Plant Respiratory Burst Oxidase Homologs Impinge on Wound Responsiveness and Development in<i>Lycopersicon esculentum</i> [W]

✅ 全文

植物呼吸爆发氧化酶同源物影响番茄的伤口反应性和发育

作者 Moshe Sagi; Olga Davydov; Saltanat Orazova; Zhazira Yesbergenova; Ron Ophir; Johannes W. Stratmann; Robert Fluhr 期刊 The Plant Cell 发表日期 2004 ISSN 1040-4651 DOI 10.1105/tpc.019398 类型 原创研究 (Original Research)

📄 中文摘要 Chinese Abstract

中文
植物呼吸爆发氧化酶同源物(Rboh)是人类中性粒细胞gp91phox亚基NADPH氧化酶的植物同源物,在病原体防御过程中产生活性氧(ROS)。在植物中,ROS不仅参与防御信号传导和过敏反应,还在细胞扩张、气孔关闭和激素信号传导等发育过程中发挥作用。尽管Rboh具有重要意义,但其在植物中更广泛的生理和发育功能仍不完全清楚。本研究利用反义技术抑制Rboh表达,研究了Rboh在番茄(*Lycopersicon esculentum*)中的作用,并评估其对ROS产生、伤口反应、发育和基因表达的影响。

📋 英文结构化总结 English Structured Summary

全文整理

EN

Background:

Plant respiratory burst oxidase homologs (Rboh) are plant homologs of the human neutrophil gp91phox subunit of NADPH oxidase, which generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) during pathogen defense. In plants, ROS play roles not only in defense signaling and the hypersensitive response but also in developmental processes such as cell expansion, stomatal closure, and hormone signaling. Despite their importance, the broader physiological and developmental functions of Rboh in plants remain incompletely understood. This study investigates the role of Rboh in *Lycopersicon esculentum* (tomato) using antisense technology to suppress Rboh expression and assess its impact on ROS production, wound response, development, and gene expression.

Methods:

Transgenic tomato lines (cv Motelle) were generated using antisense constructs targeting two highly expressed Rboh genes, *Lerboh1* and *Wfi1*, under the control of the 35S promoter. Four independent antisense lines (M3–M6/7) were analyzed for Rboh transcript and protein levels via RT-PCR and immunoblotting. ROS accumulation was assessed using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining for H₂O₂. Wound-induced systemic responses were evaluated by measuring ROS and proteinase inhibitor II (PIN II) accumulation in unwounded leaves after wounding. Transcriptome profiling was conducted using a 12K tomato EST microarray comparing wild-type and M6/7 antisense plants under control and wounded conditions. Selected expression changes were validated by quantitative RT-PCR.

Results:

Antisense lines showed reduced Rboh transcript and protein levels, leading to significantly lower constitutive and wound-induced H₂O₂ accumulation. These plants exhibited a bushy, highly branched phenotype with curled and inverted leaflets, determinate growth habit, fasciated reproductive organs, and parthenocarpic fruit development. Wound-induced systemic expression of PIN II was compromised, indicating a requirement for Rboh-derived ROS in this defense response. Microarray analysis revealed that 129 out of 169 wound-induced transcripts showed Rboh dependency, including members of the PIN gene family. Additionally, ectopic expression of floral homeotic MADS box genes (e.g., *APETALA3* and *PMADS2* homologs) was observed in leaves of antisense plants, along with altered expression of redox-related genes such as monodehydroascorbate reductase and proline oxidase.

Data Summary:

Quantitative DAB staining showed that H₂O₂ levels in antisense leaves were reduced by up to 70% compared to wild type. In M6/7 plants, wound-induced ROS accumulation in systemic leaves was nearly abolished. Microarray analysis identified 1,473 differentially expressed ESTs (P ≤ 0.05); among them, 384 were constitutively upregulated and 485 downregulated in antisense plants. Of 169 wound-upregulated transcripts, 129 required Rboh for full induction. For example, PIN II induction was 3.4–4.9-fold higher in wild-type than in M6/7 plants after wounding. Ectopic expression of floral MADS box genes in leaves was confirmed, with some showing >2-fold higher expression in antisense lines.

Conclusions:

Rboh is essential for maintaining cellular ROS homeostasis and acts as a signal transducer in both stress responses and developmental regulation. Its activity is required for systemic wound signaling, particularly for full induction of defense genes like PIN II. Moreover, Rboh influences plant architecture and reproductive development, likely through modulation of hormone signaling and redox-sensitive transcriptional programs. The ectopic expression of floral homeotic genes in vegetative tissues suggests that Rboh impacts epigenetic or chromatin-level regulation, linking ROS metabolism to developmental fate.

Practical Significance:

Understanding Rboh’s dual role in stress signaling and development provides new targets for engineering crop resilience and architecture. Manipulating Rboh activity could enhance wound and pathogen resistance while also influencing traits like branching, flowering, and fruit set—key agronomic characteristics in tomato and other crops.

📋 中文结构化总结 Chinese Structured Summary

中文

背景:

植物呼吸爆发氧化酶同源物(Rboh)是人类中性粒细胞gp91phox亚基NADPH氧化酶的植物同源物,在病原体防御过程中产生活性氧(ROS)。在植物中,ROS不仅参与防御信号传导和过敏反应,还在细胞扩张、气孔关闭和激素信号传导等发育过程中发挥作用。尽管Rboh具有重要意义,但其在植物中更广泛的生理和发育功能仍不完全清楚。本研究利用反义技术抑制Rboh表达,研究了Rboh在番茄(*Lycopersicon esculentum*)中的作用,并评估其对ROS产生、伤口反应、发育和基因表达的影响。

方法:

利用靶向两种高表达Rboh基因*Lerboh1*和*Wfi1*的反义构建体,在35S启动子控制下生成了转基因番茄株系(品种Motelle)。通过RT-PCR和免疫印迹分析四个独立的反义株系(M3–M6/7)的Rboh转录物和蛋白水平。使用3,3′-二氨基联苯胺(DAB)染色法检测H₂O₂以评估ROS积累。通过测量受伤后未受伤叶片中ROS和蛋白酶抑制剂II(PIN II)的积累来评估伤口诱导的系统性反应。使用12K番茄EST微阵列在对照和受伤条件下对野生型和M6/7反义植株进行转录组分析。通过定量RT-PCR验证选定的表达变化。

结果:

反义株系的Rboh转录物和蛋白水平降低,导致组成型和伤口诱导的H₂O₂积累显著减少。这些植株表现出丛生、高度分枝的表型,小叶卷曲和倒置,具有确定性生长习性,生殖器官出现融合现象,并产生单性结实果实。伤口诱导的PIN II系统性表达受损,表明该防御反应需要Rboh衍生的ROS。微阵列分析显示,169个伤口诱导的转录物中有129个表现出Rboh依赖性,包括PIN基因家族成员。此外,在反义植株叶片中观察到花器官同源异型MADS盒基因(如*APETALA3*和*PMADS2*同源物)的异位表达,同时单脱氢抗坏血酸还原酶和脯氨酸氧化酶等氧化还原相关基因的表达也发生改变。

数据摘要:

定量DAB染色显示,反义叶片中的H₂O₂水平与野生型相比降低了高达70%。在M6/7植株中,系统性叶片中伤口诱导的ROS积累几乎完全消失。微阵列分析鉴定出1,473个差异表达的EST(P ≤ 0.05),其中384个在反义植株中组成型上调,485个下调。在169个伤口上调的转录物中,129个需要Rboh才能完全诱导。例如,受伤后野生型中PIN II的诱导水平比M6/7植株高3.4–4.9倍。叶片中花MADS盒基因的异位表达得到证实,部分基因在反义株系中的表达量高出2倍以上。

结论:

Rboh对维持细胞ROS稳态至关重要,并在应激反应和发育调控中充当信号转导子。其活性是系统性伤口信号传导所必需的,特别是对于PIN II等防御基因的完全诱导。此外,Rboh通过调节激素信号传导和氧化还原敏感转录程序影响植物结构和生殖发育。花器官同源异型基因在营养组织中的异位表达表明Rboh影响表观遗传或染色质水平的调控,将ROS代谢与发育命运联系起来。

实际意义:

理解Rboh在应激信号传导和发育中的双重作用为工程化作物抗性和结构提供了新的靶点。调控Rboh活性可增强伤口和病原体抗性,同时影响分枝、开花和坐果等性状——这些是番茄及其他作物的重要农艺性状。

📖 英文全文 English Full Text

EN

Plant Respiratory Burst Oxidase Homologs Impinge on

Wound Responsiveness and Development in Lycopersicon esculentum

W Moshe Sagi,a Olga Davydov,b Saltanat Orazova,a Zhazira Yesbergenova,a Ron Ophir,c Johannes W. Stratmann,d and Robert Fluhrb,1 a Institute for Applied Research, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel b Department of Plant Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel c Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Biological Services, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel d Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208

Plant respiratory burst oxidase homologs (Rboh) are homologs of the human neutrophil pathogen-related gp91phox.

