Characteristics of the MicroRNA Expression Profile of Exosomes Released by Vero Cells Infected with Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus

✅ 全文

猪流行性腹泻病毒感染的Vero细胞释放外泌体的microRNA表达谱特征

作者 Lei Yin; Xuehuai Shen; Dongdong Yin; Jieru Wang; Ruihong Zhao; Yin Dai; Xiaocheng Pan 期刊 Viruses 发表日期 2022 卷/期/页码 Vol. 14(4) ISSN 1999-4915 DOI 10.3390/v14040806 类型 原创研究 (Original Research)

📄 中文摘要 Chinese Abstract

中文
猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)是一种高度传染性冠状病毒,可导致仔猪严重肠道疾病,在新生仔猪中死亡率高达90%。尽管该病毒对养猪业具有重大经济影响,但PEDV感染的分子机制——特别是涉及外泌体微小RNA(miRNA)的宿主-病原体相互作用——仍知之甚少。外泌体是纳米级细胞外囊泡,通过转移miRNA等生物活性分子介导细胞间通讯,可调节免疫应答和病毒复制。本研究探讨了PEDV感染如何改变Vero细胞释放的外泌体中miRNA的表达谱,旨在揭示外泌体miRNA在PEDV发病机制中的潜在作用。

📋 英文结构化总结 English Structured Summary

全文整理

EN

Background:

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is a highly contagious coronavirus that causes severe intestinal disease in piglets, with mortality rates up to 90% in neonates. Despite its significant economic impact on the pig industry, the molecular mechanisms underlying PEDV infection—particularly host–pathogen interactions involving exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs)—remain poorly understood. Exosomes are nanoscale extracellular vesicles that mediate intercellular communication by transferring bioactive molecules such as miRNAs, which can regulate immune responses and viral replication. This study investigates how PEDV infection alters the miRNA expression profile of exosomes released by Vero cells, aiming to uncover potential roles of exosomal miRNAs in PEDV pathogenesis.

Methods:

Exosomes were isolated from the culture supernatants of PEDV-infected and uninfected Vero cells using differential ultracentrifugation. Their morphology and size were characterized via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). Small RNA libraries were constructed from both groups and subjected to high-throughput sequencing. Differentially expressed miRNAs (DEmiRNAs) were identified using bioinformatics tools (TargetScan, miRanda, RNAhybrid), with thresholds of |log2(fold change)| > 1 and p < 0.05. Functional enrichment of target genes was analyzed using Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway databases. Selected miRNAs were validated by qRT-PCR using the 2^−ΔΔCt method with U6 snRNA as an internal control.

Results:

TEM confirmed that exosomes were spherical, uniformly sized (30–200 nm), and negatively stained. NTA revealed an average particle diameter of 130.5 nm. Sequencing identified 115 differentially expressed miRNAs in PEDV-infected exosomes compared to controls: 80 significantly upregulated and 35 downregulated. Among these, 70 were known miRNAs (51 up, 19 down) and 45 were novel miRNAs (29 up, 16 down). Most miRNAs were 22 nucleotides long, with a strong bias for uracil at the 5′ end. qRT-PCR validation confirmed expression trends for 13 selected miRNAs, including downregulation of mml-miR-148a-5p and upregulation of mml-miR-150-5p and pha-miR-145.

Data Summary:

A total of 30.6–27.6 million raw reads were obtained from infected samples and 27.1–21.2 million from uninfected controls. After filtering, clean reads ranged from 24.3 to 20.9 million (infected) and 20.9 to 16.4 million (uninfected). Known miRNA reads totaled ~3.6 million (infected) and ~3.0 million (uninfected). The analysis identified 115 DEmiRNAs (80 up, 35 down) meeting statistical significance (p < 0.05, |log2FC| > 1). Target gene prediction yielded 5,282 potential mRNA targets. KEGG pathway analysis highlighted enrichment in key signaling pathways including MAPK, Hippo, TGF-beta, HIF-1, FoxO, cAMP, and Ras.

Conclusions:

This study provides the first comprehensive profile of exosomal miRNAs altered during PEDV infection in Vero cells. The dysregulated miRNAs are implicated in critical cellular pathways involved in antiviral defense, apoptosis, and immune regulation. These findings suggest that PEDV modulates host exosomal miRNA cargo, potentially facilitating viral immune evasion or replication. The identified miRNAs may serve as candidates for understanding PEDV–host interactions and developing novel antiviral strategies.

Practical Significance:

Understanding how PEDV manipulates exosomal miRNA expression offers new insights into viral pathogenesis and host response mechanisms. These findings could inform the development of miRNA-based diagnostics or therapeutics for controlling porcine epidemic diarrhea, ultimately reducing economic losses in swine farming. Additionally, the identified signaling pathways (e.g., MAPK, Hippo) may represent targets for antiviral drug design.

📋 中文结构化总结 Chinese Structured Summary

中文

背景:

猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)是一种高度传染性冠状病毒,可导致仔猪严重肠道疾病,在新生仔猪中死亡率高达90%。尽管该病毒对养猪业具有重大经济影响,但PEDV感染的分子机制——特别是涉及外泌体微小RNA(miRNA)的宿主-病原体相互作用——仍知之甚少。外泌体是纳米级细胞外囊泡,通过转移miRNA等生物活性分子介导细胞间通讯,可调节免疫应答和病毒复制。本研究探讨了PEDV感染如何改变Vero细胞释放的外泌体中miRNA的表达谱,旨在揭示外泌体miRNA在PEDV发病机制中的潜在作用。

方法:

采用差速超速离心法从PEDV感染和未感染的Vero细胞培养上清中分离外泌体。通过透射电子显微镜(TEM)和纳米颗粒追踪分析(NTA)对其形态和大小进行表征。从两组样本中构建小RNA文库并进行高通量测序。使用生物信息学工具(TargetScan、miRanda、RNAhybrid)鉴定差异表达miRNA(DEmiRNA),阈值为|log2(倍数变化)| > 1且p < 0.05。利用基因本体(GO)和KEGG通路数据库对靶基因进行功能富集分析。使用2^−ΔΔCt方法,以U6 snRNA为内参,通过qRT-PCR对选定的miRNA进行验证。

结果:

TEM证实外泌体呈球形、大小均一(30–200 nm),负染效果良好。NTA显示平均颗粒直径为130.5 nm。测序鉴定出PEDV感染外泌体中115个差异表达miRNA:80个显著上调,35个下调。其中,70个为已知miRNA(51个上调,19个下调),45个为新型miRNA(29个上调,16个下调)。大多数miRNA长度为22个核苷酸,5'端具有强烈的尿嘧啶偏好性。qRT-PCR验证确认了13个选定miRNA的表达趋势,包括mml-miR-148a-5p的下调以及mml-miR-150-5p和pha-miR-145的上调。

数据摘要:

感染样本共获得3060万至2760万条原始读段,未感染对照组获得2710万至2120万条。过滤后,感染组清洁读段范围为2430万至2090万条,未感染组为2090万至1640万条。已知miRNA读段总数感染组约360万条,未感染组约300万条。分析鉴定出115个符合统计学显著性(p < 0.05,|log2FC| > 1)的DEmiRNA(80个上调,35个下调)。靶基因预测共获得5282个潜在mRNA靶标。KEGG通路分析显示在关键信号通路中显著富集,包括MAPK、Hippo、TGF-beta、HIF-1、FoxO、cAMP和Ras通路。

结论:

本研究首次提供了Vero细胞PEDV感染期间外泌体miRNA改变的综合表达谱。失调的miRNA参与抗病毒防御、细胞凋亡和免疫调节等关键细胞通路。这些发现表明PEDV可调控宿主外泌体miRNA货物,可能促进病毒免疫逃逸或复制。所鉴定的miRNA可作为理解PEDV-宿主相互作用和开发新型抗病毒策略的候选分子。

实际意义:

了解PEDV如何调控外泌体miRNA表达为病毒发病机制和宿主应答机制提供了新见解。这些发现可为开发基于miRNA的诊断方法或治疗策略以控制猪流行性腹泻提供依据,最终减少养猪业的经济损失。此外,所鉴定的信号通路(如MAPK、Hippo)可能成为抗病毒药物设计的靶点。

