857 jbiomedsci Journal of Biomedical Science J Biomed Sci BMC PMC13047808 13047808 13047808 41928257 10.1186/s12929-026-01240-3 Protein arginine methyltransferases in cancer: mechanisms, functions, and therapeutic opportunities Jeong Yoonae 1 Cho Yena 1 2 ✉ Kim Yong Kee 1 2 ✉ 1 College of Pharmacy, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul, 04310 Republic of Korea 2 Muscle Physiome Research Center and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul, 04310 Republic of Korea ✉ Corresponding author. 2 4 2026 33 37 37 4 4 2026 © The Author(s) 2026 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Abstract Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) catalyze the methylation of arginine residues on both histone and non-histone substrates, orchestrating cellular processes such as transcriptional regulation, RNA splicing, signal transduction, and DNA damage response. Because dysregulated methylation reprograms epigenetic and post-transcriptional landscapes to promote malignant transformation, aberrant PRMT activity is closely associated with tumorigenesis and cancer progression. Major family members, containing PRMT1, CARM1, PRMT5, and PRMT6, regulate gene expression through site-specific histone methylation, thereby contributing to the transcriptional activation or repression. PRMTs also methylate a wide range of non-histone proteins, including transcription factors, splicing regulators, and signaling intermediates, to coordinate cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and RNA metabolism. Collectively, PRMT-mediated methylation contributes to higher-order cancer phenotypes, including metabolic reprogramming―through modulation of glycolytic flux, lipid biosynthesis, and redox homeostasis―and immune evasion via altered immune signaling and checkpoint pathways within the tumor microenvironment. Recent advances in chemical biology have led to the development of selective PRMT inhibitors, several of which are currently under clinical evaluation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive and integrative overview of PRMT biology, systematically organizing current knowledge from multilayered regulatory mechanisms to downstream oncogenic effects and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Keywords: Post-translational modification, PRMTs, Arginine methylation, Epigenetic regulation, Metabolic reprogramming, Cancer therapy status released display-pdf yes is-olf no is-manuscript no is-preprint no is-journal-matter no is-scanned no is-retracted no Received 2025 Dec 1; Accepted 2026 Mar 31; Collection date 2026. Background Post-translational modifications (PTMs) are covalent chemical alterations that regulate protein activity, stability, subcellular localization, and intermolecular interactions [ 1 ]. Well-established modifications, including phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, and emerging modifications such as lactylation and succinylation, coordinate essential cellular processes [ 2 , 3 ]. Dysregulation of PTM networks is now recognized as a key driver of cancer development, reshaping signaling cascades, metabolic programs, and immune responses through complex regulatory crosstalk [ 1 , 4 ]. Among these modifications, protein arginine methylation plays an integrative role by linking chromatin-associated gene regulation with cytoplasmic signaling pathways. Moreover, protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) have emerged as a central epigenetic and signaling regulator in tumor biology. By modifying both histone and non-histone substrates, PRMTs regulate transcriptional programs, RNA processing, DNA damage responses, and signal transduction pathways [ 5 ]. Aberrant PRMT activity disrupts these multilayered regulatory mechanisms, contributing to hallmark oncogenic processes such as genomic instability, metabolic reprogramming, and immune evasion within the tumor microenvironment [ 6 , 7 ]. Given these multifaceted oncogenic roles, PRMTs are under active investigation as therapeutic targets, with several selective inhibitors currently advancing through preclinical and clinical development [ 8 , 9 ]. Moreover, altered PRMT expression and substrate methylation patterns are frequently associated with adverse clinical outcomes, highlighting their potential as prognostic biomarkers [ 10 ]. In this review, we summarize the current insights into PRMT-mediated arginine methylation in cancer biology, focusing on its oncogenic functions, therapeutic implications, and recent advances in PRMT-targeting strategies. We further discuss ongoing efforts in pharmacological modulation and combination therapies that may open new avenues for precision oncology. A short history of PRMT research The earliest evidence of arginine methylation emerged in the mid-twentieth century when Allfrey et al. (1964) reported methylated arginine and lysine residues in histones, suggesting their roles in gene regulation (Fig. 1 A) [ 11 ]. Shortly thereafter, Paik and Kim used 14 C-labeled S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) in calf thymus histones to detect novel methylated amino acids, leading to the identification of monomethyl arginine (MMA) and the first arginine methyltransferase [ 12 , 13 ]. Subsequently, all three methylated arginine species, including asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), were identified in human urine [ 14 ] and calf brain proteins [ 15 ]. During the same period, arginine methylation of myelin basic proteins was reported [ 16 , 17 ], demonstrating that this modification extends beyond histones. In the 1980s, research focused on enzymes that catalyze arginine methylation. Kim et al. (1988) partially purified two methyltransferases from the bovine brain, one acting on histones and the other on myelin [ 18 ]. This histone-directed enzyme was later shown to methylate heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) [ 19 ], linking arginine methylation to RNA processing and metabolism. Fig. 1 Timeline and classification of PRMTs. A Chronological timeline highlighting major milestones in PRMT research, including the first reports of arginine methylation and the identification of PRMT family members. Key developments in PRMT inhibitors and degraders are also indicated. Blue represents type I PRMTs and their inhibitors, red represents type II PRMTs and their inhibitors, and purple represents the type III PRMT and its inhibitor. B Schematic of arginine methylation reactions. PRMTs catalyze the transfer of methyl groups from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the guanidino group of protein arginine residues. Type I enzymes generate asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), type II enzymes generate symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), and type III enzymes catalyze monomethylation (MMA). C Venn diagram showing classification of PRMT family members based on their methylation type and substrate specificity. Overlapping regions indicate PRMTs that can act on shared substrates A breakthrough occurred in 1996 with the cloning of mammalian PRMT1 and its yeast homolog, Hmt1/Rmt1, which established the evolutionary conservation of arginine methylation [ 20 ]. Between 1998 and 2001, the canonical PRMT family expanded rapidly. PRMT2 (1998) was identified as a PRMT1-associated factor [ 21 ], PRMT3 (1998) was identified via yeast two-hybrid screening [ 22 ], PRMT4/CARM1 (1999) was identified as a coactivator-associated PRMT [ 23 ], and PRMT5 (1999) was identified as a JAK2-interacting protein with histone methylation activity [ 24 ]. Subsequent studies identified PRMT6 (2002) [ 25 ], PRMT7 (2004) [ 26 ], and PRMT8 (2005) [ 27 ]. In 2005, a candidate gene later designated PRMT9 was proposed based on genomic analysis [ 27 ], and its enzymatic activity was subsequently characterized in later study [ 28 ]. Together, these findings established the nine-member family, whose members exhibit distinct substrate specificities, subcellular localizations, and biological functions. Based on their catalytic activity, PRMTs are classified into three enzymatic subtypes: type I PRMTs (PRMT1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8) sequentially convert arginine to MMA and then to ADMA; type II PRMTs (PRMT5 and 9) generate MMA and subsequently SDMA; type III PRMTs (PRMT7) catalyze only MMA formation (Fig. 1 B). Although each PRMT exhibits substrate preference, certain substrates can be shared among multiple family members (Fig. 1 C). Advances in X-ray crystallography and cryoelectron microscopy have revealed detailed PRMT structures, providing insights into their catalytic mechanisms and substrate recognition [ 29 , 30 ]. Proteomics-based studies have uncovered numerous PRMT substrates, establishing their broad regulatory roles in transcription, RNA processing, DNA repair, cell cycle regulation, metabolism, and immune modulation [ 5 , 31 ]. Therefore, dysregulated PRMT expression and activity is linked to oncogenic signaling outputs and malignant phenotypes. The recognition of PRMTs as therapeutic targets has accelerated the development of small-molecule inhibitors of PRMTs (Fig. 1 A). The first PRMT5 inhibitor, EPZ015938 (GSK3326595; NCT02783300 ), entered Phase I clinical trials in 2016, followed by JNJ-64619178 (2018) ( NCT03573310 ) and GSK3368715 ( NCT03666988 ), the first PRMT1 inhibitor (2019). Although the mechanism of action of these agents has been clinically established, their therapeutic windows and antitumor activities are limited. Recently, next-generation PRMT5 inhibitors such as AMG-193 ( NCT05975073 ) and AZD3470 ( NCT06130553 , NCT06137144 ), were clinically evaluated in 2023 by leveraging methylthioadenosine (MTA)-cooperative binding mechanisms to enhance the selectivity for methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP)-deleted tumors. These advances mark a transition from enzymology to translational oncology, positioning PRMTs as a new class of druggable targets for cancer therapy development. The PRMT family: structure, catalytic diversity, and regulation Classification and structural features of PRMTs Protein methylation reactions, including arginine methylation, require SAM as a universal methyl donor. Intracellular SAM availability is tightly controlled by the SAM cycle and methionine salvage pathway, in which methionine is converted to SAM by methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT) (Fig. 2 ) [ 32 ]. Protein arginine methylation is catalyzed by PRMTs, which transfer a methyl group from SAM to the guanidino nitrogen of arginine residues [ 33 ]. Nine human PRMTs (PRMT1–PRMT9) have been identified, each encoded by a distinct chromosomal locus. All PRMTs share a conserved catalytic Rossmann-fold domain required for SAM binding and catalysis, comprising four consensus motifs: Motif I (VLD/EVGXGXG), post-I (V/IXG/AXD/E), Motif II (F/I/VDI/L/K), and Motif III (LR/KXXG), along with a THW loop that facilitates methyl transfer. The N- and C-terminal extensions confer substrate specificity, localization, and cofactor interactions. Notably, CARM1 possesses an extended C-terminal transactivation domain (TAD) responsible for its transcriptional coactivator function, distinguishing it from other PRMTs (Fig. 3 ). These distinct methylation patterns critically shape protein–protein and protein–RNA interactions, influencing diverse biological processes [ 5 ]. Fig. 2 S-adenosylmethionine metabolism and protein arginine methylation. S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), a central methyl donor, is synthesized from methionine and ATP by methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT) in the SAM cycle. SAM-dependent methylation by PRMTs generates MMA, ADMA, and SDMA, along with S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH), which is converted to homocysteine and recycled to methionine through the folate cycle (involving SHMT, MTHFR, and MTR). SAM is also consumed in the polyamine biosynthetic pathway to form spermidine and spermine, which produce methylthioadenosine (MTA). MTA is recycled to methionine through the MTAP-dependent methionine salvage pathway; however, MTAP is frequently deleted in cancer, resulting in MTA accumulation. Arginine metabolism intersects these pathways: NOS converts L-arginine to nitric oxide and citrulline, whereas arginase produces ornithine and urea. The breakdown of methylated proteins releases MMA and ADMA, which are endogenous NOS inhibitors associated with cardiovascular risk Fig. 3 Classification and structural domains of mammalian PRMTs. Classification and structural domains of mammalian PRMTs. Nine PRMTs have been identified, each containing conserved motifs important for catalytic activity, including Motif I (VLD/EVGXGXG), Post-I (V/IXG/AXD/E), Motif II (F/I/VDI/L/K), Motif III (LR/KXXG), and the THW loop. PRMTs are classified by enzymatic type (I, II, and III) and show distinct subcellular localization Beyond catalytic specificity, PRMTs exhibit distinct substrate sequence preferences that define their biological context. Most type I and II PRMTs target arginine–glycine (RG/RGG) rich motifs, which are common in RNA-binding and chromatin-associated proteins. In contrast, CARM1 preferentially recognizes proline–glycine–methionine (PGM) motifs found in transcriptional coactivators and splicing factors, whereas PRMT7 targets RxR motifs enriched in stress response proteins [ 5 , 31 , 32 ]. These sequence preferences, along with interactions with adaptor proteins and PTMs, ensure the context-dependent regulation of PRMT activity and substrate selectivity. Molecular and biophysical consequences of arginine methylation While catalytic specificity and sequence preference determine where methylation occurs, the biological outcome ultimately depends on how methylation alters the physicochemical properties of arginine residues. At the molecular level, arginine methylation regulates protein structure and function by chemically remodeling the guanidinium group while largely preserving its positive charge. The addition of methyl groups increases steric bulk, reduces hydrogen-bond donor capacity, and enhances local hydrophobicity [ 5 , 32 ]. These changes reshape electrostatic, hydrogen-bonding, and cation–π interactions, thereby subtly modulating intra-molecular contacts that influence folding stability and conformational flexibility, while reconfiguring inter-molecular interfaces with acidic proteins, nucleic acids, and membrane surfaces [ 34 ]. Such effects are particularly pronounced within intrinsically disordered regions, especially RG/RGG motifs. In these regions, methylation shifts conformational ensembles and modulates multivalent interaction networks that drive liquid–liquid phase separation, thereby regulating the formation, stability, and material properties of membraneless organelles [ 35 – 37 ]. In addition, methylated arginine residues function as selective docking sites for specialized reader domains, including Tudor-containing proteins, while sterically hindering alternative binding events [ 38 – 40 ]. Through this coordinated capacity to create, redirect, or block interaction surfaces, arginine methylation operates as a dynamic molecular rheostat that fine-tunes binding specificity, complex assembly, subcellular localization, and enzymatic activity without necessitating large-scale structural rearrangements. Multilayered regulation of PRMT activity PRMTs are regulated through multilayered mechanisms that integrate signaling pathways, metabolic inputs, and protein–protein interactions. For example, CARM1 is tightly regulated by coordinated PTMs and subcellular localization that dynamically shape its catalytic output. CARM1 undergoes automethylation at R551 within its C-terminal region, a modification required for its full transcriptional activity and regulation of pre-mRNA splicing [ 41 ]. In addition, CARM1 is phosphorylated during mitosis, altering its enzymatic activity and chromatin association, thereby linking arginine methylation to cell cycle progression [ 42 – 44 ]. Ubiquitination of CARM1 has also been reported to influence its stability and proteasomal turnover, adjusting enzyme abundance in response to energy stress [ 45 ]. Furthermore, alternative splicing generates CARM1 isoforms with distinct catalytic properties and substrate selectivity, adding another layer of regulation [ 46 – 48 ]. In parallel, PRMT5 regulation is largely governed by its obligate complex formation and PTMs. PRMT5 requires association with its obligate cofactor MEP50 to achieve full catalytic activity and proper substrate recognition [ 46 – 48 ]. Tyrosine phosphorylation of PRMT5 by upstream kinases inhibits its enzymatic activity [ 49 , 50 ], while K63-linked ubiquitination of PRMT5 promotes interaction with MEP50, leading to an increase in enzyme activity [ 51 ]. PRMT5 activity is also sensitive to intracellular levels of SAM, linking its function to cellular metabolic status [ 52 , 53 ]. In cancer contexts, oncogenic signaling pathways often upregulate PRMT5 expression or enhance its complex assembly, thereby promoting symmetric dimethylation of histones and non-histone substrates involved in proliferation and RNA splicing [ 5 , 54 ]. Collectively, these examples illustrate that PRMT regulation occurs at multiple levels: (i) dynamic PTMs such as automethylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination that modulate catalytic output and stability, (ii) isoform control, (iii) cofactor-dependent complex assembly, (iv) metabolic control via SAM availability, and (v) transcriptional control. Such multilayered regulation ensures that PRMT activity is precisely tuned in a context-dependent manner in both normal physiology and disease states. Emerging evidence for arginine demethylation Although arginine methylation has long been considered an irreversible modification, recent studies have suggested that certain JmjC domain–containing proteins may possess arginine demethylase (RDM) activity toward both histone and non-histone substrates [ 55 ]. For example, KDM3B has been reported to demethylate H4R3me2s [ 56 ], whereas Mina53 has been proposed to target H4R3me2a and p53 arginine methylation [ 57 ]. In addition, KDM5C has been implicated in regulating ULK1 arginine methylation [ 58 ], and KDM4A erases H3R17me2a [ 59 ] and also removes arginine methylation of PI3KC2α and IDH2 [ 60 , 61 ]. Collectively, these findings indicate that arginine methyl marks deposited by PRMTs could be enzymatically reversible under specific cellular contexts, linking arginine demethylation to processes such as transcriptional regulation, tumor progression, autophagy, and mitotic control. Nevertheless, the substrate specificity, catalytic efficiency, and physiological relevance of these demethylation events remain incompletely understood, and further biochemical and structural validation will be essential to establish RDM as a broadly operative regulatory mechanism. Oncogenic roles of PRMTs in cancer Aberrant expression and activity of PRMTs have been increasingly recognized as driving forces of tumorigenesis. PRMTs influence nearly every hallmark of cancer through their diverse substrates and cellular functions, including sustained proliferation, metabolic reprogramming, evasion of apoptosis, enhanced migration and invasion, and resistance to therapy. Mechanistically, PRMTs integrate epigenetic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and signaling networks to reprogram the oncogenic state of the cell. The role of each PRMT in cancer is summarized in Table 1 . Table 1 The role of PRMTs in cancer PRMTs Cancer type Expression Function Biological mechanism Refs PRMT1 Breast cancer High Oncogenic ERα methylation (R260) activates IGF-1 signaling [ 257 ] EZH2 methylation (R342) stabilizes EZH2 and promotes EMT/metastasis [ 91 ] C/EBPα methylation (R35/156/165) promotes cyclin D1 expression and cell proliferation [ 83 ] H4R3me2a at ZEB1 promoter promotes EMT, metastasis, and regulates senescence [ 70 ] SRSF1 methylation (R93, R97 and R109) promotes exon inclusion and cell proliferation [ 100 ] DDX3 methylation stabilizes DDX3, coordinating mitochondrial homeostasis to promote metastasis [ 259 ] Pancreatic cancer High Oncogenic Gli1 methylation (R597) promotes transcriptional activity and its oncogenic functions [ 260 ] HSP70 methylation (R416, R447) stabilizes BCL2 