).

4 October 2020 | Volume 7 | Article 540248 Fan et al. Quantitative ELISA Detection of PEDV

FIGURE 2 | The standard curve of the DAS-qELISA. Two-fold serially diluted standard rPEDV-N protein with concentrations of 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, and 0 µg/L was assayed using DAS-qELISA with two replicates per concentration. The standard curve was calculated using a linear relationship between the OD450 values and concentrations.

TABLE 4 | The results of DAS-qELISA of 10-fold dilution of purified PEDV virus. TABLE 5 | The results of DAS-qELISA of 2-fold dilution of purified PEDV virus. Dilution fold of virus Dilution fold of virus

DAS-qELISA TCID50 /ml Mean OD450 values Concentration (µg/L) DAS-qELISA TCID50 /ml Mean OD450 values Concentration (µg/L) 1:10 104.74 3.065 127.25 1:10 104.74 3.065 127.25 1:100 103.74 3.091 128.39 1:20

104.44 3.303 137.68 1:1,000 102.74 1.557 61.18 1:40 104.14 3.321 138.47 1:10,000 101.74 0.207 2.03 1:80 103.84 3.189 132.69 1:100,000 100.74 0.176 0.67 1:160 103.54 2.912 120.55 0 0.165 0.19 1:320 103.23

2.552 104.78 1:640 102.93 1.866 74.72 1:1,280 102.63 0.901 32.44 1:2,560 102.33 0.296 5.93 1:5,120 102.03 0.229 2.99 1:10,240 101.73 0.193 1.43 0 0.165 0.19 CON

The 105.74 TCID50 /ml purified virus was presently inactivated and serially diluted 10-fold, then was assayed by DAS-qELISA. RESULTS CON PEDV N Protein Expression in E. coli

The 105.74 TCID50 /ml purified virus was presently inactivated and serially diluted 2-fold, then was assayed by DAS-qELISA.

Recombinant vectors were transformed into competent E. coli BL21 cells and induced with 1 mM IPTG at 37◦ C for 5 h to express the recombinant protein. The purified protein is shown in Figure 1A; the molecular weight of the recombinant protein was about 50 kDa, which corresponded with the molecular weight of fusion protein His-N. The correct corresponding protein band was confirmed by western blot using anti-N monoclonal antibody (Figure 1B).

for subcloning. A total of 37 hybridoma cell lines capable of secreting MAbs against PEDV N protein were obtained and numbered #1–37. All hybridomas producing antibodies were detected by indirect ELISA with 0.5 as the cut-off value. A 96well ELISA plate was coated with purified rPEDV-N at 1 µg/ml. Among the 37 MAbs, 23 had antibody titers >1:1,024,000, 5 had titers ranging from 1:512,000 to 1:1,024,000, 4 has titers between 1:64,000 and 1:128,000, and 5 had titers <1:64,000. Antibody subtypes were also determined using the isotype detection kit.

Preparation and Characterization of MAbs Antibody-positive subclones were obtained by the limited dilution method. Ten days after the test, positive clones were continuously isolated and selected by the limited dilution method

Frontiers in Veterinary Science | www.frontiersin.org 5 October 2020 | Volume 7 | Article 540248 Fan et al. Quantitative ELISA Detection of PEDV Specificity of DAS-qELISA Among the 37 MAbs, 30 were IgG1a , 3 were IgG2a , 3 were IgG2b , and 1 was IgM.

The specificity of DAS-qELISA was assessed by testing culture supernatants of six other viruses: TGEV, RV, PRRSV, CSFV, PCV2, and PRV. As shown in Table 2, only PEDV-infected cell culture supernatants presented a positive signal, and no positive results or cross-reactivity was observed for the other viruses. These results indicated that the DAS-qELISA method was specific for PEDV detection.

Paired Antibody Selection We selected 16 MAbs that had the highest antibody titers for antibody pairing. The data are shown in Table 1. Seven MAbs had positive sample OD450 values of more than 2.1 times negative sample OD450 values, which were judged as positive. MAb #16 had the highest OD450 value for positive samples, rPEDV-N and virus supernatant, and the lowest OD450 value for negative samples. Therefore, MAb #16 was selected for development of DAS-qELISA. MAb #16 was prepared from hybridoma cell line #16, which was subtype IgG1a and had a titer of >1:1,024,000.

Detection Limit of PEDV DAS-qELISA PEDV DAS-qELISA was assayed by using 2-fold serially diluted standard rPEDV-N protein with concentrations of 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, and 0 µg/L. The standard curve was obtained as follows: Y = 22.39X−3.8,583, R2 = 1.0. The detection limit of rPEDV-N protein was approximately 1 µg/L (Table 3). The standard curve is shown in Figure 2. The detection limit of virus titer was also assayed by using PEDV DAS-qELISA. A 105.74 TCID50 /ml purified PEDV virus was serially diluted 10-fold (Table 4) and 2-fold (Table 5), respectively. The value of 102.03 TCID50 /ml of virus supernatant was above the critical value of 0.229, indicating that the detection limit of DAS-qELISA was about 102.0 TCID50 /ml.