📖 英文全文 English Full Text

EN

1559 viruses Viruses Viruses Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) PMC9025164 9025164 9025164 35458536 10.3390/v14040806 Characteristics of the MicroRNA Expression Profile of Exosomes Released by Vero Cells Infected with Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Yin Lei 1 2 † Shen Xuehuai 1 2 † Yin Dongdong 1 2 Wang Jieru 1 2 Zhao Ruihong 1 2 Dai Yin 1 2 Pan Xiaocheng 1 2 * Li Bin Academic Editor Li Wenliang Academic Editor 1 Livestock and Poultry Epidemic Diseases Research Center of Anhui Province, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230031, China; yinlei1989@yeah.net (L.Y.); xuehuaishen1986@163.com (X.S.); yindd160@163.com (D.Y.); wangjr0317@163.com (J.W.); zrhkdy@aliyun.com (R.Z.); daiyin2020@163.com (Y.D.) 2 Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Product Safety Engineering, Hefei 230031, China * Correspondence: pxcpyq@sina.com † These authors contributed equally to this work. 13 4 2022 14 4 806 806 23 4 2022 © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). Abstract Exosomes are nanoscale vesicles actively secreted by a variety of cells. They contain regulated microRNA (miRNA), allowing them to function in intercellular communication. In the present study, the role of exosomal miRNAs in porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) infection was investigated using exosomes isolated from Vero cells infected with PEDV. The results of transmission electron microscopy observation showed that the exosomes are spherical in shape, uniform in size, and negatively stained in the membrane. Nanoparticle tracking analysis showed that the average exosome particle size is 130.5 nm. The results of miRNA sequencing showed that, compared with the control group, a total of 115 miRNAs are abnormally expressed in the exosomes of infected cells. Of these, 80 miRNAs are significantly upregulated and 35 miRNAs are significantly downregulated. Functional annotation analysis showed that the differentially expressed miRNAs are associated with PEDV infection through interaction with the cAMP, Hippo, TGF-beta, HIF-1, FoxO, MAPK, and Ras signaling pathways. Thus, our findings provide important information about the effects of PEDV infection on exosomal miRNA expression and will aid the search for potential anti-PEDV drug candidates. Keywords: porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, exosome, microRNAs, host–pathogen interactions status released display-pdf yes is-olf no is-manuscript no is-preprint no is-journal-matter no is-scanned no is-retracted no Received 2022 Mar 24; Accepted 2022 Apr 11; Collection date 2022 Apr. 1. Introduction A severe intestinal disease caused by porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), porcine epidemic diarrhea, is highly contagious. The pig industry has suffered enormous losses since it reappeared in 2010 [ 1 ]. PEDV is a single-stranded, envelope positive RNA virus of the coronavirus family ( Coronaviridae ). Infection with PEDV in suckling piglets can lead to severe enteritis, vomiting, and watery diarrhea, and its mortality rate for piglets under 1 week old is as high as 90% [ 2 , 3 ]. However, despite its severity, the biological mechanisms of PEDV infection, especially the interactions between host and pathogen, are largely unknown. Therefore, there is an urgent need to understand the pathogenesis of PEDV and thus provide information vital for the development of suitable antiviral drugs. Exosomes are a kind of microvesicle structure with diameters of 30–100 nm. They can be secreted by almost all types of cells and tissues [ 4 , 5 ]. Exocrine vesicles can carry a variety of proteins, functional RNAs, and lipids as well as other bioactive substances and can transfer these bioactive substances from origin cells to target cells, thus affecting the regulation of biochemical components and signaling pathways in the target cells [ 6 , 7 ]. Accordingly, exosome research is receiving widespread attention in the field of virus infection. It has been found that the exosomes secreted by host cells after virus infection carry active virus or host-cell components and can regulate the immune response of target cells or cause target cell infection [ 8 , 9 ]. For example, the exosomes of the hepatitis A virus are endowed with an unenveloped virus membrane, allowing the virus to escape immune recognition by the host [ 10 ]. Furthermore, exosomes from non-parenchymal liver cells can transfer the antiviral activity induced by interferons to hepatocytes replicated by the hepatitis B virus [ 11 ]. Thus, exosomes are involved in the life cycles of many viruses. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, noncoding regulatory RNA molecules with lengths of ~22 nucleotides; they are the most abundant RNA in exosomes [ 12 , 13 ]. In interactions between a host and a virus, exosomes can specifically select miRNAs in packaging cells to directly target virus genomic RNA and inhibit virus replication, thus playing an important regulatory role [ 14 , 15 ]. For example, exosomes isolated from HeLa cells infected with Newcastle disease virus promote its spread by carrying miRNA into adjacent cells [ 16 ]. Furthermore, exosomes released by prion-infected nerve cells show significantly increased levels of miR-128a, miR-21, miR-222, miR-29b, miR-342-3p, and miR-424 compared to those of uninfected exosomes [ 17 ]; in exosomes infected with HIV, the expressions of miR-29a, miR-150, miR-518, and miR-875 are upregulated 16- to 44-fold [ 18 ]. These differentially expressed miRNAs have been shown to be involved in virus replication and reproduction [ 19 , 20 ]. However, the role of exocrine miRNAs in the pathogenesis of PEDV infection is not clear. In this study, the exosomes released by Vero cells infected with PEDV were identified and the differential expression of miRNAs therein was investigated. This work lays a foundation for further study of the role of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of PEDV. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Cells and Virus A culture of Vero cells (CVCCCL28, purchased from the China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control (Beijing, China)) was performed in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. The Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences provided the classical PEDV CV777 strain (GenBank: KT323979.1 ) for this study. 2.2. Exosome Isolation Vero cells were infected with PEDV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 and cultured for 24 h. Exosomes were isolated and purified from a PEDV-infected Vero cell culture supernatant 24 h post infection according to the following protocol: Exosomes were isolated from the supernatants of the cells by differential centrifugation according to Thery et al. [ 21 ]. Briefly, in the first step, the supernatant of the culture medium was transferred to a centrifuge tube and the large vesicles were removed by centrifugation at 4 °C for 45 min. In the second step, the supernatant was filtered through a 10,000-μm membrane; the filtrate was transferred to a new centrifuge tube and subjected to centrifugation at 100,000× g and 4 °C for 70 min. Then, the supernatant was re-suspended in 10 mL of precooled 1× PBS. Finally, the supernatant was removed by ultracentrifugation at 100,000× g for 70 min at 4 °C, resuspended in 150 μL of precooled 1× PBS, and stored at −80 °C. 2.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) In order to observe the morphology of exosomes, a 0.2% paraformaldehyde suspension was mixed with an exosome suspension, which was then applied to a formvar-coated copper grid. Staining with uranyl acetate 1% in aqueous water for 2 min was followed by filtering the liquid off and examining the sample under an electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). 2.4. Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) The concentration and size distribution profile of the exosomes were measured using a NanoSight NS300 system (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK) and the data were analyzed with NTA 3.1 Dev Build 3.1.54 software. We resuspended exosome preparations in sterile PBS and then vortex emulsified them. 2.5. MiRNA Microarray Assay and Bioinformatics Analysis of Target Genes The Oe Biotech Corporation performed an miRNA profiling study of the exosomes of PEDV-infected Vero cells (Shanghai, China, http://www.oebiotech.com , accessed on 26 January 2022) [ 22 ].Briefly, in order to normalize the raw data, Genespring software was used to isolate miRNAs that were differentially expressed after RNA was extracted and labeled with an Agilent-070154 Rat miRNA Microarray V21.0 8 × 15K (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) [ 23 , 24 ]. DEmiRNAs targeting up- and downregulated genes were chosen using two intersections of two databases (Targetscan and microRNAorg) that showed a fold change of ≥1.5 and a p ≤ 0.05 [ 25 ]. Gene ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) were used to analyze functional and pathway enrichment in putative genes. A p ≤ 0.05 was defined as the threshold of significance for GO and KEGG analyses, respectively [ 26 ]. 2.6. Analysis of the miRNAs by qRT-PCR The expression levels of miRNAs were identified by sequencing and qRT-PCR assay. MiRcute miRNA qPCR SYBR Green Detection Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) was utilized with an ABI Step One thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) for qRT-PCR. The miRNA-specific forward primers used in this study are shown in Table 1 . The U6 snRNA was used as an internal standard. Three independent biological replicates were used for each gene. The relative expression level of each miRNA was calculated by the 2 −ΔΔct method [ 27 ]. Table 1 Primers used to confirm miRNA expression with qRT-PCR. MiRNA Name MiRNA Sequence (5′-3′) RT Primer Sequence (5′-3′) Forward PCR Primer Sequence (5′-3′) mne-miR-133a TTGGTCCCCTTCAACCAGCTGT GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACACAGCT CTCATTGGTCCCCTTCAACC novel65_mature GGTGGGGTCGGCGGGGGG GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACCCCCCC TCATTATAGGTGGGGTCGGC mml-miR-503-5p TAGCAGCGGGAACAGTTCTGCAG GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACCTGCAG ACTTAGCAGCGGGAACAGTT novel307_mature CGGCGGCGACGGTGGCGG GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACCCGCCA TATATTTACGGCGGCGACGG novel376_mature CAGGGGTGGAGCCTGCGGA GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACTCCGCA ATTACTTCAGGGGTGGAGCC mml-miR-204-3p GGCTGGGAAGGCAAAGGGACGT GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACACGTCCC AGTTAGGCTGGGAAGGCAAA pha-miR-769 TGAGACCTCTGGGTTCTGAGCT GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACAGCTCA TCAGTTGAGACCTCTGGGTTC mml-miR-148a-5p AAAGTTCTGAGACACTCCGACT GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACAGTCGG TGGCGAAAGTTCTGAGACACT mml-miR-135a-1-3p ATATAGGGATTGGAGCCGTGGC GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACGCCACGG CGCTCGATATAGGGATTGGAG mml-miR-150-5p TCTCCCAACCCTTGTACCAGTG GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACCACTGG TGCTGTCTCCCAACCCTTGT mml-miR-199a-3p ACAGTAGTCTGCACATTGGTTA GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACTAACCAA TCTCGCACAGTAGTCTGCACA pha-miR-145 GTCCAGTTTTCCCAGGAATCCCT GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACAGGGATT ACGTGTCCAGTTTTCCCAGG mml-miR-27a-5p AGGGCTTAGCTGCTTGTGAGCA GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACTGCTCAC GTGACAGGGCTTAGCTGCTT MicroRNA U6

AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA 2.7. Statistical Analysis All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 21.0 statistical software. Data are presented as means ± SD. In this study, we compared groups using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a post hoc comparison using the least significant difference (LSD). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. 3. Results 3.1. Characterization of Exosomes In order to analyze the exosomes, we used TEM and NTA. The TEM revealed round vesicle structures ranging in size from 30 to 200 nm ( Figure 1 A). According to NTA measurements, the size distribution peak was found at a 130.5-nm diameter ( Figure 1 B), which is consistent with the previously reported characteristics of exosomes. All these data indicate the successful isolation of exosomes. Figure 1 Characterization of Vero cell-derived exosomes. Exosomes were isolated and purified from PEDV-uninfected and -infected Vero cell culture. ( A ) Morphology of exosomes observed by TEM. Scale bars, 100 nm and 200 nm. ( B ) Particle size and quantification analysis of exosomes by NTA. 3.2. Analysis of Small RNA Sequencing Library Data Six microRNA libraries were constructed from PEDV-infected and control Vero cells and sequenced to reveal the effects of PEDV infection on exosomal miRNAs. A total of 30,572,744, 26,165,923, and 27,571,400 raw reads were obtained from infected (Infections 1,2, and 3) cells, shown in Table 2 , while 27,070,230, 21,158,763, and 26,987,232 were obtained from uninfected (Controls 1,2, and 3) cells. After removing low-quality tags, adapter sequences, and short reads smaller than 15 nt, 24,269,195, 21,385,578, and 22,875,953 (infected) and 20,920,004, 16,414,523, and 20,535,191 (uninfected) clean reads were identified. Further, the data were divided into the following categories: miRNA, rRNA, snRNA, tRNA, Cis-region, repeat, other Rfam-RNA, and unannotated ( Table 2 ). The length distribution of the miRNA is presented in Figure 2 . From all the libraries, most miRNAs had a length of 22 nt. Table 2 Distribution of sRNAs in PEDV-infected and uninfected samples. Category Infected Uninfected Raw reads 30,572,744/26,165,923/27,571,400 27,070,230/21,158,763/26,987,232 Clean reads 24,269,195/21,385,578/22,875,953 20,920,004/16,414,523/20,535,191 miRNAs’ reads 1,673,115/1,253,338/675,418(Total) 2074/2003/1752(unique) 1,047,301/788,983/1,212,878(Total) 1386/1208/1352(unique) known miRNAs 441/415/396 352/326/346 novel miRNAs 310/306/290 210/181/208 rRNA reads 189,890/164,385/185,472 115,653/98,041/103,065 tRNA reads 29,156/30,890/14,333 13,765/6017/8148 snRNA reads 27,653/31,092/33,635 36,342/26,198/34,540 Cis-region reads 55,409/67,613/84,276 86,221/61,990/85,314 other_Rfam_RNA 73,478/74,761/99,704 76,065/61,225/70,461 unannotated 9,493,236/8,307,505/8,358,603 9,414,281/7,302,434/9,459,270 Figure 2 Clean read length distribution on each sequence. The x-axis represents the read length. The y-axis represents the percentage of each read length. 3.3. Identification of Known MiRNAs in Exosomes Identification of known miRNAs that are altered when Vero cells are infected with PEDV, an miRNA count, and a base bias at the first position were obtained by mapping the small RNA sequences to the mature miRNAs and their precursors in the miRBase 20 database. An estimated 2074, 2003, and 1752 unique sequences (1,673,115, 1,253,338, and 675,418 reads) were annotated as miRNA candidates in the infected library and 1386, 1208, and 1352 unique sequences (1,047,301, 788,983, and 1,212,878 reads) in the uninfected library ( Table 2 ). PEDV-infected Vero cells were found to contain 441, 415, and 396 known miRNA genes while control-uninfected Vero cells contained 352, 326, and 346 known miRNA genes. A heat map of the miRNA expression patterns in the two groups can be seen in Figure 3 A. The two groups were cut off at a p < 0.05 and |log2 (PEDV-infected/control-uninfected in expression)|>1. There were 70 known DEmiRNAs in the two groups, out of which 51 were upregulated and 19 were downregulated. Additionally, 22 nt appeared to be the dominant length for miRNAs, and the first nucleotide bias in the identified miRNAs clearly favored ′U′ at the 5′-end ( Figure 3 B). Figure 3 Differential expression levels of known miRNAs. ( A ) Hierarchical clustering analysis of known miRNAs in the PEDV-infected and control groups using the R program. Euclidean methods and complete linkage were used for this analysis. ( B ) Infected and uninfected cells have different sizes and base biases of miRNA at the first position. MiRNA lengths are given on the x-axis between 15and 26 nucleotides. MiRNA base bias is represented as a percentage at the first position of the y-axis. 3.4. Identification of Novel MiRNAs in Exosomes The PEDV-infected and uninfected groups contained 9,493,236, 8,307,505, and 8,358,603 and 9,414,281, 7,302,434, and 9,459,270 unannotated sRNAs, respectively; based on these sRNAs, new candidates for miRNAs were predicted. According to Table 2 , miReap software predicted 310, 306, and 290 and 210, 181, and 208 novel miRNAs in the PEDV-infected and uninfected Vero cell libraries, respectively. As a result of the differential expression analysis, 45 novel miRNAs were identified in the two groups using the cut-off values reported previously, where 29 miRNAs were upregulated and 16 were downregulated ( p < 0.05). The heat map in Figure 4 illustrates the differences in miRNA expression between the two groups. Figure 4 Using the R program, hierarchical clustering was used to determine novel miRNAs among PEDV-infected and control groups. Euclidean methods and complete linkage were used for this analysis. Upregulated and downregulated miRNAs are marked in red and green, respectively. 3.5. Target Gene Prediction and Pathway Enrichment Analysis of DEmiRNAs We compared the potential mRNA targets of two independent miRNA prediction algorithms, miRanda and RNAhybrid, to determine their biological functions. A total of 5282 genes for the 115 miRNAs was predicted as potential miRNA targets. GO analysis of the predicted target genes revealed that they are involved in the biological process, cellular component, and molecular function ( Figure 5 ). KEGG orthology-based annotation system (KOBAS) analysis was carried out to analyze miRNA roles in regulatory networks. It was found that many of the abundant KEGG terms relate to biological processes including adherens junction (ko04520), focal adhesion (ko04510), endocytosis (ko04144), the MAPK signaling pathway (ko04010), the Hippo signaling pathway (ko04390), the mRNA surveillance pathway (ko03015), the TGF-beta signaling pathway (ko04350), ECM–receptor interaction (ko04512), the HIF-1 signaling pathway (ko04066), and the FoxO signaling pathway (ko04068) ( Figure 6 ). Figure 5 GO analysis of the target genes of the dysregulated miRNAs. Figure 6 Top 20 KEGG pathways of the target genes of the differentially expressed miRNAs. 3.6. Validation of MiRNAs by qRT-PCR An analysis of miRNAs differentially expressed was conducted using qRT-PCR assays based on the sequencing data. Three novel candidate miRNAs were selected for validation along with 10 known miRNAs. Compared with the sequencing data, the expression profiles were consistent. The downregulation of five miRNAs (mml-miR-503-5p, mml-miR-204-3p, pha-miR-769, mml-miR-148a-5p, and mml-miR-135a-1-3p) and the upregulation of eight miRNAs (mne-miR-133a, novel65_mature, novel307_mature, novel376_mature, mml-miR-150-5p, mml-miR-199a-3p, pha-miR-145,and mml-miR-27a-5p) in infected Vero cells compared with those in uninfected cells were confirmed ( Figure 7 ). Figure 7 Validation of exosomal miRNAs’ expression by qRT-PCR. 4. Discussion PEDV is a coronavirus that causes acute and highly contagious intestinal infectious diseases in piglets [ 28 ]. PEDV infection leads to dynamic changes of miRNA expression in the host cells and forms a complex interaction network with the virus [ 29 , 30 ]. In recent years, the use of high-throughput sequencing techniques to reveal the integration of miRNAs and mRNAs in viral infection has proven to be helpful in elucidating the regulatory mechanism of miRNA. However, it is not clear whether the miRNAs in exosomes affect PEDV replication by regulating host immune response and targeting viruses. Accordingly, we collected and observed the exosomes from PEDV-infected Vero cells. It is well known that Vero cells are the best host cells for PEDV isolation, passage, and experimental research in vitro [ 31 ]. Therefore, this study used Vero cells as the research object to explore the miRNA profiles of exosomes and how they are affected by PEDV infection. Studying miRNAs in Vero cell exosomes after PEDV virus infection is an essential step to gaining insight into the role of miRNAs in intracellular communication and induction of antiviral responses. We obtained and successfully identified 70 known miRNAs and 45 novel miRNAs that are differentially expressed in PEDV-infected exosomes. These miRNAs may be involved in the interaction of Vero cells with PEDV. In the present study, most of the clean reading fragments in PEDV-infected and uninfected cells were 21 to 24 nt in length, with 22-nt RNA being the most abundant. These results are consistent with the typical size of miRNAs in Diller-derived products [ 32 ], indicating a high enrichment of miRNA sequences in the library. An increasing number of studies have shown that exosomal miRNAs of host cells, through positive or negative regulation of host immunity, play a key role in virus transmission and immune evasion. In the present study, we found that the expression levels of mml-miR-148a-5p, mml-miR-423-5p, and mml-miR-135a-1-3p are significantly downregulated during PEDV infection while mml-miR-143-3p, mml-miR-150-5p, mml-miR-15b-5p, mml-miR-199a, pha-miR-145, mml-miR-23a, and mml-miR-27a expression levels are significantly upregulated during PEDV infection. It has been reported that DEF-cell-derived exosomal miR-148a-5p promotes duck Tembusu virus replication by negatively regulating TLR3 expression [ 33 ]. Furthermore, miR-143-3p, miR-150-5p, and miR-15b-5p show high expression levels in serum exosomes infected with Influenza A and B viruses [ 34 ], and in exosomes infected with Hepatitis C virus (HCV), the high expression of miR-199a and miR-145 promotes HCV RNA replication [ 35 ]. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected macrophages secrete exosomes with high expression levels of miR-23a and miR-27a that disrupt the integrity of lung epithelial cells and mitochondrial biological functions [ 36 ]. In the exosomes secreted by the human diploid cell line Medical Research Council-5 (MRC-5), rabies virus infection upregulates microRNA (miR)-423-5p expression by abrogating the inhibition of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) on type I interferon (IFN) signaling, resulting in feedback inhibition of RABV replication [ 37 ]. Furthermore, miR-135a family expression is downregulated to activate the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/p53 pathway, thereby contributing to apoptosis [ 38 ]. Recently, Han Zhao and colleagues identified that, after infecting Vero-E6 cells, PEDV downregulates expression of miRNA-328-3p and the resulting reduced inhibition of the target tight junction protein 3 (TJP-3/ZO-3) helps to enhance PEDV infection [ 39 ]. However, our results showed that transcript expression of miRNA-328-3p had no significant differential changes in exosomes released from PDEV-infected Vero cells. It was reported that miRNA expression is cell and specie specific, and the miRNAs are differentially expressed in exosomes released by different types of cells and cells in different physiological states, which also have varying effects on viral replication and its pathogenesis [ 40 ]. Therefore, our results suggest that these differentially expressed miRNAs may be involved in host–virus interactions in PEDV-infected Vero cells. However, it is not fully clear whether the miRNAs reported in this study are necessarily beneficial to understanding the participation of miRNA in exosomes from pigs. Therefore, further work is required. The target genes of 115 miRNAs were predicted and the miRNAs were screened by qRT-PCR analysis. Based on the sRNA sequencing results, 13 miRNA expression profiles were consistent. In general, an miRNA has hundreds of predicted target genes, and a single target gene can be regulated by multiple miRNAs. In the present study, all the predicted mRNA transcripts were classified and annotated using GO and KEGG databases. GO analysis showed that the mRNA targets negatively associated with miRNAs are involved in biological regulation, immune system processes, responses to stimuli, and other cellular processes. Signaling pathway analyses conducted by KEGG revealed that the target genes are primarily involved in important cellular signaling pathways, including the cAMP signaling pathway, Hippo signaling pathway, TGF-beta signaling pathway, and the HIF-1 signaling pathway, indicating their important functions in the defense against PEDV infection. It was found that a host’s antiviral response depends on the control of various signaling pathways and that viruses evade cytosolic sensing by disrupting signaling pathways. For example, phosphodiesterase-induced cAMP degradation restricts hepatitis B virus infection [ 41 ]. The Hippo signaling pathway plays a key role in regulating viral replication [ 42 ]. The viral liver disease is accelerated by the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) by regulating viral progression and mediating inflammation-related responses [ 43 ]. Hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) is activated in host cells during viral infection and plays an important role at the site of inflammation by inducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by immune cells [ 44 ]. Japanese encephalitis virus induces apoptosis by inhibiting the FoxO signaling pathway [ 45 ]. SV40 polyomavirus activates the Ras-MAPK signaling pathway for vacuolization, cell death, and virus release. Amyloid β (Aβ) deposition is a characteristic feature of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1)-infected brains [ 46 ]. The Ras signaling pathway is involved in HIV-1-induced blood–brain barrier disruption, and Aβ deposition also plays an important role [ 47 ]. Therefore, targeting this pathway by specific miRNAs could be a promising therapeutic strategy to limit PEDV replication in target or neighboring cells. 5. Conclusions In summary, we identified a number of dysregulated miRNAs in exosomes released from PEDV-infected Vero cells. The functions of these dysregulated miRNAs remain to be investigated in future studies, potentially helping us to elucidate the mechanisms of PEDV–host interactions. Author Contributions Conceptualization, X.P. and L.Y.; methodology, X.S.; software, R.Z.; validation, L.Y., X.S. and D.Y.; formal analysis, Y.D.; investigation, J.W.; resources, D.Y.; data curation, X.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Y.; writing—review and editing, L.Y.; visualization, X.P.; supervision, J.W.; project administration, X.P.; funding acquisition, Y.D., J.W. and L.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding This work was supported by grants from the Key Research and development program of Anhui Province (grant no. S202204c06020022), the Special Fund for Anhui Agriculture Research System (grant no. AHCYJXTX-05-13), and the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (grant no.2008085QC138). Data Availability Statement The sequence data was deposited in the GenBank database (Accession number PRJNA826684). Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Footnotes Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. References 1. Salamat S.E.A., Collantes T.M.A., Lumbera W.M.L., Tablizo F.A., Mutia C.T.M., Ong J.D.P., Bandoy D. Sequence analysis of new variants of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in Luzon, Philippines, in 2017. Arch. Virol. 2021;166:1859–1867. doi: 10.1007/s00705-021-05068-0. 2. Yang L., Wang C., Shu J., Feng H., He Y., Chen J., Shu J. Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Induces Vero Cell Apoptosis via the p53-PUMA Signaling Pathway. Viruses. 2021;13:1218. doi: 10.3390/v13071218. 3. Wen F., Yang J., Li A., Gong Z., Yang L., Cheng Q., Wang C., Zhao M., Yuan S., Chen Y., et al. Genetic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in Guangdong, China, between 2018 and 2019. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0253622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253622. 4. Mathivanan S., Ji H., Simpson R.J. Exosomes: Extracellular organelles important in intercellular communication. J. Proteom. 2010;73:1907–1920. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.06.006. 5. Colombo M., Raposo G., Théry C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014;30:255–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122326. 6. Silverman J.M., Reiner N.E. Exosomes and other microvesicles in infection biology: Organelles with unanticipated phenotypes. Cell. Microbiol. 2011;13:1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01537.x. 7. Tkach M., Théry C. Communication by Extracellular Vesicles: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Cell. 2016;164:1226–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.043. 8. Xu X., Zhang D., Ding W., Wang W., Jin N., Ding Z. NDV related exosomes enhance NDV replication through exporting NLRX1 mRNA. Vet. Microbiol. 2021;260:109167. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109167. 9. Chen J., Jin L., Yan M., Yang Z., Wang H., Geng S., Gong Z., Liu G. Serum Exosomes from Newborn Piglets Restrict Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection. J. Proteome Res. 2019;18:1939–1947. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00195. 10. Feng Z., Hensley L., McKnight K.L., Hu F., Madden V., Ping L., Jeong S.H., Walker C., Lanford R.E., Lemon S.M. A pathogenic picornavirus acquires an envelope by hijacking cellular membranes. Nature. 2013;496:367–371. doi: 10.1038/nature12029. 11. Yao Z., Qiao Y., Li X., Chen J., Ding J., Bai L., Shen F., Shi B., Liu J., Peng L., et al. Exosomes Exploit the Virus Entry Machinery and Pathway To Transmit Alpha Interferon-Induced Antiviral Activity. J. Virol. 2018;92 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01578-18. 