Antiviral activity of cathelicidins against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV): Mechanisms, and efficacy

✅ 全文

抗菌肽cathelicidins对猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)的抗病毒活性:机制与疗效

作者 Fatemeh Pashaie; Tabitha E. Hoornweg; Floris J. Bikker; Tineke Veenendaal; Femke Broere; Edwin J.A. Veldhuizen 期刊 Virus Research 发表日期 2024 ISSN 0168-1702 DOI 10.1016/j.virusres.2024.199496 类型 原创研究 (Original Research)

📄 中文摘要 Chinese Abstract

中文
猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)是一种感染猪的有害冠状病毒,给全球养猪业带来了巨大的经济损失。目前缺乏有效的疫苗或治疗方法,凸显了开发新型抗病毒策略的迫切需求。抗菌肽(AMPs),特别是cathelicidins类如LL-37,已展现出对多种病毒的良好活性。本研究旨在通过体外实验检测cathelicidins对PEDV的抑制能力,阐明其抗病毒机制。研究分析了四种猪源抗菌肽(PMAP-36、PMAP-23、PR-39和PG-1)以及鸡源CATH-B1和人源LL-37的抗PEDV活性。

📋 英文结构化总结 English Structured Summary

全文整理

EN

Background:

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is a harmful coronavirus infecting pigs, resulting in substantial financial losses in the global pig industry. The lack of effective vaccines or treatments underscores the pressing need for new antiviral strategies. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), specifically cathelicidins such as LL-37, have demonstrated promising activity against a range of viruses. This study aims to elucidate the antiviral mechanisms of cathelicidins by examining their inhibitory capabilities against PEDV in vitro. Four pig-derived antimicrobial peptides (PMAP-36, PMAP-23, PR-39, and PG-1), together with chicken-derived CATH-B1 and human-derived LL-37 were analyzed for their anti-PEDV activity.

Methods:

A flow cytometry based method to detect anti-PEDV activity was set up. Vero cells were subjected to co-incubation, pre-incubation, and post-incubation assays with AMPs and PEDV-GFP. Cytotoxicity was assessed using LDH release and WST-1 assays. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to observe direct effects of peptides on virus morphology. Cellular localization and uptake of fluorogenic LL-37 were determined using confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. Capto Core 700 beads were used to study the physical interaction between AMPs and the virus.

Results:

Flow cytometry and fluorescent microscopy confirmed that LL-37 and CATH-B1 had strong inhibitory effects at non-toxic concentrations of 5 and 10 µM, significantly reducing GFP-PEDV infection of Vero cells both in co- and pre-incubation setups. In contrast, none of the porcine peptides exhibited any inhibitory effects, even at higher doses. TEM showed direct effects of LL-37 and CATH-B1 on virus morphology, causing membrane disruption, deformation, and aggregation of viral particles. Fluorogenic LL-37 was shown to enter Vero cells via endocytic pathways, indicative of a possible immunomodulatory antiviral mode of action.

Data Summary:

In co-incubation assays at MOI=0.3, LL-37 and CATH-B1 at 10 µM reduced the percentage of GFP-positive cells from approximately 35% to 1–2%. At a higher viral load (MOI=1), LL-37 at 10 µM reduced infection from almost 100% to 30% infected cells. CATH-B1 and LL-37 demonstrated no toxic effects on Vero cells at concentrations up to 10 µM over 24 hours, while PMAP-36 and PG-1 exhibited some cytotoxicity. An extended panel of non-porcine AMPs also failed to prevent PEDV-GFP entry.

Conclusions:

This analysis highlights the potential of LL-37 and CATH-B1 as inhibitors against PEDV, suggesting promising directions for innovative therapeutic antiviral strategies. The study indicates that PEDV may possess resistance to conventional porcine AMPs, potentially contributing to its high pathogenicity. The exact mechanisms responsible for the antiviral activity of LL-37 and CATH-B1 remain unclear and warrant further investigation, but likely involve both direct interaction with viral particles and intracellular immunomodulatory effects.

Practical Significance:

The findings underscore the potential for developing novel antiviral therapies based on cathelicidins, such as LL-37 and CATH-B1, to combat PEDV infections in the swine industry, addressing the current lack of effective treatments.

📋 中文结构化总结 Chinese Structured Summary

中文

背景:

猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)是一种感染猪的有害冠状病毒,给全球养猪业带来了巨大的经济损失。目前缺乏有效的疫苗或治疗方法,凸显了开发新型抗病毒策略的迫切需求。抗菌肽(AMPs),特别是cathelicidins类如LL-37,已展现出对多种病毒的良好活性。本研究旨在通过体外实验检测cathelicidins对PEDV的抑制能力,阐明其抗病毒机制。研究分析了四种猪源抗菌肽(PMAP-36、PMAP-23、PR-39和PG-1)以及鸡源CATH-B1和人源LL-37的抗PEDV活性。

方法:

建立了一种基于流式细胞术检测抗PEDV活性的方法。将Vero细胞分别与AMPs和PEDV-GFP进行共孵育、预孵育和孵育后处理。通过LDH释放实验和WST-1实验评估细胞毒性。采用透射电子显微镜(TEM)观察肽对病毒形态的直接影响。利用共聚焦显微镜和流式细胞术确定荧光标记LL-37的细胞定位和摄取情况。使用Capto Core 700微球研究AMPs与病毒之间的物理相互作用。

结果:

流式细胞术和荧光显微镜证实,LL-37和CATH-B1在5和10 µM的无毒性浓度下均表现出强烈的抑制作用,在共孵育和预孵育条件下均显著降低了GFP-PEDV对Vero细胞的感染。相比之下,所有猪源肽即使在更高剂量下也未表现出任何抑制效果。TEM显示LL-37和CATH-B1对病毒形态有直接作用,导致病毒颗粒的膜破裂、变形和聚集。荧光标记的LL-37被证实通过内吞途径进入Vero细胞,提示其可能具有免疫调节抗病毒作用模式。

数据总结:

在MOI=0.3的共孵育实验中,10 µM的LL-37和CATH-B1将GFP阳性细胞比例从约35%降低至1-2%。在更高病毒载量(MOI=1)条件下,10 µM的LL-37将感染率从接近100%降低至30%。CATH-B1和LL-37在10 µM浓度下作用24小时对Vero细胞无毒性作用,而PMAP-36和PG-1表现出一定的细胞毒性。扩展的非猪源AMPs面板也未能阻止PEDV-GFP的进入。

结论:

本分析突出了LL-37和CATH-B1作为PEDV抑制剂的潜力,为创新治疗性抗病毒策略提供了有前景的研究方向。研究表明PEDV可能对常规猪源AMPs具有抗性,这可能是其高致病性的原因之一。LL-37和CATH-B1抗病毒活性的确切机制尚不清楚,有待进一步研究,但可能涉及与病毒颗粒的直接相互作用以及胞内免疫调节效应。

实际意义:

研究结果强调了基于cathelicidins(如LL-37和CATH-B1)开发新型抗病毒疗法的潜力,可用于对抗养猪业中的PEDV感染,弥补当前缺乏有效治疗手段的不足。

📖 英文全文 English Full Text

EN

4445 virusres Virus Research Virus Res Elsevier PMC11607671 11607671 11607671 39528011 10.1016/j.virusres.2024.199496 Antiviral activity of cathelicidins against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV): Mechanisms, and efficacy Pashaie Fatemeh a Hoornweg Tabitha E a Bikker Floris J b Veenendaal Tineke c Broere Femke a Veldhuizen Edwin JA a ⁎ a Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Division Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CL, the Netherlands b Department of Oral Biochemistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 LA, the Netherlands c Cell Microscopy Core, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3584CX, the Netherlands ⁎ Corresponding author. e.j.a.veldhuizen@uu.nl 15 11 2024 350 199496 199496 30 11 2024 © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Highlights • A flow cytometry based method to detect anti-PEDV activity was set up. • 2 antimicrobial peptides were actively repressing PEDV infectivity. • LL-37 entered VERO- cells and prevented subsequent PEDV infection. • TEM showed direct effects of LL-37 and CATH-B1 on virus morphology. Keywords: Antimicrobial peptides, Cathelicidins, Antiviral activity, Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, Vero cells Abstract Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is a harmful coronavirus infecting pigs, which is resulting in substantial financial losses in the global pig industry. The lack of effective vaccines or treatments underscores the pressing need for new antiviral strategies. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), specifically cathelicidins such as LL-37, have demonstrated promising activity against a range of viruses. This study aims to elucidate the antiviral mechanisms of cathelicidins by examining their inhibitory capabilities against PEDV in vitro . Four pig-derived antimicrobial peptides (PMAP-36, PMAP-23, PR-39, and PG-1), together with chicken-derived CATH-B1 and human-derived LL-37 were analyzed for their anti-PEDV activity. Flow cytometry and fluorescent microscopy confirmed that LL-37 and CATH-B1 had strong inhibitory effects at non-toxic concentrations of 5 and 10 µM, significantly reducing GFP-PEDV infection of Vero cells both in co- and pre-incubation setups. In contrast, none of the porcine peptides exhibited any inhibitory effects, even at higher doses. Fluorogenic LL-37 was shown to enter VERO cells, indicative of a possible immunomodulatory antiviral mode of action. However, transmission electron microscopy clearly indicated that both LL-37 and CATH-B1 affected virus morphology and caused aggregation of viral particles, showing that peptide-virus interaction caused reduced virus infectivity. In conclusion, this analysis highlights the potential of LL-37 and CATH-B1 as inhibitors against PEDV, suggesting promising directions for innovative therapeutic antiviral strategies. status released display-pdf yes is-olf no is-manuscript no is-preprint no is-journal-matter no is-scanned no is-retracted no Received 2024 Jul 29; Revised 2024 Nov 7; Accepted 2024 Nov 9; Collection date 2024 Dec. 1. Introduction Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is an enveloped single-stranded RNA virus, classified under the Alphacoronavirus genus in the Coronaviridae family and the Nidovirales order. It is pathogenic to swine of all ages, causing symptoms like anorexia, vomiting, watery diarrhea, dehydration, and causes high mortality ( Kirchdoerfer et al., 2021 ; Z Li et al., 2020 ; Lin et al., 2022 ). PEDV outbreaks have had a pronounced economic impact on the swine industry, rendering it a formidable hazard to the industry worldwide. Notably, the 2013–2014 PEDV outbreak in the United States resulted in considerable financial repercussions, with losses estimated to range between $900 million and $1.8 billion ( Yang et al., 2019 ; Chen et al., 2020 ; Langel et al., 2016 ). PEDV primarily targets porcine intestinal epithelial cells, leading to subsequent extensive infection of the intestinal tract, which triggers processes of atrophy and necrosis within the structure of the intestinal villi. Moreover, infection significantly impairs the absorption of vital nutrients, consequently eliciting a spectrum of clinical manifestations including emetic episodes, diarrheal incidents, notable reduction in body mass, decreased appetite, and prevailing despondency. The excretion of PEDV into the external milieu via fecal discharge further precipitates the potential for a widespread epidemic event upon contamination of the surrounding environment ( Z Li et al., 2020 ). According to reports, neonatal pigs are more susceptible to PEDV compared to older pigs due to several factors including a slower regeneration of enterocytes, and an anatomically and physiologically immature large intestine ( Jung et al., 2020 ). The first detection of PEDV in swine dates back to the late 1970s, with its initial identification in the United Kingdom in 1977 and Belgium in 1978. Nonetheless, the emergence of novel variants of PEDV has occurred more recently, as evidenced by the 2011 outbreak in China, which was followed by subsequent occurrences in the Americas, Europe, and Asia ( Lin et al., 2022 ; Yang et al., 2019 ). Despite the development of various vaccines for PEDV, their effectiveness has been limited. For example, the initial success of vaccine CV777, which was employed in 1990, was compromised by the emergence of a new strain of PEDV in 2011. Consequently, the pursuit of antiviral drugs has emerged as a realistic approach to control the spread of the virus ( Chen et al., 2020 ; X Li et al., 2020 ). The development of antiviral drugs began with the approval of idoxuridine in the 1960s, marking the onset of a field that has seen over 90 human antiviral drugs approved in the last six decades. These drugs can be broadly categorized into two groups: virus-targeting and host-directed antivirals. Virus-targeting antivirals operate through direct or indirect inhibition of viral proteins' biological activity or disruption of the viral particle structure. In contrast, host-directed antivirals function by obstructing host factors that viruses exploit during their life cycle ( Zakaryan et al., 2021 ). Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a promising class of antiviral compounds. They comprise a diverse family of peptides with various functions, including direct antimicrobial activity against a range of viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens. Their recently described immunomodulatory functions are particularly noteworthy, as these provide further potential for clinical applications. Among AMPs, the cathelicidin family has attracted a lot of interest due to its well-studied immunomodulatory properties ( Scheenstra et al., 2020 ). Cathelicidins exhibit significant structural diversity across species, ranging from proline-rich structures to amphipathic α-helices as well as β-sheet containing peptides. These peptides have been identified in a diverse array of animals, including mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, and amphibians. In contrast to humans, rabbits, and mice that express a single cathelicidin type, other species such as pigs, cows, and chickens have multiple and more structurally diverse cathelicidins ( Zakaryan et al., 2021 ; Wieczorek et al., 2010 ). LL-37, as the sole human cathelicidin, possesses the ability to inhibit viruses such as dengue virus (DENV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human rhinovirus (HRV), vaccinia virus (VACV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), zika virus (ZIKV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) ( A Ahmed et al., 2019 ; Harcourt et al., 2016 ; Findlay et al., 2016 ; Matsumura et al., 2016 ; Alagarasu et al., 2017 ; Tripathi et al., 2015 ). This inhibition is achieved through multiple mechanisms, including direct interaction with virions, enhancement of type I interferon (IFN) expression, and suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokine production ( A Ahmed et al., 2019 ; Harcourt et al., 2016 ; Findlay et al., 2016 ; Matsumura et al., 2016 ; Alagarasu et al., 2017 ; Tripathi et al., 2015 ). The cathelicidin CATH-B1, originally found in chickens, demonstrates antiviral activity by effectively inhibiting the entry of influenza A virus (IAV). This inhibition occurs through viral agglutination, thereby hindering the virus's capacity for invasion ( Peng et al., 2020 ). Although there have been several in vitro studies investigating the antiviral properties of LL-37 and CATH-B1, the precise mechanism underlying their antiviral activity remains unclear to date. Numerous research studies have extensively investigated the antibacterial properties of cathelicidins ( Nagaoka et al., 2020 ; Lee et al., 2016 ; Blodkamp et al., 2016 ; J Chen et al., 2021 ). However, there is no consensus on the exact antiviral mechanism of action of cathelicidins and it is likely that it can differ for each virus and cathelicidins combination. Consequently, this study aimed to address the inhibitory abilities and antiviral mechanisms of several cathelicidins against PEDV in vitro . The findings of this study will provide valuable insights into the antiviral mechanisms of cathelicidins and their potential application as effective antiviral drugs. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Antimicrobial peptides Peptides were synthesized by China peptides (Shanghai, China) and the Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA, The Netherlands) using Fmoc-chemistry (CPC Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). All peptides were purified by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography to a purity of >95%. Protegrin-1 was a kind gift of Thomas Wood and Nathaniel Martin (Molecular Biotechnology, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, the Netherlands, Leiden). The peptides were dissolved in water at a concentration of 1600 µM, aliquoted, and stored at −80 °C until required for subsequent experiments.