Antisense technology was employed to ascertain the biological function of Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato) Rboh. Lines with diminished Rboh activity showed a reduced level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the leaf, implying a role for Rboh in establishing the cellular redox milieu. Surprisingly, the antisense plants acquired a highly branched phenotype, switched from indeterminate to determinate growth habit, and had fasciated reproductive organs. Wound-induced systemic expression of proteinase inhibitor II was compromised in the antisense lines, indicating that ROS intermediates supplied by

Rboh are required for this wound response. Extending these observations by transcriptome analysis revealed ectopic leaf expression of homeotic MADS box genes that are normally expressed only in reproductive organs. In addition, both Rboh- dependent and -independent wound-induced gene induction was detected as well as transcript changes related to redox maintenance. The results provide novel insights into how the steady state cellular level of ROS is controlled and portrays the role of Rboh as a signal transducer of stress and developmental responses.

INTRODUCTION The kinetics and defense functions of superoxide O2 and H2O2 during activation of mammalian neutrophils have served as a model for similar processes in plants. The mammalian NADPH oxidase consists of two plasma membrane proteins, gp91phox and p22phox (phox, phagocyte oxidase), which together form heterodimeric flavocytochrome b558. The three cytosolic regu- latory proteins p40phox, p47phox, and p67phox translocate to the plasma membrane after stimulation to form the active complex (Bokoch et al., 1994). In plants, enhanced O2 generation can be observed in microsomal preparations from pathogen-challenged leaf material (Doke and Ohashi, 1988). Diphenylene iodonium, a nonspecific suicide substrate inhibitor of the neutrophil NADPH oxidase and other flavin-containing enzymes (Cross and Jones,

1986), blocks the plant oxidative burst (Doke and Ohashi, 1988).

Homology to the neutrophil gp91phox was the basis for molecular cloning of plant respiratory burst oxidase homologs (Rboh) in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) (Keller et al., 1998;

Torres et al., 1998). Plant Rboh defines transcripts encoding a protein of 105 to 112 kD, with a C-terminal region that shows pronounced similarity to the gp91phox. Rboh proteins have a cytosolic N-terminal domain containing calcium binding EF hand motifs and a degree of similarity to the human RanGTPase- activating protein (Keller et al., 1998; Simon-Plas et al., 2002).

Subsequently, human NADPH oxidase 5 (NOX5), a gene con- taining a gp91phox core cytochrome and N-terminal EF hand motifs, was identified (Banfiet al., 2001). Direct activation of plant

Rboh by calcium may be important for rapid stimulation of the oxidative burst during the hypersensitive response, and plant

Rboh, unlike the mammalian gp91phox complex, is active in the absence of additional cytosolic components (Sagi and Fluhr,

2001). Interestingly, human NOX5 displayed calcium-dependent activity as well (Banfiet al., 2001).

Rapid generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is considered to be an important component of the resistance response of plants to pathogen challenge. ROS intermediates can serve as direct protective agents by their toxicity or by their ability to contain pathogen ingress by driving the cross-linking of the cell wall (Baker and Orlandi, 1995). The oxidative burst can further trigger the collapse of challenged host cells at the onset of the hypersensitive response and generate apoptopic-like signals (Allan and Fluhr, 1997). The gp91phox homologs AtrbohD and

AtrbohF from Arabidopsis, NtrbohD from Nicotiana tabacum, and NbrbohA and NbrbohB from N. benthamiana were shown to be required for ROS accumulation in plant defense responses

1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail robert.fluhr@ weizmann.ac.il; fax 972-8-9344181.

The authors responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) are: Moshe Sagi (gizi@bgumail.bgu.ac.il) and Robert Fluhr (robert.fluhr@weizmann.ac.il).

W Online version contains Web-only data.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.019398.

The Plant Cell, Vol. 16, 616–628, March 2004, www.plantcell.org ª 2004 American Society of Plant Biologists (Simon-Plas et al., 2002; Torres et al., 2002; Yoshioka et al.,

2003).

ROS can function as signaling molecules that mediate responses to various stimuli in both plant and animal cells (Neill et al., 2002a). The wounding response is thought to progress through the release of systemin (an 18–amino acid wound signal) in the wounded leaf, subsequent activation of early-response signal relay genes, such as polygalacturonase, allene oxide synthase, and lipoxygenase, and synthesis of the long-distance signal jasmonic acid (JA). A second wave of gene induction follows, involving synthesis of proteinase inhibitor (PIN) and other defense polypeptides (Ryan, 2000; Lee and Howe, 2003). The wound-induced increase in H2O2 levels is JA dependent and diphenylene iodonium sensitive, suggesting that a NADPH-like oxidase activity is required for the activation of wound/systemin- responsive genes (Orozco-Cardenas and Ryan, 1999; Orozco- Cardenas et al., 2001). Potential sources of ROS include NADPH oxidase, cell wall peroxidase, other flavin-containing oxidases, and oxalate oxidase (Neill et al., 2002a, 2002b). Thus, the exact source of wound-induced ROS remains unknown.

ROS also can play a role in hormonal regulation of plant development, as shown by ROS involvement in auxin-regulated

Figure 1. Expression of Lerboh1 and Wfi1 Transcripts and Rboh Polypeptide Levels in Antisense Plants. (A) Schematic presentation of L. esculentum Rboh showing gp91phox, EF hand, and RanGap homology regions. The location of the antisense fragments of Lerboh1 and Wfi1 are shown in the C-terminal region. The combinations of inserts used in constructs M3 to M6/7 are shown at the right. Fragment types are indicated in parenthesis, and the insert orientations are indicated at the right. Arrows pointing to the left or right represent antisense and sense orientations, respectively. (B) RT-PCR expression analysis of antisense construct and Lerboh1 and Wfi1 sense expressions in wild-type (W) and antisense (M) plants. Top panels;

RT-PCR product of antisense expression transcript showing fragments of 810, 293, 648, and 927 bp for M3, M4, M5, and M6/7, respectively; middle panels, RT-PCR of endogenous Lerboh1 sense transcript showing the expected PCR fragment of 270 bp; bottom panels, RT-PCR of endogenous Wfi1 sense transcript showing the expected PCR products of 213 bp. L. esculentum actin (Tom41 actin gene, U60480) was used as a standard, and the expected PCR product of a 325-bp fragment is shown. The data are representative of results obtained in at least four independent lines. (C) Immunoblot analysis of L. esculentum Rboh levels in wild-type (W) and transgenic antisense (M) lines. Proteins were extracted from wild-type and antisense leaves and fractionated (100 mg per lane) by denaturating SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with antisera against the C-terminal portion of the

L. esculentum Rboh. The data are representative of results obtained in at least four independent lines.

Multifunctional Rboh 617 gravitropic responses such as root bending (Joo et al., 2001).

NADPH oxidase–mediated H2O2 synthesis has been implicated in abscisic acid (ABA)-induced signaling processes in Arabidop- sis (Pei et al., 2000) and likely in maize (Zea mays) (Jiang and

Zhang, 2003). The Arabidopsis genes AtrbohD and AtrbohF function in ROS-dependent ABA signaling for stomatal closure (Kwak et al., 2003). Arabidopsis RbohC-deficient mutants were defective in Ca21 uptake and displayed short root hairs on stunted roots, suggesting that this Rboh species regulates plant cell expansion (Foreman et al., 2003).