12. Jung K.O., Youn H., Lee C.H., Kang K.W., Chung J.K. Visualization of exosome-mediated miR-210 transfer from hypoxic tumor cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:9899–9910. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14247. 13. Mihelich B.L., Dambal S., Lin S., Nonn L. miR-182, of the miR-183 cluster family, is packaged in exosomes and is detected in human exosomes from serum, breast cells and prostate cells. Oncol. Lett. 2016;12:1197–1203. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4710. 14. Squadrito M.L., Baer C., Burdet F., Maderna C., Gilfillan G.D., Lyle R., Ibberson M., De Palma M. Endogenous RNAs modulate microRNA sorting to exosomes and transfer to acceptor cells. Cell Rep. 2014;8:1432–1446. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.035. 15. Zhao L., Liu W., Xiao J., Cao B. The role of exosomes and “exosomal shuttle microRNA” in tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Cancer Lett. 2015;356:339–346. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.10.027. 16. Zhou C., Tan L., Sun Y., Qiu X., Liao Y., Song C., Liu W., Nair V., Ding C. Exosomes Carry microRNAs into Neighboring Cells to Promote Diffusive Infection of Newcastle Disease Virus. Viruses. 2019;11:527. doi: 10.3390/v11060527. 17. Bellingham S.A., Coleman B.M., Hill A.F. Small RNA deep sequencing reveals a distinct miRNA signature released in exosomes from prion-infected neuronal cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:10937–10949. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks832. 18. Roth W.W., Huang M.B., Addae Konadu K., Powell M.D., Bond V.C. Micro RNA in Exosomes from HIV-Infected Macrophages. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;13:32. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010032. 19. Salido-Guadarrama I., Romero-Cordoba S., Peralta-Zaragoza O., Hidalgo-Miranda A., Rodríguez-Dorantes M. MicroRNAs transported by exosomes in body fluids as mediators of intercellular communication in cancer. OncoTargets Ther. 2014;7:1327–1338. doi: 10.2147/ott.s61562. 20. Rebustini I.T., Vlahos M., Packer T., Kukuruzinska M.A., Maas R.L. An integrated miRNA functional screening and target validation method for organ morphogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:23215. doi: 10.1038/srep23215. 21. Théry C., Amigorena S., Raposo G., Clayton A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 2006;30:3–22. doi: 10.1002/0471143030.cb0322s30. 22. Qiao Y., Liang X., Yan Y., Lu Y., Zhang D., Yao W., Wu W., Yan Z. Identification of Exosomal miRNAs in Rats With Pulmonary Neutrophilic Inflammation Induced by Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Front. Physiol. 2018;9:217. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00217. 23. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. 24. Griffiths-Jones S., Saini H.K., van Dongen S., Enright A.J. miRBase: Tools for microRNA genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D154–D158. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm952. 25. Friedländer M.R., Mackowiak S.D., Li N., Chen W., Rajewsky N. miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:37–52. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr688. 26. Ye J., Zhang Y., Cui H., Liu J., Wu Y., Cheng Y., Xu H., Huang X., Li S., Zhou A., et al. WEGO 2.0: A web tool for analyzing and plotting GO annotations, 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W71–W75. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky400. 27. Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. 28. Shen X., Yin L., Pan X., Zhao R., Zhang D. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection blocks cell cycle and induces apoptosis in pig intestinal epithelial cells. Microb. Pathog. 2020;147:104378. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104378. 29. Zhang X., Li C., Zhang B., Li Z., Zeng W., Luo R., Cao J., Cheng G., Fan S., He Q. Differential expression and correlation analysis of miRNA-mRNA profiles in swine testicular cells infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1868. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81189-5. 30. Zheng H., Xu L., Liu Y., Li C., Zhang L., Wang T., Zhao D., Xu X., Zhang Y. MicroRNA-221-5p Inhibits Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Replication by Targeting Genomic Viral RNA and Activating the NF-κB Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:3381. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113381. 31. Ge F.F., Yang D.Q., Li X., Ju H.B., Shen H.X., Liu J., Zhao H.J., Wang J. Novel Method for Isolation of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus with the Use of Suspension Vero Cells and Immunogenicity Analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021;59:2. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02156-20. 32. Zhang W.W., Sun X.F., Tong H.L., Wang Y.H., Li S.F., Yan Y.Q., Li G.P. Effect of differentiation on microRNA expression in bovine skeletal muscle satellite cells by deep sequencing. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2016;21:8. doi: 10.1186/s11658-016-0009-x. 33. Guo H., Cheng A., Zhang X., Pan Y., Wang M., Huang J., Zhu D., Chen S., Liu M., Zhao X., et al. DEF Cell-Derived Exosomal miR-148a-5p Promotes DTMUV Replication by Negative Regulating TLR3 Expression. Viruses. 2020;12:94. doi: 10.3390/v12010094. 34. Othumpangat S., Lindsley W.G., Beezhold D.H., Kashon M.L., Burrell C.N., Mubareka S., Noti J.D. Differential Expression of Serum Exosome microRNAs and Cytokines in Influenza A and B Patients Collected in the 2016 and 2017 Influenza Seasons. Pathogens. 2021;10:149. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020149. 35. Qian X., Xu C., Fang S., Zhao P., Wang Y., Liu H., Yuan W., Qi Z. Exosomal MicroRNAs Derived From Umbilical Mesenchymal Stem Cells Inhibit Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2016;5:1190–1203. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0348. 36. Yuan Z., Petree J.R., Lee F.E., Fan X., Salaita K., Guidot D.M., Sadikot R.T. Macrophages exposed to HIV viral protein disrupt lung epithelial cell integrity and mitochondrial bioenergetics via exosomal microRNA shuttling. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:580. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1803-y. 37. Wang J., Teng Y., Zhao G., Li F., Hou A., Sun B., Kong W., Gao F., Cai L., Jiang C. Exosome-Mediated Delivery of Inducible miR-423-5p Enhances Resistance of MRC-5 Cells to Rabies Virus Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:1537. doi: 10.3390/ijms20071537. 38. Yuan F., Yun Y., Fan H., Li Y., Lu L., Liu J., Feng W., Chen S.Y. MicroRNA-135a Protects Against Ethanol-Induced Apoptosis in Neural Crest Cells and Craniofacial Defects in Zebrafish by Modulating the Siah1/p38/p53 Pathway. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:583959. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.583959. 39. Zhao H., Yang J., Wang Q., Cui Z., Li D., Niu J., Guo Y., Zhang Q., Zhang S., Zhao Y., et al. Exosomal miRNA-328-3p targets ZO-3 and inhibits porcine epidemic diarrhea virus proliferation. Arch. Virol. 2022;167:901–910. doi: 10.1007/s00705-022-05364-3. 40. Valadi H., Ekström K., Bossios A., Sjöstrand M., Lee J.J., Lötvall J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:654–659. doi: 10.1038/ncb1596. 41. Evripioti A.A., Ortega-Prieto A.M., Skelton J.K., Bazot Q., Dorner M. Phosphodiesterase-induced cAMP degradation restricts hepatitis B virus infection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2019;374:20180292. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0292. 42. Wang Z., Lu W., Zhang Y., Zou F., Jin Z., Zhao T. The Hippo Pathway and Viral Infections. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:3033. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03033. 43. Zou L.L., Li J.R., Li H., Tan J.L., Wang M.X., Liu N.N., Gao R.M., Yan H.Y., Wang X.K., Dong B., et al. TGF-β isoforms inhibit hepatitis C virus propagation in transforming growth factor beta/SMAD protein signalling pathway dependent and independent manners. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021;25:3498–3510. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16432. 44. Jahani M., Dokaneheifard S., Mansouri K. Hypoxia: A key feature of COVID-19 launching activation of HIF-1 and cytokine storm. J. Inflamm. 2020;17:33. doi: 10.1186/s12950-020-00263-3. 45. Guo F., Yu X., Xu A., Xu J., Wang Q., Guo Y., Wu X., Tang Y., Ding Z., Zhang Y., et al. Japanese encephalitis virus induces apoptosis by inhibiting Foxo signaling pathway. Vet. Microbiol. 2018;220:73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.05.008. 46. Motamedi N., Sewald X., Luo Y., Mothes W., DiMaio D. SV40 Polyomavirus Activates the Ras-MAPK Signaling Pathway for Vacuolization, Cell Death, and Virus Release. Viruses. 2020;12:1128. doi: 10.3390/v12101128. 47. Wang H.D., Trivedi A., Johnson D.L. Hepatitis B virus X protein induces RNA polymerase III-dependent gene transcription and increases cellular TATA-binding protein by activating the Ras signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997;17:6838–6846. doi: 10.1128/MCB.17.12.6838. Associated Data Data Availability Statement The sequence data was deposited in the GenBank database (Accession number PRJNA826684).