Table 1 Table 1 Characteristics of the main cathelicidins utilized in this study. Table 1: AMPs Species Amino acid sequence Length Charge LL-37 Human LLGDFFRKSKEKIGKEFKRIVQRIKDFLRNLVPRTES 37 +6 Fluorogenic LL-37 Human Tamra-(ahx)-LLGDFFRKSKEKIGKEFKRIVQRIKDFLRNLVPRTES 37 +6 CATH-B1 Chicken PIRNWWIRIWEWLNGIRKRLRQRSPFYVRG HLNVTSTPQP 40 +7 PMAP-36 Porcine GRFRRLRKKTRKRLKKIGKVLKWIPPIVGSIPLGCG 36 +13 PMAP-23 Porcine RIIDLLWRVRRPQKPKFVTVWVR 23 +6 PR-39 Porcine RRRPRPPYLPRPRPPPFFPPRLPPRIPPGFPPRFPPRFP 39 +10 PG-1 Porcine RGGRLCYCRRRFCVCVGR 18 +6 2.2. Cell culture Vero-mCeacam cells (Vero cells), derived from African green monkey kidney cells, were maintained in DMEM (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) supplemented with 10% FCS (Bodinco B.V., Alkmaar, The Netherlands) and 200 units/mL penicillin, and 200 mg/mL streptomycin (P/S) (Gibco, Life Technologies Limited, Paisley, UK) at 37 °C and 5% CO 2 . 2.3. PEDV cultivation PEDV and PEDV-GFP were a kind gift of Berend Jan Bosch (Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands) and preserved and propagated using Vero cells as described before ( Li et al., 2013 ). To prepare viral stocks, Vero cells were seeded in a T75 flask and cultured in DMEM complete medium supplemented with 10% FCS at 37 °C and 5% CO 2 , until reaching 90% confluency. Subsequently, the Vero cells were exposed to PEDV by incubating them with a 100 µL viral solution in 1900 µL of PBS at 37 °C for 2 h Following this, the flask was supplemented with 10 mL of DMEM complete medium and incubated until cytopathic effects were observed using light microscopy at 96 h post-infection. To release the virus from the Vero cells, the culture flask was repeatedly frozen at −20 °C and then thawed at room temperature (RT) (4 times). The supernatant was subsequently collected into a 15 mL centrifuge tube. Cell debris was eliminated by centrifugation at 350 × g for 5 min, and the resulting supernatant was aliquoted and stored at −80 °C. 2.4. Virus titration Plaque assays were performed by culturing Vero cells at a density of 24 × 10 5 cells per well in 6-well plates. The cells were infected with 10-fold serial dilutions of virus and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h After removing the virus inoculum, cells were overlaid with 1 mL overlay solution, consisting of equal volumes of 1% Agarose (Sea Plaque GTG agarose; Lonza) and 1x MEM (Gibco, Temin's modification (2X), without phenol red, NY, USA), and incubated at 37 °C for 5 days with 1 mL of overlay medium. Following fixation with 0.5 mL of 10% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Sigma-Aldrich, P6148, Darmstadt, Germany), plates were stained with crystal violet (0.1% crystal violet (Abcam, Germany) in 20% methanol). Subsequently, plaques were counted to determine the viral titer (Fig. S1). 2.5. Cell viability assay Vero cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 10 5 cells per well in 96-well plates. The cells were then stimulated with 100 µL of AMPs (0–10 µM) in DMEM for either 3 or 24 h Subsequently, the culture medium was replaced with 100 μL of medium containing 10% water-soluble tetrazolium 1 (WST-1) (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). After 10–15 min of incubation, the colorimetric changes were measured at 450 nm using a FLUOstar Omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech GmbH, Ortenberg, Germany). Metabolic activity was calculated relative to the control group without AMPs. 2.6. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay To assess the cytotoxicity of peptides, Vero cells were treated with AMPs (0 − 10 μM in DMEM) as outlined in paragraph 2.5. After 3 and 24 h of stimulation, the fraction of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released into the culture supernatant was measured using the Cyto Tox 96 nonradioactive cytotoxicity kit (Promega GmbH, Walldorf, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and expressed as a percentage of the maximum LDH release from cells, lysed by 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, T8787, Darmstadt, Germany). 2.7. In vitro antiviral activity of cathelicidins