We wished to examine the global role that Rboh genes play in plant environmental responses and development. We employed an antisense technique to downregulate Rboh activity in

Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato) lines. The results showed a requirement of Rboh for expression of certain wound response genes, whereas other wound-responsive genes were regulated in a Rboh-independent manner. The reduced Rboh levels shifted redox-related metabolism, induced multiple effects on plant development, and resulted in ectopic expression of flower- specific homeotic genes.

RESULTS Repression of Rboh Sense Transcripts and Polypeptides in Transgenic Plants

AtrbohD and AtrbohF are the most highly expressed genes among the Arabidopsis Rboh multigene family (Torres et al.,

1998). Based on accumulative compilation of ESTs, whitefly- induced (Wfi1) and Lerboh1 are the most highly expressed L. esculentum Rboh homologs (AAF73124 and AAD25300, re- spectively; The Institute for Genomic Research [TIGR], version

9.0). They belong by homology to the gene families of NbrbohB and AtrbohD and NbrbohA and AtrbohF, respectively (Yoshioka et al., 2003). Based on sequence comparison between Lerboh1 and Wfi1, the largest unbroken stretch of homology in the region employed for antisense regulation was 12 bp. Sequence data for other L. esculentum Rboh genes is not known. Antisense transgenic L. esculentum lines were generated by expression of sequence combinations from the 39 gene region of the L. esculentum Rboh homologs Wfi1and Lerboh1under the control of the 35S promoter (Methods, Figure 1A). For each antisense construct (M3, M4, M5, and M6/7), at least four independent lines of each type were brought to the homozygous state and an- alyzed. All of the L. esculentum lines expressed the antisense construct (Figure 1B, Antisense) and were subjected to quanti- tative reverse transcriptase (RT) PCR analysis specific for each gene type using actin transcript as an expression level control.

Lines M4 and M5, which express antisense constructs of

Lerboh1 and Wfi1, respectively, repressed both types of transcript when compared with the wild-type levels (cf. cycles,

Figure 1B). Similarly, constructs with combinations of antisense elements (M3 and M6/7) showed sense repression in both transcripts (cf. cycles, Figure 1B). We conclude that in all four lines both gene sets are repressed. The lack of specificity is apparently attributable to the residual homology between these two genes.

Rboh protein levels were determined by performing immu- noanalysis of plant extracts using antisera raised against L. esculentum Rboh (Sagi and Fluhr, 2001). Polyclonal antibody was raised against 214–amino acid length of the conserved C terminus of Wfi1 and is not expected to differentiate among members of the L. esculentum Rboh family. Immunoblot analysis of extracts of wild-type leaves revealed major immunoreactive polypeptides of 112 kD, the expected size of Lerboh and Wfi1 proteins. By contrast, levels were severely reduced in the antisense lines (Figure 1C).

Repression in expression levels of the Rboh polypeptide may imply a reduction in the constitutive level of ROS. Although the

L. esculentum Rboh has been shown to produce superoxide radicals (Sagi and Fluhr, 2001), staining for H2O2 produced by endogenous superoxide dismutation of superoxide radicals has been used to quantify Rboh activity (Simon-Plas et al., 2002;

Torres et al., 2002; Yoshioka et al., 2003). Excised leaves were

Figure 2. H2O2 Production in Wild-Type and Antisense Leaves. (A) Constitutive levels of H2O2 in leaves were visualized by DAB staining of the terminal leaflet of the first fully expanded leaves sampled from wild-type and Rboh transgenic 45-d-old plants. Leaflets were collected and vacuum-infiltrated with the DAB solution. The sampled leaves were placed in a plastic box under high humidity for DAB-H2O2 staining development. (B) Quantitative analysis of DAB staining. Quantitative measurements were performed as described in the Methods. Each point represents the mean of four terminal leaflets derived from four different plants. Bars represent SE.

618 The Plant Cell allowed to imbibe a 1-mg/mL solution of 3,39-diaminobenzidine reagent (DAB). DAB polymerizes and turns deep brown in the presence of H2O2, and the intensity of coloration can be quali- tatively assessed. The development of the DAB-H2O2 reaction product in wild-type and transgenic L. esculentum leaves is shown in Figures 2A and 2B. M4 leaves showed partial ROS development (70%) compared with wild-type leaves, whereas in M5 and M6/7 leaves, the majority of the DAB-H2O2 reaction product was eliminated. Thus, based on RT-PCR and protein immunoblot and activity data, the antisense lines contain re- duced levels of total Rboh expression and activity.

Developmental Effects of Reduced Rboh Expression L. esculentum lines that showed reduced Rboh expression were selected for further physiological and growth parameter analysis.

Total chlorophyll content in all antisense lines tested was 20 to

30% lower than that of the wild type (data not shown). The parental line used for transformation (L. esculentum cv Motelle) exhibits indeterminate growth habit with minor secondary branching. By contrast, all of the transformed lines displayed decreased apical dominance reflected in enhanced branching ranging from 2- to 10-fold more than the wild type. This yielded a bushy growth style particularly in M3 and M4 lines and to a lesser extent in M5 and M6/7 lines (Figure 3A). The parental line features a compound leaf structure. Examination of the trans- formed lines showed that the leaflets generally tended to have smoother edges and appeared less lobed (Figures 2, 3B, and

3C). In addition, leaflets tended to exhibit curling (Figure 3B). The evaluation of leaf curling in the mutant plants compared with wild-type plants was calculated according to the example shown in Figure 3B: the severity extended from slightly curled at the edges (severity 1) to a complete curled phenotype (severity 3).

The tabulation of this phenomenon showed that all lines were affected (Figure 3B). In many instances, leaves contained inverted terminal and preterminal leaflets. The tabulation of this phenomenon shows that it is a general robust feature of Rboh compromised lines (Figure 3C).

Vegetative and reproductive phases alternate regularly during sympodial growth in L. esculentum. Thus, in the Motelle cultivar, the inflorescences are separated by three vegetative nodes.

When in determinate-habit plants homozygous for the recessive allele of the self pruning gene (the Arabidopsis CEN ortholog), sympodial segments develop progressively fewer nodes until the shoot is terminated by two consecutive inflorescences (Pnueli et al., 1998). Instead of the indeterminate nature of the Motelle parent cultivar, antisense plants displayed a determinate sp-like growth habit (Figure 4C). Examination of Rboh antisense L. esculentum plants revealed a two- to threefold increase in number of inflorescences (data not shown) and total flower number (Figure 4A). This is likely the result of decreased apical dominance and the sp-like phenotype. A significant proportion exhibited abnormal flowers resulting in sterility or a high ratio of abnormal fruits in the transgenic lines (Figures 4A to 4D).

Flower development in the transgenic lines was accompanied by homeotic-like deformations, characterized by abnormal petal

Figure 3. Characterization of Vegetative Growth of Rboh Antisense Plants. (A) Top panel, quantitative chart of appearance of secondary branches in wild-type and antisense plants. Each column represents an independent antisense line. Bottom panel, antisense plant line M4 showing a bushy phenotype. (B) Top panel, quantitative chart of appearance of leaf curl in wild-type and antisense plants. Each column in the chart represents an independent antisense line. The analysis was performed using a 0 to 3 severity score as shown in the bottom panel, with 0 representing the wild type and 3 representing the most severe curling. (C) Top panel, quantitative analysis of inverted leaflets in wild-type and antisense plants. Each column in the chart represents an independent antisense line. The analysis was performed using a 1 to 5 severity score (see Methods). The bottom panel illustrates wild-type leaflets and leaflets from an antisense line.

Multifunctional Rboh 619 number (more than six) and fasciated styles and ovaries (Figure

4D). Fasciated-like stems were observed as well (data not shown). The abnormal flowers yielded parthenocarpic fruits (Figure 4D). The sterile seeds were of reduced size (1.5 to 1.2 mm, 38 to 30% of wild-type seed diameter). M6/7 lines also were characterized by a phenomenon called blossom end rot ([BER];

10% of the fruits), a physiological disorder thought to be related to calcium deficiency (Figure 4D). BER occurrence has been noted in plants exposed to abiotic stresses, such as salinity and drought. It is associated with reduced translocation of calcium to fruit tips because of competition with the leaf or in- adequate xylem differentiation because of reduced lignification (Ho et al., 1993). The latter possibility is consistent with the reduced ROS milieu detected in antisense plants.