Development of DAS-qELISA MAb #16 and rabbit HRP-labeled polyclonal antibody were determined as the optimal capture and detector antibodies by indirect ELISA, respectively. Optimum reaction conditions of the antigen-capture assay was conducted by a checkerboard analysis of serial dilutions of capture and detection antibodies. And the results showed that the optimal concentrations for capture by MAb #16 and for detection by HRP-labeled polyclonal antibody were both 2 µg/mL. Forty PEDV-negative fecal samples were used to determine the cut-off value. The mean (X) was 0.168 and the standard deviation (SD) was 0.017, thus the critical value (X + 2SD) was 0.201, which was used to define negativity and positivity.

Reproducibility of DAS-qELISA The results of duplicability testing are shown in Tables 6, 7. The %CV of intra- and inter-batch duplicability tests was between 2.4 and 7.8% and between 3.4 and 8.4%, respectively. These results indicated that the developed DAS-qELISA was adequate for PEDV detection.

TABLE 6 | The results of intra-batch duplicability test.The results of intra-batch duplicability test. Assay time No. of PEDV positive fecal samples 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 First 17.4 154.2 55.0 128.0 35.7 70.6

35.4 75.4 Second 16.2 144.6 50.1 124.8 32.1 75.4 36.8 75.1 Third 18.7 174.2 50.7 139.7 30.7 67.6 32.5 79.1 X 17.4 157.7 51.9 130.8 32.8 71.2 34.9 76.5 SD 1.0 12.3 2.2 6.4 2.1 3.2 1.8 1.8 CV 5.9% 7.8% 4.2%

4.9% 6.4% 4.5% 5.1% 2.4%

Eight pre-treated fecal samples were assayed by DAS-qELISA. X, mean N protein content of each sample; SD, standard deviation; CV, coefficients of variation. TABLE 7 | The results of inter-batch duplicability test. Batch number

No. of PEDV positive fecal samples 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 First 17.5 176.0 56.3 124.3 28.6 84.7 36.4 75.9 Second 15.4 162.9 55.3 123.9 24.1 74.2 36.1 71.0 Third 15.7 143.0 47.1 136.4 26.7 86.9 39.7 70.3 X 16.2

160.6 52.9 128.2 26.5 81.9 37.4 72.4 SD 0.9 13.6 4.1 5.8 1.8 5.5 1.6 2.4 CV 5.7% 8.4% 7.8% 4.5% 7.0% 6.8% 4.4% 3.4%

Eight pre-treated fecal samples were assayed by DAS-qELISA. X, mean N protein content of each sample; SD, standard deviation; CV, coefficients of variation. Frontiers in Veterinary Science | www.frontiersin.org

6 October 2020 | Volume 7 | Article 540248 Fan et al. Quantitative ELISA Detection of PEDV Field Sample Detection

result was not credible. Thus, the concentration of the virus stock solution was about 14,000 µg/L. After inactivation and preparation into a vaccine, the concentration of the vaccine was about 7,000 µg/L. Considering the vaccine was prepared by mixing an equal volume of killed antigen and adjuvant, viral antigen concentrations likely remained unchanged before and after vaccine preparation.

A total of 90 intestinal and 237 fecal samples were screened for the presence of PEDV using DAS-qELISA and RT-PCR (Table 8). In intestinal samples, 68 of the 90 field samples were determined to be positive by using DAS-qELISA, whereas 65 samples were positive by RT-PCR. Three samples gave discordant results, which were PEDV-positive by DAS-qELISA but PEDVnegative by RT-PCR. In fecal samples, a total of 93 samples were positive in both DAS-qELISA and RT-PCR and 133 were negative in both tests. Eleven samples gave discordant results, which were PEDV-negative by DAS-qELISA but PEDV-positive by RT-PCR. Overall, DAS-qELISA was found to have 98.1% specificity (155/158) and 93.5% sensitivity (158/169) relative to RT-PCR. And the accuracy of these two detection methods was [(87 + 226)/327] = 95.7%. In addition, the kappa values were 0.914 and 0.905 by examining fecal and intestinal samples respectively, suggesting an almost perfect agreement between the DAS-qELISA and RT-PCR methods.

DISCUSSION As a re-emerged disease, PEDV has caused huge economic losses to the swine industry all over the world. Early and rapid diagnosis of PEDV is very important to prevent and control the spread of this disease. At present, RT-PCR is the main technology for the diagnosis of microbial infections. However, this method has some shortcomings, such as the need for expensive specialized equipment, the instability of RNA samples, and the possible contamination. Other rapid tests are therefore needed to facilitate diagnosis. In this study, we developed a DAS-qELISA, which could be used for quantitative detection of viral antigens, by using one mouse MAb and rabbit polyclonal antibody as capture and detection antibodies, respectively. The described assay could detect up to 1 µg/L of PEDV N protein and 102.0 TCID50 /ml virus stock. No cross-reactivity with other similar causative agents of diarrhea and important pig pathogens, such as TGEV, RV, PRV, PRRSV, CSFV, PCV2 and PRV, was observed. Furthermore, the results of field sample detection reveal a positive coincidence between DAS-qELISA and RT-PCR. This newly developed DASqELISA with high sensitivity and specificity could be used as an effective method for the diagnosis of PEDV infection in pigs. In a previous study, a DAS-ELISA to detect PEDV antigen was developed by using MAbs to M protein of PEDV classical strain CV777 (33). However, in recent years, highly virulent PEDV variants have become the main pathogens of porcine diarrheal diseases, which show large genetic differences compared with classical strains, such as CV777 and DR13 (3, 5). Recently, two studies reported similar ELISA methods for detecting pathogens using antibodies to S protein as capture antibodies (34, 35). Although the use of antibody against S could improve the specificity of the detection method, S protein, as one of the