Fig. 1 Fig. 1 The cytotoxicity of AMPs on Vero cells . Cells were incubated with 0 – 10 µM AMPs for either 3 h or 24 h A and B) LDH release assay, indicating cell membrane permeability after 3 and 24 h, respectively. C and D) WST assay, measuring cell metabolic activity after 3 and 24 h, respectively. ‘No peptide‘ represents cells incubated with only growth medium for the indicated times, serving as a control. P.C in the LDH assay are cells that have been lysed by the lysis buffer representing 100% release of intracellular LDH. The reported values represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. Fig. 1 In order to determine the effect of AMPs on the infectivity of PEDV, Vero cells (5 × 10 5 per well) were seeded in 12-well plates and cultured overnight at 37 °C, 5% CO 2 . In a co-incubation of virus and AMPs experiments ( Fig. 2 A), the mixture of AMPs (0–10 µM) and PEDV-GFP (MOI= 0.3) in a 1 mL volume of DMEM (P/ S + 10% FCS) was added to the cells and incubated at 37 °C. After 2 h, the supernatant was replaced with fresh DMEM (P/ S + 10% FCS) and incubated for 24 h. Subsequently, the cells were washed 2 times with flow cytometry buffer (500 mL PBS+ 10 mL FCS+ 250 µL of 10% NaN 3 ) and were imaged with an EVOS M5000 Imaging System for semi-quantitative determination of infectivity. Eventually, cells were carefully detached by 2.5% trypsin, stained with ViaKrome 808 fixable viability dye (1:1000), and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C. Following washing, the cells were fixed using 50 µL of 4% PFA for 10 min, and a minimum of 1 × 10 5 cells were acquired using the CytoFLEX LX Flow Cytometer (FC)(Beckman Coulter, USA). Data was analyzed using FlowJo software v.10.6 (Flowjo LCC, Ashland, OR, USA). Fig. 2 Effect of AMPs on the infectivity of PEDV (MOI=0.3). A) Experimental set-up of the ‘co-incubation assay’; Vero cells were subjected to 2 h exposure to a combination of AMPs and PEDV-GFP. Afterward, the supernatant was replaced, and the cells were incubated for an additional 24 h B) Fluorescent microscopy (20 × magnification) was performed to visualize the fluorescence signal of GFP in the presence of 1, 5, and 10 µM AMPs. The cell-only sample consists exclusively of cells while the no-peptide sample contains only PEDV-GFP, with no peptides present. Fig. 2 The effect of AMPs on viral infectivity was also determined when they were added to Vero-cells before (pre-treatment) or after (post-treatment) infection. In the pre-treatment assay ( Fig. 6 A), Vero cells were treated with different concentrations of CATH-B1 and LL-37 peptides (ranging from 0 to 10 µM) for various durations (1, 2, 3, 4, and 24 h) at 37 °C. Subsequently, the cells were washed 2 times with PBS and infected with PEDV-GFP at an MOI of 0.3 for 2 h Fig. 6 Effects of AMPs in pre-incubation assay. A) Experimental set-up of pre-incubation experiment. B) FC was employed to quantify the percentage of GFP-positive cells during pre-incubation. C) The histogram of FC shows the fluorescence intensity of GFP for both CATH-B1 and LL-37 during pre-treatment. The y-axis represents relative cell count, while the x-axis shows fluorescence intensity (GFP). The sample designated as ‘cells only’ comprises only cells, with an absence of peptides and viruses. In contrast, the ‘no peptide’ sample is characterized by the presence of only the virus. The reported values represent the mean ± SD derived from three independent experiments performed in triplicate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Fig. 6 In post-incubation assays ( Fig. 7 A), cells were initially exposed to the virus for 2 h, washed 2times with PBS and subsequently treated with AMPs for 3 h Both for pre- and post-infection assays, after the respective incubation periods, the cells were assessed using fluorescence microscopy and quantified using FC as described above. Fig. 7 Effects of AMPs in post-incubation assay. A) Design and setup of post-incubation assay. B) The percentage of GFP-positive cells was quantified using FC during post-incubation. C) The FC histogram illustrates the fluorescence intensity of GFP after treatment with CATH-B1 and LL-37 . The y-axis represents relative cell count, while the x-axis shows fluorescence intensity (GFP). The sample designated as ‘cells only’ comprises only cells, with an absence of peptides and viruses. In contrast, the ‘no peptide’ sample is characterized by the presence of only the virus. The reported values represent the mean ± SD derived from three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Fig. 7 A larger selection of AMPs was tested in our antiviral assays to assess whether specifically porcine peptides were inactive, or if this was a general feature and the effectiveness of LL-37 and CATH-B1 would be prominent. This extended panel of AMPs encompassed chicken-derived peptides (D-CATH-2, l-CATH-2), mouse-derived peptide (CRAMP), horse-derived peptides (eCATH-1, eCATH-3), parrot-derived peptides (ER2, ER3, AG3), and synthetic peptides (CR165, CR174), all of which were readily accessible within our laboratory. As previously described, these AMPs were co-incubated with PEDV. Characteristics of these peptides are listed in table S1. In order to determine if CATH-B1 and LL-37 physically interact with PEDV, Capto Core 700 beads (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA) were used to selectively eliminate unbound AMPs. PEDV were pre-incubated with or without CATH-B1/LL-37 in Opti-MEM medium, and Capto Core 700 beads were added, followed by a 1 h incubation at 4 °C while slowly rotating. After centrifugation, supernatants were collected and applied to the cells. To make sure the AMP was removed effectively, we tested samples with peptides but no virus using the same process. The collected supernatants were used to inoculate cells, and the number of infected cells was determined using the described method. 2.8. Transmission electron microscopy PEDV was treated with CATH-B1, LL-37, PMAP-23, and PMAP-36 for one minute at 37 °C. Subsequently, 10 µL of the sample was placed onto a freshly carbon-coated copper grid. The grids were washed 3 times with PBS and then fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in PBS for 10 min. Following this fixation, the grids were rinsed 2 times with PBS and 4 times with MilliQ water. They were stained for 5 min in Uranyl Acetate (pH 7) then briefly washed with methylcellulose/uranyl acetate (pH 4) and incubated for 5 min on ice. Finally, the grids were looped out of the solution and air-dried. The samples were subsequently examined in a JEM1010 (JEOL) equipped with a Veleta 2k × 2k CCD camera (EMSIS, Munster, Germany). 2.9. Detection of fluorogenic LL-37 by FC and confocal microscopy To investigate the cellular localization of LL-37, Fluorogenic (FL) LL-37 was incubated with Vero cells for 3 h The cells were then washed with PBS and further incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. FC analysis was conducted to evaluate the amount of labeled LL-37 adhered or internalized within the cell, as described earlier (using unlabeled LL-37 as control). Additionally, to assess LL-37 uptake in Vero cells, the cells were incubated with FL LL-37 at concentrations of 1 and 5 µM for 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min, followed by PBS washes. After incubation, the cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 30 min at RT. After two PBS washes, DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) diluted in PBS (1:1000) was added for 5 min to stain the nuclei. The live cells were then imaged using a Leica TCS SP2 confocal microscope with a 63 × objective. To examine the uptake mechanism, Vero cells were first incubated at 4 °C for 30 min to inhibit energy-dependent pathways before adding FL LL-37. Subsequently, the cells were incubated with the peptide at 4 °C for 30, 60, and 180 min. FC analysis was performed to quantify the amount of FL LL-37 adhered to or internalized by the cells. 2.10. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism version 8.3.0 (538). The data were subjected to ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test to assess significant differences, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. 3. Results 3.1. Evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of AMPs on Vero cells The AMPs employed in this study were assessed across a concentration range from 0 to 10 µM for their cytotoxicity towards Vero cells. CATH-B1, LL-37, PR-39, and PMAP-23 demonstrated no toxic effects throughout the 3 h and 24 h incubation period (Fig. 1A+ B ) even at the highest concentrations tested. In contrast, PMAP-36, and PG-1 exhibited some cytotoxicity at 5 and/or 10 µM. Similar results were observed when the metabolic activity of Vero cells was measured using the WST assay. Incubation with CATH-B1, LL-37, and PMAP-23 did not reduce the metabolic activity of Vero cells at both time points (Fig. 1C+D), while PMAP-36, PR-39, and PG-1 significantly lowered metabolic activity to 60–70% of the control. 3.2. In vitro antiviral activity of AMPs Viral inactivation assays were conducted to assess the antiviral potential of AMPs. Six different peptides were assessed for their ability to neutralize PEDV, following the experimental protocol detailed in Fig. 2 A. LL-37 was selected due to its established antiviral activity against various viruses ( A Ahmed et al., 2019 ; Harcourt et al., 2016 ; Findlay et al., 2016 ; Matsumura et al., 2016 ; Alagarasu et al., 2017 ; Tripathi et al., 2015 ). CATH-B1 was also chosen based on its proven activity against IAV ( Peng et al., 2020 ; Ye et al., 2023 ). Additionally, four porcine peptides were included in the study, reflecting the restricted host specificity of the virus. Compared to the control without peptide, reduced numbers of infected cells were observed by fluorescent microscopy upon co-incubation of PEDV with 5 and 10 µM LL-37 or CATH-B1. However, the four porcine peptides did not have a clear effect on infection of Vero cells ( Fig. 2 B). Next, we used FC to quantify the number of GFP-positive (infected) cells. FC analysis demonstrated that CATH-B1 and LL-37 efficiently inhibited infection, leading to a significant reduction in the percentage of GFP-positive cells from approximately 35% to 1–2% at 10 µM ( Fig. 3 A). These results are consistent with the qualitative findings observed in fluorescent microscopy ( Fig. 2 B). The reduced infectivity of PEDV is also clear from the reduced total fluorescence intensity measured (histogram shifts to the left) upon incubation with either CATH-B1 ( Fig. 3 B) or LL-37 ( Fig. 3 C). On the contrary, quantitative analyses of the effect of the four other porcine AMPs on PEDV infectivity ( Fig. 3 A) showed no antiviral effect of these AMPs against PEDV. Fig. 3 Antiviral activity of AMPs as determined by flow cytometry (FC). A) The percentage of GFP-positive cells following a 2 h incubation with a combination of PEDV and AMPs. B and C) The FC histogram shows the intensity of GFP for CATH-B1 and LL-37, respectively. The y-axis represents relative cell count, while the x-axis shows fluorescence intensity (GFP). The sample designated as 'cells only' comprises only cells, with an absence of AMPs and viruses. In contrast, the 'no peptide' sample is characterized by the presence of only the virus. The values reported here depict the average ± SD derived from three independent experiments performed in duplicate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Fig. 3 When similar experiments were performed with higher viral levels (MOI=1) ( Fig. 4 ), LL-37′s antiviral effect remained strong, causing a large reduction in viral infection of Vero cells at 10 µM, from almost 100 to 30 % infected cells ( Fig. 4 B) and a reduced total fluorescent signal ( Fig. 4 C). The results obtained from fluorescence microscopy further support these findings, as depicted in Fig. 4 A. The antiviral impact of CATH-B1 diminished as the MOI increased, and the porcine AMPs remained ineffective as well ( Fig. 4 B). Fig. 4 The inhibitory effect of AMPs on PEDV at MOI=1. A) Fluorescence microscopy image was captured at 20 × magnification to visualize the GFP fluorescence signal in Vero cells following co-incubation of AMPs and PEDV at MOI=1. B) The percentage of GFP-positive cells was determined by FC after 3 h co-incubation of PEDV and AMPs. C) The fluorescence intensity of GFP across three different concentrations of LL-37 was illustrated through the FC histogram. The y-axis represents relative cell count, while the x-axis shows fluorescence intensity (GFP). The sample designated as 'cells only' comprises only cells, with an absence of peptides and viruses. In contrast, the 'no peptide' sample is characterized by the presence of only the virus. The reported values in 4A represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed in duplicate **** p < 0.0001. Fig. 4 An extended range of non-porcine AMPs was tested in the co-incubation setup to determine if the observed lack of antiviral activity could be specific to porcine AMPs. However, as shown in Fig. 5 , all other tested AMPs, including an all-D isomer AMP and two non-naturally occurring synthetic (CR-165 and CR-174) AMPs were unsuccessful in significantly preventing PEDV-GFP entry into the Vero cells at a concentration of 1 and 5 µM. Again, LL-37, serving as a positive control in this set of experiments showed strong antiviral activity. These results clearly indicate that anti-PEDV activity is not related to the species origin of the AMP, but that specific characteristics of CATH-B1 and LL-37 are involved in antiviral activity. Fig. 5 Antiviral effects of a diverse group of AMPs on PEDV infection . Vero cells were incubated for 3 h with a combination of PEDV-GFP and AMPs, as described previously. FC was utilized to assess the inhibitory impact of AMPs. The sample designated as 'cells only' comprises only cells, with an absence of peptides and viruses. In contrast, the 'no peptide' sample is characterized by the presence of only the virus. The values displayed represent the mean ± SD of two independent experiments in duplicate. *** p < 0.001. Fig. 5 3.3. Effects of AMPs on PEDV upon pre- and post-incubation Initial pilot experiments indicated that LL-37 also showed antiviral activity in pre-incubation assays in which Vero cells were first incubated with the AMPs and subsequently, after removal of unbound peptide by washing of cells, were infected with PEDV. The protocol for incubating AMPs with Vero cells was optimized, and 3 h was identified as the optimal time point where the largest effect of LL-37 was observed. Subsequently, the full set of AMPs (0–10 μM) were tested for antiviral activity in this 3 h pre-incubation setup. Notably, LL-37 demonstrated potent inhibition of viral infection in Vero cells at all three concentrations, while CATH-B1 exhibited strong activity only at 10 μM ( Fig. 6 B, C). However, both effects were smaller than seen for co-incubation experiment. Again, none of the porcine AMPs showed a significant reduction in infected cells at these concentrations. Fluorescence microscopy qualitatively confirmed these FC results (Fig. S2). Finally, the effectivity of all six AMPs was assessed when added 3 h after PEDV infection ( Fig. 7 B, C). The results indicate that in this ‘post-incubation setting’ AMPs are not able to reduce viral infection. Only LL-37 showed a very moderate effect in prohibiting PEDV-GFP infection into the Vero cells at 10 μM. Again, the fluorescence microscopy outcomes were consistent with the FC findings (Fig. S3). In order to better understand how CATH-B1 and LL-37 mechanistically block PEDV infection, the possible binding of the AMPs to the virion was studied using Capto Core 700 beads. These porous beads can bind peptides but virions are too large to enter the beads’ capillaries and therefore are not bound. When CATH-B1 and LL-37 were incubated with PEDV without beads, a decrease in virus infectivity was observed ( Fig. 8 ), while exposing PEDV for 30 min to the beads before addition to Vero cells did not significantly change virus infectivity. Only a small reduction in infectivity was observed, which was comparable to the activity drop seen if PEDV was incubated at 4 °C without beads. This shows that the beads cannot capture the virus. Pre-incubating CATH-B1 and LL-37 with beads before PEDV introduction resulted in minimal effects on virus infectivity, suggesting an effective capture of the peptides by the beads. Interestingly, when CATH-B1 was combined with the virus and beads, its antiviral activity remained unchanged. This implies a direct interaction of the peptide with the virus, and thereby the inability of the Capto Core beads to capture the peptide in its capillaries. Conversely, LL-37 lost its inhibitory effect when combined with the virus and beads, implying a lower binding affinity of LL-37 for the virus, leading to LL-37 capturing and binding to capto core beads. Fig. 8 Interactions between CATH-B1 and LL-37 with PEDV . CATH-B1/LL-37 were pre-incubated with the virus, and subsequently, the peptide and virus were separated using Capto Core beads. The supernatant containing the separated virus was then employed to infect Vero cells. The sample designated as 'cells only' comprises only cells, with an absence of peptides and viruses. In contrast, the 'no peptide' sample is characterized by the presence of only the virus. The data is presented as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments in duplicate, each with triplicate samples. **** p < 0.0001. Fig. 8 3.4. LL-37 and CATH-B1 affect virus morphology To investigate how LL-37 and CATH-B1 affect the structure of viruses, we imaged negatively stained virus by Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to determine the direct effects of LL-37 and CATH-B1 on virus morphology. Fig. 9 A-D displays untreated PEDV virions, which shows the shape and size of the virus, maintaining a continuous envelope lining and sometimes showing clear spikes on the virion. There are no big aggregates of virus present ( Fig. 9 C, D), and generally the inside of the virion was not heavily stained, although in a small number of untreated viruses, the inside of the virion was darkly stained, likely due to viral membrane permeabilization ( Fig. 9 D). However, when PEDV was incubated with LL-37 (10 µM), significant membrane disruption was noted ( Fig. 9 E-G) and in some cases, extensive virus aggregation was observed ( Fig. 9 H). Similarly, incubation of PEDV with CATH-B1 (10 µM) resulted in significant membrane damage ( Fig. 9 I), virus deformation ( Fig. 9 J), and extensive virus aggregation ( Fig. 9 K, L). These findings suggest that direct interactions between LL-37, CATH-B1, and viral particles can damage the virion which could affect the infectivity of PEDV. Fig. 9 The effect of AMPs on the morphology of the virus. PEDV (MOI=0.3), which was pre-incubated with peptides. TEM images were taken of PEDV alone (A–D) , PEDV treated with 10 µM LL-37 (E-H) , PEDV treated with 10 µM CATH-B1 (I-L), PEDV treated with 10 µM PMAP-23 (M, N ), and PEDV treated with 10 µM PMAP-36 (O, P) . In the images, black arrows indicate large aggregations, red arrows show deformed viruses, and white arrows highlight significant membrane damage. Micrographs were captured with a pixel size of 0,5 nm and analyzed visually using ImageJ. The micrographs are representative of observations from three independent experiments. Scale bars represent 100 nm. Fig. 9 PMAP-23 ( Fig. 9 M, N) and PMAP-36 (Fig. O, P) were used as controls to demonstrate that the inactive peptides do not affect PEDV morphology, as the images confirmed that the virus's structure remained unchanged. 3.5. Uptake of LL-37 in vero cells Localization of LL-37 was determined using FL LL-37, in order to provide more insight into how LL-37 can prevent PEDV infection of Vero cells. Fluorogenic labelling of LL-37 had no effect on the antiviral activity of the peptide (Fig. S4). FC analysis, as shown in Fig. 10 A demonstrated a substantial concentration-dependent uptake or attachment of FL LL-37 to Vero cells. No increase in fluorescence signal was observed for the negative control, unlabeled LL-37. Fig. 10 Cellular entry of FL LL-37 into Vero cells. A) Following a 3 h incubation with Vero cells and subsequent washing, the cellular entry of FL LL-37 and unlabeled LL-37 was examined using FC. Two concentrations of LL-37 were employed for this investigation. B) After treating the cells with 1 and 5 µM FL LL-37 for 30 min, 1 h, and 3 h, the cells were washed, and DAPI staining was applied before imaging using confocal microscopy. The merged image displays bright field, DAPI, and FL LL-37 signals, with nuclei shown in blue and FL LL-37 in red. The image was acquired at a magnification of 63x. The sample designated as 'cells only' comprises only cells, with an absence of peptides and viruses. In contrast, the 'no peptide' sample is characterized by the presence of only the virus. The reported values depict the mean ± SD in three different measurements in triplicate. ** p < 0.01. Fig. 10 Next, confocal microscopy analysis was used to determine the cellular localization of FL LL-37 at various time points and concentrations. As shown in Fig. 10 B, predominant intracellular localization of LL-37 after 1 and 3 h of incubation was observed at both concentrations. This indicates that LL-37 s antiviral activity could at least partially also be mediated by its intracellular effects on the host cell. The internalization mechanism of LL-37 was evaluated at 4 °C using flow cytometry, which showed a significant reduction in the uptake of fluorogenic LL-37, indicating that internalization occurs through endocytic pathways (Fig. S5). 4. Discussion PEDV outbreaks, with high death rates among newborn piglets, have a major impact on the global swine industry. Given the ineffectiveness of current vaccines and the absence of antiviral drugs against PEDV variants, discovering new treatments is crucial ( Wang et al., 2020 ). AMPs are known to play an important role in preventing and treating severe bacterial and viral infectious diseases by both their direct antimicrobial activity as well as their immunomodulatory activity ( Lei et al., 2019 ; van Harten et al., 2018 ). Our study explored the antiviral potential of various AMPs against PEDV in vitro . Although LL-37 has been widely studied for its effects on multiple viruses, its efficacy against PEDV remains unexamined ( Steinstraesser et al., 2005 ; Currie et al., 2013 ; Sousa et al., 2017 ; MD Howell et al., 2004 ; Ogawa et al., 2013 ; He et al., 2018 ; A Ahmed et al., 2019 ). Moreover, there is limited data on the antiviral activity of other peptides, highlighting the need for further investigation. In this study, besides LL-37, the efficacy of four porcine AMPs (PMAP-36, PMAP-23, PR-39, and PG-1), one chicken-derived AMP (CATH-B1), against PEDV was evaluated. Among the peptides tested, CATH-B1 and LL-37 in particular exhibited strong inhibition of PEDV in both co-incubation and pre-incubation settings in vitro . Somewhat surprising was the lack of activity of many other natural AMPs, considering that they contain the same general structural characteristics (cationic, helical, amphipathic). Notably, also CRAMP which has described activity against several viruses ( Yu et al., 2021 ; MD Howell et al., 2004 ; Barlow et al., 2011 ) failed to neutralize PEDV. It is possible that the lack of anti-PEDV activity of the tested porcine AMPs partially contributes to PEDVs infectivity in pigs, although, obviously, many more factors are involved in this process. Interestingly, based on activity reports against other viruses, LL-37 s mechanism of action can be both through direct interactions with the virus particle, but also be based on its effect on the hosts antiviral response ( Pahar et al., 2020 ). LL-37-disrupted viral particle structures have been documented for several viruses, including DENV-2, RSV, IAV, and rhinovirus (RV) ( Alagarasu et al., 2017 ; Currie et al., 2013 ; Sousa et al., 2017 ; Tripathi et al., 2013 ). Similar direct effects were also observed in this study where TEM clearly showed that LL-37 affected the structure and aggregated virus particles. Regarding the more immunomodulatory antiviral activity, LL-37 can enter Vero cells, which could influence the host's antiviral response and viral reproduction, as shown in our pre-incubation infection experiments ( Fig. 6 ). Several studies have shown that LL-37 can enter the endocytic pathway via binding to multiple receptors ( Zhang et al., 2020 ; Deshpande et al., 2020 ; Bandholtz et al., 2006 ). For example in A549 epithelial cells, FPRL-1 and a second unidentified high-affinity receptor was involved in the uptake ( Lau et al., 2005 ), while P2XR7 and CXCR2 were identified as the receptor involved in LL-37 uptake in macrophages and monocytes ( Zhang et al., 2020 ; Tang et al., 2015 ). In our study LL-37 uptake was also energy dependent as incubation of Vero cells with LL-37 at 4 °C inhibited uptake, indicating that endocytosis is required. It has been described that LL-37 stimulates immune responses by modulating cytokine and chemokine responses through activation of the hosts pattern recognition receptors. This modulation enhances IFN-β expression, thereby boosting antiviral activity against Enterovirus 71 ( EV71) and HSV-1 infections ( Yu et al., 2021 ; Sato et al., 2018 ). IFN-β initiates antiviral responses by activating key proteins such as IRF3 ( Yu et al., 2021 ; Levy et al., 2001 ). However, since Vero cells are interferon-deficient and therefor do not produce Type I interferons, the reduction in infection seen in our experimental setup cannot be attributed to IFN-β production ( Prescott et al., 2010 ; Emeny and Morgan, 1979 ). Similar, IFN-β independent antiviral activity in Vero cells was described for LL-37′s activity against RSV ( Currie et al., 2013 ) and EV-71 ( Yu et al., 2021 ) although those studies also could not depict what immunomodulatory mechanism was important. Other possibilities would include that LL-37 interferes with viral replication instead of entry as was described for HIV-1 where LL-37 specifically inhibited HIV-1 reverse transcriptase ( Bergman et al., 2007 ; Wong et al., 2011 ). In addition, LL-37 can modulate (intracellular) Toll-like receptor signaling ( Lande et al., 2007 ; Lai et al., 2011 ; Singh et al., 2013 ) can affect virus replication and in general the immune response towards viruses. This was recently described for West Nile virus (WNV) infection of keratinocytes in the presence or absence of poly (I:C) and LL-37 where both stimuli resulted in much stronger antiviral responses. Finally, a recent study showed that LL-37 bound directly to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) binding domain, blocking this receptor for SARS-CoV-2 binding and entry into host cells ( Wang et al., 2021 ; Lokhande et al., 2022 ; Li et al., 2021 ). Overall, it is clear that the multitude of described immunomodulatory effects of (intracellular) LL-37 can affect the outcome of virus infections, but the exact mechanism can differ for each virus and probably even each cell type infected. Therefore, the use of Vero cells also potentially give rise to a limitation of this study, because immunomodulatory antiviral effects of (porcine) AMPs cannot be ruled out in porcine tissues or cells. The second AMP with anti-PEDV activity analyzed in this research was CATH-B1, a chicken cathelicidin primarily found in the bursa of Fabricius, where it plays a role in enhancing the host's immune defenses against various microbial infections ( Goitsuka et al., 2007 ). Previous research has highlighted its ability to inhibit viruses through both direct and indirect mechanisms, similar to LL-37, but only a limited number of antiviral studies have been performed with this peptide. CATH-B1 has been observed to bind to IAV particles, thereby blocking viral entry and infection ( Peng et al., 2020 ). Similarly, in vitro studies have demonstrated that CATH-B1 can directly disrupt the structural integrity of pseudorabies virus (PRV) virions, thereby preventing virus binding and entry into host cells. Additionally, pre-treatment with CATH-B1 was shown to increase the antiviral immune response against PRV, leading to increased expression of IFN-β ( Ye et al., 2023 ). The current study indicated that CATH-B1 likely exerts its anti-PEDV effects through direct interactions with viral particles. Notably, our TEM results suggest that CATH-B1 not only aggregates viruses as was seen for IAV, but also disrupts the viral structural integrity, leading to deformations in the virus morphology. The activity of CATH-B1 was lost in a pre-incubation setup indicating that at least under the tested conditions an immunomodulatory anti-PEDV role for CATH-B1 is less likely. While peptide-based drugs show potential and are undergoing extensive clinical trials, with some already approved by the food and drug administration (FDA), challenges remain in their real-world application. These include toxicity, short lifespans and high production costs, especially for longer peptides ( Agarwal and Gabrani, 2021 ). Therefore, in terms of drug development, using full-length CATH-B1 or LL-37 as anti-PEDV compounds in pigs may not be optimal. However, their effectiveness against pathogens and their non-toxicity to mammalian cells are crucial factors to consider, if they demonstrate both properties, they could be viable options. However, it would be beneficial to determine the structural characteristics of LL-37 and CATH-B1 that confer the antiviral activity against PEDV, and produce shorter or more (proteolytically) stable peptides. Several studies have shown that shortened LL-37 fragments can retain activity while small amino acid mutations can even increase activity ( Ren et al., 2013 ; K Chen et al., 2021 ; Chingaté et al., 2015 ; Aghazadeh et al., 2019 ; Biswas et al., 2021 ). With the use of our developed flow-cytometry-based antiviral activity assay, this screening of LL-37-based peptides could be easily performed and would be a logical next step toward drug development. In conclusion, our findings indicate that PEDV may possess resistance to conventional porcine AMPs, potentially contributing to its high pathogenicity. Significantly, among the peptides tested, only CATH-B1 and LL-37 demonstrated effective inhibition of PEDV in vitro , suggesting a direct interaction with viral particles. However, the exact mechanisms responsible for their antiviral activity remain unclear and warrant further investigation. This discovery not only enhances our understanding of the biological roles of cathelicidins in vivo but also underscores their potential for developing novel antiviral therapies based on this class of antimicrobial agents. CRediT authorship contribution statement Fatemeh Pashaie: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. Tabitha E. Hoornweg: Investigation, Data curation. Floris J. Bikker: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology. Tineke Veenendaal: Data curation, Methodology. Femke Broere: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Edwin J.A. Veldhuizen: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Data curation, Conceptualization. Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interests. Acknowledgements This work was partially financially supported by Perstorp Waspik B.V. The authors would like to thank Sergio González Acosta (IPNA-CSIC, Spain) for providing the parrot AMPs, and Nalan Liv, (Center for Molecular Medicine, UMC Utrecht, The Netherlands) for her help with the transmission electron microscopy studies. We also thank Richard Wubbolts and Esther van ’t Veld (Center for Cell Imaging, Utrecht University, The Netherlands) for their help with confocal microscopy, and the Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting Facility at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, for their support. Footnotes Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2024.199496 . Appendix. Supplementary materials