mRNA, promoting apoptosis resistance [ 261 ] PRMT1 regulates RNA metabolism and DNA damage response, promoting PDAC growth [ 107 ] - Tumor-suppressive p14 ARF methylation (R96/R99) triggers stress-induced apoptosis via release from nucleolus [ 262 ] Colorectal cancer High Oncogenic EGFR methylation (R198/R200) enhances EGF signaling and cetuximab resistance [ 111 ] H4R3me2a recruits SMARCA4 to activate EGFR/TNS4 signaling, promoting cancer progression [ 69 ] NONO methylation (R251) promotes colorectal cancer growth and metastasis [ 170 ] Gastric cancer High Oncogenic cGAS methylation (R133) suppresses cGAS/STING signaling and anti-tumor immunity [ 208 ] PRMT1 activates β-catenin signaling via MLXIP recruitment, promoting gastric cancer metastasis [ 84 ] c-Fos methylation (R287) stabilizes c-Fos, activates AP-1, and promotes gastric cancer progression [ 262 ] Lung cancer High Oncogenic Twist1 methylation (R34) promotes EMT and lung cancer metastasis [ 263 ] HCC High Oncogenic PRMT1 promotes cell proliferation and survival, serving as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target [ 264 ] PHGDH methylation (R236) enhances serine synthesis and promotes HCC proliferation [ 190 ] ccRCC High Oncogenic PRMT1 regulates RNA metabolism; its inhibition induces R-loops and DNA damage [ 108 ] PRMT1 promotes ccRCC growth and drug resistance via LCN2-Akt-RB signaling [ 265 ] Retinoblastoma High Oncogenic PRMT1 promotes retinoblastoma proliferation via p53/p21/CDC2/Cyclin B signaling [ 133 ] Melanoma High Oncogenic PRMT1 methylates/activates ALCAM, promoting melanoma cell growth and metastasis [ 266 ] Head and neck cancer High Oncogenic PRMT1 promotes HNC growth and migration via ADMA-mediated protein methylation [ 267 ] ESCC High Oncogenic PRMT1 promotes ESCC progression via activation of Hedgehog signaling [ 268 ] NPC (EBV-associated) - Oncogenic PRMT1 methylates PGC-1α, stabilized by EBV LMP1, promoting PD-L1-mediated immune escape [ 175 ] PRMT1 maintains ESCC tumor-initiating cells via H4R3me2a, activating Wnt/Notch signaling [ 269 ] AMKL High Oncogenic PRMT1 drives AMKL growth by boosting glycolysis and inhibiting fatty acid oxidation [ 181 ] PRMT2 Breast cancer High Oncogenic PRMT2/variants enhance ERα signaling to promote breast cancer cell proliferation [ 270 ] Low Tumor-suppressive PRMT2 inhibits ERα/AP-1-mediated cyclin D1 transcription, suppressing cancer cell proliferation [ 263 ] Colorectal cancer High Oncogenic PRMT2 promotes CRC progression and immune suppression via H3R8me2a at WNT5A promoter [ 72 ] RCC High Oncogenic PRMT2 drives RCC progression by activating Wnt signaling via H3R8me2a at WNT5A promoter [ 73 ] Glioblastoma High Oncogenic PRMT2 drives GBM progression by maintaining oncogenic transcription via H3R8me2a [ 71 ] PRMT3 Breast Cancer High Oncogenic H4R3me2a-mediated activation of ER stress signaling promotes proliferation and metastasis [ 171 ] Glioblastoma High Oncogenic PRMT3 promotes GBM progression by enhancing HIF1A and glycolytic metabolism [ 185 ] Pancreatic cancer High Oncogenic PRMT3 drives pancreatic cancer growth via GAPDH methylation (R248)-mediated metabolic rewiring [ 183 ] CARM1 Breast cancer High Oncogenic CARM1 promotes CCNE1 transcription via H3R17/R26 methylation, promoting cell cycle progression [ 127 ] BAF155 methylation (R1064) drives metastasis via regulation of oncogenic chromatin programs [ 92 , 93 ] LSD1 R838 methylation drives metastasis via epigenetic regulation of E-cadherin and vimentin [ 159 ] - Tumor-suppressive CARM1 coactivates ERα to induce differentiation and suppress proliferation in ERα-positive cancer [ 271 ] MED12 methylation (R1862/R1912) enhances chemotherapy sensitivity in breast cancer [ 94 , 271 ] Lung cancer (SCLC) ESRP1 reverses SCLC chemoresistance by regulating CARM1 splicing and inhibiting EMT [ 166 ] Colorectal cancer High Oncogenic CARM1 promotes CRC by enhancing β-catenin-mediated transcription through H3R17me2a [ 116 ] Gastric cancer High Oncogenic H3R17me2-mediated G6PD expression and PPP promote gastric cancer cell survival low glucose [ 194 ] Pancreatic cancer Low Tumor-suppressive MDH1 methylation (R230) suppresses glutamine metabolism and regulate redox homeostasis [ 193 ] HCC Low Tumor-suppressive GAPDH methylation (R234) suppresses glycolysis and delays proliferation in liver cancer cells [ 187 ] High Oncogenic CARM1 drives HCC progression by activating Akt/mTOR pathway, enhancing migration and invasion [ 272 ] Ovarian cancer High Oncogenic CARM1 promotes EZH2-dependent silencing of tumor suppressor genes [ 273 ] AML High Oncogenic RUNX1 methylation (R223) blocks myeloid differentiation in AML [ 85 ] CARM1 drives AML by promoting proliferation and blocking differentiation [ 274 ] PRMT5 Lymphoma High Oncogenic PRMT5 drives lymphoma cell proliferation through Wnt/β-catenin activation via H3R8me2s [ 167 ] DLBCL High Oncogenic PRMT5 drives DLBCL proliferation via BCR-induced PI3K–Akt and NF-κB signaling [ 275 ] Leukemia/lymphoma High Oncogenic PRMT5 represses tumor suppressor genes via H3R8/H4R3 hypermethylation [ 276 ] AML - Oncogenic SRSF1 methylation (R93, R97, R109) regulates alternative splicing of essential genes [ 101 ] - Oncogenic PRMT5 promotes AML via H4R3me2s-mediated miR-29b silencing, leading to Sp1/FLT3 activation [ 76 ] Breast cancer High Oncogenic ZNF326 methylation (R175) regulates alternative splicing and mRNA stability [ 102 ] PRMT5 promotes stemness and doxorubicin resistance by regulating OCT4, KLF4, and MYC [ 277 ] PRMT5 interacts with TRAF4 to activate NF-κB signaling, promoting breast cancer proliferation [ 278 ] PRMT5 regulates breast cancer stem cell function via histone methylation and FOXP1 expression [ 78 ] PRMT5 scaffolds GR to promote glucocorticoid-induced transcription and cell migration in TNBC [ 173 ] Repression of E-cadherin via H4R3me2s and activation of vimentin via H3R2me2s [ 162 ] Ovarian cancer High Oncogenic PRMT5 regulates tumor cell growth and apoptosis dependent on E2F-1 [ 131 ] ENO1 methylation (R9me2s) promotes dimerization and enhances glycolysis [ 279 ] Cervical cancer High Oncogenic PRMT5 drives cervical cancer metastasis via the Snail/PRMT5/NuRD complex-mediated EMT [ 161 ] Lung cancer High Oncogenic PRMT5 promotes lung cancer growth and metastasis via the H4R3me2s–miR-99–FGFR3 axis [ 280 ] PRMT5 promotes lung cancer cell proliferation by directly interacting and activating Akt [ 281 ] PRMT5-SHARPIN complex-mediated H3R2me1 activates transcription of metastasis-related genes [ 282 ] ENO-1 methylation (R50) enhances its localization to the surface membrane [ 283 ] H4R3me2s deposition on CD274 promoter represses PD-L1 expression [ 210 ] PRMT5 dimethylates at R41 and stabilizes KLF5 to activate Akt/GSK3β pathway [ 284 ] Prostate cancer High Oncogenic PRMT5 recruits pICln to methylate H4R3 at AR promoter, activating AR/AR-V7 transcription [ 285 ] AR methylation (R761) suppresses differentiation gene expression and promoting proliferation [ 286 ] Gastric cancer High Oncogenic PRMT5 is upregulated in gastric cancer, enhances proliferation, invasion, and migration [ 287 ] PRMT5 binds c-Myc to repress tumor suppressor genes via H4R3me2s [ 86 ] PRMT5-mediated histone methylation recruits DNMT3A to silence IRX1 [ 172 ] HCC High Oncogenic PRMT5 is overexpressed in HCC and colon cancer, promotes invasiveness via MMP-2 upregulation [ 288 ] PRMT5 promotes HCC proliferation by activating ERK signaling and suppressing BTG2 [ 289 ] Metadherin-PRMT5 complex enhances metastasis through Wnt-β-catenin pathway [ 117 ] Pancreatic cancer High Oncogenic PRMT5-mediated epigenetic silencing of FBW7 stabilizes c-Myc at the protein level [ 290 ] PRMT5 promotes EMT through activation of the EGFR/Akt/β-catenin signaling pathway [ 113 ] Colorectal cancer High Oncogenic YBX1 Methylation (R205) is essential for NF-κB activation and CRC growth and migration [ 125 ] PRMT5 cooperates with EZH2 to epigenetically silence CDKN2B , promoting CRC progression [ 77 ] PRMT5 activates the EGFR/Akt/GSK3β signaling pathway, promoting CRC proliferation [ 291 ] SMAD4 methylation (R361) activates TGF-β signaling and promotes metastasis [ 115 ] ZEB2 recruits TWIST1, PRMT5, and NuRD to epigenetically silence E-cadherin [ 163 ] Melanoma High Oncogenic SHARPIN facilitates PRMT5 activity that increases SOX10 and PAX3 expression [ 292 ] Regulation of MDM4 expression via alternative splicing, resulting in resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitor [ 97 ] ESCC - Oncogenic MTHFD1 methylation (R173) enhances NADPH production, promoting metastasis [ 176 ] Glioblastoma High Oncogenic SWI/SNF-associated PRMT5 generates H3R8me2s to repress ST7 and NM23 [ 293 ] PRMT5 regulates splicing and stemness in glioblastoma [ 99 ] PRMT5 regulates PTEN/Akt/ERK signaling to maintain both differentiated and stem-like tumor cell [ 294 ] Neuroblastoma High Oncogenic Akt1 methylation (R15) promotes tumor metastasis [ 120 ] Bladder cancer High Oncogenic PRMT5 activates NF-κB signaling and upregulates anti-apoptotic genes BCL-XL/cIAP1 [ 126 ] MTAP-deleted cancer Increased endogenous MTA inhibits PRMT5 activity and induces vulnerability toward PRMT5 [ 247 , 295 ] PRMT6 Breast cancer High Oncogenic PRMT6/PARP1/CRL4B forms transcriptional-repression complex and promotes metastasis [ 174 ] STAT3 methylation (R729) promotes its membrane localization and promotes cancer cell metastasis [ 169 ] Colorectal cancer High Oncogenic PRMT6 cooperates with PRMT5 to epigenetically silence CDKN2B and CCNG1 through H3R2me2a [ 81 ] Gastric cancer High Oncogenic H3R2me2a suppresses tumor suppressor genes ( PCDH7 , SCD , and IGFBP5 ) [ 79 ] Endometrial cancer High Oncogenic PRMT6 promotes endometrial cancer via Akt/mTOR signaling [ 296 ] Lung cancer High Oncogenic PRMT6 interacts with ILF2 to drive alternative activation of tumor-associated macrophages [ 220 ] Methylation of 6PGD (R324) and ENO1 (R9, R372) promotes glucose metabolism [ 201 ] Glioblastoma High Oncogenic PRMT6 attenuates the protein stability of CDKN1B by promoting its ubiquitinated degradation [ 82 ] RCC1 methylation (R214) promotes chromatin association and RAN activation [ 137 ] Melanoma - Tumor-suppressive PRMT6 suppresses melanoma progression by depositing H3R2me2a at ALDH1A1 promoter [ 80 ] HCC Low Tumor-suppressive CRAF methylation (R100) restrains RAS–MEK/ERK signaling, suppressing HCC progression [ 124 ] PRMT7 Breast cancer High Oncogenic METTL3/IGF2BP1-driven m 6 A methylation enhances PRMT7 expression, activating Wnt signaling [ 106 ] R531 automethylation promotes H4R3me2s and represses E-cadherin [ 297 ] PRMT7 represses E-cadherin through H4R3me2s-mediated epigenetic remodeling [ 160 ] Gastric cancer Low Tumor-suppressive PRMT7 methylates PTEN and inhibits the PI3K/Akt pathway, suppressing gastric cancer progression [ 122 ] Lung (NSCLC) High Oncogenic PRMT7 promotes NSCLC metastasis through interaction with HSPA5 and EEF2 [ 298 ] Renal cell carcinoma High Oncogenic PRMT7 methylates β-catenin and inhibiting the ubiquitin-mediated degradation of β-catenin [ 118 ] PRMT9 HCC High Oncogenic PRMT9 promotes HCC invasion and metastasis by activating the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β/Snail pathway [ 123 ] AML High Oncogenic PRMT9 drives AML progression by promoting leukemia cell survival and immune evasion [ 217 ] AML acute myeloid leukemia; acute megakaryoblastic leukemia, ccRCC clear cell renal cell carcinoma, DLBCL diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; EBV Epstein-Barr virus, ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, HCC hepatocarcinoma (hepatocellular carcinoma), MTAP methylthioadenosine phosphorylase, NPC nasopharyngeal carcinoma, NSCLC non-small cell lung carcinoma, RCC renal cell carcinoma, SCLC, small cell lung carcinoma Epigenetic and transcriptional regulation Epigenetic dysregulation is the central mechanism by which PRMTs drive oncogenesis. Several PRMT family members, particularly PRMT1, CARM1, and PRMT5, modulate chromatin architecture through site-specific methylation of histone arginine residues (Fig. 4 ). PRMT1-mediated asymmetric dimethylation of H4R3 (H4R3me2a) is associated with transcriptional activation through the recruitment of chromatin remodelers and histone acetyltransferases [ 62 ]. CARM1 catalyzes the asymmetric dimethylation of H3R17 (H3R17me2a) and H3R26 (H3R26me2a) [ 63 ]. At estrogen receptor (ER) target genes, CBP/p300 is typically recruited first to acetylate histones, thereby facilitating the subsequent recruitment of CARM1 and the establishment of H3R17me2a. This cooperative assembly of CBP/p300 and CARM1 enhances ER-driven transcription and oncogene expression in breast cancer [ 64 , 65 ]. Conversely, PRMT5 catalyzes the symmetric dimethylation of H4R3 (H4R3me2s) and H3R8 (H3R8me2s), generating repressive chromatin environments that silence tumor-suppressor genes [ 66 ]. Besides histones, PRMTs modify numerous transcriptional regulators, including p53, NF-κB, E2F1, and MED12, which fine-tune transcriptional outputs that favor cell survival, proliferation, and malignant plasticity [ 5 ]. Collectively, aberrant histone and non-histone methylation by PRMTs remodels the epigenetic landscape, reinforcing transcriptional addiction and oncogenic signaling in cancer cells. Fig. 4 Histone arginine methylation and epigenetic regulation by PRMTs. A Schematic representation of arginine (R) residues on histone tails (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) methylated by distinct PRMT family members. PRMT enzymes are color-coded as follows: Type I (blue), Type II (red), and Type III (purple). The indicated R residues represent established methylation sites targeted by specific PRMTs. B PRMTs deposit transcription-activating arginine methylation marks on histones, facilitating chromatin relaxation and gene activation. C PRMTs also generate transcription-repressive arginine methylation marks, promoting chromatin compaction and transcriptional silencing. D PRMTs methylate transcription factors (TFs), modulating their stability, localization, and DNA-binding activity to regulate gene expression. E PRMTs methylate transcriptional coactivators or corepressors and cooperate with other epigenetic modifications, such as histone acetylation, to fine-tune transcriptional outcomes. Green circles indicate transcriptionally active marks, whereas teal circles represent repressive marks. Yellow circles (Me) denote methylation events, and orange circles (Ac) represent acetylation Histone modification Histone arginine methylation is a fundamental step in epigenetic regulation that governs transcriptional programs. Asymmetric dimethylation by type I PRMTs favors transcriptional activation, whereas symmetric dimethylation by type II enzymes establishes a repressive chromatin state. The biological outcome depends on the specific modified residues: H4R3me2a, H3R8me2a, H3R17me2a, and H3R2me2s are activation marks, H4R3me2s and H3R8me2s correlate with repression, and H3R2me2a function bidirectionally [ 67 ]. PRMT1-mediated histone methylation recruits reader proteins and chromatin-remodeling complexes, which facilitate gene activation [ 68 ]. In colorectal cancer (CRC), PRMT1 enhances H4R3me2a deposition at the promoters of genes involved in growth and survival, in part through the recruitment of SMARCA4, the ATPase subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. This recruitment facilitates the transcriptional activation of EGFR and TNS4, thereby promoting tumor cell proliferation and migration [ 69 ]. In breast cancer, PRMT1 similarly facilitates ZEB1 promoter methylation, inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer stem cell traits [ 70 ]. PRMT2-mediated H3R8me2a deposition also contributes to transcriptional activation. In glioblastoma (GBM), PRMT2 increases the expression of oncogenic clusters [ 71 ], and in renal carcinoma, PRMT2-dependent enrichment of H3R8me2a at the WNT5A promoter enhances Wnt signaling and tumor proliferation [ 72 , 73 ]. CARM1-mediated H3R17me2a deposition likewise contributes to transcriptional activation. In various cancers, elevated H3R17me2a levels promote the expression of oncogenes and proliferation-related genes, thereby supporting tumor growth and progression [ 74 , 75 ]. PRMT5 catalyzes the symmetric dimethylation of multiple residues, including H3R2, H3R8, and H4R3, which typically generates repressive chromatin states. Although PRMT5 exerts transcriptional repression through symmetric dimethylation, its effects vary depending on the chromatin context and its interacting partners. For example, PRMT5 represses miR-29b transcription via H4R3me2s in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [ 76 ] and silences CDKN2B expression via H4R3me2s in CRC [ 77 ]. Conversely, in breast cancer stem cells, PRMT5 promotes FOXP1 transcription through H3R2me2s [ 78 ], highlighting its dual role in epigenetic regulation of tumors. Similar to PRMT5, PRMT6 mediates context-specific transcriptional regulation through H3R2me2a, a modification that modulates gene expression via crosstalk with H3K4me3. Depending on the chromatin landscape and target gene environment, PRMT6 can function as either a transcriptional repressor or activator, displaying tumor-suppressive or oncogenic effects. In cancer, PRMT6 enhances global H3R2me2a enrichment at tumor suppressor promoters such as PCDH7 [ 79 ], and at oncogene promoters such as ALDH1A1 [ 80 ]. Moreover, PRMT6 cooperates with PRMT5 to repress tumor suppressors such as CDKN2B and CCNG1, via the coordinated deposition of H3R2me2a, H4R3me2s, and H3R8me2s [ 81 ], establishing repressive chromatin environments that exert context-dependent effects on tumor progression. In contrast, PRMT6-mediated H3R2me2a also promotes CDC20 transcription, resulting in the degradation of the cell cycle inhibitor CDKN1B and uncontrolled proliferation of GBM [ 82 ]. Non-histone modification Beyond histone modifications, PRMTs profoundly influence transcription by methylating non-histone substrates, including transcription factors, nuclear receptors, coactivators, and chromatin remodelers. These modifications alter protein stability, DNA-binding affinity, and interactions with regulatory complexes, reprogramming oncogenic transcriptional networks. Transcription Factors : Several PRMTs directly target transcription factors that act as master switches in oncogenic transcription. PRMT1 methylates multiple transcriptional regulators to modulate their stability and functions. In breast cancer cells, PRMT1 methylates C/EBPα at R35, R156, and R165 and disrupts its interaction with HDAC3, promoting cyclin D1 expression and increasing tumor cell proliferation [ 83 ]. PRMT1 also methylates ZEB1 to modulate EMT and cellular senescence [ 70 ]. In gastric cancer, PRMT1 recruits MLXIP to the CTNNB1 promoter, activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling and promoting migration and metastasis [ 84 ]. Similarly, in AML models, CARM1 methylates RUNX1 at R223, enhancing its interaction with DPF2 and repressing miR-223 transcription. Because miR-223 promotes myeloid differentiation, the knockdown of CARM1 reduces the leukemia burden [ 85 ]. In gastric cancer, PRMT5 interacts with c-Myc to transcriptionally repress tumor suppressor genes, including CDKN1A , CDKN1C , CDKN2C , PTEN , and TP63 , promoting cell proliferation [ 86 ]. Nuclear Receptors and Coactivators: PRMT2 and CARM1 directly interact with ERα and function as transcriptional coactivators to enhance ERα-mediated gene expression [ 87 ]. Conversely, PRMT2 also suppresses ERα binding to the AP-1 site on the CCND1 promoter, inhibiting its transcription in breast carcinoma cells [ 88 ]. PRMT5 activates androgen receptor (AR) transcription by interacting with Sp1 and recruiting the chromatin remodeler Brg1, promoting tumor progression in prostate cancer [ 89 ]. Chromatin Remodelers and Epigenetic Enzymes: PRMT1 methylates and stabilizes histone methyltransferase EZH2 at R342 by preventing CDK1- and AMPK-mediated phosphorylation and the TRAF6 ubiquitin–proteasome pathway. In addition, PRMT1-mediated EZH2 methylation enhances its binding to SUZ12 and PRC2 complex formation. This stabilization leads to the repression of CDKN1A and CDKN2A through H3K27me3 enrichment in their promoters, ultimately promoting EMT, invasion, and metastasis [ 90 , 91 ]. CARM1 targets multiple components of the transcriptional machinery