Hormones Modulate Rboh Levels The developmental effects of Rboh downregulation, including reduced chlorophyll content, loss of apical dominance, and changes in morphology, may reflect hormone-controlled devel- opmental events that are mediated by Rboh activity. It is there- fore of interest to look at the direct effect of hormones on Rboh levels innormal plants. Rboh protein levels were monitored by fol- lowing the immunoreactive 112-kD polypeptide in leaves of plants imbibed with various hormones for 24 h. As shown in

Figure 5, the phytohormones ABA, indoleacetic acid (IAA), benzylaminopurine (BA), and the ethylene precursor 1-amino- cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), but not gibberellic acid (GA), induced Rboh accumulation. Thus, hormones may exert long-term effects on Rboh levels.

Reduced Systemic Accumulation of ROS and PIN in Response to Wounding

The general reduction of Rboh activity in the antisense lines represents an opportunity to resolve the source of wound ROS as well as the involvement of Rboh in global management of wound and additional cellular responses. To this end, 3-week- old plants were wounded, and 5 h after wounding, unwounded leaves of wounded plants (systemic leaves) and leaves from unwounded control plants were examined by DAB infiltration. As shown in Figures 6A and 6B, wild-type leaves of unwounded control plants had a basal level of hydrogen peroxide that was

Figure 4. Characterization of Reproductive Organs in Rboh Antisense

Plants. (A) Chart of normal versus abnormal flowers counted in 100-d-old wild- type and antisense plants. Each black-and-white column pair in the chart represents an independent antisense line. (B) Chart of normal versus abnormal fruits counted in 150-d-old wild- type and antisense plants. Each black-and-white column pair in the chart represents an independent antisense line. (C) Growth habit in wild-type and M4, M5, and M6/7 lines. (D) Left panel, flower, styles, ovaries, and whole and sliced green fruit of the wild type (top row), antisense M5 (middle row), and antisense M6/7 plants (bottom row). Right panel, BER illustrated in M6/7 lines (middle and bottom) compared with normal parental fruit (top).

620 The Plant Cell enhanced in the systemic leaf in response to wounding. By contrast, in M3, M5, and M6/7 plants, the majority of the DAB- H2O2 reaction product was eliminated and did not increase in systemic leaves after wounding. Leaves of M4 plants showed a weaker phenotype with an 30% reduction in ROS devel- opment compared with wild-type leaves. Extracts of control and apical systemic leaves were examined 24 h after wounding.

Immunoblots using antiserum specific for PIN II revealed suppression of PIN II polypeptide accumulation in the antisense lines (Figure 6C), showing that Rboh functions in wound-signal transmission.

Transcriptome Profile of Rboh Antisense Plants Line M6/7 was chosen for in-depth microarray analysis. The mRNA of wild-type and M6/7 nonwounded control and non- wounded systemic leaves of wounded plants was sampled using a 12K L. esculentum EST slide as a probe. To improve statistical veracity, all samples were compared with a reference sample composed of equally mixed RNA extracts from all treatments (Oleksiak et al., 2002). Transcripts that are differentially ex- pressed in at least one of the conditions (1473 of total 12,000

ESTs; one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] equal variance, P #

0.05) were selected and subjected to two-way hierarchical clustering of genes and experimental conditions. As shown in

Figure 7A, M6/7 antisense control and wounding treatments clustered separately from wild-type control and wounding treatments. Furthermore, the ESTs clustered into a variety of activity groups. Questions that can be asked are as follows.

Which genes are constitutively influenced by the reduced level of

Rboh protein? How does Rboh affect gene functions related to development? More specifically, how does Rboh impact the wound response? We focused on four clusters showing distinct patterns of behavior (Figure 7A, arrows and brackets). The EST populations chosen are shown in Figure 7B, and select ESTs were verified by direct quantitative PCR (Figure 8).

Groups 1 and 4 represent genes that are constitutively upregulated or downregulated because of the change in Rboh levels in the wild type compared with the transgenic plants.

Group 1 contains 384 ESTs in which the median fold change of the wild type to mutant is 1.5, irrespective of wounding treat- ment. Conversely, in group 4, the 485 ESTs are always ex- pressed at a lower level in the wild-type line than the antisense line with a median fold change of 0.59. Within these groups may reside transcripts that reflect the different constitutive redox status of the mutant and wild-type plants.

Groups 2 and 3 together represent 169 wound upregulated transcripts. The transcripts in group 3 are upregulated only in systemic leaves of wild-type wounded plants but not systemic leaves of the antisense plants, whereas the transcripts in group 2 show varying degrees of systemic leaf induction in the mutant line as well. We can consider that Rboh plays a role when the ratio of (wild-type wound induction):(mutant wound induction) is

>1. In this case, 54 of the 94 transcripts of group 2 are influenced to a smaller or larger extent by perturbation of Rboh levels.

Hence, 129 (54 of group 2 and 75 of group 3) of 169 transcripts exhibit a Rboh requirement. The remaining 40 ESTs are induced by wounding to the same extent in wild-type and antisense plants, despite the compromised Rboh levels. Thus, they re- present an Rboh-independent pathway. Data for the activity dis- tribution of all of the EST groups are available in Supplemental

Table 1 online.

Wound Response Genes Are Differentially Regulated The impact of Rboh on defense gene transcript levels has been confirmed for select ESTs by RT-PCR as shown in Figure 8. Table

1 includes confirmed ESTs and their transcript families as revealed in the microarray analysis. All of the PIN-type ESTs fall into the group 2–type expression pattern (Table 1). PIN II and PIN

I ESTs are massively induced in the systemic leaf of both M6/7 and wild-type lines (e.g., cLED14D15 by 10- and 51-fold, respectively). However, the induction of all representatives of

PIN II (e.g., Table 1, contig 1; Figure 8, cLED14D15) and some of the PIN I ESTs (e.g., EST cLED4O3) are significantly more highly induced (approximately threefold) in wild-type lines (Table 1, column W/M). This result is consistent with the requirement of

Rboh for PIN expression in response to wounding. By contrast, some PIN I representatives (e.g., Table 1, cLET22A6 and cLET28M23 [contig 2]; Figure 8) are at least as highly induced in the systemic leaf of M6/7 lines, suggesting that wound induction of some PIN I gene members has no Rboh require- ment. On the other side of the spectrum, inspection of group 3

ESTs (transcripts that require Rboh) reveals massive wound in- duction of a novel g-thionin–like polypeptide of putative defensin function (Table 1, group 3; Figure 8, cLED4L7). This transcript is normally constitutively expressed in flowers (Brandstadter et al., 1996).

The WRKY defense-related transcription factors, showed constitutive downregulation in M7 plants (Table 1, group 1;

Figure 8, cLEC7J13). Their constitutive downregulation in the

M6/7 line relative to the wild type may be related to the inability of these plants to mount a full defense posture.

Growth Anomalies Are Reflected in Modulation of Transcription Factors

Here, the lowered Rboh levels in the antisense lines were shown to have a profound influence on plant growth. The transcriptome profile of the group 4 cluster features homeotic-type transcripts that are overexpressed in leaves of the antisense lines as

Figure 5. Protein Gel Blot Analysis of L. esculentum Rboh Protein in

Leaves Exposed to Select Phytohormones.

Plants (28 d) were placed in solutions containing 50 mM ABA, GA, IAA,

BA, or the ethylene precursor ACC. After 24 h, proteins were extracted from the second upper leaf and fractionated (100 mg per lane) by denaturating SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with antiserum against the

C-terminal portion of the L. esculentum Rboh (Sagi and Fluhr, 2001).