Image, application 1 Data availability Data will be made available on request. References Agarwal G., Gabrani R. Antiviral Peptides: identification and Validation. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2021;27(1):149–168. doi: 10.1007/s10989-020-10072-0. Aghazadeh H., Memariani H., Ranjbar R. Pooshang Bagheri K. The activity and action mechanism of novel short selective LL-37-derived anticancer peptides against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2019;93(1):75–83. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.13381. Ahmed A., Siman-Tov G., Hall G., Bhalla N., Narayanan A. Human antimicrobial peptides as therapeutics for viral infections. Viruses. 2019;11(8) doi: 10.3390/v11080704. Ahmed A., Siman-Tov G., Keck F., Kortchak S., Bakovic A., Risner K., et al. Human cathelicidin peptide LL-37 as a therapeutic antiviral targeting Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus infections. Antiviral Res. 2019;164:61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.02.002. Alagarasu K., Patil P.S., Shil P., Seervi M., Kakade M.B., Tillu H., et al. In-vitro effect of human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide LL-37 on dengue virus type 2. Peptides. 2017;92:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2017.04.002. Bandholtz L., Ekman G.J., Vilhelmsson M., Buentke E., Agerberth B., Scheynius A., et al. Antimicrobial peptide LL-37 internalized by immature human dendritic cells alters their phenotype. Scand. J. Immunol. 2006;63(6):410–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2006.001752.x. Barlow P.G., Svoboda P., Mackellar A., Nash A.A., York I.A., Pohl J., et al. Antiviral activity and increased host defense against influenza infection elicited by the human cathelicidin LL-37. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025333. Bergman P., Walter-Jallow L., Broliden K., Agerberth B., Söderlund J. The antimicrobial peptide LL-37 inhibits HIV-1 replication. Curr. HIV Res. 2007;5(4):410–415. doi: 10.2174/157016207781023947. Biswas D., Ambalavanan P., Ravins M., Anand A., Sharma A., Lim K.X.Z., et al. LL-37-mediated activation of host receptors is critical for defense against group A streptococcal infection. Cell Rep. 2021;34(9) doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108766. Blodkamp S., Kadlec K., Gutsmann T., Naim H.Y., von Köckritz-Blickwede M., Schwarz S. In vitro activity of human and animal cathelicidins against livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Vet. Microbiol. 2016;194:107–111. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.09.018. Chen J., Lin Y.F., Chen J.H., Chen X., Lin Z.H. Molecular characterization of cathelicidin in tiger frog (Hoplobatrachus rugulosus): antimicrobial activity and immunomodulatory activity. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2021;247 doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2021.109072. Chen K., Gong W., Huang J., Yoshimura T., Wang J.M. The potentials of short fragments of human anti-microbial peptide LL-37 as a novel therapeutic modality for diseases. Front. Biosci. 2021;26(11):1362–1372. doi: 10.52586/5029. Chen Y., Luo Q., Li S., Li C., Liao S., Yang X., et al. Antiviral activity against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus of Pogostemon cablin polysaccharide. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020;259 doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113009. Chingaté S., Delgado G., Salazar L.M., Soto C.Y. The ATPase activity of the mycobacterial plasma membrane is inhibited by the LL37-analogous peptide LLAP. Peptides. 2015;71:222–228. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2015.07.021. Currie S.M., Findlay E.G., McHugh B.J., Mackellar A., Man T., Macmillan D., et al. The human cathelicidin LL-37 has antiviral activity against respiratory syncytial virus. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e73659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073659. Deshpande D., Grieshober M., Wondany F., Gerbl F., Noschka R., Michaelis J., et al. Super-Resolution microscopy reveals a direct interaction of intracellular mycobacterium tuberculosis with the antimicrobial peptide LL-37. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(18) doi: 10.3390/ijms21186741. Emeny J.M., Morgan M.J. Regulation of the interferon system: evidence that Vero cells have a genetic defect in interferon production. J. Gen. Virol. 1979;43(1):247–252. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-43-1-247. Findlay F., Proudfoot L., Stevens C., Barlow P.G. Cationic host defense peptides; novel antimicrobial therapeutics against Category A pathogens and emerging infections. Pathog. Glob. Health. 2016;110(4–5):137–147. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2016.1195036. Goitsuka R., Chen C-lH, Benyon L., Asano Y., Kitamura D., Cooper M.D. Chicken cathelicidin-B1, an antimicrobial guardian at the mucosal M cell gateway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104(38):15063–15068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707037104. Harcourt J.L., McDonald M., Svoboda P., Pohl J., Tatti K., Haynes L.M. Human cathelicidin, LL-37, inhibits respiratory syncytial virus infection in polarized airway epithelial cells. BMC Res. Notes. 2016;9:11. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1836-y. He M., Zhang H., Li Y., Wang G., Tang B., Zhao J., et al. Cathelicidin-Derived antimicrobial peptides inhibit zika virus through direct inactivation and interferon pathway. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:722. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00722. Howell M.D., Jones J.F., Kisich K.O., Streib J.E., Gallo R.L., Leung D.Y. Selective killing of vaccinia virus by LL-37: implications for eczema vaccinatum. J. Immunol. 2004;172(3):1763–1767. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.3.1763. Howell M.D., Jones J.F., Kisich K.O., Streib J.E., Gallo R.L., Leung D.Y.M. Selective killing of vaccinia virus by LL-37: implications for eczema vaccinatum1. J. Immunol. 2004;172(3):1763–1767. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.3.1763. Jung K., Saif L.J., Wang Q. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV): an update on etiology, transmission, pathogenesis, and prevention and control. Virus Res. 2020;286 doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198045. Kirchdoerfer R.N., Bhandari M., Martini O., Sewall L.M., Bangaru S., Yoon K.J., et al. Structure and immune recognition of the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus spike protein. Structure. 2021;29(4):385–392. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2020.12.003. e5. Lai Y., Adhikarakunnathu S., Bhardwaj K., Ranjith-Kumar C.T., Wen Y., Jordan J.L., et al. LL37 and cationic peptides enhance TLR3 signaling by viral double-stranded RNAs. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026632. Lande R., Gregorio J., Facchinetti V., Chatterjee B., Wang Y.H., Homey B., et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells sense self-DNA coupled with antimicrobial peptide. Nature. 2007;449(7162):564–569. doi: 10.1038/nature06116. Langel S.N., Paim F.C., Lager K.M., Vlasova A.N., Saif L.J. Lactogenic immunity and vaccines for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV): historical and current concepts. Virus Res. 2016;226:93–107. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2016.05.016. Lau Y.E., Rozek A., Scott M.G., Goosney D.L., Davidson D.J., Hancock R.E. Interaction and cellular localization of the human host defense peptide LL-37 with lung epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2005;73(1):583–591. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.1.583-591.2005. Lee M.O., Jang H.J., Rengaraj D., Yang S.Y., Han J.Y., Lamont S.J., et al. Tissue expression and antibacterial activity of host defense peptides in chicken. BMC Vet. Res. 2016;12(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0866-6. Lei J., Sun L., Huang S., Zhu C., Li P., He J., et al. The antimicrobial peptides and their potential clinical applications. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019;11(7):3919–3931. Levy D.E., Garcı x, a-Sastre A. The virus battles: IFN induction of the antiviral state and mechanisms of viral evasion. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2001;12(2):143–156. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6101(00)00027-7. Li C., Li Z., Zou Y., Wicht O., van Kuppeveld F.J., Rottier P.J., et al. Manipulation of the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus genome using targeted RNA recombination. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e69997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069997. Li D., Chen P., Shi T., Mehmood A., Qiu J. HD5 and LL-37 inhibit SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 binding to human ACE2 by molecular simulation. Interdisciplinary Sci. 2021;13(4):766–777. doi: 10.1007/s12539-021-00462-3. Li X., Sun J., Prinz R.A., Liu X., Xu X. Inhibition of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) replication by A77 1726 through targeting JAK and Src tyrosine kinases. Virology. 2020;551:75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2020.06.009. Li Z., Ma Z., Li Y., Gao S., Xiao S. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus: molecular mechanisms of attenuation and vaccines. Microb. Pathog. 2020;149 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104553. Lin F., Zhang H., Li L., Yang Y., Zou X., Chen J., et al. PEDV: insights and advances into types, function, structure, and receptor recognition. Viruses. 2022;14(8) doi: 10.3390/v14081744. Lokhande K.B., Banerjee T., Swamy K.V., Ghosh P., Deshpande M. An in silico scientific basis for LL-37 as a therapeutic for Covid-19. Proteins. 2022;90(5):1029–1043. doi: 10.1002/prot.26198. Matsumura T., Sugiyama N., Murayama A., Yamada N., Shiina M., Asabe S., et al. Antimicrobial peptide LL-37 attenuates infection of hepatitis C virus. Hepatol. Res. 2016;46(9):924–932. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12627. Nagaoka I., Tamura H., Reich J. Therapeutic potential of cathelicidin peptide LL-37, an antimicrobial agent, in a murine sepsis model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(17) doi: 10.3390/ijms21175973. Ogawa Y., Kawamura T., Matsuzawa T., Aoki R., Gee P., Yamashita A., et al. Antimicrobial peptide LL-37 produced by HSV-2-infected keratinocytes enhances hiv infection of langerhans cells. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13(1):77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.12.002. Pahar B., Madonna S., Das A., Albanesi C., Girolomoni G. Immunomodulatory role of the antimicrobial LL-37 peptide in autoimmune diseases and viral infections. Vaccines. 2020;8(3) doi: 10.3390/vaccines8030517. Peng L., Du W., Balhuizen M.D., Haagsman H.P., de Haan C.A.M., Veldhuizen E.J.A. Antiviral activity of chicken cathelicidin B1 against Influenza A virus. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:426. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00426. Prescott J., Hall P., Acuna-Retamar M., Ye C., Wathelet M.G., Ebihara H., et al. New world hantaviruses activate IFNlambda production in type I IFN-deficient vero E6 cells. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e11159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011159. Ren S.X., Shen J., Cheng A.S., Lu L., Chan R.L., Li Z.J., et al. FK-16 derived from the anticancer peptide LL-37 induces caspase-independent apoptosis and autophagic cell death in colon cancer cells. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063641. Sato E., Hiromatsu K., Murata K., Imafuku S. Loss of ATP2A2 allows herpes simplex virus 1 infection of a human epidermis model by disrupting innate immunity and barrier function. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(12):2540–2549. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.05.019. Scheenstra M.R., van Harten R.M., Veldhuizen E.J.A., Haagsman H.P., Coorens M. Cathelicidins modulate TLR-activation and inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:1137. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01137. Singh D., Qi R., Jordan J.L., San Mateo L., Kao C.C. The human antimicrobial peptide LL-37, but not the mouse ortholog, mCRAMP, can stimulate signaling by poly(I:C) through a FPRL1-dependent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288(12):8258–8268. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.440883. Sousa F.H., Casanova V., Findlay F., Stevens C., Svoboda P., Pohl J., et al. Cathelicidins display conserved direct antiviral activity towards rhinovirus. Peptides. 2017;95:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2017.07.013. Steinstraesser L., Tippler B., Mertens J., Lamme E., Homann H.H., Lehnhardt M., et al. Inhibition of early steps in the lentiviral replication cycle by cathelicidin host defense peptides. Retrovirology. 2005;2:2. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-2-2. Tang X., Basavarajappa D., Haeggström J.Z., Wan M. P2X7 receptor regulates internalization of antimicrobial peptide LL-37 by human macrophages that promotes intracellular pathogen clearance. J. Immunol. 2015;195(3):1191–1201. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402845. Tripathi S., Tecle T., Verma A., Crouch E., White M., Hartshorn K.L. The human cathelicidin LL-37 inhibits influenza A viruses through a mechanism distinct from that of surfactant protein D or defensins. J. Gen. Virol. 2013;94(Pt 1):40–49. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.045013-0. Tripathi S., Wang G., White M., Qi L., Taubenberger J., Hartshorn K.L. Antiviral activity of the human cathelicidin, LL-37, and derived peptides on seasonal and pandemic influenza A viruses. PLoS One. 2015;10(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124706. van Harten R.M., van Woudenbergh E., van Dijk A., Haagsman H.P. Cathelicidins: immunomodulatory antimicrobials. Vaccines. 2018;6(3) doi: 10.3390/vaccines6030063. Wang C., Wang S., Li D., Chen P., Han S., Zhao G., et al. Human cathelicidin inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection: killing two birds with one stone. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021;7(6):1545–1554. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00096. Wang P., Bai J., Liu X., Wang M., Wang X., Jiang P. Tomatidine inhibits porcine epidemic diarrhea virus replication by targeting 3CL protease. Vet Res. 2020;51(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13567-020-00865-y. Wieczorek M., Jenssen H., Kindrachuk J., Scott W.R.P., Elliott M., Hilpert K., et al. Structural studies of a peptide with immune modulating and direct antimicrobial activity. Chem. Biol. 2010;17(9):970–980. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.07.007. Wong J.H., Legowska A., Rolka K., Ng T.B., Hui M., Cho C.H., et al. Effects of cathelicidin and its fragments on three key enzymes of HIV-1. Peptides. 2011;32(6):1117–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2011.04.017. Yang W., Chen W., Huang J., Jin L., Zhou Y., Chen J., et al. Generation, identification, and functional analysis of monoclonal antibodies against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus nucleocapsid. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019;103(9):3705–3714. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09702-5. Ye C., Wan C., Chen J., Li G., Li Y., Wang Y., et al. Cathelicidin CATH-B1 inhibits pseudorabies virus infection via direct interaction and TLR4/JNK/IRF3-mediated interferon activation. J. Virol. 2023;97(7) doi: 10.1128/jvi.00706-23. Yu J., Dai Y., Fu Y., Wang K., Yang Y., Li M., et al. Cathelicidin antimicrobial peptides suppress EV71 infection via regulating antiviral response and inhibiting viral binding. Antiviral Res. 2021;187 doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2021.105021. Zakaryan H., Chilingaryan G., Arabyan E., Serobian A., Wang G. Natural antimicrobial peptides as a source of new antiviral agents. J. Gen. Virol. 2021;102(9) doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001661. Zhang Z., Le K., La Placa D., Armstrong B., Miller M.M., Shively J.E. CXCR2 specific endocytosis of immunomodulatory peptide LL-37 in human monocytes and formation of LL-37 positive large vesicles in differentiated monoosteophils. Bone Rep. 2020;12 doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2019.100237. Associated Data Supplementary Materials Image, application 1 Data Availability Statement Data will be made available on request.