to promote oncogenic programs. It methylates the SWI/SNF complex subunit BAF155 at R1064, enhancing chromatin remodeling at oncogenic loci, including c-Myc target genes, driving cell migration and metastasis [ 92 ]. Methylated BAF155 also cooperates with BRD4 to activate oncogenic transcription while concurrently repressing ISG expression and reducing T-cell infiltration in metastatic tumors [ 93 ]. In addition, CARM1 methylates MED12 at R1862 and R1912, conferring resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, such as 5-FU and doxorubicin, by repressing CDKN1A transcription [ 94 ]. Together, these mechanisms underscore how PRMTs bridge transcriptional and epigenetic systems through non-histone substrate methylation, integrating multiple oncogenic signaling pathways into a coordinated transcriptional program. mRNA processing and translation regulation PRMTs exert pivotal control over RNA metabolism by linking chromatin cues to post-transcriptional gene regulation. They fine-tune mRNA maturation, stability, and translation efficiency by methylating splicing factors, RNA-binding proteins, and translational machinery. Dysregulated arginine methylation in cancer cells disrupts these processes, fostering transcriptomic plasticity and oncogenic adaptation. Regulation of splicing PRMT5 is a critical regulator of pre-mRNA splicing. It methylates core spliceosomal components, including Sm proteins, enhancing their association with SMN [ 95 ]. In neural stem cells, the loss of PRMT5 disrupts the splicing of MDM4 , reducing full-length transcript levels and generating a truncated isoform subject to nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). This destabilized isoform fails to properly inhibit p53, leading to defective cell cycle control [ 96 ]. In melanoma, loss of PRMT5 promotes exon skipping of MDM4 to generate the MDM4-S isoform, restores p53 function, and sensitizes cells to CDK4/6 inhibitors [ 97 ]. Moreover, several splicing and RNA-processing factors, including Lsm4 and hnRNPH1, undergo PRMT5-dependent SDMA [ 96 – 98 ]. In GBM stem cells, PRMT5 inhibition causes widespread splicing defects, particularly in genes controlling the cell cycle and proliferation, suppressing tumor growth in vitro and in vivo [ 99 ]. Besides spliceosome assembly, PRMT-mediated methylation dynamically modulates alternative splicing in cancer. In breast cancer, PRMT1 methylates SRSF1 and enhances its RNA-binding activity, promoting oncogenic exon inclusion. Both PRMT1 and methylated SRSF1 are upregulated in tumors, and their inhibition attenuates aberrant splicing and tumor growth [ 100 ]. Similarly, in AML, PRMT5 methylates SRSF1 at R93, R97, and R109, stabilizing RNA–protein interactions and promoting the efficient splicing of proliferation-related transcripts. Loss of PRMT5 disrupts these networks, causing extensive alternative splicing and cell death [ 101 ]. PRMT5 also methylates ZNF326 at R175, which is essential for RNA polymerase II transcription of A-T-rich genes. Loss of PRMT5 induces A-T-rich exon inclusion in ST3GAL5 , FOXM1 , and AP4 , generating aberrant transcripts that are degraded by NMD. These defects impair breast cancer cell proliferation and migration [ 102 ]. Collectively, PRMT-dependent regulation of alternative splicing ensures precise RNA maturation, whereas its dysregulation contributes to malignant transformation and therapeutic resistance in various cancers. mRNA modification and metabolism The N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) modification is a major determinant of mRNA metabolism, influencing transcript splicing, export, translation, and decay [ 103 ]. The METTL3–METTL14–WTAP complex functions as the principal m 6 A methyltransferase. PRMT1 is linked to the m 6 A machinery by methylating METTL14 at R442 and R445. This modification promotes the association of METTL14 with RNA polymerase II, enhancing m 6 A deposition on transcripts involved in DNA interstrand crosslink repair pathways. PRMT1 maintains genomic stability under genotoxic stress through METTL14 methylation; consequently, its inhibition sensitizes cancer cells to chemotherapy [ 104 , 105 ]. The m 6 A machinery acts upstream of PRMT7. The METTL3/IGF2BP1 axis enhances m 6 A modification of PRMT7 mRNA, stabilizing its expression and activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling to promote tumor progression [ 106 ]. Besides m 6 A regulation, PRMT1 exerts broad control over RNA metabolism. Multiomics analyses have identified PRMT1 as a central regulator that integrates RNA processing and DNA damage response (DDR) networks. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), PRMT1 interacts with RNA-binding proteins such as hnRNPs, coordinating RNA splicing and genome maintenance [ 107 ]. Similar observations in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) revealed that PRMT1 loss leads to R-loop accumulation and double-stranded DNA breaks, ultimately triggering growth arrest [ 108 ]. These findings suggest that PRMT1 is a key regulator of RNA metabolism, genomic integrity, and cancer cell survival. Translational regulation PRMTs are crucial regulators of translational homeostasis and influence both global and selective protein synthesis. In p53/Rb-deficient osteosarcoma, PRMT1 regulates global translation by methylating core components of the translation initiation complex, including eIF4G1, eIF4A, and eIF4E. This suggests that PRMT1 is an oncogenic driver that safeguards translation under stress conditions and highlights it as a potential therapeutic target [ 109 ]. In addition, PRMT5 regulates internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-dependent translation by methylating hnRNP A1 at R218 and R225. This methylation enhances the affinity of hnRNP A1 for IRES-containing mRNAs, such as CCND1 and MYC , promoting translation initiation. Mutations in these residues or PRMT5 inhibition disrupt hnRNP A1–IRES binding and selectively impair IRES-dependent translation. Through this mechanism, PRMT5 supports the synthesis of proteins encoded by CCND1 , MYC , HIF1A, and ESR1 , promoting tumor proliferation and survival [ 110 ]. Signal transduction and cell cycle regulation PRMTs have emerged as central integrators of oncogenic signaling and cell cycle control. Extracellular cues are linked to transcriptional and checkpoint responses through methylation of both histone and non-histone substrates. At the signaling level, PRMTs modify receptors, kinases, and transcription factors across major oncogenic pathways, including EGFR, TGF-β, Wnt, PI3K–Akt, MAPK, and NF-κB, fine-tuning the amplitude and duration of signal transduction [ 7 ]. At the downstream effector level, PRMT-dependent methylation of key cell cycle regulators, including p21, cyclin E1, and CDK1, converts upstream inputs into cellular decisions of proliferation or arrest [ 5 ]. Collectively, PRMTs function as methylation-based rheostats that integrate growth factor signaling with sustained tumor cell proliferation and metastatic progression. Signal transduction EGFR pathway: PRMT1 methylates EGFR at R198 and R200 within the extracellular domain, enhancing EGF binding, receptor dimerization, and downstream signaling in CRC cells [ 111 ]. PRMT5 also promotes EGF-induced EGFR trans-autophosphorylation by methylating EGFR at R1199 (corresponding to R1175 in mature EGFR) [ 112 ]. In pancreatic cancer cells, PRMT5 is upregulated and enhances EGFR phosphorylation and downstream Akt and GSK3β activation, leading to increased β-catenin expression. This PRMT5-dependent signaling cascade promotes the expression of EMT-related genes, such as vimentin and collagen I [ 113 ]. TGF-β/SMAD pathway: PRMT1 promotes TGF-β–driven EMT by methylating SMAD7 at R57 and R67, enhancing the transcription of EMT- and stemness-associated genes in mammary epithelial cells [ 114 ]. In CRC cells, PRMT5 also reinforces TGF-β signaling through SMAD4 methylation at R361, facilitating SMAD complex formation and nuclear translocation to induce EMT and metastasis. Clinically, elevated PRMT5 expression and increased SMAD4 R361 methylation correlate with poor patient prognosis [ 115 ]. Wnt/ β -catenin pathway: Aberrant activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling is a hallmark of CRC. CARM1, which is frequently overexpressed in colon cancer, interacts with β-catenin to enhance β-catenin–driven transcription. β-catenin recruits CARM1 to LEF/TCF-bound promoters, where CARM1 deposits H3R17me2a, creating an active chromatin state that promotes target gene expression and cell proliferation [ 116 ]. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the MTDH–PRMT5 complex augments Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Overexpressed MTDH preferentially binds to PRMT5, releasing β-catenin for nuclear translocation and activating downstream oncogenic programs [ 117 ]. In ccRCC, PRMT7 is upregulated and methylates β-catenin, protecting it from ubiquitin-mediated degradation and amplifying the β-catenin/c-Myc axis to drive cell proliferation [ 118 ]. PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway: PRMT5 directly enhances PI3K/Akt signaling through multiple methylation events in Akt. PRMT5-mediated methylation of Akt1 at R391, along with phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate, weakens intramolecular PH–KD binding, facilitating membrane translocation and subsequent activation of PDK1 and mTORC2 [ 119 ]. PRMT5 also methylates Akt1 at R15, enabling its full activation via phosphorylation at T308 and S473. PRMT5 inhibition abolishes these events, impairs Akt activation, and suppresses EMT transcription factors, such as ZEB1, Snail, and Twist1, reducing neuroblastoma growth and metastasis [ 120 ]. In GBM, PRMT5 indirectly sustains PI3K/Akt signaling by repressing PTEN , which promotes proliferation through the suppression of p27 and activation of E2F targets. PRMT5 depletion reversed these effects and induced G1/S arrest and cellular senescence. In contrast, PRMT6 counteracts the PI3K/Akt pathway by methylating PTEN at R159 [ 121 ]. Other PRMT family members modulate this axis in a context-dependent manner. In gastric cancer, PRMT7 promotes PTEN methylation and activates PI3K/Akt signaling [ 122 ]. In HCC, PRMT9 activates the PI3K/Akt/GSK3β/Snail cascade, promoting EMT and metastasis [ 123 ]. RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway: PRMT6 is frequently downregulated in HCC, and its expression is inversely correlated with aggressive cancer features in patients with HCC. PRMT6 silencing promoted tumorigenesis, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance in HCC cell lines and patient-derived organoids. PRMT6 methylates CRAF at R100, reducing its RAS-binding potential and inhibiting downstream MEK/ERK signaling. Consequently, PRMT6 deficiency upregulates stemness-related genes, such as CD133 , SOX2 , and NANOG [ 124 ]. NF-κB pathway: PRMT5 amplifies NF-κB signaling by methylating YBX1 at R205 and p65 at R30. These modifications strengthen YBX1–p65 interactions and enhance p65 DNA binding, driving the transcription of YBX1-dependent NF-κB target genes and promoting oncogenic and proinflammatory responses [ 125 ]. In bladder cancer, PRMT5 facilitates NF-κB recruitment to the promoters of anti-apoptotic genes, such as BCLXL and BIRC2 , suppressing apoptosis [ 126 ]. Cell cycle regulation G1/S Transition and Checkpoint Control: CARM1 contributes to the G1/S transition by regulating ERα-mediated transcriptional activation. Upon estrogen stimulation, CARM1 associates with ERα and the coactivator AIB1 to promote H3R17me2a at the E2F1 promoter, thereby enhancing E2F1 transcription and facilitating cell cycle progression [ 75 ]. In a growth stimulation context, CARM1 is recruited to the CCNE1 promoter in an E2F-dependent manner, together with the p160 coactivator ACTR. This recruitment is accompanied by dynamic changes in H3R17 and H3R26 methylation and contributes to CCNE1 activation and S-phase entry [ 127 ]. Furthermore, during the G1/S transition, CARM1-mediated methylation of Rb at R775, R787, and R798 enhances CDK-dependent phosphorylation and disrupts its association with E2F1, activating E2F1 target genes and driving G1/S progression [ 128 ]. Recent evidence further demonstrates that CARM1 hypermethylates components of the NuRD chromatin remodeling complex, including GATAD2A/B, thereby enhancing the expression of cell cycle–related genes and promoting breast cancer development [ 129 ]. PRMT5 is essential for cell proliferation because it sustains the G1/S transition. It directly methylates E2F1 at R111 and R113, reducing protein stability. Under DNA damage stress, methylation decreases, leading to E2F1 accumulation and induction of apoptosis [ 130 ]. Consistently, PRMT5 overexpression promotes tumor cell growth in epithelial ovarian cancer, whereas its inhibition triggers apoptosis via E2F1 upregulation [ 131 ]. In addition, PRMT5 depletion suppresses p53 protein synthesis by downregulating the translation factor eIF4E, resulting in impaired induction of p53 target genes, such as MDM2 and CDKN1A , upon DNA damage. Together, these findings establish PRMT5 as a key pro-survival regulator that integrates methylation–dependent control of E2F1 stability and p53 translation to sustain cell cycle progression [ 132 ]. G2/M Transition and Mitotic Control: PRMTs orchestrate multiple steps in mitotic regulation through histone and non-histone methylation. Inhibition of PRMT1 activates the p53/p21 signaling pathway, suppressing cyclin B and CDK1, which leads to G2/M arrest and accumulation of mitotic cells [ 133 ]. CARM1 plays a multifaceted role in mitosis. CARM1-mediated methylation of PI3KC2α at R175 enhances its interaction with tubulin, stabilizes microtubules, and promotes proper spindle formation [ 61 , 134 , 135 ]. Besides its methyltransferase activity, CARM1 functions as a scaffold that regulates CDK1 stability [ 42 ]. During interphase, CARM1 acts as an adaptor for Cullin-1-mediated CDK1 degradation, restricting nuclear CDK1 levels. In late G2, the CDK1–cyclin B1 complex translocates to the nucleus and phosphorylates CARM1, inactivating its enzymatic function and inducing its cytoplasmic translocation. Loss of nuclear CARM1 stabilizes the nuclear CDK1–cyclin B1 complex, facilitating mitotic entry. Additional layers of mitotic regulation are provided through histone arginine methylation. Upon mitotic entry, CARM1 is phosphorylated by CDK1 and PKC, leading to enzymatic inactivation and a decrease in H3R17me2a levels [ 42 , 59 ]. Concurrently, PRMT6 deposits the H3R2me2a mark [ 42 , 136 ]. These coordinated chromatin modifications are essential for the recruitment of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), facilitating Aurora B binding to chromatin and promoting H3S10 phosphorylation, a key step in chromosome condensation. Loss of H3R2me2a impairs CPC localization to chromosomal arms and disrupts mitotic progression [ 136 ]. In GBM, CK2α phosphorylates and stabilizes PRMT6, enhancing the PRMT6-dependent methylation of RCC1 at R214. This modification promotes chromatin association and Ran GTPase activation, facilitating mitotic progression and nucleocytoplasmic transport during the interphase [ 137 ]. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that PRMTs coordinate mitotic progression through diverse mechanisms, including epigenetic regulation, scaffold function, and kinase-driven signaling (Fig. 5 ). In particular, the dual roles of CARM1—as a methyltransferase regulating spindle formation and chromosome condensation, and as an adaptor modulating CDK1 homeostasis—underscore its central role in maintaining mitotic integrity. Fig. 5 Temporal regulation of mitosis by PRMTs. During interphase (G1/S), CARM1 (green) localizes to the nucleus, where it acts as a scaffold to facilitate Cullin-1 (CUL1)–Skp2–mediated ubiquitination of CDK1 (blue), thereby maintaining low nuclear CDK1 levels while exerting epigenetic functions such as H3R17me2a deposition. As cells enter late G2, the CDK1–cyclin B1 complex (blue/purple) accumulates and translocates into the nucleus. CDK1 phosphorylates CARM1 at S217, suppressing its methyltransferase activity and promoting cytoplasmic relocalization. Loss of nuclear CARM1 disrupts CDK1 ubiquitination, resulting in CDK1 stabilization and sustained nuclear retention of the CDK1–cyclin B1 complex to drive mitotic entry. During mitosis (M phase), PRMT6 (teal) catalyzes H3R2me2a, recruiting the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) to chromosome arms. This enhances Aurora B ( AURKB )-dependent H3S10 phosphorylation and promotes chromosome condensation. Upon mitotic exit, CARM1 re-enters the nucleus, restores CDK1 ubiquitination, and resets the cell-cycle regulatory circuit. Color scheme: CDK1 (blue), cyclin B1 (purple), CARM1 (green), PRMT6 (teal), and CPC components (magenta). Yellow circles (Me) indicate methylation, red circles (P) indicate phosphorylation, and gray (Ub) symbols denote ubiquitination DNA damage repair and genome stability PRMTs are pivotal regulators of DDR, modulating the recruitment, activity, and stability of repair factors through both histone and non-histone methylation. By targeting core DNA repair proteins and chromatin components, PRMTs orchestrate multiple DNA repair pathways, including homologous recombination (HR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), base/nucleotide excision repair (BER/NER), and replication-associated checkpoint signaling [ 138 ]. DNA double-strand break repair Double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) are among the most lethal DNA lesions and are primarily repaired by HR and NHEJ. PRMTs have emerged as critical modulators of these pathways, as they orchestrate the assembly and function of repair factors (Fig. 6 ). PRMT1-mediated BRCA1 methylation determines the binding preference for Sp1 or STAT1 [ 139 ], promoting chromatin recruitment. In breast cancer, loss of PRMT1 mislocalizes BRCA1 to the cytoplasm, resulting in defective DNA repair and increased radiosensitivity [ 140 ]. PRMT1 methylates both MRE11 and 53BP1, promoting their recruitment to DSBs [ 141 – 143 ]. These methylation events are facilitated by GFL1, which serves as an adaptor that enables PRMT1 to interact with MRE11 and 53BP1 [ 144 ]. In addition, DNA-PK-dependent PRMT1 phosphorylation drives PRMT1 accumulation in chromatin upon cisplatin exposure, inducing the expression of senescence-associated secretory phenotype genes through sustained H4R3me2a deposition [ 145 ]. Fig. 6 Regulation of DDR by PRMTs. A Following DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), PRMT1 (blue) methylates MRE11 within the MRN complex (MRE11–RAD50–NBS1), enhancing its exonuclease activity and promoting homologous recombination (HR). PRMT1 also methylates BRCA1, contributing to HR regulation. B In the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway, 53BP1 is methylated by both PRMT1 (blue) and PRMT5 (red). PRMT5-mediated methylation increases 53BP1 stability, whereas PRMT1-mediated methylation enhances its recruitment to DSB sites. Elevated 53BP1 recruitment facilitates the assembly of NHEJ factors, including Ku70/80, DNA-PKcs, XRCC4, XLF, and LIG4, thereby promoting NHEJ. C In HR regulation, PRMT5 (red) methylates RUVBL1, facilitating TIP60-dependent histone acetylation (Ac). This modification antagonizes 53BP1 recruitment and promotes the loading of HR factors, including RPA and RAD51, thereby enhancing HR-mediated repair. Yellow circles (Me) indicate methylation events, orange circles (Ac) represent acetylation, and red circles (P) denote phosphorylation PRMT5 orchestrates the cellular choice between NHEJ and HR through the multilayered regulation of DNA repair factors. At the protein stability level, PRMT5 methylates and stabilizes 53BP1, promoting NHEJ, which is counteracted by Src-mediated phosphorylation, inhibiting PRMT5 and diminishing 53BP1 accumulation [ 50 ]. PRMT5 also modulates the functional engagement of repair proteins in DSBs. Methylation of RUVBL1 at R205 facilitates TIP60/KAT5-dependent chromatin acetylation and displaces 53BP1 from DSBs, suppressing NHEJ [ 146 ]. In parallel, PRMT5-mediated METTL3 methylation at R36 enhances RAD51 recruitment to DSBs, promoting HR [ 147 ]. Besides its direct effects on repair factor stability and recruitment, PRMT5 exerts