Multifunctional Rboh 621 compared with wild-type lines (Table 1, AvWt/AvMt below 1;

Figure 8). Among them are the floral homeotic APETALA3 transcription factor homolog that specifies petal and stamen identities in Arabidopsis and the floral homeotic protein PMADS

2 homolog that is expressed specifically in flowers of Petunia hybrida (petunia) (Immink et al., 2003). Their functions in L. esculentum are unknown; however, inspection of current TIGR databases confirms their recovery exclusively from flower or fruit cDNA libraries. Hence, their upregulation in the transgenic leaf indicates loss of tissue-specific regulation.

ConstitutiveandWound-InducedRedox-RelatedandAmino Acid Metabolism-Related Transcript Changes

The ascorbate–dehydroascorbate redox pair is an important indicator of cellular redox maintenance. Inspection of the transcriptome profile reveals changes in the redox-associated expression level of cytosolic monodehydroascorbate reduc- tase and L. esculentum CIG1 (cytokine induced gene), an L. esculentum Pro oxidase homolog (Table 1, Figure 8). Novel transcripts related to amino acid metabolism are changed. His decarboxylase is upregulated (Table 1, Figure 8). Because this enzymatic step would produce elevated histamine levels, its possible role could be antiherbivore activity. Asparaginase (Table 1, Figure 8) is downregulated in transgenic leaves relative to the wild type. Thus, Rboh repression induced changes in nitrogen assimilation-related transcripts. It is of interest that ectopic expression of prosystemin was shown to substantially increase nitrogen accumulation in Solanum tuberosum (potato) tubers (Narvaez-Vasquez and Ryan, 2002).

DISCUSSION Rboh as Signal Transponder We have applied an antisense strategy to deregulate the expression of the L. esculentum Rboh multigene family. Sim- ultaneous silencing of at least two genes was achieved, and the global reduction in Rboh levels facilitated elimination of potential functional redundancy.

In this respect, both Arabidopsis AtrbohD and AtrbohF null lines displayed functional overlap with regard to their disease response and imposed partial impairment of the stomatal response to ABA (Torres et al., 2002; Kwak et al.,

2003). Interestingly, enhanced water loss as measured by transpiration rates and loss of fresh weight in detached leaves was not detected in the antisense L. esculentum; however, germinating seeds were less sensitive to the presence of 2 mM

ABA (data not shown). The elimination of AtrbohC impaired root hair formation in Arabidopsis (Foreman et al., 2003). This phenomenon was not detected here and may be because of

Figure 6. ROS and PIN II Production in the Systemic Leaf of Wild-Type and Antisense Plants 24 h after Wounding. (A) ROS accumulation in control and systemic leaves of wild-type and antisense (M) L. esculentum plants 5 h after wounding. Plants were imbibed with DAB for 3 h. Subsequently, lower leaves were wounded.

Five hours later, leaves from unwounded control plants and upper systemic leaves of wounded plants were assayed for DAB staining.

Brown precipitates correlate with the presence of H2O2. (B) Quantitative analysis of DAB staining. Quantitative measurements were performed as described in the Methods. Each point represents the mean of four terminal leaflets derived from four different plants. Bars represent SE. (C) Protein gel blot analysis of PIN II protein accumulation in control and systemic leaves of wild-type and antisense L. esculentum plants 24 h after wounding. Leaves of the same size and position in unwounded plants served as controls. Proteins were extracted and fractionated (100 mg per lane) by denaturating SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with antiserum against PIN II.

622 The Plant Cell the lack of repression of the particular L. esculentum Rboh homolog or differences between L. esculentum and Arabidopsis biology.

What is the molecular basis of the pleiotropic developmental effects of reduction of Rboh levels? Rboh could function as a signal transponder for hormone action. Direct evidence for this can be garnered from the Rboh dependency of the guard cell response to ABA (Kwak et al., 2003). However, as shown here, it is likely that hormonal effects on Rboh are more general and extend beyond ABA action alone, as implied by the results in

Figure 5. For example, impairment in the auxin response partially mimics some of the phenotypes described here, and upwardly curled and inverted leaves were described for auxin IAA

Arabidopsis mutants as well (Tian and Reed, 1999; Liscum and

Reed, 2002). The observations made here extend Rboh function to a plethora of developmental effects in many plant organs and imply that a range of hormones are involved. Thus, hormones might regulate Rboh in two ways. In the short term, hormones might affect Rboh by promoting a ROS burst that may be mediated by functions in the N-terminal segment containing calcium binding EF hands and other unknown regulatory regions.

A more lasting and long-term effect of hormones may be achieved by the upregulation of Rboh levels as shown in Figure

5, a result that corresponds with the report of Kwak et al. (2003), showing that application of ABA leads to accumulation of Rboh transcript.

Rboh Activity Impinges on Fundamental Cellular Processes

Rboh activity and plant development can be related in additional ways. The ectopic expression of MADS box genes that was detected in mutant leaves (Table 1, group 4) and its correlation with the leaf curling phenotype (Figure 3B) is of special interest.

The Arabidopsis curly leaf mutation appears superficially similar to the L. esculentum leaf curl phenotype. curly leaf was shown to be encoded by a polycomb factor. Repression of polycomb group gene activity contributes to destabilization of heterochro- matin structure and ectopic expression of flower-specific MADS box genes in the leaf. Their expression is accompanied by the development of curled leaves and fruit abnormality (Krizek and

Meyerowitz, 1996; Goodrich et al., 1997). Thus, attenuation of

Rboh activity may influence chromosome structure, and in this respect, it is of interest that a number of histone 3.3 variants (belonging to groups 1 and 4 expression patterns; Table 1, Figure

8) also are modulated. The histone H3.3 variant is deposited throughout the cell cycle and is thought to modulate gene expression (Ahmad and Henikoff, 2002). Redox-regulated chromatin remodeling may be executed by an NAD1-dependent protein and/or histone deacetylases (Denu, 2003). Alternatively, proteins active in remodeling can be redox sensitive (e.g., NPR1, the regulator of systemic resistance, undergoes redox-depen- dent oligomerization that is essential for its signaling attributes) (Mou et al., 2003).

Figure 7. Microarray Analysis of Leaves of Nonwounded Plants and the Systemic Leaves of Wounded Plants from Wild-Type and Transgenic M6/7

Lines. (A) Double clustering analysis of transcripts showing a change in expression level (one-way ANOVA equal variance, P # 0.05) in either control or systemic leaves of wild-type or antisense plants in the four experimental conditions. Each condition is the averaged result of two to three independent biological replicates. The conditions are as follows: MC, mutant control leaf; MS, mutant systemic leaf; WC, wild-type control leaf; WS, wild-type systemic leaf. The arrows point to selected clusters that are assigned numbers (brackets) corresponding to four groups (described in [B]). (B) Log scale distribution of individual transcript activity in the selected groups.

Multifunctional Rboh 623 ROS-Dependent and -Independent Gene Induction

The microarray methodology employed to measure gene induction enables the distinction of processes that require

Rboh and those that do not (Table 1, Figure 7). Group 2 transcripts, which contain the PIN multigene family, show varying degrees of Rboh dependency. Thus, not all PIN members are coordinately regulated, extending the observa- tions made by Orozco-Cardenas et al. (2001). Comparison of local and systemic transcriptome activity after wounding shows differential responses. Profiling by an 8.2K Arabidopsis array was performed on RNA extracted directly from the wounded tissue (Cheong et al., 2002). Prominent transcripts induced within the wounded leaves were pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, EREBP and WRKY transcription factors, enzymes for phenylpropanoid metabolism, and components of the JA and ethylene pathways. Thus, it appears that the transcriptome profiles of the wounded leaf and its cognate systemic leaf are distinct. PIN transcripts, but not EREBP or PR protein tran- scripts, are present in the systemic leaf. The results presented here are consistent with restriction of JA synthesis to the wounded leaf proper and JA functioning as the long-distance wound signal (Strassner et al., 2002; Lee and Howe, 2003).