📖 中文全文 Chinese Full Text

中文

# 猪流行性腹泻病毒感染Vero细胞释放的外泌体中microRNA表达谱特征

**尹磊** 1,2 † **沈雪海** 1,2 † **尹冬冬** 1,2 **王洁如** 1,2 **赵瑞宏** 1,2 **戴银** 1,2 **潘晓成** 1,2 *

1 安徽省农业科学院畜牧兽医研究所,安徽省畜禽疫病研究中心,合肥 230031,中国 2 安徽省畜禽产品安全工程重点实验室,合肥 230031,中国

* 通讯作者:pxcpyq@sina.com † 这些作者对本工作做出了同等贡献。

## 摘要

外泌体是由多种细胞主动分泌的纳米级囊泡。它们含有受调控的microRNA(miRNA),从而在细胞间通讯中发挥作用。本研究利用从猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)感染的Vero细胞中分离的外泌体,探讨了外泌体miRNA在PEDV感染中的作用。透射电子显微镜观察结果显示,外泌体呈球形,大小均一,膜呈负染色。纳米颗粒追踪分析显示,外泌体平均粒径为130.5 nm。miRNA测序结果显示,与对照组相比,感染细胞外泌体中共有115个miRNA异常表达。其中,80个miRNA显著上调,35个miRNA显著下调。功能注释分析表明,差异表达的miRNA通过cAMP、Hippo、TGF-beta、HIF-1、FoxO、MAPK和Ras信号通路与PEDV感染相关。因此,我们的研究结果为PEDV感染对外泌体miRNA表达的影响提供了重要信息,并将有助于寻找潜在的抗PEDV药物候选物。

**关键词:** 猪流行性腹泻病毒;外泌体;microRNA;宿主-病原体相互作用

## 1. 引言

猪流行性腹泻是由猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)引起的一种严重肠道疾病,具有高度传染性。自2010年再次出现以来,养猪业遭受了巨大损失[1]。PEDV是冠状病毒科(Coronaviridae)的单链、有包膜的正链RNA病毒。PEDV感染仔猪可导致严重肠炎、呕吐和水样腹泻,对1周龄以下仔猪的死亡率高达90%[2,3]。然而,尽管其严重性,PEDV感染的生物学机制,特别是宿主与病原体之间的相互作用,在很大程度上尚不清楚。因此,迫切需要了解PEDV的发病机制,从而为开发合适的抗病毒药物提供至关重要的信息。

外泌体是一种直径30-100 nm的微囊泡结构。它们几乎可以被所有类型的细胞和组织分泌[4,5]。外泌体可以携带多种蛋白质、功能性RNA和脂质以及其他生物活性物质,并可以将这些生物活性物质从起源细胞转移到靶细胞,从而影响靶细胞中生化成分和信号通路的调控[6,7]。因此,外泌体研究在病毒感染领域受到广泛关注。研究发现,宿主细胞在病毒感染后分泌的外泌体携带活性病毒或宿主细胞成分,可以调节靶细胞的免疫反应或引起靶细胞感染[8,9]。例如,甲型肝炎病毒的外泌体被赋予无包膜病毒膜,使病毒能够逃避免疫识别[10]。此外,非实质肝细胞的外泌体可以将干扰素诱导的抗病毒活性转移至乙型肝炎病毒复制的肝细胞[11]。因此,外泌体参与了许多病毒的生命周期。

MicroRNA(miRNA)是长度约22个核苷酸的小非编码调控RNA分子,是外泌体中最丰富的RNA[12,13]。在宿主与病毒的相互作用中,外泌体可以特异性选择包装细胞中的miRNA,直接靶向病毒基因组RNA并抑制病毒复制,从而发挥重要的调控作用[14,15]。例如,从感染新城疫病毒的HeLa细胞中分离的外泌体通过携带miRNA进入邻近细胞来促进其传播[16]。此外,朊病毒感染的神经细胞释放的外泌体显示miR-128a、miR-21、miR-222、miR-29b、miR-342-3p和miR-424水平与未感染外泌体相比显著增加[17];在HIV感染的外泌体中,miR-29a、miR-150、miR-518和miR-875的表达上调16至44倍[18]。这些差异表达的miRNA已被证明参与病毒的复制和繁殖[19,20]。然而,外泌体miRNA在PEDV感染发病机制中的作用尚不清楚。在本研究中,鉴定了PEDV感染Vero细胞释放的外泌体,并研究了其中miRNA的差异表达。这项工作为进一步研究miRNA在PEDV发病机制中的作用奠定了基础。

## 2. 材料与方法

### 2.1. 细胞与病毒

Vero细胞(CVCCCL28,购自中国兽医药品监察所(北京,中国))在添加10%胎牛血清(HyClone,Logan,UT,USA)和1%青霉素-链霉素的Dulbecco改良Eagle培养基(Gibco BRL,Grand Island,NY,USA)中培养。江苏省农业科学院提供了本研究中使用的经典PEDV CV777株(GenBank:KT323979.1)。

### 2.2. 外泌体分离

以1的感染复数(MOI)用PEDV感染Vero细胞并培养24 h。感染后24 h,按照以下方案从PEDV感染的Vero细胞培养上清液中分离和纯化外泌体:根据Thery等人的方法,通过差速离心从细胞上清液中分离外泌体[21]。简而言之,第一步,将培养基上清液转移到离心管中,在4 °C下离心45 min去除大囊泡。第二步,将上清液通过10,000-μm膜过滤;将滤液转移到新的离心管中,在100,000× g和4 °C下离心70 min。然后,将上清液重悬于10 mL预冷的1× PBS中。最后,在4 °C下以100,000× g超速离心70 min去除上清液,重悬于150 μL预冷的1× PBS中,并在-80 °C下保存。

### 2.3. 透射电子显微镜(TEM)

为了观察外泌体的形态,将0.2%多聚甲醛悬浮液与外泌体悬浮液混合,然后将其应用于formvar包被的铜网上。用1%醋酸铀酰水溶液染色2 min,过滤掉液体,然后在电子显微镜(FEI,Hillsboro,OR,USA)下检查样品。

### 2.4. 纳米颗粒追踪分析(NTA)

使用NanoSight NS300系统(Malvern Instruments Ltd.,Malvern,UK)测量外泌体的浓度和粒径分布,并使用NTA 3.1 Dev Build 3.1.54软件分析数据。我们将外泌体制备物重悬于无菌PBS中,然后涡旋乳化。

### 2.5. miRNA微阵列分析及靶基因生物信息学分析

Oe Biotech公司(中国上海)对PEDV感染Vero细胞的外泌体进行了miRNA谱研究(http://www.oebiotech.com,2022年1月26日访问)[22]。简而言之,为了标准化原始数据,使用Genspring软件在提取RNA并用Agilent-070154 Rat miRNA Microarray V21.0 8×15K(Agilent,Santa Clara,CA,USA)标记后分离差异表达的miRNA[23,24]。使用两个数据库(Targetscan和microRNAorg)的交集选择靶向上调和下调基因的DEmiRNA,其倍数变化≥1.5且p≤0.05[25]。使用基因本体(GO)和京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)分析推定基因的功能和通路富集。p≤0.05被定义为GO和KEGG分析的显著性阈值[26]。