a broader influence on repair pathways by modulating mRNA splicing. Loss of PRMT5 results in the aberrant splicing of key chromatin-modifying enzymes, such as TIP60/KAT5 and KMT5C/SUV4-20H2, leading to reduced TIP60α expression and impaired chromatin acetylation, ultimately compromising HR efficiency [ 148 ]. CARM1 contributes to BRCA1 regulation by methylating CBP/p300 at R754, a modification that is recognized by the BRCT domain of BRCA1. This interaction facilitates the recruitment of BRCA1 to the p53-binding region of the CDKN1A promoter [ 149 ]. Besides this transcription-coupled mechanism, CARM1 is rapidly recruited to DSBs via its interaction with PARP1, where it contributes to efficient DSB repair [ 150 ]. Base excision repair PRMT6 enhances BER efficiency by methylating DNA polymerase β at R83 and R152. These modifications increase DNA-binding affinity and processivity, promoting more efficient repair synthesis and conferring resistance to alkylation-induced DNA damage [ 151 ]. PRMT1 methylates DNA polymerase β at R137, disrupting its interaction with PCNA. This methylation likely modulates the handoff between BER and replication, preventing the inappropriate engagement of DNA polymerase β at replication forks and ensuring pathway fidelity [ 152 ]. In NER, the structure-specific endonuclease XPF–ERCC1 is essential for incising damaged DNA strands, particularly during the removal of ultraviolet (UV)-induced pyrimidine dimers. CARM1 methylates XPF at multiple arginine residues, including R568, which is required for XPF protein stability, chromatin association, and efficient heterodimerization with ERCC1. Therefore, loss of CARM1 reduces XPF–ERCC1 levels and impairs its recruitment to UV-damaged chromatin, leading to impaired NER efficiency and heightened sensitivity to UV irradiation [ 153 ]. Damage sensing and checkpoint signaling PRMT5 regulates genomic integrity through multiple mechanisms, including the control of γH2AX proteostasis, checkpoint signaling, and transcriptional regulation. PRMT5 balances γH2AX stability by modulating ubiquitination through the PRMT5–RNF168–SMURF2 axis: RNF168 stabilizes γH2AX, whereas SMURF2 promotes its degradation. Specifically, PRMT5 preserves γH2AX levels by maintaining RNF168 expression via H3R2me1 and H3R8me2s. In GBM, loss of MTAP disrupts this pathway, leading to impaired DNA damage signaling [ 154 ]. PRMT5-mediated RAD9 methylation at R172, R174, and R175 are also required for genotoxin-induced Chk1 phosphorylation. Methylated and phosphorylated RAD9 subsequently forms a 9–1-1 complex with RAD1 and Hus1, which is critical for cell cycle control and DNA repair [ 155 ]. In addition, PRMT5 methylates and stabilizes the transcription factor KLF4 at R374, R376, and R377, promoting cell survival by inducing CDKN1A and repressing BAX . Upon DNA damage, the loss of KLF4 methylation triggers its degradation, leading to cell cycle arrest [ 156 ]. Tumor metastasis PRMTs are key epigenetic regulators that drive cancer metastasis by orchestrating processes essential for tumor dissemination, survival, and colonization. Metastasis typically begins with EMT, during which epithelial cancer cells lose polarity and adhesion, while gaining motility and invasive potential. PRMTs promote EMT by repressing epithelial markers, such as E-cadherin ( CDH1 ), and activating mesenchymal markers, including vimentin ( VIM ), either directly or indirectly through modulation of EMT-inducing transcription factors (EMT-TFs) [ 157 , 158 ]. PRMT1 methylates and stabilizes EZH2 at R342, reinforcing H3K27me3-dependent repression of CDH1 [ 91 ]. Similarly, CARM1 methylates and stabilizes LSD1 at R838, repressing CDH1 and activating VIM transcription through H3K4me2 and H3K9me2 [ 159 ]. PRMT7-mediated H4R3me2s also inhibits CDH1 expression by reducing H3K4me3, H3Ac, and H4Ac at the CDH1 promoter during EMT induction [ 160 ]. In addition, PRMTs regulate key EMT-TFs. Snail and Slug form complexes with PRMT5 and LSD1 to repress CDH1 and activate VIM transcription [ 161 , 162 ]. ZEB2 cooperates with Twist1, PRMT5, and the NuRD complex to epigenetically silence CDH1 , reinforcing the mesenchymal phenotype [ 163 ]. PRMT1-mediated methylation of Twist1 at R34 strengthens its repressor function, whereas PRMT1 enhances ZEB1 expression via H4R3me2a deposition in its promoter [ 70 , 164 ]. At the signaling level, PRMTs modulate key pathways that govern EMT and metastasis. In the TGF-β pathway, PRMT1 and CARM1 methylate SMAD6 and SMAD7, promoting their dissociation from receptors and enhancing SMAD-dependent transcription [ 114 , 165 , 166 ]. PRMT5 methylates SMAD4 at R361, facilitating its nuclear translocation and transcriptional activity [ 115 ]. PRMT5 also potentiates Wnt signaling by epigenetically silencing pathway antagonists, such as DKK1 and DKK3, leading to enhanced β-catenin–driven transcriptional programs [ 167 , 168 ]. Furthermore, PRMT5-mediated Akt1 methylation at R15 and PRMT1/PRMT6-dependent STAT3 methylation activate downstream oncogenic signaling, promoting EMT and metastatic potential [ 120 , 169 ]. Beyond these pathways, PRMTs modulate growth factor receptor signaling, including that of EGFR and FGFR3, to enhance migration, invasion, and EMT induction. Parallel to EMT regulation, PRMTs promote cancer cell migration and invasion through cytoskeletal remodeling, adhesion turnover, and extracellular matrix degradation. PRMT1-driven methylation of NONO enhances CRC metastasis [ 170 ], and PRMT3 promotes breast cancer proliferation and metastasis through H4R3me2a-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling [ 171 ]. CARM1 activates genes that enhance cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastasis by methylating BAF155 [ 93 ]. PRMT5 promotes cancer metastasis by recruiting DNMT3A to the promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes [ 172 ]. Moreover, PRMT5 functions as a scaffold of the glucocorticoid receptor—independent of its enzymatic activity—by recruiting phospho-HP1γ and RNA polymerase II, enhancing glucocorticoid receptor-dependent gene transcription and promoting TNBC cell motility [ 173 ]. PRMT6 supports tumor growth and metastasis by modulating circadian gene expression [ 174 ]. PRMTs also enable cell survival during metastatic dissemination by conferring resistance to anoikis and apoptosis triggered by the loss of extracellular matrix attachment. PRMT1 methylates and stabilizes PGC-1α to promote anoikis resistance [ 175 ], and PRMT5 methylates MTHFD1 to increase NADPH production, facilitating metabolic adaptation under anchorage-independent conditions [ 176 ]. Collectively, PRMTs orchestrate a multifaceted pro-metastatic program that encompasses EMT induction, EMT-TF modulation, signaling network regulation, cytoskeletal remodeling, and metabolic adaptation. These diverse functions highlight PRMTs as pivotal drivers of tumor progression and as compelling therapeutic targets for preventing metastatic cancer dissemination. Metabolic reprogramming and stress adaptation Metabolic reprogramming is a hallmark of cancer that enables tumor cells to proliferate rapidly and persist in nutrient-limited conditions [ 177 , 178 ]. Among the central regulators, PRMTs have emerged as pivotal orchestrators of glucose metabolism and the Warburg effect. However, their metabolic influence extends far beyond glycolysis, encompassing amino acid synthesis, redox balance, and lipid metabolism, collectively shaping multiple layers of metabolic control in cancer (Fig. 7 ). Fig. 7 PRMT-driven metabolic reprogramming in cancer. PRMTs orchestrate metabolic reprogramming by coordinating glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), serine biosynthesis, and mitochondrial function to support tumor growth. PRMT1 (blue), PRMT3 (orange), and CARM1 (green) regulate glycolytic flux through transcriptional control and direct methylation of key metabolic enzymes, including G6PD, RPIA, PFKFB3, GAPDH, PGK1, PHGDH, PKM2, PTBP1, LDHA, and IDH2. Yellow circles (Me) indicate methylation-mediated regulation, whereas black circles (T) denote transcriptional regulation. Solid lines represent positive regulation and dotted lines indicate negative regulation. These modifications enhance glucose utilization, lactate production, and promote the PKM2/PKM1 isoform switch. CARM1-mediated activation of G6PD and methylation of RPIA stimulate the PPP, elevate NADPH levels, and maintain redox homeostasis. CARM1-dependent methylation of DRP1 and IDH2, along with modulation of mitochondrial Ca 2 ⁺ signaling, regulates mitochondrial dynamics, TCA cycle activity, and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Collectively, PRMTs integrate cytoplasmic and mitochondrial metabolism to increase metabolic flexibility in cancer cells Glycolysis, glucose utilization, and energy homeostasis Several PRMTs promote aerobic glycolysis by regulating key glycolytic enzymes. PRMT1 drives glucose metabolism through multiple mechanisms. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), PRMT1-deposited H4R3me2a upregulates PTBP1, which enhances the glycolytic flux by increasing the PKM2/PKM1 ratio [ 179 ]. In CRC, PRMT1 methylates PGK1 at R205, promoting its phosphorylation and shifting energy production toward glycolysis [ 180 ]. In acute megakaryocytic leukemia, PRMT1 increases glucose consumption while suppressing CPT1A-dependent fatty acid oxidation, making cells metabolically reliant on glycolysis [ 181 ]. PRMT3 also enhances glycolytic flux through both direct enzymatic regulation and transcriptional control. At the enzymatic level, PRMT3 methylates LDHA at R112 in hepatocellular carcinoma, thereby increasing lactate production [ 182 ], and GAPDH at R248 in pancreatic cancer, promoting the assembly of its active tetrameric structure and enhancing catalytic activity [ 183 ]. In addition, PRMT3-mediated methylation of HIF-1α at R282 increases protein stability [ 184 ], thereby promoting the transcription of glycolytic genes, including PGK1 , PDK1 , GAPDH , TPI1 , LDHA, and PFKL [ 185 ]. CARM1 functions as both a positive and negative regulator of glycolysis: it promotes glycolytic commitment by methylating PKM2 at R445, R447, and R455 [ 186 ], while suppressing glycolysis through methylation of GAPDH at R234 [ 187 ]. In breast cancer cells, CARM1-mediated methylation of PKM2 reduces the expression of inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors and limits Ca 2 ⁺ transfer from the endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria, thereby attenuating mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and promoting a shift toward aerobic glycolysis [ 186 ]. In liver cancer cells, CARM1-mediated methylation of GAPDH suppresses its catalytic activity and represses glycolysis in an AMPK-dependent manner [ 187 ]. Beyond cytosolic glycolysis, CARM1 also links glucose metabolism to mitochondrial energy homeostasis. CARM1 localizes to mitochondria and contributes to energy homeostasis by targeting key tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle enzymes [ 60 ]. Notably, methylation of IDH2 at R188 suppresses its catalytic activity while enhancing protein stability [ 60 ]. Consistent with this role, CARM1 inhibition has been reported to increase oxygen consumption rates and enhance oxidative phosphorylation [ 60 , 188 , 189 ], suggesting that CARM1 may restrain mitochondrial respiratory activity. Amino acid and redox metabolism PRMTs also redirect carbon flux toward amino acid synthesis and redox regulation. PRMT1 methylates PHGDH at R236, activating serine biosynthesis and alleviating oxidative stress in hepatocellular carcinoma [ 190 ]. Under proliferative conditions, PRMT1 methylates and stabilizes PFKFB3, increasing F-2,6-BP levels and promoting glycolysis. However, under oxidative stress, reduced PFKFB3 methylation diverts the glucose flux toward the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), generating NADPH and enhancing chemoresistance [ 191 ]. Similarly, CARM1 regulates amino acid and redox metabolism through the methylation of multiple substrates. It methylates PKM2 to suppress de novo serine synthesis [ 192 ] and methylates MDH1 at R230 to inhibit glutamine metabolism [ 193 ]. CARM1 also cooperates with NRF2 to upregulate G6PD and methylate RPIA at R42, sustaining NADPH production and redox homeostasis via PPP activation [ 194 ]. In addition, CARM1-mediated methylation of DRP1 at R403 and R634 promotes mitochondrial fission and contributes to redox signaling [ 188 , 189 ]. Lipid metabolism and ferroptosis PRMT5 is a major regulator of lipid metabolism and ferroptosis. It methylates SREBP1a, promoting de novo lipogenesis, a process further amplified by SIRT7-mediated desuccinylation [ 195 ]. In mantle cell lymphoma, PRMT5 promotes tumor growth by upregulating SREBP1/2 and FASN expression through a MYC -dependent mechanism, thereby driving lipid metabolic reprogramming [ 196 ]. Beyond its role in lipid biosynthesis, PRMT5 also suppresses ferroptosis by stabilizing GPX4. PRMT5 catalyzes symmetric dimethylation of GPX4 at R152, which disrupts its interaction with the Cullin1–FBW7 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, thereby preventing ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation [ 197 ]. In addition to PRMT5, CARM1 has also been implicated in ferroptosis regulation, where it functions as a negative regulator of ferroptotic cell death. Mechanistically, CARM1 has been shown to promote H3R26me2a deposition at the GPX4 promoter, thereby sustaining GPX4 expression and suppressing lipid peroxidation [ 198 ]. Moreover, CARM1-mediated methylation of ACSL4 has been reported to limit ferroptosis sensitivity in colorectal cancer cells [ 199 ]. Through these mechanisms, CARM1 contributes to ferroptosis resistance by reinforcing antioxidant defenses and modulating lipid metabolic pathways. Collectively, these findings highlight the broader role of PRMT family members in coordinating lipid metabolic reprogramming and ferroptosis resistance in cancer. Autophagy regulation Autophagy represents a critical adaptive mechanism that enables cancer cells to survive metabolic and therapeutic stress. Emerging evidence indicates that PRMTs contribute to the fine-tuning of autophagy initiation and maturation. For instance, PRMT5 has been reported to methylate ULK1 at R170, thereby modulating autophagy initiation and stress responses [ 58 ]. In parallel, CARM1 regulates autophagy-related transcriptional programs through the AMPK–Skp2 axis. Under energy stress, AMPK activation promotes Skp2 degradation and subsequent stabilization of nuclear CARM1, which enhances the transcription of autophagy- and lysosome-related genes, in part through H3R17me2a deposition [ 45 ]. Moreover, CARM1-mediated methylation of Pontin is essential for the activation of this transcriptional program, facilitating the expression of genes required for autophagosome formation and lysosomal function [ 200 ]. Through these coordinated mechanisms, PRMTs integrate metabolic signaling with autophagy control, thereby contributing to tumor cell survival and therapeutic resistance. Context-specific metabolic regulation (others) Other PRMT family members exhibit tissue-specific and context-dependent metabolic functions. In lung cancer, PRMT6 regulates tumor metabolism by activating 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) and α-enolase (ENO1) through site-specific methylation. PRMT6 methylates 6PGD at R324 and increases its catalytic activity, enhancing oxidative PPP flux [ 201 ]. It also methylates ENO1 at R9 and R372, promoting active dimer formation and 2-phosphoglycerate binding, respectively, thereby stimulating glycolysis and tumor cell proliferation [ 201 ]. In HCC, PRMT6 methylates CRAF at R100, modulating ERK signaling and consequently regulating the nuclear translocation of PKM2, a key mediator of the Warburg effect. This PRMT6–ERK–PKM2 axis enhances glycolytic gene expression and contributes to tumorigenicity and drug resistance [ 202 ]. Conversely, loss of PRMT7 in chronic myeloid leukemia reprograms glycine metabolism, selectively eliminating leukemia stem cells [ 203 ]. Taken together, these findings establish PRMTs as multifaceted metabolic regulators that fine-tune the balance between energy production, biosynthesis, and redox homeostasis. PRMTs endow cancer cells with metabolic flexibility, which is essential for proliferation, survival, and therapeutic resistance, by coordinating glycolytic activation, amino acid metabolism, lipid synthesis, and ferroptosis resistance. Immunomodulation Cancer immunity is a hallmark of tumor progression that influences how malignant cells evade immune surveillance and respond to therapy. Among the molecular regulators shaping these interactions, PRMTs have emerged as pivotal modulators that fine-tune immune signaling and determine the balance between immune activation and tolerance to cancer. Antigen presentation and immune checkpoints PRMTs reduce tumor immunogenicity by suppressing antigen presentation pathways, such as the STAT1–MHC-I signaling pathway. Using a CRISPR screen, PRMT1 was identified as a negative regulator of CD8 + T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity in melanoma. Mechanistically, PRMT1 suppresses STAT1 transcription, reducing STAT1-driven MHC-I expression and attenuating CD8 + T-cell killing [ 204 ]. In the adaptive immune compartment, PRMT5 enhances the immunosuppressive activity of regulatory T cells resulting from FOXP3 methylation at R27, R51, and R126 [ 205 ]. PRMT5 also regulates long non-coding RNA genes encoding immunogenic micropeptides presented by MHC-I molecules and elicits potent CD8 + T-cell responses, adding a layer of tumor antigenicity [ 206 ]. In parallel, PRMTs upregulate immune checkpoint molecules, including PD-L1 and PD-L2, to further dampen T cell-mediated immunity. PRMT1 contributes to the upregulation of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in tumor cells by affecting promoter-linked expression and interferon signaling [ 207 , 208 ]. PRMT5 promotes PD-L1 expression through H3R2me2s-mediated activation of STAT1 transcription in cervical cancer [ 209 ], and H4R3me2s deposition at the CD274 promoter in lung cancer [ 210 ]. Moreover, PRMT5 is upregulated by circGSK3β, a circular RNA derived from GSK3B , via miR-338-3p sponging, which in turn increases H3K4me3 at the PD-L1 promoter, promoting immune evasion in breast cancer [ 211 ]. In HCC, PRMT3 promotes immune escape by upregulating PD-L1 via PDHK1-driven glycolysis. Specifically, PRMT3-mediated PDHK1 methylation at R363 and R368 enhances its kinase activity and increases lactate production. This lactate accumulation elevates H3K18la levels at the PD-L1 promoter, further amplifying PD-L1 transcription [ 212 ]. Innate immune signalling and inflammation cGAS/STING pathway: Beyond immune checkpoint control, PRMTs orchestrate innate immune responses by methylating cytosolic DNA sensors and adaptor proteins, such as cGAS, STING, and NLRC5 (Fig. 8 ). The cGAS/STING pathway plays a critical role in detecting cytosolic DNA and initiating type I interferon responses, which influence nearly all aspects of tumorigenesis. Upon activation, cGAS/STING triggers TBK1 and IRF3 phosphorylation, leading to type I interferon-mediated antitumor immunity [ 213 ]. PRMT1 methylates cGAS at R133, preventing cGAS dimerization and suppressing cGAS/STING signaling. When PRMT1 is inhibited, the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes increases in a cGAS-dependent manner [ 208 ]. Moreover, PRMT1 knockdown activates the cGAS/STING axis through enhanced dsDNA aggregation, increasing IFN-β secretion and shifting macrophages toward an M1-like phenotype [ 214 ]. In HCC, PRMT3 methylates HSP60 at R446 to promote oligomerization and maintain mitochondrial integrity. Consequently, PRMT3 inhibition induces mtDNA leakage, activating cGAS/STING–mediated antitumor immunity [ 215 ]. PRMT5 methylates IFI16, another component of the cGAS/STING pathway, attenuating DNA-induced interferon and chemokine production. It also represses NLRC5 transcription, reduces MHC-I antigen presentation, and promotes immune evasion [ 216 ]. In AML and leukemia stem cells, PRMT9 inhibition disrupts RNA translation and DNA damage responses, activating cGAS/STING signaling, inducing type I interferon production, and promoting immunogenic