📖 中文全文 Chinese Full Text

中文

# 翻译

## 标题与文献信息

**4445 virusres** Virus Research (病毒研究), Virus Res, Elsevier, PMC11607671, 11607671, 11607671, 39528011, 10.1016/j.virusres.2024.199496

**Cathelicidins抗猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)的抗病毒活性:机制与疗效**

Pashaie Fatemeh^a, Hoornweg Tabitha E^a, Bikker Floris J^b, Veenendaal Tineke^c, Broere Femke^a, Veldhuizen Edwin JA^a*

^a 荷兰乌得勒支大学兽医学院生物分子健康科学系传染病与免疫学分部,乌得勒支3584 CL,荷兰 ^b 阿姆斯特丹牙科学术中心口腔生物化学系,阿姆斯特丹大学与VU大学阿姆斯特丹分校,阿姆斯特丹1081 LA,荷兰 ^c 乌得勒支大学医学中心分子医学中心细胞显微镜核心设施,乌得勒支3584 CX,荷兰

*通讯作者。e.j.a.veldhuizen@uu.nl

2024年11月15日;350: 199496;2024年11月30日

© 2024 作者。由Elsevier B.V.出版。本文采用CC BY许可协议(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)开放获取。

---

**亮点**

• 建立了一种基于流式细胞术检测抗PEDV活性的方法。 • 两种抗菌肽有效抑制了PEDV的感染性。 • LL-37进入Vero细胞并阻止随后的PEDV感染。 • 透射电子显微镜(TEM)显示LL-37和CATH-B1对病毒形态有直接影响。