Rboh Activity Influences Specific Redox-Related Cellular Activity

ROS bursts can be observed by many physiological effectors, such as pathogen-related effectors or wounding; however, it is important to differentiate the transcriptional programs imple- mented by each burst. The treatment of Arabidopsis cells with hydrogen peroxide affected transcripts of heat-shock proteins and senescence-related transcripts (Desikan et al., 2001). These types of transcripts were not detected as being significantly changed in the Rboh antisense plants. When N. tabacum discs were subjected to oxidative stress by application of ROS- generating methyl-viologen, PR proteins, phytoalexin biosyn- thetic genes, and genes of oxylipin metabolism were induced (Vranova et al., 2002). These gene types were not found to be upregulated in systemic leaves of wounded plants. Apparently, bursts that originate as a superoxide as compared with hydrogen peroxide might have different spatial, temporal, and target specificities. In this respect, the visualization of rapid and specific subcellular ROS bursts has been reported (Allan and

Fluhr, 1997; Coelho et al., 2002).

Comparison of control tissue from wild-type and mutant leaves enables us to ascertain the long-term effects of impaired

Rboh activity. Rboh downregulation resulted in reduced hydro- gen peroxide accumulation in leaves (Figure 2). Such changes are reflected in upregulation of the cytosolic monodehydro- ascorbate reductase transcript (Table 1). The ascorbate– dehydroascorbate redox pair is a measure of the cellular redox state and equilibrates with reduced and oxidized forms of glutathione in plants and animals (Mittler, 2002). In transgenic tissue, the elevated transcript level may facilitate ascorbate regulation in plants with a lower level of reactive oxygen production. The reciprocal downregulation of the L. esculentum

Pro oxidase homolog is consistent with the lessened need for

NADPH. Pro oxidase catalyzes the oxidation of Pro to pyrroline- 5-carboxylate with the concomitant transfer of electrons to cytochrome c (Donald et al., 2001). In the case of transgenic

Rboh antisense leaves, a potential source of more reducing power through Pro apparently is not necessary.

Thus, it is likely that in vivo Rboh produces a continuous flux of

ROS, consistent with the fact that a basal activity level for Rboh was present in isolated membranes (Sagi and Fluhr, 2001).

Hence, plant Rboh is a quantitative player in dictating the cellular milieu of ROS flux, and it is anticipated that their modulation would demand metabolic adjustment as measured by compen- satory fine-tuning in transcriptome profiles. Rboh appears to be a highly regulated, sensitive, and versatile mediator of de- velopmental and environmental signals. Depending on the incoming signals from the plant, pathogen, or environment, the redox state might be altered such that it governs a transcriptional response aimed at maximizing plant fitness in a changing environment. Future work should delineate the molecular components that control Rboh activity and the primary down- stream targets modulated by ROS bursts.

Figure 8. RT-PCR Analysis of Transcript Levels of Select ESTs.

Primers were synthesized for select ESTs in Table 1, and quantitative

PCR was performed as described in the Methods. All PCR products were confirmed by sequence. WC, WS, MC, and MS are as in Figure 7.

624 The Plant Cell Table 1. Expression Levels of Select Transcripts in EST Groups 1 to 4

Groupa AvWt/AvMtb Pc Descriptiond Nuclear Factors 1* cLEC7J13(1)e

2.45 3.7E-03 WRKY transcription factor 1* cLED4B14(1)

1.97 1.5E-02 WRKY transcription factor 1* cLEC7B1(1)

1.77 7.0E-03 WRKY transcription factor 1 cLED7J4 2.97

3.4E-03 Histone H3 variant H3R-21 1 cLET11O16 3.46

1.0E-02 Histone H3 variant H3R-21 1 cLED5G7 1.97 1.6E-02

Histone H3 variant H3.3 1 cLEM6P24 1.67 7.6E-04 Histone H3 variant H3.3

Metabolism 1 cLED6D20 5.97 6.8E-04 CIG1 Pro oxidase

1 cLEG41N16 4.71 6.5E-04 L-Asparaginase Defense Mf

Wg W/Mh 2 cLED14D15(1) 10.5 51.4 4.87 4.8E-04 PIN II

2 cLET21I5(1) 14.7 50.2 3.42 1.5E-03 PIN II 2 cLEC40H22

9.60 32.8 3.41 2.0E-03 PIN II 2 cLED4O3 8.39 24.5 2.92

4.5E-03 PIN I 2 cLET23O14(1) 8.74 25.4 2.91 6.0E-03

PIN II 2 cLED6E24(1) 4.46 7.23 1.62 4.8E-03 PIN II

2 cLED5P11 2.59 4.16 1.61 8.9E-04 PIN II 2 cLED4N20

15.6 22.0 1.41 2.1E-03 PIN I 2 cLED6L3 5.18 6.48 1.25

1.6E-02 PIN PID 2 cLED19A9 6.33 7.38 1.17 6.7E-03 PIN I

2 cLED6N13 7.16 7.84 1.10 4.8E-03 PIN I 2 cLED5K5 2.70

2.59 0.96 8.3E-03 PIN (auxin) 2 cLET22A6 (2) 8.09 7.19

0.89 8.4E-03 PIN I 2 cLET28M23 (2) 5.60 4.31 0.77 1.2E-02

PIN I 2 TC116378 8.65 25.3 2.92 5.4E-03 Cytochrome c

3 cLED4L8 1.60 13.2 8.24 4.3E-04 His decarboxylase

3 cLED4L7(1) 2.77 61.9 22.4 1.4E-03 g-Thionin–like defensin

3 cLED25O16(1) 2.06 10.9 5.29 2.0E-03 g-Thionin–like defensin

Nuclear Factors AvWt/AvMt 4 cLEX1O3 0.57 1.0E-03 Histone H3 variant H3.3

4 cLED29P24 0.60 7.7E-03 Histone H3 4 cLED7L22(1) 0.56

4.5E-03 Homeodomain HDZ2 homolog 4 cLED8G3(1) 0.52

2.8E-03 Homeodomain HDZ2 homolog 4 cTOC13J3 0.54 6.7E-04

Floral homeotic protein PMADS 2 4 cLEC7M18 0.39 3.2E-03

TDR6 MADS box protein 4 cLED5O12 0.38 2.9E-03 APETALA3 LEAP3

4 cLED5P12 0.32 2.7E-05 APETALA3 LEAP3 Metabolism 4 cLEC14J4

0.34 1.4E-02 Cytosolic MDA reductase a Cluster groups (1 to 4) refer to the clustering of expression patterns as shown in Figure 7, in which twofold or more induction is observed in an EST or in an assigned tentative consensus group. Asterisks indicate ESTs from related genes not selected in the assigned clusters. b The average induction level in wild-type control and systemic leaves relative to the average induction level of control and systemic leaves in the M6/7 line. c The P-values test by sum of squares simultaneous test procedure for null hypothesis. The hypotheses are as follows: group 1, (MC, MS) versus (WC,

WS); group 2, (MC, WC) versus (MS, WS); group 3, (MC, MS, WC) versus (WS); and group 4, (MC, MS) versus (WC, WS). d Descriptions are based on the TIGR database (version 9.0; http://www.tigr.org/). The Center for Gene Expression Profiling resequence update was incorporated only when both sequence ends were consistent. e The numbers in parenthesis refer to ESTs that belong to a common contig (tentative consensus) group as described in TIGR databases. A contig unit may represent the same transcript. f Ratio of expression of wounded systemic leaf to control leaf in the M6/7 line. g Ratio of expression of wounded systemic leaf to control leaf in the wild type. h Ratio of induction in wild-type systemic wounded leaves to M6/7 systemic wounded leaves.

Multifunctional Rboh 625 METHODS Plant Material L. esculentum cv Motelle wild-type and transgenic plants were grown in pots filled with a peat and vermiculite (4:1 [v/v]) mixture containing slow release High N multicote 4 with microelements (0.3% [w/w]; Haifa

Chemicals, Haifa Bay, Israel). Greenhouse average temperatures during the growth period fluctuated from 18 to 258C. Midday photosynthetic photon flux density in the greenhouse was 300 to 500 mmolm2s1.

Plasmid Constructs L. esculentum EST 244804 and 243389 that span the C terminus of the two L. esculentum gp91phox NADPH oxidase plant homologs Lerboh1 (AAD25300) and Wfil (AF73124), respectively, were used as a source.