cell death [ 217 ]. Fig. 8 PRMT-mediated regulation of the cGAS/STING pathway. PRMT family members modulate innate immune signaling through methylation-dependent regulation of the cGAS–STING axis. PRMT1 (blue) methylates cGAS, attenuating cGAS activation and downstream STING signaling. PRMT3 (orange) methylates HSP60 to maintain mitochondrial integrity, whereas mitochondrial damage promotes mitochondrial DNA release into the cytosol and activation of cGAS. PRMT5 (red) methylates cGAS and IFI16, thereby regulating cytosolic DNA sensing. PRMT9 (pink) negatively regulates dsDNA-induced cGAS activation upstream of STING signaling. Yellow circles (Me) indicate methylation events, and red circles (P) represent phosphorylation. Solid arrows denote activation, whereas blunt-ended lines indicate inhibition RIG-I/MDA5 Pathway: PRMTs regulate cytosolic RNA sensing via the RIG-I/MDA5/MAVS axis. PRMT7 maintains H4R3me2s-dependent silencing of endogenous retroviral elements (ERVs), and its loss derepresses ERVs, leading to dsRNA accumulation and activation of the RIG-I/MDA5/MAVS/TBK1/IRF3 pathway. This signaling cascade triggers type I interferon responses, enhancing antigen presentation and chemokine production [ 218 ]. Similarly, PRMT1 inhibition induced ERV re-expression and dsRNA accumulation, activating the RIG-I/MAVS pathway. The resulting interferon response increases PD-L1 expression, augments CD8 + T-cell infiltration, and synergizes with PD-1 blockade to enhance antitumor immunity [ 219 ]. Tumor microenvironment and immune cell modulation PRMT-mediated methylation extends to the immune and stromal components of the tumor microenvironment, particularly macrophages and T cells. PRMT6 promotes lung tumor progression by driving M2-like polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and establishing an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment through the PRMT6–ILF2–MIF axis [ 220 ]. Similarly, PRMT2 contributes to colorectal tumorigenesis by inducing M2-like TAM polarization and suppressing CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell activity [ 72 ]. PRMT1 exerts context-dependent antitumor effects. It sustains memory CD8 + T cell function via Wnt-driven reprogramming by depositing H4R3me2a at the IL-2 promoter to maintain cytokine transcription and polyfunctional capacity [ 221 ]. In parallel, PRMT1 knockdown promotes M1-like macrophage polarization and reduces M2 infiltration both in vitro and in vivo, inhibiting tumor growth [ 214 ]. Collectively, PRMTs orchestrate multiple layers of immune regulation in cancer, including antigen presentation, innate immune sensing, inflammatory signaling, and tumor microenvironment remodeling. By selectively modulating these pathways, PRMTs can either promote antitumor immune activation or facilitate immune evasion. Their dual ability to suppress immune visibility, while simultaneously triggering interferon-driven cytotoxicity, highlights the context-dependent nature of arginine methylation in tumor immunity. These multifaceted roles position PRMTs as central epigenetic regulators at the interface of oncogenic signaling and the immune response, offering a compelling rationale for targeting PRMTs to enhance immunotherapy efficacy. PRMT inhibitors and therapeutic targeting PRMTs have emerged as attractive targets for cancer therapy because of their central roles in epigenetic remodeling, transcriptional regulation, metabolic reprogramming, immune modulation, and metastatic progression [ 5 , 31 ]. The development of small-molecule PRMT inhibitors has advanced rapidly, demonstrating promising efficacy in preclinical models. However, clinical translation has been limited by challenges related to selectivity, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics. This section summarizes the PRMT inhibitors currently under preclinical (Table 2 ) and clinical development (Table 3 ), and outlines recent advances in PRMT-targeting strategies, including proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC)-based degraders and synthetic lethality-guided precision therapies. Table 2 PRMT inhibitors Target Compound Chemical Structure IC 50 MOA Ref Type I PRMTs AMI-1 8.8 μM substrate pocket binding [ 299 ] MS023 PRMT1 (30 nM) PRMT3 (119 nM) CARM1 (83 nM) PRMT6 (4 nM) PRMT8 (5 nM) allosteric [ 300 ] EPZ019997 (GSK3368715) PRMT1 (33.1 nM) PRMT3 (162 nM) CARM1 (38 nM) PRMT6 (4.7 nM) PRMT8 (3.9 nM) bind near active site, affecting substrate and SAM binding region [ 241 ] PRMT1 DCP1061 PRMT1 (5 nM) PRMT6 (5 nM) PRMT8 (5 nM) bind near active site, affecting substrate and SAM binding region [ 265 ] TC-E-5003 1.5 μM substrate pocket binding [ 301 ] PRMT3 SGC707 31 nM allosteric [ 302 ] CARM1 TP-064 CARM1 (10 nM) PRMT6 (1.3 μM) PRMT8 (8.1 μM) substrate pocket binding [ 224 ] EZM2302 (GSK3359088) 6 nM substrate pocket binding [ 226 ] EPZ0025654 (GSK35336023) 3 nM - [ 274 ] SKI-73 1.3 μM substrate pocket binding [ 227 ] YD1342 (prodrug) < 1 nM substrate pocket binding [ 303 ] SGC2085 50 nM substrate pocket binding [ 304 ] CARM1 PRMT6 MS049 CARM1 (34 nM) PRMT6 (43 nM) substrate pocket binding [ 300 ] PRMT6 EPZ020411 10 nM substrate pocket binding [ 305 ] SGC6870 77 nM allosteric [ 306 ] MS117 18 nM active site binding [ 307 ] GMS 90 nM active site binding [ 308 ] PRMT5 EPZ015938 (GSK3326595) (pemrametostat) 189 – 237 nM SAM-cooperative, substrate pocket binding [ 98 ] EPZ015666 (GSK3235025) 22 nM substrate pocket binding [ 309 ] EPZ015866 (GSK591, GSK320291) 4 nM - [ 310 ] JNJ-64619178 (Onametostat) 0.14 nM SAM-competitive [ 311 ] LLY-283 22 nM SAM-competitive [ 229 ] PF-06939999 1.1 nM SAM-competitive [ 312 ] PF-06855800 1 nM SAM-competitive [ 313 ] PRT543 10.8 nM SAM-competitive [ 314 ] PRT811 3.9 nM SAM-competitive [ 315 ] AM-9747 0.06 nM substrate pocket binding [ 316 ] TNG462 (Vopimetostat) - MTA cooperative, substrate pocket binding [ 317 ] TNG456 - MTA cooperative, substrate pocket binding [ 318 ] TNG908 (Ralometostat) 21.2 nM MTA cooperative, substrate pocket binding [ 319 ] AMG-193 107 nM (MTAP-deleted cell) MTA cooperative, substrate pocket binding [ 254 ] BMS-986504 MRTX1719 (Navlimetostat) 3.6 nM MTA cooperative, substrate pocket binding [ 255 ] MRTX9768 11 nM MTA cooperative, substrate pocket binding [ 320 ] AZD3470 - MTA cooperative [ 256 ] BGB-58067 Unveiled - MTA cooperative NCT06589596 BAY3713372 Unveiled - MTA cooperative NCT06914128 PRMT5 PRMT9 MRK-990 PRMT5 (10 nM) PRMT9 (30 nM) - [ 321 ] PRMT9 EML1219 0.2 μM substrate pocket binding [ 322 ] LD2 2–7 μM catalytic pocket binding [ 217 ] PRMT7 SGC3027 (prodrug of SGC8158) 294 nM SAM-competitive [ 230 ] SGC8158 2–9 μM SAM-competitive [ 231 ] JS1310 PRMT7 (5 μM) PRMT5 (50 μM) - [ 203 ] PRMT5 PRMT7 DS-437 PRMT5 (5.9 μM) PRMT7 (6 μM) SAM-competitive [ 323 ] Pan-inhibitor DB75 (Furamidine) PRMT1 (9.4 μM) PRMT5 (166 μM) PRMT6 (283 μM) CARM1 (> 400 μM) SAM-competitive [ 324 ] Table 3 PRMT Inhibitors in Clinical Trials Target Compound Clinical trial (NCT) Phase Treatment type Indication Status Type I PRMTs EPZ019997 (GSK3368715) NCT03666988 Phase 1 Single agent Advanced solid tumors, DLBCL Terminated (Early) PRMT5 EPZ015938 (GSK3326595) (Pemrametostat) NCT02783300 (Meteor 1) Phase 1 GSK3326595 ± pembrolizumab Selected solid tumors; part cohorts included NHL/NSCLC etc Completed NCT03614728 Phase 1/2 GSK3326595 ± 5-azacitidine MDS / AML Terminated NCT04676516 Phase 2 Single agent Early-stage HR-positive breast cancer Completed PRMT5 JNJ-64619178 (Onametostat) NCT03573310 Phase 1 Single agent Advanced solid tumors, NHL, lower-risk MDS Active, not recruiting NCT06788509 Phase 1 Single agent AML, NHL, MDS, CLL, Advanced solid tumors and mCRPC Enrolling by invitation PRMT5 PF-06939999 NCT03854227 Phase 1 PF-06939999 ± docetaxel Advanced/metastatic solid tumors Terminated PRMT5 PRT543 NCT03886831 Phase 1 Single agent Advanced Solid Tumors and Hematologic Malignancies Completed PRMT5 PRT811 NCT04089449 Phase 1 Single agent Advanced Solid Tumors, CNS Lymphoma and Gliomas Completed PRMT5 TNG462 (Vopimetostat) NCT05732831 Phase 1/2 TNG462 ± pembrolizumab MTAP-deleted solid tumors Recruiting / Active NCT06188702 Phase 1/2 TNG462 ± MAT2A inhibitor Advanced or metastatic solid tumors with deletion of MTAP Recruiting / Active NCT06922591 Phase 1/2 TNG462 ± RAS inhibitors PDAC and NSCLC Recruiting / Active PRMT5 TNG456 NCT06810544 Phase 1/2 TNG456 ± abemaciclib MTAP-deleted solid tumors Recruiting / Active PRMT5 TNG908 (Ralometostat) NCT05275478 Phase 1/2 Single agent MTAP-deleted Solid Tumors Active, not recruiting PRMT5 AMG-193 NCT06333951 (MTAPESTRY104) Phase 1 AMG-193 ± carboplatin/paclitaxel/pembrolizumab/pemetrexed/sotorasib Advanced thoracic tumors with homozygous MTAP deletion (master protocol) Active / Recruiting NCT05094336 (MTAPESTRY101) Phase 1/2 AMG-193 ± docetaxel Advanced MTAP-null solid tumors Recruiting / Active NCT06593522 Phase 2 Single agent MTAP-deleted advanced NSCLC Active / Recruiting NCT06360354 (MTAPESTRY103) Phase 1 AMG-193 ± gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/mFOLFIRINOX Advanced GI / biliary / pancreatic cancers with MTAP deletion Recruiting / Active NCT05975073 Phase 1/2 AMG-193 ± IDE397 Advanced MTAP-null Solid tumors Active, not recruiting PRMT5 BMS-986504 / MRTX1719 (Navlimetostat) NCT05245500 Phase 1 Single agent MTAP-deleted solid tumors Active / Recruiting NCT06883747 Phase 0/1 Single agent MTAP-deleted recurrent GBM Recruiting NCT07077434 Phase 1 Single agent Advanced Solid Tumors Active / Not yet recruiting NCT07076121 (MountainTAP-30) Phase 2/3 BMS-986504 ± gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel Untreated Metastatic PDAC with Homozygous MTAP Deletion Active / Recruiting NCT06855771 (MountainTAP-9) Phase 2 Single agent Advanced or metastatic NSCLC with homozygous MTAP deletion (refractory) Recruiting NCT06672523 Phase 1 Single agent Advanced Solid Tumors with Homozygous MTAP Deletion Recruiting NCT07063745 (MountainTAP-29) Phase 2/3 BMS-986504 ± pembrolizumab/platinum agent/pemetrexed/paclitaxel First-line Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Participants with Homozygous MTAP Deletion Recruiting PRMT5 AZD3470 NCT06130553 (PRIMROSE) Phase 1/2 Single agent MTAP-deficient advanced/metastatic solid tumors Recruiting NCT06137144 Phase 1/2 AZD3470 ± combos Relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies Recruiting / active PRMT5 BGB-58067 NCT06589596 Phase 1 BGB-58067 ± BG-89894 Advanced solid tumors with MTAP deletion Recruiting / Active PRMT5 BAY3713372 NCT06914128 Phase 1/2 Single agent MTAP-deleted Solid Tumors Recruiting AML Acute Myeloid Leukemia, CLL Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia DLBCL Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, GBM Glioblastoma Multiforme HR-positive breast cancer; hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, MDS myelodysplastic syndromes, mCRPC Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, MTAP Methylthioadenosine Phosphorylase, NHL Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, NSCLC Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, PDAC Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Preclinical studies Broad-spectrum inhibitors, such as AMI-1 and MS023, target type I PRMTs and have demonstrated anti-metastatic effects in several cancer models. In breast cancer, AMI-1 increases p16 and p21 expression by inhibiting PRMT1-mediated EZH2 methylation, reducing cell proliferation and metastasis [ 90 , 222 ]. MS023 also decreases metastasis by suppressing oncogene expression and enhancing cytotoxic T-cell infiltration through the activation of interferon antiviral response pathways [ 223 ]. Selective inhibitors improve specificity and reduce off-target effects. SGC707 selectively inhibits PRMT3 and disrupts LDHA methylation and glycolytic reprogramming in hepatocellular carcinoma [ 182 , 212 ]. CARM1 inhibitors, including TP-064 [ 224 , 225 ], EZM2302 (GSK3359088) [ 226 ], and SKI-73 [ 227 ], suppress BAF155 methylation, leading to reduced recruitment of BRD4 to super-enhancers and subsequent downregulation of oncogenes such as MYC . These inhibitors also enhance interferon signaling and increase CD8 + T cell infiltration, reducing the metastatic potential, particularly in breast cancer models. EPZ020411 , a PRMT6-selective inhibitor, blocks R729 methylation and subsequent Y705 phosphorylation of STAT3, ultimately suppressing its metastatic dissemination [ 169 ]. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that PRMT5 inhibitors effectively suppress EMT and metastatic progression in multiple cancer models. For example, EPZ015666 (GSK3235025) inhibits PRMT5-mediated formation of the Slug-LSD1 complex in breast cancer, restores E-cadherin expression, and reduces lung metastasis [ 162 ]. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, EPZ015666 disrupts the PRMT5/WDR5-dependent H3R2me2s-H3K4me3 axis, suppressing TWIST1 transcription and lymph node metastasis [ 228 ]. In cervical cancer, EPZ015666 interferes with the Snail/PRMT5/NuRD complex, restoring TET1 expression and increasing 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels, thereby attenuating EMT and invasion [ 161 ]. Other PRMT5 inhibitors also show anti-metastatic effects: LLY-283 reduces proliferation and metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [ 229 ]. EPZ015938 inhibits EMT-related phenotypes by disrupting the ZEB2/Twist1/PRMT5/NuRD complex that epigenetically represses E-cadherin expression in colorectal cancer [ 163 ]. PRMT7 inhibitors, including SGC3027, SGC8158, and JS1310, have been developed and investigated [ 230 , 231 ]; however, further optimization is required in terms of selectivity, bioavailability, and safety for translational applications. Clinical trials The clinical development of PRMT inhibitors is largely limited to early-phase studies, primarily focusing on assessing their safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy. The current status of clinical trials investigating PRMT inhibitors is summarized in Table 3 . Clinical progress of type I PRMT inhibitors is limited. GSK3368715, a potent SAM-noncompetitive inhibitor, demonstrated broad preclinical efficacy but was discontinued in Phase I trials ( NCT03666988 ) owing to thromboembolic toxicity and insufficient efficacy, underscoring the need for safer and more selective compounds. Instead, PRMT5 inhibitors have advanced further clinically, especially in MTAP-deficient tumors, exploiting synthetic lethality to enhance the selectivity and therapeutic index. EPZ015938 has been evaluated as a monotherapy ( NCT04676516 ), in combination with pembrolizumab for selected tumors ( NCT02783300 ), and with 5-azacitidine for relapsed/refractory myelodysplastic syndrome and AML ( NCT03614728 ). PF-06939999 was evaluated in advanced/metastatic solid tumors, both as a monotherapy and combined with docetaxel ( NCT03854227 ). JNJ-64619178 has completed a Phase I evaluation for advanced solid tumors, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome ( NCT03573310 ). Moreover, next-generation MTAP-selective or MTA cooperative inhibitors, including AZD3470, AMG-193, BGB-58067, MRTX1719, TNG456, and TNG462 are being tested in MTAP-deleted advanced solid tumors, either alone or in combination with standard chemotherapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors (Table 3 ). Many of these agents remain in early dose escalation and expansion cohorts. These clinical studies indicate that PRMT inhibitor development focuses on early phase evaluation in genetically defined populations, with combination therapy strategies emerging as the principal approach to maximize the therapeutic potential. The establishment of early safety, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles, and preliminary antitumor activity provides a strong rationale for continued and systemic clinical investigation of PRMT inhibitors. PROTACs PRMTs exert not only critical enzymatic functions but also essential scaffold roles that influence oncogenesis and other cellular processes; therefore, the development of targeted protein degradation technologies, such as PROTACs, has accelerated to enable more complete functional suppression. Recent advances have enabled the generation of PROTACs that target multiple members of the PRMT family. For PRMT1, both CRBN- and VHL-recruiting degraders have been reported to achieve moderate degradation efficiencies [ 232 ]. These early molecules revealed key structural determinants and offer a foundation for further optimization of linker architecture and E3 ligase selection. A selective PRMT3 degrader using an MDM2-based PROTAC design effectively reduced PRMT3 protein levels, leading to the suppression of ADMA marks [ 233 ]. It exhibited superior anti-leukemic efficacy compared to the catalytic inhibitor SGC707 by inducing apoptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress in leukemia cells. For CARM1, both VHL-based CARM1 degrader-1 (derived from TP-064) and C199 (derived from EZM2302) demonstrated robust and selective degradation [ 234 , 235 ]. CARM1 degrader-1 potently depleted CARM1 (DC 50 = 8 nM; D max > 95%) and effectively inhibited breast cancer cell migration. C199 also exhibited strong degradation activity (DC 50 = 106 nM, D max = 93.1%) and favorable pharmacokinetics. In vivo, C199 induced near-complete CARM1 depletion and markedly inhibited tumor growth (TGI = 78%). Among the PRMT family members, PRMT5-targeting PROTACs are the most advanced. The first-generation VHL-based degrader MS4322 achieved moderate degradation (DC 50 = 1,100 nM; D max = 74%), but displayed relatively slow kinetics [ 236 ]. The optimized derivative MS115, which is also VHL-based, exhibited improved potency and induced rapid proteasome-dependent degradation of both PRMT5 and its cofactor MEP50 in breast and prostate cancer models [ 237 ]. CRBN-recruiting degraders have further enhanced efficacy; YZ-836P demonstrates potent activity with a DC 50 of approximately 10 nM and > 80% maximal degradation, suppressing tumor growth in TNBC organoids and xenografts [ 238 ]. Therapeutic implications PRMT inhibitors exert multifaceted antitumor effects by modulating the chromatin architecture, transcriptional programs, metabolic flux, immune evasion, and metastatic potential. Although extensive preclinical data underscore their promise, their clinical efficacy has been tempered by toxicity, limited selectivity, and pharmacokinetic challenges. To overcome these barriers, current therapeutic strategies increasingly emphasize rational drug combinations and the exploitation of context-specific vulnerabiliti
Protein arginine methyltransferases in cancer: mechanisms, functions, and therapeutic opportunities
蛋白质精氨酸甲基转移酶在癌症中的作用:机制、功能与治疗机遇
📄 英文摘要 English Abstract
Abstract Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) catalyze the methylation of arginine residues on both histone and non-histone substrates, orchestrating cellular processes such as transcriptional regulation, RNA splicing, signal transduction, and DNA damage response. Because dysregulated methylation reprograms epigenetic and post-transcriptional landscapes to promote malignant transformation, aberrant PRMT activity is closely associated with tumorigenesis and cancer progression. Major family members, containing PRMT1, CARM1, PRMT5, and PRMT6, regulate gene expression through site-specific histone methylation, thereby contributing to the transcriptional activation or repression. PRMTs also methylate a wide range of non-histone proteins, including transcription factors, splicing regulators, and signaling intermediates, to coordinate cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and RNA metabolism. Collectively, PRMT-mediated methylation contributes to higher-order cancer phenotypes, including metabolic reprogramming―through modulation of glycolytic flux, lipid biosynthesis, and redox homeostasis―and immune evasion via altered immune signaling and checkpoint pathways within the tumor microenvironment. Recent advances in chemical biology have led to the development of selective PRMT inhibitors, several of which are currently under clinical evaluation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive and integrative overview of PRMT biology, systematically organizing current knowledge from multilayered regulatory mechanisms to downstream oncogenic effects and emerging therapeutic opportunities.