**关键词:** 抗菌肽;Cathelicidins(抗菌肽素);抗病毒活性;猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV);Vero细胞

---

## 摘要

猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)是一种感染猪的有害冠状病毒,给全球养猪业造成了巨大的经济损失。有效疫苗和治疗方法的缺乏凸显了开发新型抗病毒策略的迫切需求。抗菌肽(AMPs),特别是cathelicidins类如LL-37,已展现出对多种病毒的良好活性。本研究旨在通过体外检测cathelicidins对PEDV的抑制能力来阐明其抗病毒机制。研究分析了四种猪源抗菌肽(PMAP-36、PMAP-23、PR-39和PG-1)以及鸡源CATH-B1和人源LL-37的抗PEDV活性。流式细胞术和荧光显微镜结果证实,LL-37和CATH-B1在5和10 µM的无毒性浓度下具有强烈的抑制作用,在共孵育和预孵育实验中均显著降低了GFP-PEDV对Vero细胞的感染。相比之下,四种猪源肽即使在更高剂量下也未表现出任何抑制效果。荧光标记的LL-37被证实可进入Vero细胞,提示其可能通过免疫调节机制发挥抗病毒作用。然而,透射电子显微镜结果明确显示,LL-37和CATH-B1均影响病毒形态并导致病毒颗粒聚集,表明肽-病毒的直接相互作用导致了病毒感染性的降低。总之,本分析突出了LL-37和CATH-B1作为PEDV抑制剂的潜力,为创新性抗病毒治疗策略提供了有前景的方向。

**发表状态:** released;**显示PDF:** yes;**手稿:** no;**预印本:** no;**期刊内容:** no;**扫描版:** no;**撤稿:** no

收稿日期:2024年7月29日;修回日期:2024年11月7日;接受日期:2024年11月9日;收录日期:2024年12月。

---

## 1. 引言

猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)是一种有包膜的单股正链RNA病毒,分类上属于冠状病毒科(Coronaviridae)甲型冠状病毒属(Alphacoronavirus),隶属于网巢病毒目(Nidovirales)。该病毒对所有年龄段的猪均具有致病性,可引起厌食、呕吐、水样腹泻、脱水等症状,并可导致高死亡率(Kirchdoerfer等, 2021;Z Li等, 2020;Lin等, 2022)。PEDV的暴发对养猪业产生了显著的经济影响,使其成为全球养猪业面临的严峻威胁。值得注意的是,2013–2014年美国PEDV疫情造成了巨大的经济损失,估计损失在9亿至18亿美元之间(Yang等, 2019;Chen等, 2020;Langel等, 2016)。

PEDV主要靶向猪肠道上皮细胞,导致肠道广泛感染,引发肠绒毛结构的萎缩和坏死。此外,感染严重损害了营养物质的吸收,从而引起一系列临床症状,包括呕吐、腹泻、体重显著下降、食欲减退和精神沉郁。PEDV通过粪便排泄到外界环境中,一旦污染周围环境,可能引发大规模疫情(Z Li等, 2020)。据报道,与成年猪相比,新生仔猪对PEDV更易感,原因包括肠上皮细胞更新速度较慢以及大肠在解剖学和生理学上的发育不成熟(Jung等, 2020)。

PEDV在猪群中的首次检出可追溯至20世纪70年代末,1977年在英国和1978年在比利时首次被鉴定。然而,PEDV新型变异株的出现发生在较近的时期,2011年中国暴发的疫情即为明证,随后美洲、欧洲和亚洲也相继出现疫情(Lin等, 2022;Yang等, 2019)。尽管已开发了多种PEDV疫苗,但其效力有限。例如,1990年使用的CV777疫苗最初取得了成功,但2011年PEDV新毒株的出现使其效力大打折扣。因此,开发抗病毒药物已成为控制病毒传播的可行途径(Chen等, 2020;X Li等, 2020)。

抗病毒药物的开发始于20世纪60年代碘苷(idoxuridine)的获批,标志着这一领域的开端,在过去六十年中已有超过90种人用抗病毒药物获批。这些药物大致可分为两类:靶向病毒的抗病毒药物和宿主导向的抗病毒药物。靶向病毒的抗病毒药物通过直接或间接抑制病毒蛋白的生物学活性或破坏病毒颗粒结构发挥作用。相比之下,宿主导向的抗病毒药物通过阻断病毒生命周期中利用的宿主因子发挥作用(Zakaryan等, 2021)。

抗菌肽(AMPs)是一类有前景的抗病毒化合物。它们是一类功能多样的肽类家族,对多种病毒、细菌和真菌病原体具有直接的抗微生物活性。其近年来被发现的免疫调节功能尤其值得关注,为临床应用提供了进一步的可能性。在AMPs中,cathelicidins家族因其已被充分研究的免疫调节特性而引起了广泛关注(Scheenstra等, 2020)。

Cathelicidins在不同物种间表现出显著的结构多样性,从富含脯氨酸的结构到两亲性α-螺旋以及含β-折叠的肽类均有存在。这些肽已在多种动物中被发现,包括哺乳动物、鸟类、爬行动物、鱼类和两栖动物。与人类、兔和小鼠仅表达一种类型的cathelicidin不同,猪、牛和鸡等其他物种具有多种结构更为多样的cathelicidins(Zakaryan等, 2021;Wieczorek等, 2010)。

LL-37作为人类唯一的cathelicidin,具有抑制多种病毒的能力,包括登革病毒(DENV)、人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)、呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)、人鼻病毒(HRV)、痘苗病毒(VACV)、单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)、寨卡病毒(ZIKV)、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和委内瑞拉马脑炎病毒(VEEV)(A Ahmed等, 2019;Harcourt等, 2016;Findlay等, 2016;Matsumura等, 2016;Alagarasu等, 2017;Tripathi等, 2015)。这种抑制作用通过多种机制实现,包括与病毒颗粒的直接相互作用、增强I型干扰素(IFN)表达以及抑制促炎细胞因子的产生(A Ahmed等, 2019;Harcourt等, 2016;Findlay等, 2016;Matsumura等, 2016;Alagarasu等, 2017;Tripathi等, 2015)。

鸡源cathelicidin CATH-B1通过有效抑制甲型流感病毒(IAV)的进入而表现出抗病毒活性。这种抑制作用通过病毒凝集实现,从而阻碍病毒的入侵能力(Peng等, 2020)。尽管已有多项体外研究探讨了LL-37和CATH-B1的抗病毒特性,但其抗病毒活性的确切机制至今仍不清楚。大量研究已广泛探讨了cathelicidins的抗菌特性(Nagaoka等, 2020;Lee等, 2016;Blodkamp等, 2016;J Chen等, 2021)。然而,关于cathelicidins的确切抗病毒作用机制尚未达成共识,且该机制可能因不同的病毒和cathelicidin组合而异。因此,本研究旨在探讨几种cathelicidins对PEDV的体外抑制能力和抗病毒机制。本研究的发现将为cathelicidins的抗病毒机制及其作为有效抗病毒药物的潜在应用提供有价值的见解。

---

## 2. 材料与方法

### 2.1. 抗菌肽

肽类由中国肽业(中国上海)和阿姆斯特丹牙科学术中心(ACTA,荷兰)采用Fmoc化学法合成(CPC Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA)。所有肽经反相高效液相色谱纯化至纯度>95%。Protegrin-1由Thomas Wood和Nathaniel Martin(莱顿大学生物学研究所分子生物技术系,荷兰莱顿)惠赠。肽类以1600 µM浓度溶解于水中,分装后于-80°C保存,直至后续实验使用。

**表1 本研究中使用的cathelicidins主要特征**

| AMPs | 物种 | 氨基酸序列 | 长度 | 电荷 | |------|------|-----------|------|------| | LL-37 | 人 | LLGDFFRKSKEKIGKEFKRIVQRIKDFLRNLVPRTES | 37 | +6 | | 荧光标记LL-37 | 人 | Tamra-(ahx)-LLGDFFRKSKEKIGKEFKRIVQRIKDFLRNLVPRTES | 37 | +6 | | CATH-B1 | 鸡 | PIRNWWIRIWEWLNGIRKRLRQRSPFYVRG HLNVTSTPQP | 40 | +7 | | PMAP-36 | 猪 | GRFRRLRKKTRKRLKKIGKVLKWIPPIVGSIPLGCG | 36 | +13 | | PMAP-23 | 猪 | RIIDLLWRVRRPQKPKFVTVWVR | 23 | +6 | | PR-39 | 猪 | RRRPRPPYLPRPRPPPFFPPRLPPRIPPGFPPRFPPRFP | 39 | +10 | | PG-1 | 猪 | RGGRLCYCRRRFCVCVGR | 18 | +6 |

### 2.2. 细胞培养

Vero-mCeacam细胞(Vero细胞)源自非洲绿猴肾细胞,在含有10%胎牛血清(FCS)(Bodinco B.V.,荷兰阿尔克马尔)和200单位/mL青霉素及200 mg/mL链霉素(P/S)(Gibco, Life Technologies Limited, Paisley, UK)的DMEM培养基(Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA)中,于37°C、5% CO₂条件下培养。

### 2.3. PEDV培养

PEDV和PEDV-GFP由Berend Jan Bosch(荷兰乌得勒支大学兽医学院生物分子健康科学系)惠赠,并使用Vero细胞按前述方法进行保存和扩增(Li等, 2013)。为制备病毒储存液,将Vero细胞接种于T75培养瓶中,在含10% FCS的DMEM完全培养基中于37°C、5% CO₂条件下培养至90%汇合度。随后,将Vero细胞暴露于PEDV,方法为在1900 µL PBS中加入100 µL病毒液,于37°C孵育2 h。此后,向培养瓶中加入10 mL DMEM完全培养基,继续培养至感染后96 h在光学显微镜下观察到细胞病变效应。为从Vero细胞中释放病毒,将培养瓶反复冻融(-20°C冷冻,室温(RT)解冻,共4次)。随后将上清液收集至15 mL离心管中。通过350 × g离心5 min去除细胞碎片,将所得上清液分装后于-80°C保存。

### 2.4. 病毒滴度测定

通过空斑实验测定病毒滴度。将Vero细胞以每孔24 × 10⁵个细胞的密度接种于6孔板中。用10倍系列稀释的病毒感染细胞,于37°C孵育2 h。去除病毒接种物后,加入1 mL覆盖液(等体积的1%琼脂糖[Sea Plaque GTG琼脂糖;Lonza]与1× MEM[Gibco, Temin's modification (2X),无酚红,NY, USA]混合),于37°C继续培养5天,期间加入1 mL覆盖培养基。随后用0.5 mL 10%多聚甲醛(PFA)(Sigma-Aldrich, P6148, 德国达姆施塔特)固定,用结晶紫(0.1%结晶紫[Abcam, 德国]溶于20%甲醇)染色。随后计数空斑以确定病毒滴度(图S1)。

### 2.5. 细胞活力检测

将Vero细胞以每孔1 × 10⁵个细胞的密度接种于96孔板中。随后用100 µL AMPs(0–10 µM,DMEM配制)刺激细胞3或24 h。之后,将培养基更换为100 µL含10%水溶性四唑盐1(WST-1)(Roche, 瑞士巴塞尔)的培养基。孵育10–15 min后,使用FLUOstar Omega微孔板读数仪(BMG Labtech GmbH, 德国奥滕贝格)在450 nm处测定吸光度变化。代谢活性相对于未加AMPs的对照组进行计算。

### 2.6. 乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)检测

为评估肽类的细胞毒性,按2.5节所述方法用AMPs(0–10 µM,DMEM配制)处理Vero细胞。刺激3和24 h后,使用Cyto Tox 96非放射性细胞毒性检测试剂盒(Promega GmbH, 德国沃尔多夫)按照制造商说明书测量培养上清液中释放的乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)比例,并以1% Triton X-100(Sigma-Aldrich, T8787, 德国达姆施塔特)裂解的细胞释放的最大LDH百分比表示。

### 2.7. Cathelicidins体外抗病毒活性

**图1 AMPs对Vero细胞的细胞毒性。** 细胞与0–10 µM AMPs分别孵育3 h或24 h。A和B)LDH释放实验,分别显示3 h和24 h后的细胞膜通透性。C和D)WST实验,分别测量3 h和24 h后的细胞代谢活性。"无肽"代表仅用生长培养基孵育相应时间的细胞,作为对照。LDH实验中的P.C为经裂解液裂解的细胞,代表100%的胞内LDH释放。报告值为三次独立实验的平均值±标准差(SD)。* p < 0.05;** p < 0.01;*** p < 0.001。

为确定AMPs对PEDV感染性的影响,将Vero细胞(每孔5 × 10⁵个)接种于12孔板中,于37°C、5% CO₂条件下过夜培养。在病毒与AMPs共孵育实验(图2A)中,将AMPs(0–10 µM)与PEDV-GFP(MOI = 0.3)的混合物1 mL(DMEM配制,含P/S + 10% FCS)加入细胞中,于37°C孵育。2 h后,将上清液更换为新鲜DMEM(含P/S + 10% FCS),继续孵育24 h。随后,用流式细胞术缓冲液(500 mL PBS + 10 mL FCS + 250 µL 10% NaN₃)洗涤细胞2次,并使用EVOS M5000成像系统成像,进行感染性的半定量测定。最后,用2.5%胰蛋白酶小心消化细胞,用ViaKrome 808固定活力染料(1:1000)染色,于4°C孵育30 min。洗涤后,用50 µL 4% PFA固定10 min,使用CytoFLEX LX流式细胞仪(FC)(Beckman Coulter, USA)获取至少1 × 10⁵个细胞。使用FlowJo软件v.10.6(Flowjo LCC, Ashland, OR, USA)分析数据。