Vaccine Sample Detection Viral antigen content changes before and after vaccine preparation were also tested by using DAS-qELISA. As shown in Table 9, the samples of 10, 50, and 100-fold dilution multiples exceeded the test limit of DAS-qELISA, and the TABLE 8 | Comparison of RT-PCR and DAS-qELISA for the detection of PEDV in (A) intestinal and (B) fecal samples. RT-PCR

DAS-qELISA Positive A Negative Total K = 0.914 Positive 65 0 65 Negative 3 22 25 Total 68 22 90 B K = 0.905 104 Positive 93 11 Negative 0 133 133 Total 93 144 237

TABLE 9 | The detection of antigen concentration of PEDV viral supernatant and vaccine by using DAS-qELISA. No. Viral supernatant Vaccine Dilution Mean OD450 Concentration Final Mean OD450 Concentration

Final factor values (µg/L) concentration values (µg/L) concentration (µg/L) (µg/L) 10 3.23 42.81 428 2.91 38.51 385 50 3.20 42.41 2,120 2.63 34.74 1,737 100 3.26 43.22 4,321 2.21 29.09 2,909 1,000 1.08

13.89 13,892 0.70 8.78 8,781 2,000 0.56 6.90 13,796 0.32 3.67 7,340 4,000 0.32 3.67 14,679 0.12 0.98 3,919

The formula of standard sample was Y = 13.451x−0.6,344, and R2 = 0.9,994. The data marked in bold represents the results in the confidence interval. Frontiers in Veterinary Science | www.frontiersin.org

7 October 2020 | Volume 7 | Article 540248 Fan et al. Quantitative ELISA Detection of PEDV viral proteins with the highest mutation rate, might reduce the detection efficiency of the mutant virus. In this study, because of the high homology of N protein amino acid sequences from different PEDV strains, and the high immunogenicity of this protein, N protein seems to be a suitable antigen marker for the diagnosis of PEDV infection. Therefore, in this study, we used the N protein of the PEDV variant strain AH2012/12 as an immunogen to obtain MAbs and polyclonal antibodies. In addition, although the N protein is located inside the virus particles, we used reagents to inactivate the virus, which may enable the antibody to pass through the envelope and react with the internal N protein. A total of 37 MAbs against PEDV-N were produced by immunizing mice with rPEDV-N. The reaction profile of each antibody was characterized by indirect ELISA and IFA. All 37 MAbs were found to be specific to PEDV-N (data not shown). These MAbs allowed for the selection of an optimal MAb for constructing a DAS-qELISA with HRP-labeled rabbit polyclonal antibody. We found that the matched pair of MAb #16 as the capture antibody exhibited the highest sensitivity (binding) to PEDV-infected culture supernatant. Moreover, we generated a polyclonal antibody and used it as the detection antibody. Based on the ability of polyclonal antibody to bind to multiple antigenic epitopes, this method can reduce the missed detection rate and increase the sensitivity of the assay. By using MAb #16 and rabbit HRP-labeled polyclonal antibody, the detection limit of DAS-qELISA was as low as 1 µg/L with rPEDV-N protein and 102.0 TCID50 /ml with PEDV culture supernatants. Moreover, to determine specificity of this DAS-qELISA detection method, other porcine gastroenteric diseases (i.e., TGEV, RV, and PRV) and several important porcine pathogens (i.e., PRRSV, CSFV, and PCV2), which are likely to cause co-infection in pigs, were examined. No cross-reaction was observed with these viruses, suggesting that this method has a high level of specificity for PEDV. We next tested fecal and intestinal samples by using DASqELISA and RT-PCR. When examining intestinal samples, only three samples gave discordant results, which were PEDVpositive by DAS-qELISA but PEDV-negative by RT-PCR. This disagreement might be due to the presence of PCR inhibitors and nucleic acid-degrading substances in intestinal samples, and they were retained in extracted nucleic acids, thus affecting the accuracy of PCR. It may also be due to poor quality of the collected samples, such as autolysis of tissues stored at room temperature for a long time. In the 237 fecal samples, 11 samples gave discordant results, which were PEDV-negative by DASqELISA but PEDV-positive by RT-PCR. The DAS-qELISA test may fail to detect antigens with very low viral titers in fecal samples. In this study, some PEDV-positive intestinal samples could not be detected by using RT-PCR, and this result was also observed by Sozzi et al. (36). Overall, the kappa value of these

two different methods were both >0.90, suggesting a very high consistency between the two methods. We also tested viral antigen contents before and after vaccine preparation by using DAS-qELISA. After inactivation and emulsification with the adjuvant, the antigen of the prepared PEDV vaccine could also be tested. Viral antigen concentrations were not changed before and after vaccine preparation. This result revealed that our DAS-qELISA method could be used for the detection of vaccine samples. In summary, we developed a DAS-qELISA method for detection of PEDV antigen by using a specific MAb against PEDV N protein and anti-PEDV-N rabbit serum. This method has a high specificity and sensitivity, and the accuracy rate between DAS-qELISA and RT-PCR was 95.7%. These results indicate that the DAS-qELISA method could be used for diagnosing diseases caused by PEDV.