📄 中文摘要 Chinese Abstract
📋 英文结构化总结 English Structured Summary
全文整理
Background:
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) are covalent chemical alterations that regulate protein activity, stability, subcellular localization, and intermolecular interactions. Well-established modifications, including phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, and emerging modifications such as lactylation and succinylation, coordinate essential cellular processes. Dysregulation of PTM networks is now recognized as a key driver of cancer development, reshaping signaling cascades, metabolic programs, and immune responses through complex regulatory crosstalk. Among these modifications, protein arginine methylation plays an integrative role by linking chromatin-associated gene regulation with cytoplasmic signaling pathways. Moreover, protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) have emerged as a central epigenetic and signaling regulator in tumor biology. By modifying both histone and non-histone substrates, PRMTs regulate transcriptional programs, RNA processing, DNA damage responses, and signal transduction pathways. Aberrant PRMT activity disrupts these multilayered regulatory mechanisms, contributing to hallmark oncogenic processes such as genomic instability, metabolic reprogramming, and immune evasion within the tumor microenvironment. Given these multifaceted oncogenic roles, PRMTs are under active investigation as therapeutic targets, with several selective inhibitors currently advancing through preclinical and clinical development. Moreover, altered PRMT expression and substrate methylation patterns are frequently associated with adverse clinical outcomes, highlighting their potential as prognostic biomarkers.
A short history of PRMT research: The earliest evidence of arginine methylation emerged in the mid-twentieth century when Allfrey et al. (1964) reported methylated arginine and lysine residues in histones, suggesting their roles in gene regulation. Shortly thereafter, Paik and Kim used ¹⁴C-labeled S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) in calf thymus histones to detect novel methylated amino acids, leading to the identification of monomethyl arginine (MMA) and the first arginine methyltransferase. Subsequently, all three methylated arginine species, including asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), were identified in human urine and calf brain proteins. During the same period, arginine methylation of myelin basic proteins was reported, demonstrating that this modification extends beyond histones. In the 1980s, research focused on enzymes that catalyze arginine methylation. Kim et al. (1988) partially purified two methyltransferases from the bovine brain, one acting on histones and the other on myelin. This histone-directed enzyme was later shown to methylate heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs), linking arginine methylation to RNA processing and metabolism.
Methods:
N/A - Review article
Results:
Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) catalyze the methylation of arginine residues on both histone and non-histone substrates, orchestrating cellular processes such as transcriptional regulation, RNA splicing, signal transduction, and DNA damage response. Because dysregulated methylation reprograms epigenetic and post-transcriptional landscapes to promote malignant transformation, aberrant PRMT activity is closely associated with tumorigenesis and cancer progression. Major family members, containing PRMT1, CARM1, PRMT5, and PRMT6, regulate gene expression through site-specific histone methylation, thereby contributing to the transcriptional activation or repression. PRMTs also methylate a wide range of non-histone proteins, including transcription factors, splicing regulators, and signaling intermediates, to coordinate cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and RNA metabolism. Collectively, PRMT-mediated methylation contributes to higher-order cancer phenotypes, including metabolic reprogramming—through modulation of glycolytic flux, lipid biosynthesis, and redox homeostasis—and immune evasion via altered immune signaling and checkpoint pathways within the tumor microenvironment.
Data Summary:
The provided text does not contain specific quantitative results, key statistics, or numerical data tables. Historical milestones are noted (e.g., 1964, 1988) and major PRMT family members are listed (PRMT1, CARM1, PRMT5, PRMT6), but no effect sizes, p-values, or frequency measures are included in this excerpt.
Conclusions:
Recent advances in chemical biology have led to the development of selective PRMT inhibitors, several of which are currently under clinical evaluation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive and integrative overview of PRMT biology, systematically organizing current knowledge from multilayered regulatory mechanisms to downstream oncogenic effects and emerging therapeutic opportunities.
Practical Significance:
PRMTs are under active investigation as therapeutic targets, with several selective inhibitors currently advancing through preclinical and clinical development. Moreover, altered PRMT expression and substrate methylation patterns are frequently associated with adverse clinical outcomes, highlighting their potential as prognostic biomarkers. Ongoing efforts in pharmacological modulation and combination therapies may open new avenues for precision oncology.
📋 中文结构化总结 Chinese Structured Summary
背景:
翻译后修饰(PTMs)是共价化学修饰,调控蛋白质活性、稳定性、亚细胞定位和分子间相互作用。成熟的修饰包括磷酸化、乙酰化、甲基化,以及新兴修饰如乳酸化和琥珀酰化,协调基本细胞过程。PTM网络的失调现被认为是癌症发展的关键驱动因素,通过复杂的调控串扰重塑信号级联、代谢程序和免疫应答。在这些修饰中,蛋白质精氨酸甲基化通过连接染色质相关基因调控与细胞质信号通路发挥整合作用。此外,蛋白质精氨酸甲基转移酶(PRMTs)已成为肿瘤生物学中核心的表观遗传和信号调控因子。通过修饰组蛋白和非组蛋白底物,PRMTs调控转录程序、RNA加工、DNA损伤应答和信号转导通路。异常的PRMT活性破坏这些多层调控机制,促进标志性致癌过程,如基因组不稳定、代谢重编程和肿瘤微环境中的免疫逃逸。鉴于这些多方面的致癌作用,PRMTs正作为治疗靶点被积极研究,多种选择性抑制剂目前正在临床前和临床开发中推进。此外,PRMT表达和底物甲基化模式的改变常与不良临床结局相关,凸显其作为预后生物标志物的潜力。
PRMT研究简史:精氨酸甲基化的最早证据出现在20世纪中期,Allfrey等人(1964年)报道了组蛋白中甲基化的精氨酸和赖氨酸残基,提示其在基因调控中的作用。此后不久,Paik和Kim使用¹⁴C标记的S-腺苷甲硫氨酸(SAM)在牛胸腺组蛋白中检测新型甲基化氨基酸,鉴定出单甲基精氨酸(MMA)和首个精氨酸甲基转移酶。随后,所有三种甲基化精氨酸,包括不对称二甲基精氨酸(ADMA)和对称二甲基精氨酸(SDMA),在人尿液和牛脑蛋白中被鉴定。同一时期,髓鞘碱性蛋白的精氨酸甲基化被报道,证明该修饰不仅限于组蛋白。20世纪80年代,研究聚焦于催化精氨酸甲基化的酶。Kim等人(1988年)从牛脑中部分纯化了两种甲基转移酶,一种作用于组蛋白,另一种作用于髓鞘。这种组蛋白导向的酶后来被证明可甲基化异质核核糖核蛋白(hnRNPs),将精氨酸甲基化与RNA加工和代谢联系起来。
方法:
不适用——综述文章
结果:
蛋白质精氨酸甲基转移酶(PRMTs)催化组蛋白和非组蛋白底物上精氨酸残基的甲基化,协调转录调控、RNA剪接、信号转导和DNA损伤应答等细胞过程。由于失调的甲基化重编程表观遗传和转录后景观以促进恶性转化,异常的PRMT活性与肿瘤发生和癌症进展密切相关。主要家族成员包括PRMT1、CARM1、PRMT5和PRMT6,通过位点特异性组蛋白甲基化调控基因表达,从而促进转录激活或抑制。PRMTs还甲基化广泛的非组蛋白,包括转录因子、剪接调控因子和信号中间体,协调细胞周期进程、DNA修复和RNA代谢。总体而言,PRMT介导的甲基化促进高级别癌症表型,包括代谢重编程——通过调节糖酵解通量、脂质生物合成和氧化还原稳态——以及通过肿瘤微环境中改变的免疫信号和检查点通路介导的免疫逃逸。
数据摘要:
提供的文本不包含具体的定量结果、关键统计数据或数值数据表。记录了历史里程碑(如1964年、1988年)和主要PRMT家族成员(PRMT1、CARM1、PRMT5、PRMT6),但本摘录中未包含效应量、p值或频率测量。
结论:
化学生物学的最新进展推动了选择性PRMT抑制剂的开发,其中几种目前正在临床评估中。在本综述中,我们提供了PRMT生物学的全面和整合性概述,系统组织当前知识,从多层调控机制到下游致癌效应和新兴治疗机会。
实际意义:
PRMTs正作为治疗靶点被积极研究,多种选择性抑制剂目前正在临床前和临床开发中推进。此外,PRMT表达和底物甲基化模式的改变常与不良临床结局相关,凸显其作为预后生物标志物的潜力。药物调控和联合疗法的持续努力可能为精准肿瘤学开辟新途径。
📖 英文全文 English Full Text
📖 中文全文 Chinese Full Text
# 癌症中的蛋白精氨酸甲基转移酶:机制、功能与治疗机遇
**作者:** Yoonae Jeong¹, Yena Cho¹²✉, Yong Kee Kim¹²✉
¹ 韩国首尔淑明女子大学药学院,04310 ² 韩国首尔淑明女子大学肌肉组学研究中心与药物科学研究所,04310
✉ 通讯作者。
---
## 摘要
蛋白精氨酸甲基转移酶(PRMTs)催化组蛋白和非组蛋白底物上精氨酸残基的甲基化,协调转录调控、RNA剪接、信号转导和DNA损伤应答等细胞过程。由于异常甲基化会重编程表观遗传和转录后景观以促进恶性转化,PRMT活性异常与肿瘤发生和癌症进展密切相关。主要家族成员包括PRMT1、CARM1、PRMT5和PRMT6,通过位点特异性组蛋白甲基化调控基因表达,从而促进转录激活或抑制。PRMTs还甲基化多种非组蛋白,包括转录因子、剪接调控因子和信号中间体,以协调细胞周期进程、DNA修复和RNA代谢。总体而言,PRMT介导的甲基化有助于形成更高阶的癌症表型,包括代谢重编程(通过调节糖酵解通量、脂质生物合成和氧化还原稳态)以及通过改变肿瘤微环境中的免疫信号和检查点通路实现免疫逃逸。化学生物学的最新进展推动了选择性PRMT抑制剂的开发,其中部分抑制剂目前正在进行临床评估。在本综述中,我们对PRMT生物学进行了全面且整合性的概述,系统整理了从多层调控机制到下游致癌效应及新兴治疗机遇的当前知识。
**关键词:** 翻译后修饰、PRMTs、精氨酸甲基化、表观遗传调控、代谢重编程、癌症治疗
---
## 背景
翻译后修饰(PTMs)是调节蛋白质活性、稳定性、亚细胞定位和分子间相互作用的共价化学改变。已确立的修饰包括磷酸化、乙酰化、甲基化,以及新兴修饰如乳酰化和琥珀酰化,协调必需的细胞过程。PTM网络的失调现已被认为是癌症发展的关键驱动因素,通过复杂的调控串扰重塑信号级联、代谢程序和免疫应答。在这些修饰中,蛋白精氨酸甲基化通过将染色质相关基因调控与细胞质信号通路联系起来发挥整合作用。此外,蛋白精氨酸甲基转移酶(PRMTs)已成为肿瘤生物学中核心的表观遗传和信号调控因子。通过修饰组蛋白和非组蛋白底物,PRMTs调控转录程序、RNA加工、DNA损伤应答和信号转导通路。PRMT活性异常破坏了这些多层调控机制,促进肿瘤微环境中基因组不稳定、代谢重编程和免疫逃逸等标志性致癌过程。鉴于这些多方面的致癌作用,PRMTs作为治疗靶点正在被积极研究,多种选择性抑制剂目前正在进行临床前和临床开发。此外,PRMT表达和底物甲基化模式的改变常与不良临床结局相关,凸显了其作为预后生物标志物的潜力。在本综述中,我们总结了PRMT介导的精氨酸甲基化在癌症生物学中的当前认识,重点关注其致癌功能、治疗意义以及PRMT靶向策略的最新进展。我们进一步讨论了药物调控和联合治疗方面的持续努力,这些可能为精准肿瘤学开辟新途径。
---
## PRMT研究简史
精氨酸甲基化的最早证据出现在二十世纪中叶,Allfrey等人(1964年)报道了组蛋白中甲基化的精氨酸和赖氨酸残基,提示其在基因调控中的作用(图1A)。此后不久,Paik和Kim使用¹⁴C标记的S-腺苷甲硫氨酸(SAM)在牛胸腺组蛋白中检测新型甲基化氨基酸,从而鉴定了单甲基精氨酸(MMA)和首个精氨酸甲基转移酶。随后,所有三种甲基化精氨酸种类,包括不对称二甲基精氨酸(ADMA)和对称二甲基精氨酸(SDMA),在人尿液和牛脑蛋白中被鉴定。同一时期,髓鞘碱性蛋白的精氨酸甲基化被报道,证明该修饰不仅限于组蛋白。
在1980年代,研究聚焦于催化精氨酸甲基化的酶。Kim等人(1988年)从牛脑中部分纯化了两种甲基转移酶,一种作用于组蛋白,另一种作用于髓鞘。这种组蛋白导向的酶后来被证明可甲基化异质核核糖核蛋白(hnRNPs),将精氨酸甲基化与RNA加工和代谢联系起来。
1996年,哺乳动物PRMT1及其酵母同源物Hmt1/Rmt1的克隆标志着一个突破性进展,确立了精氨酸甲基化的进化保守性。1998年至2001年间,经典PRMT家族迅速扩展。PRMT2(1998年)被鉴定为PRMT1相关因子,PRMT3(1998年)通过酵母双杂交筛选被鉴定,PRMT4/CARM1(1999年)被鉴定为共激活物相关PRMT,PRMT5(1999年)被鉴定为具有组蛋白甲基化活性的JAK2相互作用蛋白。后续研究鉴定了PRMT6(2002年)、PRMT7(2004年)和PRMT8(2005年)。2005年,一个后来被命名为PRMT9的候选基因基于基因组分析被提出,其酶活性在后续研究中被表征。
这些发现共同确立了由九个成员组成的家族,每个成员具有不同的底物特异性、亚细胞定位和生物学功能。根据其催化活性,PRMTs被分为三种酶亚型:I型PRMTs(PRMT1、2、3、4、6和8)依次将精氨酸转化为MMA,然后转化为ADMA;II型PRMTs(PRMT5和9)生成MMA,随后生成SDMA;III型PRMTs(PRMT7)仅催化MMA形成(图1B)。尽管每种PRMT表现出底物偏好,但某些底物可被多个家族成员共享(图1C)。
X射线晶体学和冷冻电子显微镜的进展揭示了详细的PRMT结构,为其催化机制和底物识别提供了深入见解。基于蛋白质组学的研究发现了大量PRMT底物,确立了其在转录、RNA加工、DNA修复、细胞周期调控、代谢和免疫调节中的广泛调控作用。因此,PRMT表达和活性失调与致癌信号输出和恶性表型相关。
PRMTs作为治疗靶点的认识加速了小分子PRMT抑制剂的开发(图1A)。首个PRMT5抑制剂EPZ015938(GSK3326595;NCT02783300)于2016年进入I期临床试验,随后是JNJ-64619178(2018年)(NCT03573310)和GSK3368715(NCT03666988),后者是首个PRMT1抑制剂(2019年)。尽管这些药物的作用机制已在临床上确立,但其治疗窗口和抗肿瘤活性有限。最近,新一代PRMT5抑制剂如AMG-193(NCT05975073)和AZD3470(NCT06130553、NCT06137144)于2023年进入临床评估,利用甲硫腺苷(MTA)协同结合机制增强对甲硫腺苷磷酸化酶(MTAP)缺失肿瘤的选择性。这些进展标志着从酶学到转化肿瘤学的转变,将PRMTs定位为癌症治疗开发中一类新的可药化靶点。
---
## PRMT家族:结构、催化多样性与调控
### PRMTs的分类与结构特征
蛋白甲基化反应(包括精氨酸甲基化)需要SAM作为通用甲基供体。细胞内SAM可用性由SAM循环和甲硫氨酸补救途径严格控制,其中甲硫氨酸在甲硫氨酸腺苷转移酶(MAT)的作用下转化为SAM(图2)。蛋白精氨酸甲基化由PRMTs催化,PRMTs将甲基从SAM转移至蛋白残基的胍基氮上。已鉴定出九种人类PRMTs(PRMT1–PRMT9),每种由不同的染色体基因座编码。