T-DNA constructs were made that express subclones of the EST together or separately in sense/antisense orientation downstream of the 35S promoter of Cauliflower mosaic virus using the E9 terminator as described (Savaldi-Goldstein et al., 2003). M4 expresses a Lerboh fragment in antisense orientation. It was constructed with a 345-bp Asp718/Asp718 fragment of the EST. M5 expresses a Wfil fragment in antisense orientation and was constructed with a 665-bp EcoRI/EcoRI fragment of the EST. M3 expresses Lerboh and Wfil fragments in antisense and sense orientation, respectively, whereas M6/7 expresses the Lerboh and

Wfil fragments in the antisense orientation. Both, M3 and M6/7 were constructed by insertion of the 665-bp EcoRI/EcoRI fragment of the

L. esculentum EST 243389 into EcoRI/EcoRI sites downstream to the

345-bp insert of M4 construct. The resulting constructs were transferred by electroporation into Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105. Stable transformation into L. esculentum (cv Motelle) was performed as described (Ori et al., 1997). T2 plants were tested for segregation on kanamycin, and independent lines were selected for further analysis and grown to T3 homozygous plants. Purity of parental wild-type and derived antisense var Motelle lines was confirmed by restriction fragment polymorphism length using SL8 clone as a probe (Ori et al., 1997).

RT-PCR Probes For quantitative RT-PCR, total RNA was extracted with the RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA (1.5 mg) was subjected to first-strand synthesis using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Gibco BRL,

Cleveland, OH) according to the manufacturer’s procedure using oligo(dT) as a primer. Parallel reactions in the absence of the enzyme served as control. PCR amplification was conducted on one-tenth of the reaction. Primers used were as follows: for Lerboh, forward 59- GTCAGGCTTCTACAGAAAAC-39 and reverse

59-GTTGATTACAGT- AGCCGGTTC-39, resulting in a 270-bp PCR product; for Wfil, forward

59-CTGCTTGGAAGAAGAAATC-39 and reverse 59-GAATTTTGCATCGCT- ACAATAG-39, resulting in a 213-bp PCR product; and for Tom41 actin gene (U60480), forward 59-ATGCCATTCTCCGTCTTGACTTG-39 and reverse 59-GAGTTGTATGTAGTCTCGTGGATT-39, resulting in a 325-bp

PCR product.

The antisense/sense-specific fragments were amplified using the forward primer 59-CAAGATCTATCGATTCCCG-39 (complementary to the polylinker cloning site of the binary vector) and the reverse primers for the cDNA inserts, which were as follows: for M3, 59-GCGTTTGTA- GACGTTTCT-39 (PCR product of 810 bp); for M4, 59-GGGGTTGATATT- GTATCAG-39 (PCR product of 293 bp); and for M5 and M6/7, 59- GAGGTGGTTTTATTGGTGG-39 (PCR products of 648 and 927 bp, respectively). PCR products were separated on a 1 to 2% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (10 mg/mL) and visualized by the Bio- Imaging system (model 202D; DNR-Imaging Systems, Kiryat Anavim,

Israel). PCR products were excised from the gel and sequenced for verification.

Plant Growth and Developmental Characteristics Number of inflorescences, flower type, and number (fused flowers and number of petals other than six were designated as abnormal) analysis of primary and secondary branches (>5 cm in length) were measured in

100-d-old plants. Total chlorophyll content was measured in extracts of the first fully expanded leaf as described previously (Graan and Ort,

1984). Curling level was measured in 100-d-old plants and designated as follows: 0, no curling; 1, >50% of the leaves are slightly curled; 2, >50% of the leaves are half-way curled; and 3, >50% of the leaves are completely curled. Inverted leaflet levels were designated as follows: 1, no inverted leaflets; 2, in one leaf at least one or more terminal leaflets were inverted; 3, two to three leaves had inverted leaflets; 4, four to five leaves had inverted leaflets; and 5, more than six leaves had inverted leaflets. Abnormal fruits were designated as irregular fruits that showed asymmetric shape, fasciation, catface, corky epidermis, or clausa-like fruits. The number of abnormal and normal fruits with a diameter of >2 cm was measured in 150-d-old plants.

Treatments, Protein, and RNA Extraction Rboh immunoblotting was performed on wild-type and antisense plants as described previously (Sagi and Fluhr, 2001). For hormonal treatment, extraction and immunoblotting was conducted on the second upper leaf of 28-d-old plants cut at the stem and placed in a solution containing

50 mM ABA, GA, IAA, BA, or the ethylene precursor ACC for 24 h. For wound induction, leaves of 21- to 28-d-old plants (containing three leaves) were crushed with a hemostat, three times perpendicular to the midvein on the distal end of the terminal leaflet of the lower leaf, and 24 h after wounding, the upper unwounded leaves (systemic signal) were sampled for RNA or protein extraction. Leaves of the same size and position in unwounded plants served as controls. Protein extracts were fractionated by SDS-PAGE, 12.5% (w/v) polyacrylamide separating gel and 4% (w/v) stacking gel, and were immunoblotted and developed with antibodies against L. esculentum PIN II (gift of Clarence A. Ryan, Institute of Biological

Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA).

Wounding and Detection of ROS H2O2 was detected in situ by DAB staining as described (Thordal- Christensen et al., 1997). The terminal leaflet of the first fully expanded leaf was sampled from wild-type and Rboh transgenic 45-d-old plants.

Leaflets were collected and vacuum infiltrated with the DAB solution (1 mg/mL, pH 3.8; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The sampled leaves were placed in a plastic box under high humidity until brown precipitate was ob- served (5 to 6 h) and then fixed with a solution of 3:1:1 ethanol:lactic acid: glycerol and photographed. Quantitative analyses of leaves stained with

DAB were made by scanning the leaves with a computing laser densitom- eter using Image Quant version 3.19.4 software (Molecular Dynamics,

Sunnyvale, CA). To determine H2O2 levels after wounding, leaves of 21- to 28-d-old plants containing three to four leaves were excised at the base with a razor blade and soaked in a solution containing DAB for 3 h before wounding. Wounding was accomplished by crushing the leaves with a hemostat as described above. Five hours after wounding, the upper unwounded leaves (systemic leaves) were sampled as above. Leaves of the same size and position in unwounded plants served as controls.

Quantitative analysis was performed by scanning the leaves with a computing laser densitometer using the Image Quant version 3.19.4 software (Molecular Dynamics).

626 The Plant Cell Microarray Analysis and RT-PCR Wounding was accomplished in wild-type and antisense plants as described above, and 24 h after wounding, the upper unwounded leaves (systemic leaves) were sampled, whereas leaves on the same position in unwounded wild-type and antisense plants served as controls. Each condition is the averaged result of two to three independent biological replicates as follows: mutant control leaf, two replicates; mutant systemic leaf, three replicates; wild-type control leaf, three replicates; and wild- type systemic leaf, two replicates. Total RNA was extracted using the

RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) and subjected to reverse transcription and amplified by in vitro transcription with T7 polymerase (Ambion, Austin,

TX). Amplified RNA products were subjected to reverse transcription and then labeled with Cy3 and Cy5 by the indirect amino-allyl method. A 12K

L. esculentum EST slide was used as a probe (Boyce Thompson Institute

Center for Gene Expression Profiling, http://bti.cornell.edu/CGEP/

CGEP.html). For each biological repetition, two hybridizations with swapped dye labeling were performed. Separate images for each fluorescence were acquired using ScanArray 4000 software (Packard

BioScience, Meridan, CT) at a resolution of 10 mm per pixel, adjusting the photomultiplier and laser power to achieve an optimal distribution of signals without minimal saturation. Initial image analysis was performed using QuantArray version 3 software using the histogram method (Packard BioScience). Data analysis was performed applying per-spot and per-chip normalization (GeneSpring 5.1; Silicon Genetics, Redwood

City, CA). Two-way hierarchical clustering was performed on differentially expressed genes (one-way ANOVA equal variance, P # 0.05) using

Pearson correlation similarity measure. Clusters were tested for a given null hypothesis using the sum of square simultaneous test procedure. RT- PCR analysis was performed on the aRNA as described by Savaldi- Goldstein et al. (2003). Primer pairs used are in Supplemental Table 2 online. The PCR products were excised and separated from 1 to 2% gels and sequenced for verification.