📖 中文全文 Chinese Full Text

中文

原创研究 发表日期:2020年10月26日 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.540248

**检测猪流行性腹泻病毒抗原的新型双抗体夹心定量酶联免疫吸附测定法的建立**

范宝超 1,2,3,4,孙杰 1,2,3,4,朱林 1,2,3,4,周金竹 1,2,3,4,赵永祥 1,2,3,4, 余正宇 1,2,3,4,孙冰 1,2,3,4,郭荣丽 1,2,3,4,何孔旺 1,2,3,4* 和 李彬 1,2,3,4,5*

1 农业部兽医生物工程与技术重点实验室,江苏省农业科学院兽医研究所,南京,中国,2 江苏省食品质量与安全重点实验室-科技部国家重点实验室培育基地,南京,中国,3 江苏省重要动物疫病与人兽共患病防控协同创新中心,扬州,中国,4 扬州大学江苏省人兽共患病重点实验室,扬州,中国,5 江苏大学食品与生物工程学院,镇江,中国

编辑:Jesus Hernandez,墨西哥国家科学技术委员会 (CONACYT),墨西哥 审稿:Venkatramana D. Krishna,明尼苏达大学双城分校,美国;孙东波,黑龙江八一农垦大学,中国 *通讯作者:何孔旺 Kongwanghe@126.com;李彬 libinana@126.com 专业方向:本文提交至《Frontiers in Veterinary Science》期刊的兽医传染病版块 收稿:2020年4月7日;接受:2020年10月1日;发表:2020年10月26日 引用:Fan B, Sun J, Zhu L, Zhou J, Zhao Y, Yu Z, Sun B, Guo R, He K and Li B (2020) Development of a Novel Double Antibody Sandwich Quantitative Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Antigen. Front. Vet. Sci. 7:540248. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.540248

猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)可引起哺乳仔猪急性腹泻和脱水,且死亡率高。在此,我们利用针对PEDV N蛋白的特异性单克隆抗体和抗PEDV兔血清,开发了一种用于检测PEDV的双抗体夹心定量酶联免疫吸附测定法(DAS-qELISA)。使用DAS-qELISA,重组PEDV N蛋白的检测限和病毒滴度分别约为1 µg/L和10^2.0 TCID50/ml。随后,使用DAS-qELISA和逆转录PCR(RT-PCR)对90份肠道和237份粪便样本进行了PEDV筛查。DAS-qELISA具有98.1%的高特异性和93.5%的高敏感性。DAS-qELISA与RT-PCR之间的准确率为95.7%。更重要的是,使用DAS-qELISA检测发现,在制备一次灭活疫苗前后,病毒抗原浓度保持不变。这些结果表明,DAS-qELISA可用于灭活疫苗样本和临床样本的抗原检测。这是一种诊断疾病和评估PEDV疫苗的新方法。 关键词:PEDV,定量ELISA,抗原检测,肠道和粪便样本,疫苗评估

**引言** 猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)是猪流行性腹泻(PED)的病原体,给全球养猪业造成了巨大的经济损失(1, 2)。自2010年12月以来,中国猪场再次爆发大规模严重腹泻,哺乳仔猪发病率达80–100%,死亡率达50–90%(3, 4)。越来越多的证据表明,这种大规模腹泻爆发可能是由高致病性PEDV变异株引起的(5, 6)。2013年5月,PED突然在美国爆发并迅速蔓延全国,同时传播至加拿大和墨西哥。这些爆发也导致新生仔猪出现高死亡率(7–9)。

PEDV属于冠状病毒科冠状病毒亚科α冠状病毒属(1, 10)。与其他冠状病毒一样,PEDV包含一个约28 kb的单股正链RNA基因组。该病毒产生多个亚基因组mRNA,在感染细胞内编码各种非结构蛋白和结构蛋白。病毒颗粒包括纤突(S)蛋白、包膜(E)蛋白、膜(M)蛋白和核衣壳(N)蛋白(11)。S蛋白负责诱导中和抗体、特异性受体结合和细胞膜融合(12)。此外,根据PEDV变异性分析,发现该病毒不断发生突变,PEDV流行株的氨基酸突变主要位于S1的N端结构域(13)。

仅根据临床症状和组织病理学病变无法对PED进行准确诊断(14–17)。由于腹泻病原体之间的相似性,必须在实验室进行鉴别诊断以鉴定PEDV(17, 18)。PEDV的常规检测方法是逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR),并且已经开发了一些RT-PCR的替代方法,如基于TaqMan的实时RT-PCR、逆转录环介导等温扩增和纳米颗粒辅助PCR测定(19–22)。然而,RT-PCR需要专门的实验室设备和经验丰富的技术人员。此外,反应体系和条件的优化过程既繁琐又复杂,且存在因实验室污染导致假阳性结果的风险。免疫层析测定法也被开发用于检测PEDV抗原。遗憾的是,该方法敏感性低、不能定量,且不适用于高通量抗原检测(23)。最近开发了一种基于功能化纳米颗粒的PEDV特异性PCR方法。然而,作为一种新方法,其反应体系和条件尚未优化,可能需要时间(24)。

酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)是一种测量大分子蛋白、细菌和病毒的敏感、特异且便捷的方法。该方法使用稳定的试剂和廉价的设备,结果准确且可重复。在我们的研究中,我们用在大肠杆菌中表达的PEDV变异株AH2012/12的纯化重组N蛋白免疫小鼠和兔子,获得了单克隆和多克隆抗体。随后,利用高亲和力单克隆抗体和辣根过氧化物酶(HRP)标记的兔多克隆抗体分别作为捕获抗体和检测抗体,建立了双抗体夹心定量ELISA(DAS-qELISA)。该测定法表现出高敏感性和特异性,可用于检测自然感染PEDV的仔猪腹泻样本和灭活疫苗样本中的PEDV抗原。

**伦理声明** 所有动物实验均经江苏省农业科学院实验动物伦理委员会批准(编号:NKYVET 2015-0126)。已尽力减少动物痛苦并减少使用动物的数量。

**动物重组N蛋白免疫方案** 免疫方案遵循常规皮下注射并稍作修改(27)。简而言之,4至6周龄雌性BALB/c小鼠皮下免疫0.1 mg纯化的重组PEDV-N蛋白(与弗氏完全佐剂乳化),随后每4周用0.1 mg rPEDV-N(弗氏不完全佐剂乳化)进行两次皮下免疫。四只成年雌性兔(12周龄)也按照小鼠免疫方案进行免疫。然而,免疫剂量是小鼠所用剂量的十倍。在每次加强免疫后第7天,分别从小鼠尾静脉或兔耳静脉采集血样。通过间接ELISA检测抗体滴度。

在最后一次注射后7天,抗体滴度最高的兔通过腹腔注射10%水合氯醛麻醉,以采集全血并获取血清。兔血清抗体滴度达到1:243,000。使用辛酸-饱和硫酸铵沉淀法和蛋白A-琼脂糖凝胶柱从血清中纯化抗体,并在Sephadex G-25柱上脱盐。纯化的多克隆抗体储存于−70◦ C。通过间接ELISA测定抗体滴度。

**材料与方法** **病毒、细胞培养及PEDV N蛋白的制备** PEDV毒株AH2012/12(GenBank登录号:KU646831)按前述方法(25, 26)在本实验室分离并保存。Vero-81(ATCC编号CCL81)细胞系在添加抗生素(100单位/ml青霉素、100 µg/ml链霉素和0.25 µg/ml两性霉素B;Thermo Fisher Scientific)和10%热灭活胎牛血清(FBS;天杭,中国)的杜尔贝科改良伊格尔培养基(DMEM;Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA)中培养。Vero细胞在含10 µg/ml胰蛋白酶的DMEM中维持,并用于增殖PEDV。当观察到明显的细胞病变效应时,将感染的细胞培养物冻融,并在4◦ C下以4,000 × g离心5 min去除细胞碎片。收集上清液并储存于−80◦ C备用。按前述方法(27)获取SP2/0细胞,并在含10% FBS的RPMI 1640培养基中维持。

猪传染性胃肠炎病毒(TGEV)、猪轮状病毒(RV)、猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)、经典猪瘟病毒(CSFV)、2型猪圆环病毒(PCV2)和猪伪狂犬病病毒(PRV)在本实验室保存,用于测定DAS-qELISA的特异性。

按前述方法(28)表达并纯化PEDV N蛋白。简而言之,通过RT-PCR从PEDV毒株AH2012/12中扩增N基因,引物如下:正向:5′ -TTTGGATCCGCTTCTGTCAGTTTTCAGGATC-3′(下划线为BamHI位点);反向:5′ -CCGCTCGAGTTAATTTCCAGTATCGAAGATCTCG-3′(下划线为XhoI位点)。然后用限制性内切酶BamHI和XhoI消化扩增产物,并连接到原核表达载体pET-28a中,获得重组质粒pET28a-N。携带pET28a-N的大肠杆菌BL21(DE3)细胞在含卡那霉素(25 mg/ml)的LB培养基中于37◦ C培养至A600 = 0.6,然后在37◦ C用1 mM异丙基-β-D-硫代半乳吡喃糖苷(IPTG)诱导5 h。带有6个His标签的重组PEDV-N蛋白在诱导后以可溶性蛋白形式表达。该蛋白通过Ni2+亲和层析纯化,并通过SDS-PAGE验证。

**针对PEDV N的单克隆抗体的制备与鉴定** 细胞融合前三天,用0.1 ml rPEDV-N溶液(0.5 mg/ml)加强免疫小鼠。然后采血收集血清样本,并以rPEDV-N作为包被抗原,通过ELISA检测针对rPEDV-N的抗体滴度。将抗体滴度最高的小鼠安乐死并采集其脾脏。按前述方法(29)进行B淋巴细胞与小鼠骨髓瘤细胞的融合。将获得的杂交瘤细胞铺于96孔板中,在HAT选择培养基(含20% FBS、100 mg/ml链霉素、100 IU/ml青霉素、100 mM次黄嘌呤、16 mM胸苷和400 mM氨基蝶呤的DMEM)中培养。通过间接ELISA筛选杂交瘤上清液中对N蛋白的抗体滴度。阳性克隆进行亚克隆并重新筛选。然后使用辛酸/饱和硫酸铵沉淀法从腹水中纯化高抗体滴度的单克隆抗体,随后通过蛋白G-琼脂糖凝胶柱进一步纯化。使用商品化小鼠单克隆抗体亚型鉴定试剂盒测定所得单克隆抗体的亚型。