### 2.6. qRT-PCR分析miRNA

通过测序和qRT-PCR分析鉴定miRNA的表达水平。使用MiRcute miRNA qPCR SYBR Green检测试剂盒(Vazyme,南京,中国)和ABI Step One热循环仪(Applied Biosystems,Foster City,CA,USA)进行qRT-PCR。本研究中使用的miRNA特异性正向引物如表1所示。U6 snRNA用作内参。每个基因使用三个独立的生物学重复。通过2^−ΔΔCt方法计算每个miRNA的相对表达水平[27]。

**表1 用于qRT-PCR验证miRNA表达的引物**

| MiRNA名称 | MiRNA序列(5′-3′) | RT引物序列(5′-3′) | 正向PCR引物序列(5′-3′) | |---|---|---|---| | mne-miR-133a | TTGGTCCCCTTCAACCAGCTGT | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACACAGCT | CTCATTGGTCCCCTTCAACC | | novel65_mature | GGTGGGGTCGGCGGGGGG | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACCCCCCC | TCATTATAGGTGGGGTCGGC | | mml-miR-503-5p | TAGCAGCGGGAACAGTTCTGCAG | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACCTGCAG | ACTTAGCAGCGGGAACAGTT | | novel307_mature | CGGCGGCGACGGTGGCGG | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACCCGCCA | TATATTTACGGCGGCGACGG | | novel376_mature | CAGGGGTGGAGCCTGCGGA | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACTCCGCA | ATTACTTCAGGGGTGGAGCC | | mml-miR-204-3p | GGCTGGGAAGGCAAAGGGACGT | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACACGTCCC | AGTTAGGCTGGGAAGGCAAA | | pha-miR-769 | TGAGACCTCTGGGTTCTGAGCT | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACAGCTCA | TCAGTTGAGACCTCTGGGTTC | | mml-miR-148a-5p | AAAGTTCTGAGACACTCCGACT | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACAGTCGG | TGGCGAAAGTTCTGAGACACT | | mml-miR-135a-1-3p | ATATAGGGATTGGAGCCGTGGC | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACGCCACGG | CGCTCGATATAGGGATTGGAG | | mml-miR-150-5p | TCTCCCAACCCTTGTACCAGTG | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACCACTGG | TGCTGTCTCCCAACCCTTGT | | mml-miR-199a-3p | ACAGTAGTCTGCACATTGGTTA | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACTAACCAA | TCTCGCACAGTAGTCTGCACA | | pha-miR-145 | GTCCAGTTTTCCCAGGAATCCCT | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACAGGGATT | ACGTGTCCAGTTTTCCCAGG | | mml-miR-27a-5p | AGGGCTTAGCTGCTTGTGAGCA | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACTGCTCAC | GTGACAGGGCTTAGCTGCTT | | U6 | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | — |

### 2.7. 统计分析

所有统计分析均使用SPSS 21.0统计软件进行。数据以平均值±SD表示。在本研究中,我们使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)比较各组,然后使用最小显著差异(LSD)进行事后比较。p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

## 3. 结果

### 3.1. 外泌体的表征

为了分析外泌体,我们使用了TEM和NTA。TEM显示圆形囊泡结构,大小范围为30至200 nm(图1A)。根据NTA测量,粒径分布峰值为130.5 nm直径(图1B),这与先前报道的外泌体特征一致。所有数据表明外泌体成功分离。

**图1 Vero细胞来源外泌体的表征。** 从未感染和PEDV感染的Vero细胞培养物中分离和纯化外泌体。(A)通过TEM观察的外泌体形态。比例尺,100 nm和200 nm。(B)通过NTA对外泌体进行粒径和定量分析。

### 3.2. 小RNA测序文库数据分析

从PEDV感染和对照Vero细胞构建了六个microRNA文库并进行测序,以揭示PEDV感染对外泌体miRNA的影响。如表2所示,从感染细胞(感染1、2和3)共获得30,572,744、26,165,923和27,571,400个原始读数,而从未感染细胞(对照1、2和3)获得27,070,230、21,158,763和26,987,232个原始读数。去除低质量标签、接头序列和小于15 nt的短读段后,分别鉴定出24,269,195、21,385,578和22,875,953(感染组)以及20,920,004、16,414,523和20,535,191(未感染组)个清洁读数。此外,数据分为以下几类:miRNA、rRNA、snRNA、tRNA、Cis-region、repeat、其他Rfm-RNA和未注释(表2)。miRNA的长度分布如图2所示。在所有文库中,大多数miRNA的长度为22 nt。

**表2 PEDV感染和未感染样品中sRNA的分布**

| 类别 | 感染组 | 未感染组 | |---|---|---| | 原始读数 | 30,572,744/26,165,923/27,571,400 | 27,070,230/21,158,763/26,987,232 | | 清洁读数 | 24,269,195/21,385,578/22,875,953 | 20,920,004/16,414,523/20,535,191 | | miRNA读数 | 1,673,115/1,253,338/675,418(总计)2074/2003/1752(独特) | 1,047,301/788,983/1,212,878(总计)1386/1208/1352(独特) | | 已知miRNA | 441/415/396 | 352/326/346 | | 新miRNA | 310/306/290 | 210/181/208 | | rRNA读数 | 189,890/164,385/185,472 | 115,653/98,041/103,065 | | tRNA读数 | 29,156/30,890/14,333 | 13,765/6017/8148 | | snRNA读数 | 27,653/31,092/33,635 | 36,342/26,198/34,540 | | Cis-region读数 | 55,409/67,613/84,276 | 86,221/61,990/85,314 | | 其他_Rfam_RNA | 73,478/74,761/99,704 | 76,065/61,225/70,461 | | 未注释 | 9,493,236/8,307,505/8,358,603 | 9,414,281/7,302,434/9,459,270 |

**图2 各序列的清洁读段长度分布。** x轴代表读段长度。y轴代表每个读段长度的百分比。

### 3.3. 外泌体中已知miRNA的鉴定

通过将小RNA序列映射到miRBase 20数据库中的成熟miRNA及其前体,获得了当Vero细胞被PEDV感染时发生改变的已知miRNA、miRNA计数和第一位碱基偏好。在感染文库中,分别有2074、2003和1752个独特序列(1,673,115、1,253,338和675,418个读段)被注释为miRNA候选物,而在未感染文库中,分别有1386、1208和1352个独特序列(1,047,301、788,983和1,212,878个读段)被注释为miRNA候选物(表2)。发现PEDV感染的Vero细胞含有441、415和396个已知miRNA基因,而对照未感染的Vero细胞含有352、326和346个已知miRNA基因。两组miRNA表达模式的热图如图3A所示。两组的截断值为p<0.05且|log2(PEDV感染/对照未感染的表达)|>1。两组中有70个已知的DEmiRNA,其中51个上调,19个下调。此外,22 nt似乎是miRNA的主要长度,已鉴定miRNA中的第一位核苷酸偏好明显倾向于5'端的'U'(图3B)。

**图3 已知miRNA的差异表达水平。** (A)使用R程序对PEDV感染组和对照组中的已知miRNA进行层次聚类分析。该分析使用欧几里得方法和完全连锁。(B)感染和未感染细胞在miRNA第一位的大小和碱基偏好方面存在差异。miRNA长度在x轴上给出,范围为15至26个核苷酸。miRNA碱基偏好以y轴上第一位的百分比表示。

### 3.4. 外泌体中新miRNA的鉴定

PEDV感染组和未感染组分别含有9,493,236、8,307,505和8,358,603以及9,414,281、7,302,434和9,459,270个未注释的sRNA;基于这些sRNA,预测了新的miRNA候选物。根据表2,miReap软件分别在PEDV感染和未感染的Vero细胞文库中预测了310、306和290以及210、181和208个新miRNA。差异表达分析的结果,使用前述截断值,在两组的45个新miRNA中,29个miRNA上调,16个miRNA下调(p<0.05)。图4中的热图说明了两组之间miRNA表达的差异。