所有PRMTs共享一个保守的催化Rossmann折叠结构域,该结构域是SAM结合和催化所必需的,包含四个共有基序:基序I(VLD/EVGXGXG)、后I(V/IXG/AXD/E)、基序II(F/I/VDI/L/K)和基序III(LR/KXXG),以及一个促进甲基转移的THW环。N端和C端延伸赋予底物特异性、定位和辅因子相互作用。值得注意的是,CARM1具有一个延长的C端反式激活结构域(TAD),负责其转录共激活物功能,使其区别于其他PRMTs(图3)。这些不同的甲基化模式关键性地塑造了蛋白质-蛋白质和蛋白质-RNA相互作用,影响多种生物学过程。
### 催化特异性与序列偏好
除催化特异性外,PRMTs表现出不同的底物序列偏好,这决定了其生物学背景。大多数I型和II型PRMTs靶向富含精氨酸-甘氨酸(RG/RGG)的基序,这些基序在RNA结合蛋白和染色质相关蛋白中常见。相反,CARM1优先进化识别转录共激活物和剪接因子中发现的脯氨酸-甘氨酸-甲硫氨酸(PGM)基序,而PRMT7靶向富含应激反应蛋白的RxR基序。这些序列偏好与衔接蛋白和PTMs的相互作用一起,确保PRMT活性和底物选择性的背景依赖性调控。
### 精氨酸甲基化的分子和生物物理后果
虽然催化特异性和序列偏好决定了甲基化发生的位置,但最终生物学结果取决于甲基化如何改变精氨酸残基的物理化学性质。在分子水平上,精氨酸甲基化通过化学重塑胍基同时很大程度上保留其正电荷来调节蛋白质结构和功能。甲基的添加增加了空间位阻,降低了氢键供体能力,并增强了局部疏水性。这些变化重塑了静电、氢键和阳离子-π相互作用,从而微妙地调节影响折叠稳定性和构象灵活性的分子内接触,同时重构与酸性蛋白、核酸和细胞膜表面的分子间界面。
这些效应在内在无序区域(尤其是RG/RGG基序)中尤为显著。在这些区域中,甲基化改变构象集合并调节驱动液-液相分离的多价相互作用网络,从而调节无膜细胞器的形成、稳定性和材料特性。此外,甲基化精氨酸残基作为专门的阅读器结构域(包括含Tudor结构域的蛋白)的选择性对接位点,同时空间阻碍替代结合事件。
通过这种协调的创建、重定向或阻断相互作用表面的能力,精氨酸甲基化充当一种动态分子变阻器,在不需大规模结构重排的情况下微调结合特异性、复合物组装、亚细胞定位和酶活性。
### PRMT活性的多层调控
PRMTs通过整合信号通路、代谢输入和蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用的多层机制进行调控。
**CARM1调控:** CARM1受到协调的PTMs和亚细胞定位的紧密调控,动态塑造其催化输出。CARM1在其C端区域R551处发生自甲基化,该修饰对其完全转录活性和前mRNA剪接调控是必需的。此外,CARM1在有丝分裂期间被磷酸化,改变其酶活性和染色质关联,从而将精氨酸甲基化与细胞周期进程联系起来。CARM1的泛素化也被报道影响其稳定性和蛋白酶体周转,在能量应激时调节酶丰度。此外,选择性剪接产生具有不同催化特性和底物选择性的CARM1异构体,增加了另一层调控。
**PRMT5调控:** PRMT5的调控主要由其强制性复合物形成和PTMs决定。PRMT5需要与其强制性辅因子MEP50结合以实现完全催化活性和适当的底物识别。PRMT5被上游激酶的酪氨酸磷酸化抑制其酶活性,而PRMT5的K63连接泛素化促进与MEP50的相互作用,导致酶活性增加。PRMT5活性对细胞内SAM水平敏感,将其功能与细胞代谢状态联系起来。在癌症背景下,致癌信号通路上调PRMT5表达或增强其复合物组装,从而促进参与增殖和RNA剪接的组蛋白和非组蛋白底物的对称二甲基化。
总体而言,这些例子说明PRMT调控发生在多个层面:(i)调节催化输出和稳定性的动态PTMs,如自甲基化、磷酸化和泛素化;(ii)异构体控制;(iii)辅因子依赖性复合物组装;(iv)通过SAM可用性进行的代谢控制;以及(v)转录控制。这种多层调控确保PRMT活性在正常生理和疾病状态下都以背景依赖的方式被精确调节。
---
## 精氨酸去甲基化的新证据
尽管精氨酸甲基化长期被认为是一种不可逆的修饰,但最近的研究表明,某些含JmjC结构域的蛋白可能具有针对组蛋白和非组蛋白底物的精氨酸去甲基酶(RDM)活性。例如,KDM3B被报道可使H4R3me2s去甲基化,而Mina53被提出靶向H4R3me2a和p53精氨酸甲基化。此外,KDM5C被证明参与调控ULK1精氨酸甲基化,KDM4A擦除H3R17me2a并去除PI3KC2α和IDH2的精氨酸甲基化。
这些发现共同表明,PRMTs沉积的精氨酸甲基化标记在特定细胞背景下可被酶促可逆,将精氨酸去甲基化与转录调控、肿瘤进展、自噬和有丝分裂控制等过程联系起来。然而,这些去甲基化事件的底物特异性、催化效率和生理相关性仍不完全了解,进一步的生化和结构验证对于确立RDM作为广泛运作的调控机制至关重要。
---
## PRMTs在癌症中的致癌作用
PRMTs异常表达和活性日益被认为是肿瘤发生的驱动力量。PRMTs通过其多种底物和功能影响癌症的几乎每个标志性特征,包括持续增殖、代谢重编程、凋亡逃逸、迁移和侵袭增强以及治疗耐药。从机制上讲,PRMTs整合表观遗传、转录、转录后和信号网络以重编程细胞的致癌状态。每种PRMT在癌症中的作用总结于表1。
### 表1 PRMTs在癌症中的作用
| PRMTs | 癌症类型 | 表达 | 功能 | 生物学机制 | 参考文献 | |-------|---------|------|------|-----------|---------| | PRMT1 | 乳腺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | ERα甲基化(R260)激活IGF-1信号 | | | | | | | EZH2甲基化(R342)稳定EZH2并促进EMT/转移 | | | | | | | C/EBPα甲基化(R35/156/165)促进cyclin D1表达和细胞增殖 | | | | | | | ZEB1启动子处H4R3me2a促进EMT、转移并调控衰老 | | | | | | | SRSF1甲基化(R93、R97和R109)促进外显子包含和细胞增殖 | | | | | | | DDX3甲基化稳定DDX3,协调线粒体稳态以促进转移 | | | | 胰腺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | Gli1甲基化(R597)促进转录活性及其致癌功能 | | | | | | | HSP70甲基化(R416、R447)稳定BCL2 mRNA,促进凋亡抵抗 | | | | | | | PRMT1调控RNA代谢和DNA损伤应答,促进PDAC生长 | | | | | | 抑癌 | p14 ARF甲基化(R96/R99)通过从核仁释放触发应激诱导的凋亡 | | | | 结直肠癌 | 高 | 致癌 | EGFR甲基化(R198/R200)增强EGF信号和西妥昔单抗耐药 | | | | | | | H4R3me2a招募SMARCA4激活EGFR/TNS4信号,促进癌症进展 | | | | | | | NONO甲基化(R251)促进结直肠癌生长和转移 | | | | 胃癌 | 高 | 致癌 | cGAS甲基化(R133)抑制cGAS/STING信号和抗肿瘤免疫 | | | | | | | PRMT1通过MLXIP招募激活β-catenin信号,促进胃癌转移 | | | | | | | c-Fos甲基化(R287)稳定c-Fos,激活AP-1,促进胃癌进展 | | | | 肺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | Twist1甲基化(R34)促进EMT和肺癌转移 | | | | HCC | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT1促进细胞增殖和存活,作为预后标志物和治疗靶点 | | | | | | | PHGDH甲基化(R236)增强丝氨酸合成并促进HCC增殖 | | | | ccRCC | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT1调控RNA代谢;其抑制诱导R-loop和DNA损伤 | | | | | | | PRMT1通过LCN2-Akt-RB信号促进ccRCC生长和耐药 | | | | 视网膜母细胞瘤 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT1通过p53/p21/CDC2/Cyclin B信号促进视网膜母细胞瘤增殖 | | | | 黑色素瘤 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT1甲基化/激活ALCAM,促进黑色素瘤细胞生长和转移 | | | | 头颈癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT1通过ADMA介导的蛋白甲基化促进HNC生长和迁移 | | | | ESCC | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT1通过激活Hedgehog信号促进ESCC进展 | | | | NPC(EBV相关) | - | 致癌 | PRMT1甲基化PGC-1α(被EBV LMP1稳定),促进PD-L1介导的免疫逃逸 | | | | | | | PRMT1通过H4R3me2a维持ESCC肿瘤起始细胞,激活Wnt/Notch信号 | | | | AMKL | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT1通过促进糖酵解和抑制脂肪酸氧化驱动AMKL生长 | | | PRMT2 | 乳腺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT2/变体增强ERα信号以促进乳腺癌细胞增殖 | | | | | 低 | 抑癌 | PRMT2抑制ERα/AP-1介导的cyclin D1转录,抑制癌细胞增殖 | | | | 结直肠癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT2通过WNT5A启动子处H3R8me2a促进CRC进展和免疫抑制 | | | | RCC | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT2通过WNT5A启动子处H3R8me2a激活Wnt信号驱动RCC进展 | | | | 胶质母细胞瘤 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT2通过H3R8me2a维持致癌转录驱动GBM进展 | | | PRMT3 | 乳腺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | H4R3me2a介导的ER应激信号激活促进增殖和转移 | | | | 胶质母细胞瘤 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT3通过增强HIF1A和糖酵解代谢促进GBM进展 | | | | 胰腺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT3通过GAPDH甲基化(R248)介导的代谢重编程驱动胰腺癌生长 | | | CARM1 | 乳腺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | CARM1通过H3R17/R26甲基化促进CCNE1转录,推动细胞周期进程 | | | | | | | BAF155甲基化(R1064)通过调控致癌染色质程序驱动转移 | | | | | | | LSD1 R838甲基化通过E-cadherin和vimentin的表观遗传调控驱动转移 | | | | | | 抑癌 | CARM1共激活ERα诱导分化并抑制ERα阳性癌症中的增殖 | | | | | | | MED12甲基化(R1862/R1912)增强乳腺癌化疗敏感性 | | | | 肺癌(SCLC) | | | ESRP1通过调控CARM1剪接和抑制EMT逆转SCLC化疗耐药 | | | | 结直肠癌 | 高 | 致癌 | CARM1通过H3R17me2a增强β-catenin介导的转录促进CRC | | | | 胃癌 | 高 | 致癌 | H3R17me2介导的G6PD表达和PPP促进胃癌细胞在低葡萄糖条件下的存活 | | | | 胰腺癌 | 低 | 抑癌 | MDH1甲基化(R230)抑制谷氨酰胺代谢并调控氧化还原稳态 | | | | HCC | 低 | 抑癌 | GAPDH甲基化(R234)抑制糖酵解并延迟肝癌细胞增殖 | | | | | 高 | 致癌 | CARM1通过激活Akt/mTOR通路驱动HCC进展,增强迁移和侵袭 | | | | 卵巢癌 | 高 | 致癌 | CARM1促进EZH2依赖性沉默抑癌基因 | | | | AML | 高 | 致癌 | RUNX1甲基化(R223)阻断AML中的髓系分化 | | | | | | | CARM1通过促进增殖和阻断分化驱动AML | | | PRMT5 | 淋巴瘤 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT5通过H3R8me2s激活Wnt/β-catenin驱动淋巴瘤细胞增殖 | | | | DLBCL | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT5通过BCR诱导的PI3K-Akt和NF-κB信号驱动DLBCL增殖 | | | | 白血病/淋巴瘤 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT5通过H3R8/H4R3高甲基化抑制抑癌基因 | | | | AML | | 致癌 | SRSF1甲基化(R93、R97、R109)调控必需基因的选择性剪接 | | | | | | | PRMT5通过H4R3me2s介导的miR-29b沉默促进AML,导致Sp1/FLT3激活 | | | | 乳腺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | ZNF326甲基化(R175)调控选择性剪接和mRNA稳定性 | | | | | | | PRMT5通过调控OCT4、KLF4和MYC促进干细胞性和阿霉素耐药 | | | | | | | PRMT5与TRAF4相互作用激活NF-κB信号,促进乳腺癌增殖 | | | | | | | PRMT5通过组蛋白甲基化和FOXP1表达调控乳腺癌干细胞功能 | | | | | | | PRMT5在三阴性乳腺癌中支架GR促进糖皮质激素诱导的转录和细胞迁移 | | | | | | | 通过H4R3me2s抑制E-cadherin,通过H3R2me2s激活vimentin | | | | 卵巢癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT5以E2F-1依赖性方式调控肿瘤细胞生长和凋亡 | | | | | | | ENO1甲基化(R9me2s)促进二聚化并增强糖酵解 | | | | 宫颈癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT5通过Snail/PRMT5/NuRD复合物介导的EMT驱动宫颈癌转移 | | | | 肺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT5通过H4R3me2s-miR-99-FGFR3轴促进肺癌生长和转移 | | | | | | | PRMT5通过直接相互作用和激活Akt促进肺癌细胞增殖 | | | | | | | PRMT5-SHARPIN复合物介导的H3R2me1激活转移相关基因转录 | | | | | | | ENO-1甲基化(R50)增强其向细胞表面膜的定位 | | | | | | | CD274启动子处H4R3me2s沉积抑制PD-L1表达 | | | | | | | PRMT5在R41处二甲基化并稳定KLF5以激活Akt/GSK3β通路 | | | | 前列腺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT5招募pICln在AR启动子处甲基化H4R3,激活AR/AR-V7转录 | | | | | | | AR甲基化(R761)抑制分化基因表达并促进增殖 | | | | 胃癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT5在胃癌中上调,增强增殖、侵袭和迁移 | | | | | | | PRMT5与c-Myc结合通过H4R3me2s抑制抑癌基因 | | | | | | | PRMT5介导的组蛋白甲基化招募DNMT3A沉默IRX1 | | | | HCC | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT5在HCC和结肠癌中过表达,通过MMP-2上调促进侵袭性 | | | | | | | PRMT5通过激活ERK信号和抑制BTG2促进HCC增殖 | | | | | | | Metadherin-PRMT5复合物通过Wnt-β-catenin通路增强转移 | | | | 胰腺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT5介导的FBW7表观遗传沉默在蛋白水平稳定c-Myc | | | | | | | PRMT5通过激活EGFR/Akt/β-catenin信号通路促进EMT | | | | 结直肠癌 | 高 | 致癌 | YBX1甲基化(R205)对NF-κB激活和CRC生长和迁移至关重要 | | | | | | | PRMT5与EZH2合作表观遗传沉默CDKN2B,促进CRC进展 | | | | | | | PRMT5激活EGFR/Akt/GSK3β信号通路,促进CRC增殖 | | | | | | | SMAD4甲基化(R361)激活TGF-β信号并促进转移 | | | | | | | ZEB2招募TWIST1、PRMT5和NuRD表观遗传沉默E-cadherin | | | | 黑色素瘤 | 高 | 致癌 | SHARPIN促进PRMT5活性,增加SOX10和PAX3表达 | | | | | | | 通过选择性剪接调控MDM4表达,导致CDK4/6抑制剂耐药 | | | | ESCC | | 致癌 | MTHFD1甲基化(R173)增强NADPH产生,促进转移 | | | | 胶质母细胞瘤 | 高 | 致癌 | SWI/SNF相关PRMT5生成H3R8me2s以抑制ST7和NM23 | | | | | | | PRMT5调控GBM中的剪接和干细胞性 | | | | | | | PRMT5调控PTEN/Akt/ERK信号以维持分化和干细胞样肿瘤细胞 | | | | 神经母细胞瘤 | 高 | 致癌 | Akt1甲基化(R15)促进肿瘤转移 | | | | 膀胱癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT5激活NF-κB信号并上调抗凋亡基因BCL-XL/cIAP1 | | | | MTAP缺失癌症 | | | 内源性MTA增加抑制PRMT5活性并诱导对PRMT5抑制的敏感性 | | | PRMT6 | 乳腺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT6/PARP1/CRL4B形成转录抑制复合物并促进转移 | | | | | | | STAT3甲基化(R729)促进其膜定位并促进癌细胞转移 | | | | 结直肠癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT6与PRMT5合作通过H3R2me2a表观遗传沉默CDKN2B和CCNG1 | | | | 胃癌 | 高 | 致癌 | H3R2me2a抑制抑癌基因(PCDH7、SCD和IGFBP5) | | | | 子宫内膜癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT6通过Akt/mTOR信号促进子宫内膜癌 | | | | 肺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT6与ILF2相互作用驱动肿瘤相关巨噬细胞的替代激活 | | | | | | | 6PGD(R324)和ENO1(R9、R372)甲基化促进葡萄糖代谢 | | | | 胶质母细胞瘤 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT6通过促进其泛素化降解减弱CDKN1B蛋白稳定性 | | | | | | | RCC1甲基化(R214)促进染色质关联和RAN激活 | | | | 黑色素瘤 | | 抑癌 | PRMT6通过在ALDH1A1启动子处沉积H3R2me2a抑制黑色素瘤进展 | | | | HCC | 低 | 抑癌 | CRAF甲基化(R100)限制RAS-MEK/ERK信号,抑制HCC进展 | | | PRMT7 | 乳腺癌 | 高 | 致癌 | METTL3/IGF2BP1驱动的m⁶A甲基化增强PRMT7表达,激活Wnt信号 | | | | | | | R531自甲基化促进H4R3me2s并抑制E-cadherin | | | | | | | PRMT7通过H4R3me2s介导的表观遗传重塑抑制E-cadherin | | | | 胃癌 | 低 | 抑癌 | PRMT7甲基化PTEN并抑制PI3K/Akt通路,抑制胃癌进展 | | | | 肺癌(NSCLC) | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT7通过与HSPA5和EEF2相互作用促进NSCLC转移 | | | | 肾细胞癌 | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT7甲基化β-catenin并抑制β-catenin的泛素介导降解 | | | PRMT9 | HCC | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT9通过激活PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β/Snail通路促进HCC侵袭和转移 | | | | AML | 高 | 致癌 | PRMT9通过促进白血病细胞存活和免疫逃逸驱动AML进展 | |
---
## 表观遗传与转录调控
表观遗传失调是PRMTs驱动肿瘤发生的核心机制。几种PRMT家族成员,特别是PRMT1、CARM1和PRMT5,通过组蛋白精氨酸残基的位点特异性甲基化调节染色质结构(图4)。