**抗体对的选择** 纯化的兔多克隆抗体用HRP标记。将制备的每种抗PEDV N蛋白单克隆抗体包被于96孔微孔板的孔中。以rPEDV-N(1µg/ml)或阳性样本(PEDV培养上清液)作为夹心抗原,以HRP标记的兔多克隆抗体作为检测抗体,进行DAS-ELISA抗体配对。以磷酸盐缓冲液(PBS)代替夹心抗原作为阴性对照。测试结果以OD450值表示。根据记录结果获得最佳抗体对。

**DAS-qELISA的建立与优化** 接下来,我们选择了捕获小鼠单克隆抗体和检测多克隆抗体的最佳组合用于PEDV抗原捕获ELISA。简而言之,微孔板以2 µg/ml浓度的每种捕获单克隆抗体100 µl/孔在4◦ C过夜包被。封闭后,将系列稀释的PEDV感染培养上清液或未感染对照一式两份加入孔中,将微孔板置于25◦ C暗处孵育45 min。洗涤后,加入工作浓度的HRP标记多克隆抗体,微孔板在25◦ C孵育45 min。然后,用含0.5% Tween 20的PBS洗涤孔,并加入3,3′,5,5′-四甲基联苯胺(TMB)溶液。25◦ C下15分钟后,加入硫酸(2 M,100 µl/孔)终止反应,测量OD450处的吸光度。

**DAS-qELISA阳性与阴性临界值** 从健康仔猪中获取共40份PEDV阴性粪便和肠道样本。将这些样本用PBS(0.01 M,pH 7.2)稀释制成10%悬液,以2,000 g离心10 min澄清,上清液在室温(RT)下用1% Triton X-100和0.3%磷酸三正丁酯(TNBP)处理2 h以灭活病毒(30),然后在确定的优化条件下用建立的DAS-qELISA进行检测。鉴定PEDV阳性样本的OD450临界值根据以下公式计算:阳性和阴性临界值 = 阴性样本平均值 + 2个标准差(mean + 2SD)。

**DAS-qELISA的检测限与交叉反应** 为评估DAS-qELISA的敏感性,用小鼠单克隆抗体包被微孔板并在4◦ C孵育过夜。然后,用含2%牛血清白蛋白的PBS封闭,加入100 µl用PBS稀释的0、1.0、2.0、4.0、8.0、16.0和32.0 µg/L rPEDV-N蛋白标准品,微孔板在25◦ C孵育45 min。洗涤后,加入100 µl稀释的兔HRP标记抗PEDV-N多克隆抗体,微孔板在25◦ C孵育45 min。洗涤微孔板,加入100 µl TMB溶液。在25◦ C避光孵育15 min后,加入硫酸(2 M,100 µl/孔),在450 nm处测量吸光度以确定标准曲线。为了确定病毒滴度的检测限,将PEDV感染培养上清液使用截留分子量为100 kDa的超滤膜反应器离心,以去除游离的N蛋白。纯化病毒用等体积培养基稀释并滴定TCID50。获得的10^5.74 TCID50/ml纯化PEDV溶液在RT下用1% Triton X-100和0.3% TNBP处理2 h灭活,并进行2倍或10倍系列稀释,用DAS-qELISA测定,通过酶标仪测量吸光度。 为评估DAS-qELISA的特异性,选择TGEV、RV、PRRSV、CSFV、PCV2和PRV悬液进行测试。PEDV阳性病毒悬液和来自未感染模拟细胞碎片的PEDV阴性样本也通过DAS-qELISA进行评估。

**重复性试验** 重复性试验按前述方法(31)进行。简而言之,批内试验通过在以捕获单克隆抗体包被的微孔板中设置三个平行孔检测每个样本来确定。这些样本也在用不同批次捕获单克隆抗体包被的微孔板中通过DAS-qELISA检测以进行批间试验。所有测试重复三次。批内和批间变异系数(%CV)通过以下公式计算:%CV =(标准差/8个样本的平均OD450)× 100%。

**DAS-qELISA与RT-PCR的比较** 处理从不同猪场获取的共90份肠道和237份粪便样本(如上所述),并使用DAS-qELISA和RT-PCR筛查PEDV的存在。敏感性、特异性和准确性通过以下公式计算:敏感性 = 真阳性/(真阳性 + 假阴性) × 100%;特异性 = 真阴性/(真阴性 + 假阳性) × 100%;准确性 = (真阳性 + 真阴性)/(真阳性 + 假阳性 + 真阴性 + 假阴性) × 100%。RT-PCR和DAS-qELISA技术之间的一致性通过kappa统计值衡量(32)。

**疫苗抗原的制备及灭活PEDV疫苗的配制** 如上所述获取含有PEDV毒株AH2012/12的Vero细胞上清液。测定病毒滴度并调整至10^6.0 TCID50/ml。然后在37◦ C下用0.1%甲醛灭活48 h。将灭活PEDV疫苗抗原与等体积的Montanide ISA 201佐剂混合制备疫苗。