**图2 AMPs对PEDV感染性的影响(MOI = 0.3)。** A)"共孵育实验"的实验设计;Vero细胞暴露于AMPs和PEDV-GFP的混合物中2 h。随后更换上清液,继续孵育24 h。B)荧光显微镜(20×放大倍数)用于观察在1、5和10 µM AMPs存在下的GFP荧光信号。"仅细胞"样本仅由细胞组成,"无肽"样本仅含PEDV-GFP,不含肽类。

当AMPs在感染前(预处理)或感染后(后处理)加入Vero细胞时,也测定了其对病毒感染性的影响。在预处理实验(图6A)中,将Vero细胞用不同浓度的CATH-B1和LL-37肽(0–10 µM)于37°C处理不同时间(1、2、3、4和24 h)。随后,用PBS洗涤细胞2次,以MOI 0.3的PEDV-GFP感染2 h。

**图6 AMPs在预孵育实验中的效果。** A)预孵育实验的实验设计。B)采用流式细胞术(FC)定量预孵育期间GFP阳性细胞的百分比。C)FC直方图显示预孵育处理期间CATH-B1和LL-37的GFP荧光强度。y轴代表相对细胞数,x轴显示荧光强度(GFP)。"仅细胞"样本仅由细胞组成,不含肽类和病毒。"无肽"样本仅含病毒。报告值为三次独立实验(每次三复孔)的平均值±SD。* p < 0.05;** p < 0.01。

在后孵育实验(图7A)中,细胞首先暴露于病毒2 h,用PBS洗涤2 h,然后用AMPs处理3 h。对于感染前和感染后实验,在相应孵育期后,使用荧光显微镜评估细胞,并按上述方法用FC进行定量。

**图7 AMPs在后孵育实验中的效果。** A)后孵育实验的设计与设置。B)在后孵育期间使用FC定量GFP阳性细胞的百分比。C)FC直方图显示用CATH-B1和LL-37处理后GFP的荧光强度。y轴代表相对细胞数,x轴显示荧光强度(GFP)。"仅细胞"样本仅由细胞组成,不含肽类和病毒。"无肽"样本仅含病毒。报告值为三次独立实验(每次三复孔)的平均值±SD。

在我们的抗病毒实验中测试了更多种类的AMPs,以评估猪源肽是否特异性无活性,或者这是否为普遍现象,而LL-37和CATH-B1的效力是否更为突出。这组扩展的AMPs包括鸡源肽(D-CATH-2、l-CATH-2)、小鼠源肽(CRAMP)、马源肽(eCATH-1、eCATH-3)、鹦鹉源肽(ER2、ER3、AG3)和合成肽(CR165、CR174),这些肽在我们的实验室中均可方便获取。如前所述,将这些AMPs与PEDV共孵育。这些肽的特征列于表S1中。

为确定CATH-B1和LL-37是否与PEDV发生物理相互作用,使用Capto Core 700微球(GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA)选择性去除未结合的AMPs。将PEDV与CATH-B1/LL-37在Opti-MEM培养基中一起或不一起预孵育,然后加入Capto Core 700微球,于4°C缓慢旋转孵育1 h。离心后,收集上清液并接种于细胞。为确保AMPs被有效去除,我们对含肽但无病毒的样本使用相同流程进行了测试。收集的上清液用于接种细胞,并使用所述方法测定感染细胞数。

### 2.8. 透射电子显微镜(TEM)

将PEDV与CATH-B1、LL-37、PMAP-23和PMAP-36于37°C处理1 min。随后,将10 µL样本置于新碳涂层铜网上。用PBS洗涤铜网3次,然后用含1%戊二醛(Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)的PBS固定10 min。固定后,用PBS洗涤2次,用MilliQ水洗涤4次。在醋酸铀酰(pH 7)中染色5 min,然后用甲基纤维素/醋酸铀酰(pH 4)短暂洗涤,于冰上孵育5 min。最后,将铜网从溶液中取出并风干。随后在配备Veleta 2k × 2k CCD相机(EMSIS, 德国明斯特)的JEM1010(JEOL)电镜下检查样本。

### 2.9. 通过FC和共聚焦显微镜检测荧光标记LL-37

为研究LL-37的细胞定位,将荧光标记(FL)LL-37与Vero细胞孵育3 h。随后用PBS洗涤细胞,于37°C继续孵育24 h。如前所述进行FC分析(以未标记LL-37作为对照),评估标记LL-37在细胞上附着或内化的量。此外,为评估Vero细胞对LL-37的摄取,将细胞与1和5 µM的FL LL-37分别孵育30 min、60 min和180 min,然后用PBS洗涤。孵育后,用4% PFA于室温固定细胞30 min。用PBS洗涤2次后,加入用PBS稀释(1:1000)的DAPI(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)染色5 min以标记细胞核。随后使用配备63×物镜的Leica TCS SP2共聚焦显微镜对活细胞进行成像。

为检测摄取机制,首先将Vero细胞于4°C孵育30 min以抑制能量依赖性途径,然后加入FL LL-37。随后将细胞与肽在4°C下分别孵育30、60和180 min。进行FC分析以定量附着于细胞或被细胞内化的FL LL-37的量。

### 2.10. 统计分析

使用GraphPad Prism 8.3.0(538)进行统计分析。数据采用普通单因素方差分析(one-way ANOVA)结合Tukey多重比较检验评估显著性差异,显著性水平设定为p < 0.05。

---

## 3. 结果

### 3.1. AMPs对Vero细胞细胞毒性的评估

本研究使用的AMPs在0–10 µM浓度范围内评估其对Vero细胞的细胞毒性。CATH-B1、LL-37、PR-39和PMAP-23在3 h和24 h孵育期间即使在最高测试浓度下也未表现出毒性效应(图1A+B)。相比之下,PMAP-36和PG-1在5和/或10 µM下表现出一定的细胞毒性。使用WST实验测量Vero细胞的代谢活性时观察到类似结果。与CATH-B1、LL-37和PMAP-23孵育在两个时间点均未降低Vero细胞的代谢活性(图1C+D),而PMAP-36、PR-39和PG-1将代谢活性显著降低至对照组的60–70%。

### 3.2. AMPs的体外抗病毒活性

进行病毒灭活实验以评估AMPs的抗病毒潜力。按照图2A详述的实验方案评估了六种不同肽中和PEDV的能力。选择LL-37是因为其对多种病毒已证实的抗病毒活性(A Ahmed等, 2019;Harcourt等, 2016;Findlay等, 2016;Matsumura等, 2016;Alagarasu等, 2017;Tripathi等, 2015)。选择CATH-B1是基于其对IAV已证实的活性(Peng等, 2020;Ye等, 2023)。此外,研究中纳入了四种猪源肽,反映了病毒的宿主特异性限制。

与无肽对照组相比,当PEDV与5和10 µM的LL-37或CATH-B1共孵育时,荧光显微镜观察到感染细胞数量减少。然而,四种猪源肽对Vero细胞感染没有明显影响(图2B)。随后,我们使用FC定量GFP阳性(感染)细胞的数量。FC分析表明,CATH-B1和LL-37有效抑制了感染,在10 µM下将GFP阳性细胞百分比从约35%显著降低至1–2%(图3A)。这些结果与荧光显微镜的定性观察结果一致(图2B)。PEDV感染性的降低也可从总荧光强度降低(直方图左移)中看出,无论是与CATH-B1(图3B)还是与LL-37(图3C)孵育后均如此。相反,对四种其他猪源AMPs对PEDV感染性影响的定量分析(图3A)显示这些AMPs对PEDV没有抗病毒效果。

**图3 通过流式细胞术(FC)测定的AMPs抗病毒活性。** A)PEDV与AMPs混合物孵育2 h后GFP阳性细胞的百分比。B和C)FC直方图分别显示CATH-B1和LL-37的GFP强度。y轴代表相对细胞数,x轴显示荧光强度(GFP)。"仅细胞"样本仅由细胞组成,不含AMPs和病毒。"无肽"样本仅含病毒。报告值为三次独立实验(每次双复孔)的平均值±SD。* p < 0.05;** p < 0.01。

当使用更高病毒量(MOI = 1)进行类似实验时(图4),LL-37的抗病毒效果仍然很强,在10 µM下导致Vero细胞病毒感染大幅降低,感染细胞从近100%降至30%(图4B),总荧光信号也降低(图4C)。荧光显微镜结果进一步支持了这些发现,如图4A所示。随着MOI增加,CATH-B1的抗病毒作用减弱,猪源AMPs同样保持无效(图4B)。

**图4 AMPs在MOI = 1时对PEDV的抑制效果。** A)在20×放大倍数下捕获荧光显微镜图像,以观察在MOI = 1下AMPs与PEDV共孵育后Vero细胞中的GFP荧光信号。B)通过FC测定PEDV与AMPs共孵育3 h后GFP阳性细胞的百分比。C)通过FC直方图展示三种不同浓度LL-37的GFP荧光强度。y轴代表相对细胞数,x轴显示荧光强度(GFP)。"仅细胞"样本仅由细胞组成,不含肽类和病毒。"无肽"样本仅含病毒。图4A中报告值为三次独立实验(每次双复孔)的平均值±SD。**** p < 0.0001。

在共孵育设置中测试了更多种类的非猪源AMPs,以确定观察到的抗病毒活性缺乏是否为猪源AMPs所特有。然而,如图5所示,所有其他测试的AMPs,包括一种全D型异构体AMP和两种非天然合成的AMP(CR-165和CR-174),在1和5 µM浓度下均未能显著阻止GFP-PEDV进入Vero细胞。同样,作为本组实验阳性对照的LL-37表现出强抗病毒活性。这些结果清楚地表明,抗PEDV活性与AMPs的物种来源无关,而是与CATH-B1和LL-37的特定特征有关。

**图5 多种AMPs对PEDV感染的抗病毒效果。** 如前所述,将Vero细胞与PEDV-GFP和AMPs的混合物孵育3 h。使用FC评估AMPs的抑制效果。"仅细胞"样本仅由细胞组成,不含肽类和病毒。"无肽"样本仅含病毒。显示值为两次独立实验(每次双复孔)的平均值±SD。*** p < 0.001。

### 3.3. AMPs在预孵育和后孵育条件下对PEDV的影响

初步实验表明,在预孵育实验中LL-37也表现出抗病毒活性,该实验中Vero细胞首先与AMPs孵育,然后通过洗涤去除未结合的肽,再用PEDV感染。优化了AMPs与Vero细胞的孵育方案,确定3 h为LL-37效果最显著的最佳时间点。随后,在此3 h预孵育设置中测试了全部AMPs(0–10 μM)的抗病毒活性。值得注意的是,LL-37在所有三个浓度下均表现出对Vero细胞病毒感染的强抑制作用,而CATH-B1仅在10 μM下表现出强活性(图6B,C)。然而,这两种效果均小于共孵育实验中观察到的效果。同样,猪源AMPs在这些浓度下均未显示感染细胞的显著减少。荧光显微镜定性证实了这些FC结果(图S2)。

最后,评估了所有六种AMPs在PEDV感染后3 h加入时的效果(图7B,C)。结果表明,在这种"后孵育设置"中,AMPs无法降低病毒感染。仅LL-37在10 μM下对阻止GFP-PEDV感染Vero细胞表现出非常温和的效果。同样,荧光显微镜结果与FC结果一致(图S3)。

为了更好地理解CATH-B1和LL-37在机制上如何阻断PEDV感染,使用Capto Core 700微球研究了AMPs与病毒颗粒的可能结合。这些多孔微球可以结合肽类,但病毒颗粒过大无法进入微球的孔道,因此不会被结合。当CATH-B1和LL-37在无微球条件下与PEDV孵育时,观察到病毒感染性降低(图8),而在将PEDV加入Vero细胞前用微球处理30 min并未显著改变病毒感染性。仅观察到感染性的轻微降低,与PEDV在4°C无微球条件下孵育时的活性下降相当。这表明微球无法捕获病毒。在引入PEDV前将CATH-B1和LL-37与微球预孵育,对病毒感染性影响极小,表明微球有效捕获了肽类。有趣的是,当CATH-B1与病毒和微球共同孵育时,其抗病毒活性保持不变。这意味着肽与病毒之间存在直接相互作用,因此Capto Core微球无法在其孔道中捕获该肽。相反,当LL-37与病毒和微球共同孵育时,其抑制作用消失,表明LL-37与病毒的结合亲和力较低,导致LL-37被Capto Core微球捕获并结合。