### 组蛋白修饰
组蛋白精氨酸甲基化是调控转录程序的表观遗传调控的基本步骤。I型PRMTs的不对称二甲基化有利于转录激活,而II型酶的二甲基化建立抑制性染色质状态。生物学结果取决于具体修饰的残基:H4R3me2a、H3R8me2a、H3R17me2a和H3R2me2s为激活标记,H4R3me2s和H3R8me2s与抑制相关,H3R2me2a功能双向。
**PRMT1介导的组蛋白甲基化**招募阅读蛋白和染色质重塑复合物,促进基因激活。在结直肠癌(CRC)中,PRMT1增强参与生长和存活基因启动子处H4R3me2a的沉积,部分通过招募SWI/SNF染色质重塑复合物的ATP酶亚基SMARCA4。这种招募促进EGFR和TNS4的转录激活,从而促进肿瘤细胞增殖和迁移。在乳腺癌中,PRMT1同样促进ZEB1启动子甲基化,诱导上皮-间质转化(EMT)和癌症干细胞特征。
**PRMT2介导的H3R8me2a沉积**也有助于转录激活。在胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)中,PRMT2增加致癌基因簇的表达;在肾癌中,PRMT2依赖性H3R8me2a在WNT5A启动子处的富集增强Wnt信号和肿瘤增殖。
**CARM1介导的H3R17me2a沉积**同样促进转录激活。在多种癌症中,升高的H3R17me2a水平促进致癌基因和增殖相关基因的表达,从而支持肿瘤生长和进展。
**PRMT5**催化多个残基(包括H3R2、H3R8和H4R3)的对称二甲基化,通常产生抑制性染色质状态。尽管PRMT5通过对称二甲基化施加转录抑制,但其效应取决于染色质环境及其相互作用伙伴。例如,PRMT5在急性髓系白血病(AML)中通过H4R3me2s抑制miR-29b转录,在CRC中通过H4R3me2s沉默CDKN2B表达。相反,在乳腺癌干细胞中,PRMT5通过H3R2me2s促进FOXP1转录,突出了其在肿瘤表观遗传调控中的双重作用。
与PRMT5类似,**PRMT6**通过H3R2me2a介导背景特异性转录调控,该修饰通过与H3K4me3的串扰调节基因表达。根据染色质景观和靶基因环境,PRMT6可作为转录抑制子或激活子,表现出抑癌或致癌效应。在癌症中,PRMT6增强抑癌基因启动子(如PCDH7)和致癌基因启动子(如ALDH1A1)处的全局H3R2me2a富集。此外,PRMT6与PRMT5合作,通过协调沉积H3R2me2a、H4R3me2s和H3R8me2s抑制CDKN2B和CCNG1等抑癌基因,建立对肿瘤进展施加背景依赖性效应的抑制性染色质环境。相反,PRMT6介导的H3R2me2a还促进CDC20转录,导致细胞周期抑制子CDKN1B的降解和GBM不受控制的增殖。
### 非组蛋白修饰
除组蛋白修饰外,PRMTs通过甲基化非组蛋白底物(包括转录因子、核受体、共激活物和染色质重塑因子)深刻影响转录。这些修饰改变蛋白质稳定性、DNA结合亲和力和与调控复合物的相互作用,重编程致癌转录网络。
**转录因子:** 几种PRMTs直接靶向作为致癌转录主开关的转录因子。PRMT1甲基化多种转录调控因子以调节其稳定性和功能。在乳腺癌细胞中,PRMT1在R35、R156和R165处甲基化C/EBPα,破坏其与HDAC3的相互作用,促进cyclin D1表达并增加肿瘤细胞增殖。PRMT1还甲基化ZEB1以调节EMT和细胞衰老。在胃癌中,PRMT1将MLXIP招募至CTNNB1启动子,激活Wnt/β-catenin信号并促进迁移和转移。同样,在AML模型中,CARM1在R223处甲基化RUNX1,增强其与DPF2的相互作用并抑制miR-223转录。由于miR-223促进髓系分化,CARM1的敲低减轻了白血病负担。在胃癌中,PRMT5与c-Myc相互作用以转录抑制抑癌基因,包括CDKN1A、CDKN1C、CDKN2C、PTEN和TP63,促进细胞增殖。
**核受体和共激活物:** PRMT2和CARM1直接与ERα相互作用并作为转录共激活物增强ERα介导的基因表达。相反,PRMT2还抑制ERα与CCND1启动子上AP-1位点的结合,抑制其在乳腺癌细胞中的转录。PRMT5通过与Sp1相互作用并招募染色质重塑因子Brg1激活雄激素受体(AR)转录,促进前列腺癌中的肿瘤进展。
**染色质重塑因子和表观遗传酶:** PRMT1在R342处甲基化并稳定组蛋白甲基转移酶EZH2,防止CDK1和AMPK介导的磷酸化以及TRAF6泛素-蛋白酶体通路。此外,PRMT1介导的EZH2甲基化增强其与SUZ12和PRC2复合物形成的结合。这种稳定化导致通过其启动子处H3K27me3富集抑制CDKN1A和CDKN2A,最终促进EMT、侵袭和转移。
CARM1靶向转录机器的多个组分以促进致癌程序。它在R1064处甲基化SWI/SNF复合物亚基BAF155,增强致癌基因座(包括c-Myc靶基因)处的染色质重塑,驱动细胞迁移和转移。甲基化的BAF155还与BRD4合作激活致癌转录,同时抑制ISG表达并减少转移性肿瘤中的T细胞浸润。此外,CARM1在R1862和R1912处甲基化MED12,通过抑制CDKN1A转录赋予对5-FU和阿霉素等化疗药物的抗性。
这些机制共同强调了PRMTs如何通过非组蛋白底物甲基化桥接转录和表观遗传系统,将多种致癌信号通路整合为协调的转录程序。
---
## mRNA加工与翻译调控
PRMTs通过将染色质信号与转录后基因调控联系起来,对RNA代谢发挥关键控制作用。它们通过甲基化剪接因子、RNA结合蛋白和翻译机器来精细调节mRNA成熟、稳定性和翻译效率。癌细胞中异常的精氨酸甲基化破坏了这些过程,促进转录组可塑性和致癌适应。
### 剪接调控
PRMT5是前mRNA剪接的关键调控因子。它甲基化核心剪接体组分,包括Sm蛋白,增强其与SMN的关联。在神经干细胞中,PRMT5的缺失破坏MDM4的剪接,降低全长转录本水平并产生受无义介导的衰变(NMD)影响的截短异构体。这种不稳定的异构体不能正确抑制p53,导致细胞周期控制缺陷。在黑色素瘤中,PRMT5的缺失促进MDM4的外显子跳跃以产生MDM4-S异构体,恢复p53功能并使细胞对CDK4/6抑制剂敏感。此外,几种剪接和RNA加工因子(包括Lsm4和hnRNPH1)经历PRMT5依赖性SDMA。在GBM干细胞中,PRMT5抑制引起广泛的剪接缺陷,特别是在控制细胞周期和增殖的基因中,抑制体内外肿瘤生长。
除剪接体组装外,PRMT介导的甲基化在癌症中动态调节选择性剪接。在乳腺癌中,PRMT1甲基化SRSF1并增强其RNA结合活性,促进致癌外显子包含。PRMT1和甲基化的SRSF1在肿瘤中均上调,其抑制减弱异常剪接和肿瘤生长。同样,在AML中,PRMT5在R93、R97和R109处甲基化SRSF1,稳定RNA-蛋白相互作用并促进增殖相关转录本的有效剪接。PRMT5的缺失破坏这些网络,引起广泛的选择性剪接和细胞死亡。PRMT5还在R175处甲基化ZNF326,这对RNA聚合酶II转录A-T富集基因至关重要。PRMT5的缺失诱导ST3GAL5、FOXM1和AP4中A-T富集外显子的包含,产生被NMD降解的异常转录本。这些缺陷损害乳腺癌细胞增殖和迁移。
总体而言,PRMT依赖性选择性剪接调控确保精确的RNA成熟,而其失调有助于多种癌症的恶性转化和治疗耐药。
### mRNA修饰与代谢
N⁶-甲基腺苷(m⁶A)修饰是mRNA代谢的主要决定因素,影响转录本剪接、输出、翻译和降解。METTL3-METTL14-WTAP复合物作为主要的m⁶A甲基转移酶发挥作用。PRMT1通过在R442和R445处甲基化METTL14与m⁶A机器联系起来。这种修饰促进METTL14与RNA聚合酶II的关联,增强参与DNA链间交联修复通路转录本上的m⁶A沉积。PRMT1通过METTL14甲基化维持基因毒性应激下的基因组稳定性;因此,其抑制使癌细胞对化疗敏感。
m⁶A机器在PRMT7上游发挥作用。METTL3/IGF2BP1轴增强PRMT7 mRNA的m⁶A修饰,稳定其表达并激活Wnt/β-catenin信号以促进肿瘤进展。
除m⁶A调控外,PRMT1对RNA代谢施加广泛控制。多组学分析将PRMT1鉴定为整合RNA加工和DNA损伤应答(DDR)网络的核心调控因子。在胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中,PRMT1与hnRNPs等RNA结合蛋白相互作用,协调RNA剪接和基因组维持。在透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)中的类似观察显示,PRMT1缺失导致R-loop积累和双链DNA断裂,最终触发生长停滞。这些发现表明PRMT1是RNA代谢、基因组完整性和癌细胞存活的关键调控因子。
### 翻译调控
PRMTs是翻译稳态的关键调控因子,影响全局和选择性蛋白质合成。在p53/Rb缺失的骨肉瘤中,PRMT1通过甲基化翻译起始复合物的核心组分(包括eIF4G1、eIF4A和EIF4E)调控全局翻译。这表明PRMT1是一种在应激条件下保护翻译的致癌驱动因子,并凸显其作为潜在治疗靶点的价值。
此外,PRMT5通过在R218和R225处甲基化hnRNP A1调控内部核糖体进入位点(IRES)依赖性翻译。这种甲基化增强hnRNP A1对含IRES mRNA(如CCND1和MYC)的亲和力,促进翻译起始。这些残基的突变或PRMT5抑制破坏hnRNP A1-IRES结合并选择性地损害IRES依赖性翻译。通过这种机制,PRMT5支持CCND1、MYC、HIF1A和ESR1编码蛋白的合成,促进肿瘤增殖和存活。
---
## 信号转导与细胞周期调控
PRMTs已成为致癌信号和细胞周期控制的核心整合因子。通过组蛋白和非组蛋白底物的甲基化,细胞外信号与转录和检查点应答相连接。在信号水平上,PRMTs修饰主要致癌通路中的受体、激酶和转录因子,包括EGFR、TGF-β、Wnt、PI3K-Akt、MAPK和NF-κB,微调信号转导的幅度和持续时间。在下游效应水平上,PRMT依赖性甲基化关键细胞周期调控因子(包括p21、cyclin E1和CDK1)将上游输入转化为增殖或停滞的细胞决策。总体而言,PRMTs充当基于甲基化的变阻器,将生长因子信号与持续的肿瘤细胞增殖和转移进展整合。
### 信号转导
**EGFR通路:** PRMT1在细胞外结构域的R198和R200处甲基化EGFR,增强EGF结合、受体二聚化和CRC细胞中的下游信号。PRMT5还通过在R1199(对应成熟EGFR中的R1175)处甲基化EGFR促进EGF诱导的EGFR反式自磷酸化。在胰腺癌细胞中,PRMT5上调并增强EGFR磷酸化和下游Akt与GSK3β激活,导致β-catenin表达增加。这种PRMT5依赖性信号级联促进EMT相关基因(如vimentin和胶原I)的表达。
**TGF-β/SMAD通路:** PRMT1通过在R57和R67处甲基化SMAD7促进TGF-β驱动的EMT,增强乳腺上皮细胞中EMT和干细胞相关基因的转录。在CRC细胞中,PRMT5还通过R361处SMAD4甲基化增强TGF-β信号,促进SMAD复合物形成和核转位以诱导EMT和转移。临床上,升高的PRMT5表达和增加的SMAD4 R361甲基化与患者预后不良相关。
**Wnt/β-catenin通路:** Wnt/β-catenin信号的异常激活是CRC的标志。在结肠癌中频繁过表达的CARM1与β-catenin相互作用以增强β-catenin驱动的转录。β-catenin将CARM1招募至LEF/TCF结合的启动子,在那里CARM1沉积H3R17me2a,创建促进靶基因表达和细胞增殖的活性染色质状态。在HCC中,MTDH-PRMT5复合物增强Wnt/β-catenin信号。过表达的MTDH优先与PRMT5结合,释放β-catenin进行核转位并激活下游致癌程序。在ccRCC中,PRMT7上调并甲基化β-catenin,保护其免受泛素介导的降解并放大β-catenin/c-Myc轴以驱动细胞增殖。
**PI3K/Akt/mTOR通路:** PRMT5通过Akt中的多个甲基化事件直接增强PI3K/Akt信号。PRMT5介导的Akt1在R391处的甲基化与磷脂酰肌醇(3,4,5)-三磷酸一起减弱分子内PH-KD结合,促进膜转位和PDK1与mTORC2的后续激活。PRMT5还在R15处甲基化Akt1,使其能够在T308和S473处完全激活。PRMT5抑制消除这些事件,损害Akt激活并抑制EMT转录因子(如ZEB1、Snail和Twist1),减少神经母细胞瘤生长和转移。在GBM中,PRMT5通过抑制PTEN间接维持PI3K/Akt信号,通过p27抑制和E2F靶标激活促进增殖。PRMT5缺失逆转这些效应并诱导G1/S阻滞和细胞衰老。相反,PRMT6通过在R159处甲基化PTEN来拮抗PI3K/Akt通路。其他PRMT家族成员以背景依赖性方式调节这一轴。在胃癌中,PRMT7促进PTEN甲基化并激活PI3K/Akt信号。在HCC中,PRMT9激活PI3K/Akt/GSK3β/Snail级联,促进EMT和转移。
**RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK通路:** PRMT6在HCC中频繁下调,其表达与HCC患者的侵袭性癌症特征呈负相关。PRMT6沉默促进HCC细胞系和患者来源的类器官中的肿瘤发生、转移和治疗耐药。PRMT6在R100处甲基化CRAF,降低其RAS结合潜力并抑制下游MEK/ERK信号。因此,PRMT6缺乏上调干细胞相关基因,如CD133、SOX2和NANOG。
**NF-κB通路:** PRMT5通过在R205处甲基化YBX1和在R30处甲基化p65来放大NF-κB信号。这些修饰增强YBX1-p65相互作用并增强p65 DNA结合,驱动YBX1依赖性NF-κB靶基因的转录并促进致癌和促炎应答。在膀胱癌中,PRMT5促进NF-κB招募至抗凋亡基因(如BCLXL和BIRC2)的启动子,抑制凋亡。
### 细胞周期调控
**G1/S转换和检查点控制:** CARM1通过调控ERα介导的转录激活促进G1/S转换。在雌激素刺激下,CARM1与ERα和共激活物AIB1结合,促进E2F1启动子处H3R17me2a,从而增强E2F1转录并促进细胞周期进程。在生长刺激背景下,CARM1以E2F依赖性方式与p160共激活物ACTR一起被招募至CCNE1启动子。这种招募伴随H3R17和H3R26甲基化的动态变化,并有助于CCNE1激活和S期进入。此外,在G1/S转换期间,CARM1介导的Rb在R775、R787和R798处的甲基化增强CDK依赖性磷酸化并破坏其与E2F1的关联,激活E2F1靶基因并驱动G1/S进程。
最近的证据进一步证明,CARM1高甲基化NuRD染色质重塑复合物的组分(包括GATAD2A/B),从而增强细胞周期相关基因的表达并促进乳腺癌发展。
PRMT5对细胞增殖至关重要,因为它维持G1/S转换。它在R111和R113处直接甲基化E2F1,降低蛋白稳定性。在DNA损伤应激下,甲基化减少,导致E2F1积累和凋亡诱导。一致地,PRMT5过表达促进上皮卵巢癌中的肿瘤细胞生长,而其抑制通过E2F1上调触发凋亡。此外,PRMT5缺失通过下调翻译因子eIF4E抑制p53蛋白合成,导致DNA损伤时p53靶基因(如MDM2和CDKN1A)的诱导受损。这些发现共同确立了PRMT5作为关键促存活调控因子的地位,整合甲基化依赖性E2F1稳定性和p53翻译控制以维持细胞周期进程。
**G2/M转换和有丝分裂控制:** PRMTs通过组蛋白和非组蛋白甲基化协调有丝分裂调控的多个步骤。PRMT1抑制激活p53/p21信号通路,抑制cyclin B和CDK1,导致G2/M阻滞和有丝分裂细胞积累。CARM1在有丝分裂中发挥多方面作用。CARM1介导的PI3KC2α在R175处的甲基化增强其与微管的相互作用,稳定微管并促进适当的纺锤体形成。除其甲基转移酶活性外,CARM1还作为支架调控CDK1稳定性。在间期,CARM1作为Cullin-1介导的CDK1降解的衔接子,限制核CDK1水平。在晚G2期,CDK1-cyclin B1复合物转位至细胞核并磷酸化CARM1,使其酶失活并诱导其细胞质转位。核CARM1的缺失稳定核CDK1-cyclin B1复合物,促进有丝分裂进入。
通过组蛋白精氨酸甲基化提供了额外的有丝分裂调控层。进入有丝分裂后,CARM1被CDK1和PKC磷酸化,导致酶失活和H3R17me2a水平降低。同时,PRMT6沉积H3R2me2a标记。这些协调的染色质修饰对于染色体乘客复合物(CPC)的招募至关重要,促进Aurora B与染色质结合并促进H3S10磷酸化,这是染色体凝缩的关键步骤。H3R2me2a的缺失损害CPC在染色体臂上的定位并破坏有丝分裂进程。
在GBM中,CK2α磷酸化并稳定PRMT6,增强PRMT6依赖性RCC1在R214处的甲基化。这种修饰促进染色质关联和Ran GTPase激活,促进有丝分裂进程和间期的核质运输。
这些发现共同证明PRMTs通过多种机制协调有丝分裂进程,包括表观遗传调控、支架功能和激酶驱动的信号(图5)。特别是CARM1的双重角色——作为调控纺锤体形成和染色体凝缩的甲基转移酶,以及调节CDK1稳态的衔接子——强调了其在维持有丝分裂完整性中的核心作用。
---
## DNA损伤修复与基因组稳定性
PRMTs是DDR的关键调控因子,通过组蛋白和非组蛋白甲基化调节修复因子的招募、活性和稳定性。通过靶向核心DNA修复蛋白和染色质组分,PRMTs协调多种DNA修复通路,包括同源重组(HR)、非同源末端连接(NHEJ)/碱基/核苷酸切除修复(BER/NER)和复制相关检查点信号。
### DNA双链断裂修复
DNA双链断裂(DSBs)是最致命的DNA损伤之一,主要通过HR和NHEJ修复。PRMTs已成为这些通路的关键调控因子,协调修复因子的组装和功能(图6)。
PRMT1介导的BRCA1甲基化决定其与Sp1或STAT1的结合偏好,促进染色质招募。在乳腺癌中,PRMT1缺失使BRCA1错误定位至细胞质,导致DNA修复缺陷和放射敏感性增加。PRMT1甲基化MRE11和53BP1,促进其招募至DSBs。这些甲基化事件由GFL1促进,GFL1作为衔接子使PRMT1能够与MRE11和53BP1相互作用。此外,DNA-PK依赖性PRMT1磷酸化驱动PRMT1在顺铂暴露后在染色质中积累,通过持续H4R3me2a沉积诱导衰老相关分泌表型基因的表达。
PRMT5通过DNA修复因子的多层调控协调NHEJ和HR之间的细胞选择。在蛋白稳定性水平上,PRMT5甲基化并稳定53BP1,促进NHEJ,这被Src介导的磷酸化所拮抗,抑制PRMT5并减少53BP1积累。PRMT5还调节修复蛋白在DSBs中的功能参与。RUVBL1在R205处的甲基化促进TIP60/KAT5依赖性染色质乙酰化并使53BP1从DSBs移位,抑制NHEJ。同时,PRMT5介导的METTL3在R36处的甲基化增强RAD51向DSBs的招募,促进HR。
除对修复因子稳定性和招募的直接作用外,PRMT5通过调节mRNA剪接对修复通路施加更广泛的影响。PRMT5缺失导致关键染色质修饰酶(如TIP60/KAT5和KMT5C/SUV4-20H2)的异常剪接,导致TIP60α表达降低和染色质乙酰化受损,最终损害HR效率。
CARM1通过在R754处甲基化CBP/p300来促进BRCA1调控,该修饰被BRCA1的BRCT结构域识别。这种相互作用促进BRCA1招募至CDKN1A启动子的p53结合区域。除这种转录偶联机制外,CARM1通过与PARP1的相互作用被快速招募至DSBs,在那里它有助于有效的DSB修复。
### 碱基切除修复
PRMT6通过在R83和R152处甲基化DNA聚合酶β来增强BER效率。这些修饰增加DNA结合亲和力和持续性,促进更有效的修复合成并赋予对烷化剂诱导的DNA损伤的抗性。PRMT1在R137处甲基化DNA聚合酶β,破坏其与PCNA的相互作用。这种甲基化可能调节BER和复制之间的交接,防止DNA聚合酶β在复制叉处的不适当参与并确保通路保真度。
在NER中,结构特异性内切核酸酶XPF-ERCC1对于切割受损DNA链至关重要,特别是在去除紫外线(UV)诱导的嘧啶二聚体期间。CARM1在多个精氨酸残基(包括R568)处甲基化XPF,这是XPF蛋白稳定性、染色质关联和与ERCC1有效异二聚化所必需的。因此,CARM1的缺失降低XPF-ERCC1水平并损害其向UV损伤染色质的招募,导致NER效率受损和UV照射敏感性增加。
### 损伤感知和检查点信号
PRMT5通过多种机制调控基因组完整性,包括γH2AX蛋白稳态、检查点信号和转录调控。PRMT5通过PRMT5-RNF168-SMURF2轴调节泛素化来平衡γH2AX稳定性:RNF168稳定γH2AX,而SMURF2促进其降解。具体而言,PRMT5通过H3R2me1和H3R8me2s维持RNF168表达来保持γH2AX水平。在GBM中,MTAP缺失破坏这一通路,导致DNA损伤信号受损。
PRMT5介导的RAD9在R172、R174和R175处的甲基化也是基因毒素诱导的Chk1磷酸化所必需的。甲基化和磷酸化的RAD9随后与RAD1和Hus1形成9-1-1复合物,这对细胞周期控制和DNA修复至关重要。此外,PRMT5在R374、R376和R377处甲基化并稳定转录因子KLF4,通过诱导CDKN1A和抑制BAX促进细胞存活。DNA损伤后,KLF4甲基化的缺失触发其降解,导致细胞周期停滞。
---
## 肿瘤转移
PRMTs是驱动癌症转移的关键表观遗传调控因子,协调肿瘤播散、存活和定植所必需的过程。转移通常始于EMT,在此期间上皮癌细胞失去极性和粘附,同时获得运动性和侵袭潜力。PRMTs通过抑制上皮标志物(如E-cadherin(CDH1))和激活间充质标志物(包括vimentin(VIM))促进EMT,直接或间接通过调节EMT诱导转录因子(EMT-TFs)。
PRMT1在R342处甲基化并稳定EZH2,增强H3K27me3依赖性CDH1抑制。同样,CARM1在R838处甲基化并稳定LSD1,抑制CDH1并通过H3K4me2和H3K9me2激活VIM转录。PRMT7介导的H4R3me2s还通过在EMT诱导期间减少CDH1启动子处的H3K4me3、H3Ac和H4Ac来抑制CDH1表达。
此外,PRMTs调控关键EMT-TFs。Snail和Slug与PRMT5和LSD1形成复合物以抑制CDH1并激活VIM转录。ZEB2与Twist1、PRMT5和NuRD复合物合作表观遗传沉默CDH1,增强间充质表型。PRMT1介导的Twist1在R34处的甲基化增强其抑制子功能,而PRMT1通过在其启动子处沉积H4R3me2a增强ZEB1表达。
在信号水平上,PRMTs调节控制EMT和转移的关键通路。在TGF-β通路中,PRMT1和CARM1甲基化SMAD6和SMAD7,促进其与受体解离并增强SMAD依赖性转录。PRMT5在R361处甲基化SMAD4,促进其核转位和转录活性。PRMT5还通过表观遗传沉默通路拮抗物(如DKK1和DKK3)来增强Wnt信号,导致β-catenin驱动的转录程序增强。此外,PRMT5介导的Akt1在R15处的甲基化和PRMT1/PRMT6依赖性STAT3甲基化激活下游致癌信号,促进EMT和转移潜力。
除这些通路外,PRMTs调节生长因子受体信号(包括EGFR和FGFR3)以增强迁移、侵袭和EMT诱导。与EMT调控平行,PRMTs通过细胞骨架重塑、粘附转换和