**结果** **PEDV N蛋白在大肠杆菌中的表达** 将重组载体转化入大肠杆菌BL21感受态细胞,并在37◦ C下用1 mM IPTG诱导5 h以表达重组蛋白。纯化蛋白如图1A所示;重组蛋白分子量约为50 kDa,与融合蛋白His-N的分子量一致。使用抗N单克隆抗体通过蛋白质印迹确认了正确的对应蛋白条带(图1B)。

**单克隆抗体的制备与特征** 通过有限稀释法获得抗体阳性亚克隆。测试十天后,通过有限稀释法连续分离和选择阳性克隆进行亚克隆。共获得37株能够分泌抗PEDV N蛋白单克隆抗体的杂交瘤细胞系,编号#1–37。所有产生抗体的杂交瘤均通过间接ELISA检测,临界值为0.5。96孔ELISA板用1 µg/ml纯化rPEDV-N包被。在37株单克隆抗体中,23株抗体滴度 > 1:1,024,000,5株滴度介于1:512,000至1:1,024,000之间,4株滴度介于1:64,000至1:128,000之间,5株滴度 < 1:64,000。使用亚型检测试剂盒测定抗体亚型。在37株单克隆抗体中,30株为IgG1a,3株为IgG2a,3株为IgG2b,1株为IgM。

**配对抗体的选择** 我们选择了16株具有最高抗体滴度的单克隆抗体进行抗体配对。数据如表1所示。7株单克隆抗体的阳性样本OD450值超过阴性样本OD450值的2.1倍,判定为阳性。单克隆抗体#16对阳性样本、rPEDV-N和病毒上清液的OD450值最高,对阴性样本的OD450值最低。因此,选择单克隆抗体#16用于开发DAS-qELISA。单克隆抗体#16由杂交瘤细胞系#16制备,其亚型为IgG1a,滴度 > 1:1,024,000。

**DAS-qELISA的建立** 通过间接ELISA确定单克隆抗体#16和兔HRP标记多克隆抗体分别为最佳捕获和检测抗体。通过捕获和检测抗体系列稀释的棋盘滴定分析进行抗原捕获测定的最佳反应条件。结果表明,单克隆抗体#16的捕获浓度和HRP标记多克隆抗体的检测浓度均为2 µg/mL。使用40份PEDV阴性粪便样本确定临界值。平均值(X)为0.168,标准差(SD)为0.017,因此临界值(X + 2SD)为0.201,用于定义阴性和阳性。

**DAS-qELISA的特异性** 通过测试其他六种病毒的培养上清液评估DAS-qELISA的特异性:TGEV、RV、PRRSV、CSFV、PCV2和PRV。如表2所示,仅PEDV感染的细胞培养上清液呈现阳性信号,其他病毒未观察到阳性结果或交叉反应性。这些结果表明DAS-qELISA方法对PEDV检测具有特异性。

**PEDV DAS-qELISA的检测限** 使用浓度分别为32、16、8、4、2、1和0 µg/L的2倍系列稀释标准rPEDV-N蛋白测定PEDV DAS-qELISA。获得标准曲线如下:Y = 22.39X − 3,858.3,R^2 = 1.0。rPEDV-N蛋白的检测限约为1 µg/L(表3)。标准曲线如图2所示。 还使用PEDV DAS-qELISA测定了病毒滴度的检测限。将10^5.74 TCID50/ml纯化PEDV病毒分别进行10倍(表4)和2倍(表5)系列稀释。病毒上清液10^2.03 TCID50/ml的值为0.229,高于临界值,表明DAS-qELISA的检测限约为10^2.0 TCID50/ml。

**DAS-qELISA的重复性** 重复性试验结果见表6、7。批内和批间重复性试验的%CV分别在2.4%至7.8%和3.4%至8.4%之间。这些结果表明所开发的DAS-qELISA适用于PEDV检测。

**田间样本检测** 使用DAS-qELISA和RT-PCR对共90份肠道和237份粪便样本进行PEDV筛查(表8)。在肠道样本中,90份田间样本中有68份通过DAS-qELISA确定为阳性,而65份通过RT-PCR确定为阳性。3份样本结果不一致,即DAS-qELISA为PEDV阳性而RT-PCR为PEDV阴性。在粪便样本中,93份样本在DAS-qELISA和RT-PCR中均为阳性,133份在两种测试中均为阴性。11份样本结果不一致,即DAS-qELISA为PEDV阴性而RT-PCR为PEDV阳性。总体而言,相对于RT-PCR,DAS-qELISA的特异性为98.1%(155/158),敏感性为93.5%(158/169)。这两种检测方法的准确性为[(87 + 226)/327] = 95.7%。此外,检测粪便和肠道样本的kappa值分别为0.914和0.905,表明DAS-qELISA与RT-PCR方法之间具有几乎完美的一致性。

**疫苗样本检测** 还使用DAS-qELISA检测了疫苗制备前后病毒抗原含量的变化。如表9所示,10、50和100倍稀释倍数的样本超出了DAS-qELISA的检测限,结果不可信。因此,原病毒液浓度约为14,000 µg/L。灭活并制备成疫苗后,疫苗浓度约为7,000 µg/L。考虑到疫苗是通过将等体积灭活抗原与佐剂混合制备的,病毒抗原浓度在疫苗制备前后可能保持不变。