**图8 CATH-B1和LL-37与PEDV的相互作用。** 将CATH-B1/LL-37与病毒预孵育,随后使用Capto Core微球分离肽和病毒。然后使用含有分离病毒的上清液感染Vero细胞。"仅细胞"样本仅由细胞组成,不含肽类和病毒。"无肽"样本仅含病毒。数据以三次独立实验(每次双复孔,每复孔三份样本)的平均值±SEM表示。**** p < 0.0001。

### 3.4. LL-37和CATH-B1影响病毒形态

为研究LL-37和CATH-B1如何影响病毒结构,我们通过透射电子显微镜(TEM)对负染病毒进行成像,以确定LL-37和CATH-B1对病毒形态的直接影响。图9A–D显示未经处理的PEDV病毒颗粒,展示了病毒的形状和大小,保持连续的包膜内衬,有时在病毒颗粒上可见明显的刺突。未见大量病毒聚集体存在(图9C,D),通常病毒颗粒内部染色较深,尽管在少数未处理病毒中,病毒颗粒内部被深色染色,可能是由于病毒膜通透性增加所致(图9D)。然而,当PEDV与LL-37(10 µM)孵育时,观察到显著的膜破坏(图9E–G),在某些情况下还观察到广泛的病毒聚集(图9H)。同样,PEDV与CATH-B1(10 µM)孵育导致显著的膜损伤(图9I)、病毒变形(图9J)和广泛的病毒聚集(图9K,L)。这些发现表明,LL-37、CATH-B1与病毒颗粒之间的直接相互作用可损害病毒颗粒,从而可能影响PEDV的感染性。

**图9 AMPs对病毒形态的影响。** PEDV(MOI = 0.3)与肽类预孵育。对单独PEDV(A–D)、10 µM LL-37处理的PEDV(E–H)、10 µM CATH-B1处理的PEDV(I–L)、10 µM PMAP-23处理的PEDV(M,N)和10 µM PMAP-36处理的PEDV(O,P)进行TEM成像。图像中,黑色箭头指示大的聚集体,红色箭头显示变形的病毒,白色箭头突出显著的膜损伤。以0.5 nm像素尺寸捕获显微照片,使用ImageJ进行目视分析。显微照片为三次独立实验观察的代表性结果。比例尺代表100 nm。

PMAP-23(图9M,N)和PMAP-36(图9O,P)用作对照,以证明无活性肽类不影响PEDV形态,图像确认病毒结构保持不变。

### 3.5. LL-37在Vero细胞中的摄取

使用FL LL-37确定LL-37的定位,以提供关于LL-37如何阻止PEDV感染Vero细胞的更多见解。LL-37的荧光标记不影响肽的抗病毒活性(图S4)。如图10A所示,FC分析表明FL LL-37以浓度依赖性方式大量被Vero细胞摄取或附着于Vero细胞。阴性对照未标记LL-37未观察到荧光信号增加。

**图10 FL LL-37进入Vero细胞的细胞摄取。** A)与Vero细胞孵育3 h并洗涤后,使用FC检测FL LL-37和未标记LL-37的细胞摄取。本研究使用了两种浓度的LL-37。B)用1和5 µM FL LL-37处理细胞30 min、1 h和3 h后,洗涤细胞,进行DAPI染色,然后使用共聚焦显微镜成像。合并图像显示明场、DAPI和FL LL-37信号,细胞核呈蓝色,FL LL-37呈红色。图像在63×放大倍数下获取。"仅细胞"样本仅由细胞组成,不含肽类和病毒。"无肽"样本仅含病毒。报告值为三次独立测量(每次三复孔)的平均值±SD。** p < 0.01。

随后,使用共聚焦显微镜分析确定不同时间点和浓度下FL LL-37的细胞定位。如图10B所示,在两个浓度下孵育1和3 h后,主要观察到LL-37的胞内定位。这表明LL-37的抗病毒活性可能至少部分也通过其对宿主细胞的胞内效应介导。在4°C下使用流式细胞术评估了LL-37的内化机制,结果显示荧光标记LL-37的摄取显著降低,表明内化通过内吞途径发生(图S5)。

---

## 4. 讨论

PEDV疫情,尤其是新生仔猪的高死亡率,对全球养猪业产生了重大影响。鉴于当前疫苗的无效性以及缺乏针对PEDV变异株的抗病毒药物,发现新的治疗方法至关重要(Wang等, 2020)。AMPs因其直接的抗微生物活性和免疫调节活性,在预防和治疗严重细菌性和病毒性疾病中发挥重要作用(Lei等, 2019;van Harten等, 2018)。我们的研究探索了多种AMPs对PEDV的体外抗病毒潜力。

尽管LL-37对多种病毒的作用已被广泛研究,但其对PEDV的疗效仍未被检测(Steinstraesser等, 2005;Currie等, 2013;Sousa等, 2017;MD Howell等, 2004;Ogawa等, 2013;He等, 2018;A Ahmed等, 2019)。此外,关于其他肽类抗病毒活性的数据有限,凸显了进一步研究的必要性。在本研究中,除LL-37外,还评估了四种猪源AMPs(PMAP-36、PMAP-23、PR-39和PG-1)和一种鸡源AMP(CATH-B1)对PEDV的疗效。在测试的肽类中,CATH-B1和LL-37在体外共孵育和预孵育条件下均表现出对PEDV的强抑制作用。

考虑到许多其他天然AMPs具有相同的总体结构特征(阳离子性、螺旋性、两亲性),它们缺乏活性多少令人惊讶。值得注意的是,CRAMP尽管已有报道对多种病毒具有活性(Yu等, 2021;MD Howell等, 2004;Barlow等, 2011),也未能中和PEDV。测试的猪源AMPs缺乏抗PEDV活性可能部分促进了PEDV在猪体内的感染性,尽管显然还有许多其他因素参与这一过程。

有趣的是,基于对其他病毒活性的报道,LL-37的作用机制既可以通过与病毒颗粒的直接相互作用,也可以基于其对宿主抗病毒反应的影响(Pahar等, 2020)。LL-37破坏病毒颗粒结构的现象已在多种病毒中被记录,包括DENV-2、RSV、IAV和鼻病毒(RV)(Alagarasu等, 2017;Currie等, 2013;Sousa等, 2017;Tripathi等, 2013)。在本研究中也观察到类似的直接效应,TEM清晰显示LL-37影响病毒结构并使病毒颗粒聚集。

关于更具免疫调节性的抗病毒活性,LL-37可以进入Vero细胞,这可能影响宿主抗病毒反应和病毒复制,如我们在预孵育感染实验中所展示的(图6)。多项研究表明,LL-37可通过与多种受体结合进入内吞途径(Zhang等, 2020;Deshpande等, 2020;Bandholtz等, 2006)。例如,在A549上皮细胞中,FPRL-1和第二个未鉴定的高亲和力受体参与了摄取(Lau等, 2005),而在单核细胞和巨噬细胞中,P2XR7和CXCR2被鉴定为参与LL-37摄取的受体(Zhang等, 2020;Tang等, 2015)。在我们的研究中,LL-37的摄取也是能量依赖性的,因为在4°C下将Vero细胞与LL-37孵育可抑制摄取,表明需要内吞作用。

已有研究描述LL-37通过激活宿主模式识别受体调节免疫反应,从而调节细胞因子和趋化因子反应。这种调节增强IFN-β表达,从而增强对肠道病毒71型(EV71)和HSV-1感染的抗病毒活性(Yu等, 2021;Sato等, 2018)。IFN-β通过激活IRF3等关键蛋白启动抗病毒反应(Yu等, 2021;Levy等, 2001)。然而,由于Vero细胞是干扰素缺陷型细胞,不产生I型干扰素,因此在我们实验设置中观察到的感染性降低不能归因于IFN-β的产生(Prescott等, 2010;Emeny和Morgan, 1979)。类似地,Vero细胞中不依赖IFN-β的抗病毒活性也被描述用于LL-37对RSV(Currie等, 2013)和EV-71(Yu等, 2021)的活性,尽管这些研究同样无法阐明哪种免疫调节机制是重要的。

其他可能性包括LL-37干扰病毒复制而非进入,如HIV-1中所述,LL-37特异性抑制HIV-1逆转录酶(Bergman等, 2007;Wong等, 2011)。此外,LL-37可调节(胞内)Toll样受体信号传导(Lande等, 2007;Lai等, 2011;Singh等, 2013),从而影响病毒复制和总体对病毒的免疫反应。这最近在有或没有聚肌胞苷酸(poly(I:C))和LL-37存在的情况下,对西尼罗病毒(WNV)感染角质形成细胞的研究中被描述,两种刺激均导致更强的抗病毒反应。最后,最近的一项研究表明,LL-37直接与血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE-2)结合域结合,阻断SARS-CoV-2与该受体的结合和进入宿主细胞(Wang等, 2021;Lokhande等, 2022;Li等, 2021)。

总体而言,(胞内)LL-37的多种已描述的免疫调节效应可影响病毒感染的结果,但确切机制可能因每种病毒甚至每种被感染的细胞类型而异。因此,使用Vero细胞也可能带来本研究的局限性,因为不能排除(猪源)AMPs在猪组织或细胞中的免疫调节抗病毒效应。

本研究中分析的第二种具有抗PEDV活性的AMP是CATH-B1,这是一种主要存在于鸡法氏囊中的鸡cathelicidin,在增强宿主对多种微生物感染的免疫防御中发挥作用(Goitsuka等, 2007)。先前的研究强调其通过直接和间接机制抑制病毒的能力,类似于LL-37,但使用该肽进行的抗病毒研究数量有限。已观察到CATH-B1与IAV颗粒结合,从而阻断病毒进入和感染(Peng等, 2020)。同样,体外研究表明,CATH-B1可直接破坏伪狂犬病病毒(PRV)病毒颗粒的结构完整性,从而阻止病毒与宿主细胞结合和进入。此外,CATH-B1预处理被证明可增强对PRV的抗病毒免疫反应,导致IFN-β表达增加(Ye等, 2023)。

本研究表明,CATH-B1可能通过与病毒颗粒的直接相互作用发挥其抗PEDV效应。值得注意的是,我们的TEM结果表明,CATH-B1不仅像对IAV那样使病毒聚集,而且还破坏病毒结构的完整性,导致病毒形态变形。CATH-B1的活性在预孵育设置中丧失,表明至少在测试条件下,CATH-B1对PEDV的免疫调节作用不太可能。

虽然基于肽类的药物显示出潜力,并且正在进行广泛的临床试验,其中一些已获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准,但在实际应用中仍存在挑战。这些挑战包括毒性、半衰期短以及生产成本高,尤其是对于较长的肽类(Agarwal和Gabrani, 2021)。因此,在药物开发方面,使用全长CATH-B1或LL-37作为猪的抗PEDV化合物可能不是最优选择。然而,如果它们能证明对病原体的有效性和对哺乳动物细胞的无毒性,这两个关键因素将使它们成为可行的选择。

然而,确定LL-37和CATH-B1赋予抗PEDV活性的结构特征,并生产更短或更(蛋白水解)稳定的肽类将是有益的。多项研究表明,缩短的LL-37片段可保留活性,而小的氨基酸突变甚至可增强活性(Ren等, 2013;K Chen等, 2021;Chingaté等, 2015;Aghazadeh等, 2019;Biswas等, 2021)。利用我们开发的基于流式细胞术的抗病毒活性检测方法,可以轻松完成基于LL-37的肽类筛选,这将是药物开发领域合乎逻辑的下一步。

总之,我们的研究结果表明,PEDV可能对常规猪源AMPs具有抗性,这可能部分解释了其高致病性。重要的是,在测试的肽类中,只有CATH-B1和LL-37在体外有效抑制了PEDV,提示与病毒颗粒的直接相互作用。然而,其抗病毒活性的确切机制仍不清楚,值得进一步研究。这一发现不仅增强了我们对cathelicidins体内生物学功能的理解,还强调了基于这类抗菌剂开发新型抗病毒疗法的潜力。

---

## CRediT作者贡献声明

**Fatemeh Pashaie:** 撰写初稿、方法论、调查、数据整理。 **Tabitha E. Hoornweg:** 调查、数据整理。 **Floris J. Bikker:** 审阅与编辑、监督、方法论。 **Tineke Veenendaal:** 数据整理、方法论。 **Femke Broere:** 审阅与编辑、监督、资金获取、概念化。 **Edwin J.A. Veldhuizen:** 审阅与编辑、监督、数据整理、概念化。

---

## 利益冲突声明

作者声明无利益冲突。

---

## 致谢

本研究部分由Perstorp Waspik B.V.资助。作者感谢Sergio González Acosta(IPNA-CSIC,西班牙)提供鹦鹉源AMPs,以及Nalan Liv(荷兰乌得勒支大学医学中心分子医学中心)在透射电子显微镜研究方面的帮助。我们还感谢Richard Wubbolts和Esther van 't Veld(荷兰乌得勒支大学细胞成像中心)在共聚焦显微镜方面的帮助,以及乌得勒支大学兽医学院流式细胞术和细胞分选设施的支持。

---

## 脚注

与本文相关的补充材料可在在线版本中找到,doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2024.199496。

**附录。补充材料**

**数据可用性** 数据可根据要求提供。