**图4 使用R程序,通过层次聚类确定PEDV感染组和对照组中的新miRNA。** 该分析使用欧几里得方法和完全连锁。上调和下调的miRNA分别用红色和绿色标记。

### 3.5. DEmiRNA的靶基因预测和通路富集分析

我们比较了两种独立miRNA预测算法miRanda和RNAhybrid的潜在mRNA靶标,以确定其生物学功能。共有5282个基因被预测为115个miRNA的潜在靶标。预测靶标的GO分析显示,它们参与生物学过程、细胞组分和分子功能(图5)。进行了基于KEGG直系同源性的注释系统(KOBAS)分析,以分析miRNA在调控网络中的作用。发现许多丰富的KEGG术语与生物学过程相关,包括黏附连接(ko04520)、黏着斑(ko04510)、内吞作用(ko04144)、MAPK信号通路(ko04010)、Hippo信号通路(ko04390)、mRNA监控通路(ko03015)、TGF-beta信号通路(ko04350)、ECM-受体相互作用(ko04512)、HIF-1信号通路(ko04066)和FoxO信号通路(ko04068)(图6)。

**图5 失调miRNA靶标的GO分析。**

**图6 差异表达miRNA靶标的前20个KEGG通路。**

### 3.6. qRT-PCR验证miRNA

基于测序数据,使用qRT-PCR分析差异表达的miRNA。选择了三个新的候选miRNA和十个已知miRNA进行验证。与测序数据相比,表达谱一致。与未感染细胞相比,感染Vero细胞中五个miRNA(mml-miR-503-5p、mml-miR-204-3p、pha-miR-769、mml-miR-148a-5p和mml-miR-135a-1-3p)的下调和八个miRNA(mne-miR-133a、novel65_mature、novel307_mature、novel376_mature、mml-miR-150-5p、mml-miR-199a-3p、pha-miR-145和mml-miR-27a-5p)的上调得到确认(图7)。

**图7 通过qRT-PCR验证外泌体miRNA的表达。**

## 4. 讨论

PEDV是一种引起仔猪急性、高度传染性肠道传染病的冠状病毒[28]。PEDV感染导致宿主细胞中miRNA表达的动态变化,并与病毒形成复杂的相互作用网络[29,30]。近年来,使用高通量测序技术揭示病毒感染中miRNA和mRNA的整合已被证明有助于阐明miRNA的调控机制。然而,外泌体中的miRNA是否通过调节宿主免疫反应和靶向病毒来影响PEDV复制尚不清楚。因此,我们收集并观察了PEDV感染Vero细胞的外泌体。众所周知,Vero细胞是PEDV分离、传代和体外实验研究的最适宿主细胞[31]。因此,本研究以Vero细胞为研究对象,探讨外泌体的miRNA谱以及它们如何受PEDV感染的影响。研究PEDV病毒感染后Vero细胞外泌体中的miRNA是深入了解miRNA在细胞内通讯和诱导抗病毒反应中作用的重要步骤。我们获得并成功鉴定了70个已知miRNA和45个新miRNA,它们在PEDV感染的外泌体中差异表达。这些miRNA可能参与了Vero细胞与PEDV的相互作用。在本研究中,PEDV感染和未感染细胞中的大多数清洁读段片段长度为21至24 nt,其中22 nt RNA最为丰富。这些结果与Dicer衍生产物中miRNA的典型大小一致[32],表明文库中miRNA序列的高度富集。

越来越多的研究表明,宿主细胞的外泌体miRNA通过正向或负向调节宿主免疫,在病毒传播和免疫逃逸中发挥关键作用。在本研究中,我们发现mml-miR-148a-5p、mml-miR-423-5p和mml-miR-135a-1-3p的表达水平在PEDV感染期间显著下调,而mml-miR-143-3p、mml-miR-150-5p、mml-miR-15b-5p、mml-miR-199a、pha-miR-145、mml-miR-23a和mml-miR-27a的表达水平在PEDV感染期间显著上调。据报道,DEF细胞来源的外泌体miR-148a-5p通过负调控TLR3表达来促进鸭坦布苏病毒复制[33]。此外,miR-143-3p、miR-150-5p和miR-15b-5p在感染甲型和乙型流感病毒的血清外泌体中显示高表达水平[34],在丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的外泌体中,miR-199a和miR-145的高表达促进HCV RNA复制[35]。人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染的巨噬细胞分泌高表达miR-23a和miR-27a的外泌体,破坏肺上皮细胞的完整性和线粒体生物学功能[36]。在人类二倍体细胞系Medical Research Council-5(MRC-5)分泌的外泌体中,狂犬病病毒感染通过解除细胞因子信号传导3(SOCS3)对I型干扰素(IFN)信号的抑制来上调microRNA(miR)-423-5p的表达,从而导致对RABV复制的反馈抑制[37]。此外,miR-135a家族表达下调可激活p38丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)/p53通路,从而促进细胞凋亡[38]。最近,Han Zhao及其同事发现,在感染Vero-E6细胞后,PEDV下调miRNA-328-3p的表达,由此导致的靶标紧密连接蛋白3(TJP-3/ZO-3)抑制减少有助于增强PEDV感染[39]。然而,我们的结果显示,在PEDV感染的Vero细胞释放的外泌体中,miRNA-328-3p的转录表达没有显著差异变化。据报道,miRNA表达具有细胞和物种特异性,miRNA在不同类型的细胞和不同生理状态的细胞释放的外泌体中差异表达,这对病毒复制及其发病机制也有不同的影响[40]。因此,我们的结果表明,这些差异表达的miRNA可能参与了PEDV感染Vero细胞中的宿主-病毒相互作用。然而,本研究中报道的miRNA是否必然有助于理解猪外泌体中miRNA的参与尚不完全清楚。因此,需要进一步的工作。

预测了115个miRNA的靶基因,并通过qRT-PCR分析筛选了miRNA。根据sRNA测序结果,13个miRNA表达谱一致。一般来说,一个miRNA有数百个预测的靶基因,一个靶基因可以被多个miRNA调控。在本研究中,所有预测的mRNA转录本使用GO和KEGG数据库进行分类和注释。GO分析显示,与miRNA负相关的mRNA靶标参与生物调节、免疫系统过程、刺激反应和其他细胞过程。KEGG进行的信号通路分析显示,靶基因主要参与重要的细胞信号通路,包括cAMP信号通路、Hippo信号通路、TGF-beta信号通路和HIF-1信号通路,表明它们在防御PEDV感染中发挥重要功能。发现宿主抗病毒反应取决于各种信号通路的调控,病毒通过破坏信号通路来逃避胞质感知。例如,磷酸二酯酶诱导的cAMP降解限制乙型肝炎病毒感染[41]。Hippo信号通路在调控病毒复制中发挥关键作用[42]。转化生长因子beta(TGF-β)通过调节病毒进程和介导炎症相关反应来加速病毒性肝病[43]。缺氧诱导因子-1α(HIF-1α)在病毒感染期间在宿主细胞中被激活,通过诱导免疫细胞产生促炎细胞因子在炎症部位发挥重要作用[44]。日本脑炎病毒通过抑制FoxO信号通路诱导细胞凋亡[45]。SV40多瘤病毒激活RAS-MAPK信号通路以促进空泡化、细胞死亡和病毒释放。淀粉样蛋白β(Aβ)沉积是人类免疫缺陷病毒-1(HIV-1)感染大脑的特征性特征[46]。Ras信号通路参与HIV-1诱导的血脑屏障破坏,Aβ沉积也发挥重要作用[47]。因此,通过特异性miRNA靶向该通路可能是一种有前景的治疗策略,可限制PEDV在靶细胞或邻近细胞中的复制。

## 5. 结论

总之,我们鉴定了PEDV感染Vero细胞释放的外泌体中多种失调的miRNA。这些失调miRNA的功能仍有待在未来研究中研究,可能有助于我们阐明PEDV-宿主相互作用的机制。

## 作者贡献

概念化,P.X.和L.Y.;方法论,X.S.;软件,R.Z.;验证,L.Y.、X.S.和D.Y.;形式分析,Y.D.;调查,J.W.;资源,D.Y.;数据整理,X.S.;写作-原稿准备,L.Y.;写作-审阅和编辑,L.Y.;可视化,P.X.;监督,J.W.;项目管理,P.X.;资金获取,Y.D.、J.W.和L.Y.。所有作者都已阅读并同意手稿的发表版本。

## 资金

本工作得到安徽省重点研发计划(资助号:S202204c06020022)、安徽省农业体系专项基金(资助号:AHCYJXTX-05-13)和安徽省自然科学基金(资助号:2008085QC138)的资助。

## 数据可用性声明

序列数据已存入GenBank数据库(登录号PRJNA826684)。

## 利益冲突

作者声明无利益冲突。

## 脚注

出版商说明:MDPI对已出版地图和机构隶属关系中的管辖权主张保持中立。