**讨论** 作为一种重新出现的疾病,PEDV给全球养猪业造成了巨大的经济损失。早期快速诊断PEDV对于预防和控制该病的传播非常重要。目前,RT-PCR是诊断微生物感染的主要技术。然而,该方法存在一些缺点,如需要昂贵的专用设备、RNA样本的不稳定性以及可能的污染。因此,需要其他快速检测方法以促进诊断。在本研究中,我们开发了一种DAS-qELISA,可用于病毒抗原的定量检测,分别使用一株小鼠单克隆抗体和兔多克隆抗体作为捕获和检测抗体。所述测定法可检测低至1 µg/L的PEDV N蛋白和10^2.0 TCID50/ml的病毒原液。未观察到与其他类似腹泻病原体和重要猪病原体(如TGEV、RV、PRV、PRRSV、CSFV、PCV2和PRV)的交叉反应。此外,田间样本检测结果揭示了DAS-qELISA与RT-PCR之间的阳性符合率。这种新开发的具有高敏感性和特异性的DAS-qELISA可作为诊断猪PEDV感染的有效方法。 在先前的一项研究中,使用针对经典PEDV毒株CV777 M蛋白的单克隆抗体开发了检测PEDV抗原的DAS-ELISA(33)。然而,近年来,高致病性PEDV变异株已成为猪腹泻病的主要病原体,其与CV777和DR13等经典毒株表现出较大的遗传差异(3, 5)。最近,两项研究报告了使用针对S蛋白的抗体作为捕获抗体检测病原体的类似ELISA方法(34, 35)。尽管使用抗S抗体可以提高检测方法的特异性,但S蛋白作为突变率最高的病毒蛋白之一,可能会降低对变异病毒的检测效率。在本研究中,由于不同PEDV毒株的N蛋白氨基酸序列具有高度同源性,且该蛋白具有高免疫原性,N蛋白似乎是诊断PEDV感染的合适抗原标志物。因此,在本研究中,我们使用PEDV变异株AH2012/12的N蛋白作为免疫原获取单克隆和多克隆抗体。此外,尽管N蛋白位于病毒颗粒内部,但我们使用了试剂灭活病毒,这可能使抗体穿过囊膜并与内部N蛋白反应。 通过用rPEDV-N免疫小鼠,共产生了37株抗PEDV-N单克隆抗体。每种抗体的反应谱通过间接ELISA和IFA表征。发现所有37株单克隆抗体均对PEDV-N特异(数据未显示)。这些单克隆抗体允许选择最佳单克隆抗体,以构建带有HRP标记兔多克隆抗体的DAS-qELISA。我们发现以单克隆抗体#16作为捕获抗体的配对组对PEDV感染培养上清液表现出最高敏感性(结合力)。此外,我们产生了多克隆抗体并将其用作检测抗体。基于多克隆抗体结合多个抗原表位的能力,该方法可以降低漏检率并提高测定敏感性。通过使用单克隆抗体#16和兔HRP标记多克隆抗体,DAS-qELISA对rPEDV-N蛋白的检测限低至1 µg/L,对PEDV培养上清液的检测限低至10^2.0 TCID50/ml。此外,为确定此DAS-qELISA检测方法的特异性,检查了其他猪胃肠疾病(即TGEV、RV和PRV)和几种可能在猪中引起共感染的重要猪病原体(即PRRSV、CSFV和PCV2)。未观察到与这些病毒的交叉反应,表明该方法对PEDV具有高水平的特异性。 接下来,我们使用DAS-qELISA和RT-PCR测试了粪便和肠道样本。在检查肠道样本时,仅3份样本结果不一致,即DAS-qELISA为PEDV阳性而RT-PCR为PEDV阴性。这种不一致可能是由于肠道样本中存在PCR抑制剂和核酸降解物质,它们保留在提取的核酸中,从而影响了PCR的准确性。也可能是由于采集样本质量差,例如组织在室温下长时间存放导致自溶。在237份粪便样本中,11份样本结果不一致,即DAS-qELISA为PEDV阴性而RT-PCR为PEDV阳性。DAS-qELISA测试可能无法检测到粪便样本中病毒滴度极低的抗原。在本研究中,一些PEDV阳性肠道样本无法使用RT-PCR检测到,Sozzi等人也观察到了这一结果(36)。总体而言,这些...

两种不同方法的一致性均大于0.90,表明两者之间具有极高的一致性。 我们还利用DAS-qELISA方法检测了疫苗制备前后的病毒抗原含量。经灭活并与佐剂乳化后,所制备的PEDV疫苗中的抗原仍可被检测到。疫苗制备前后病毒抗原浓度未发生显著变化。该结果表明,我们所建立的DAS-qELISA方法可用于疫苗样品的检测。 综上所述,我们建立了一种基于PEDV N蛋白特异性单克隆抗体和抗PEDV-N兔多克隆抗体的DAS-qELISA方法,用于检测PEDV抗原。该方法具有较高的特异性和灵敏度,且与RT-PCR检测结果的符合率为95.7%。这些结果表明,DAS-qELISA方法可用于PEDV所致疾病的诊断。