The complete expression data set is available as accession numbers

GPL788, GSM13872 to GSM13881, and GSE917 in Gene Expression

Omnibus, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported in part by the Peres Center for Peace; the

Israel Science Foundation Grant 417/03; the Minerva Foundation,

Germany; the Weizmann-Argentina Fundacion Antorchas; and the

Raymond Burton Fund for Plant Genomic Research. We are thankful to Neta Rines, Dinah Miller, Moshe Ventura, and Akalu Pascha for their technical assistance.

Received November 23, 2003; accepted December 19, 2003.

REFERENCES Ahmad, K., and Henikoff, S. (2002). The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly.

Mol. Cell 9, 1191–1200.

Allan, A.C., and Fluhr, R. (1997). Two distinct sources of elicited reactive oxygen species in tobacco epidermal cells. Plant Cell 9,

1559–1572.

Baker, C.J., and Orlandi, E.W. (1995). Active oxygen in plant pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 33, 299–321.

Banfi, B., Molnar, G., Maturana, A., Steger, K., Hegedus, B.,

Demaurex, N., and Krause, K.H. (2001). A Ca21-activated NADPH oxidase in testis, spleen, and lymph nodes. J. Biol. Chem. 276,

37594–37601.

Bokoch, G.M., Bohl, B.P., and Chuang, T.H. (1994). Guanine- nucleotide exchange regulates membrane translocation of Rac/Rho

GTP-binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 31674–31679.

Brandstadter, J., Rossbach, C., and Theres, K. (1996). Expression of genes for a defensin and a proteinase inhibitor in specific areas of the shoot apex and the developing flower in tomato. Mol. Gen. Genet.

252, 146–154.

Cheong, Y.H., Chang, H.S., Gupta, R., Wang, X., Zhu, T., and Luan,

S. (2002). Transcriptional profiling reveals novel interactions between wounding, pathogen, abiotic stress, and hormonal responses in

Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 129, 661–677.

Coelho, S.M., Taylor, A.R., Ryan, K.P., Sousa-Pinto, I., Brown, M.T., and Brownlee, C. (2002). Spatiotemporal patterning of reactive oxygen production and Ca21 wave propagation in fucus rhizoid cells.

Plant Cell 14, 2369–2381.

Cross, A.R., and Jones, O.T. (1986). The effect of the inhibitor diphenylene iodonium on the superoxide-generating system of neu- trophils. Specific labelling of a component polypeptide of the oxidase.

Biochem. J. 237, 111–116.

Denu, J.M. (2003). Linking chromatin function with metabolic networks:

Sir2 family of NAD(1)-dependent deacetylases. Trends Biochem. Sci.

28, 41–48.

Desikan, R., Mackerness, S.A.H., Hancock, J.T., and Neill, S.J. (2001). Regulation of the Arabidopsis transcriptome by oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 127, 159–172.

Doke, N., and Ohashi, Y. (1988). Involvement of an O2-generating system in the induction of necrotic lesions on tobacco leaves infected with tobacco mosaic virus. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 32, 163–175.

Donald, S.P., Sun, X.Y., Hu, C.A.A., Yu, J., Mei, J.M., Valle, D., and

Phang, J.M. (2001). Proline oxidase, encoded by p53-induced gene- 6, catalyzes the generation of proline-dependent reactive oxygen species. Cancer Res. 61, 1810–1815.

Foreman, J., Demidchik, V., Bothwell, J.H., Mylona, P., Miedema, H.,

Torres, M.A., Linstead, P., Costa, S., Brownlee, C., Jones, J.D.,

Davies, J.M., and Dolan, L. (2003). Reactive oxygen species pro- duced by NADPH oxidase regulate plant cell growth. Nature 422,

442–446.

Goodrich, J., Puangsomlee, P., Martin, M., Long, D., Meyerowitz,

E.M., and Coupland, G. (1997). A polycomb-group gene regulates homeotic gene expression in Arabidopsis. Nature 386, 44–51.

Graan, T., and Ort, D.R. (1984). Quantitation of the rapid electron donors to P700, the functional plastoquinone pool, and the ratio of the photosystems in spinach chloroplasts. J. Biol. Chem. 259, 14003–

14010.

Ho, L.C., Belda, R., Brown, M., Andrews, J., and Adams, P. (1993).

Uptake and transport of calcium and the possible causes of blossom- end rot in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 44, 509–518.

Immink, R.G.H., Ferrario, S., Busscher-Lange, J., Kooiker, M.,

Busscher, M., and Angenent, G.C. (2003). Analysis of the petunia

MADS-box transcription factor family. Mol. Genet. Genomics 268,

598–606.

Jiang, M., and Zhang, J. (2003). Cross-talk between calcium and reactive oxygen species originated from NADPH oxidase in abscisic acid-induced antioxidant defence in leaves of maize seedlings. Plant

Cell Environ. 26, 929–939.

Joo, J.H., Bae, Y.S., and Lee, J.S. (2001). Role of auxin-induced reactive oxygen species in root gravitropism. Plant Physiol. 126,

1055–1060.

Keller, T., Damude, H.G., Werner, D., Doerner, P., Dixon, R.A., and

Lamb, C. (1998). A plant homolog of the neutrophil NADPH oxidase

Multifunctional Rboh 627 gp91phox subunit gene encodes a plasma membrane protein with

Ca21 binding motifs. Plant Cell 10, 255–266.

Krizek, B.A., and Meyerowitz, E.M. (1996). The Arabidopsis homeotic genes APETALA3 and PISTILLATA are sufficient to provide the B class organ identity function. Development 122, 11–22.

Kwak, J.M., Mori, I.C., Pei, Z.M., Leonhardt, N., Torres, M.A., Dangl,

J.L., Bloom, R.E., Bodde, S., Jones, J.D.G., and Schroeder, J.I. (2003). NADPH oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF genes function in ROS- dependent ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 22, 2623–2633.

Lee, G.I., and Howe, G.A. (2003). The tomato mutant spr1 is defective in systemin perception and the production of a systemic wound signal for defense gene expression. Plant J. 33, 567–576.

Liscum, E., and Reed, J.W. (2002). Genetics of Aux/IAA and ARF action in plant growth and development. Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 387–400.

Mittler, R. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance.

Trends Plant Sci. 7, 405–410.

Mou, Z., Fan, W., and Dong, X. (2003). Inducers of plant systemic acquired resistance regulate NPR1 function through redox changes.

Cell 113, 935–944.

Narvaez-Vasquez, J., and Ryan, C.A. (2002). The systemin precursor gene regulates both defensive and developmental genes in Solanum tuberosum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15818–15821.

Neill, S., Desikan, R., and Hancock, J. (2002a). Hydrogen peroxide signalling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5, 388–395.

Neill, S.J., Desikan, R., Clarke, A., Hurst, R.D., and Hancock, J.T. (2002b). Hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide as signalling molecules in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1237–1247.

Oleksiak, M.F., Churchill, G.A., and Crawford, D.L. (2002). Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations. Nat. Genet.

32, 261–266.

Ori, N., Eshed, Y., Paran, I., Presting, G., Aviv, D., Tanksley, S.,

Zamir, D., and Fluhr, R. (1997). The I2C family from the wilt disease resistance locus I2 belongs to the nucleotide binding, leucine-rich repeat superfamily of plant resistance genes. Plant Cell 9, 521–532.

Orozco-Cardenas, M., and Ryan, C.A. (1999). Hydrogen peroxide is generated systemically in plant leaves by wounding and systemin via the octadecanoid pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6553–

6557.

Orozco-Cardenas, M.L., Narvaez-Vasquez, J., and Ryan, C.A. (2001).

Hydrogen peroxide acts as a second messenger for the induction of defense genes in tomato plants in response to wounding, systemin, and methyl jasmonate. Plant Cell 13, 179–191.

Pei, Z.M., Murata, Y., Benning, G., Thomine, S., Klusener, B., Allen,

G.J., Grill, E., and Schroeder, J.I. (2000). Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in guard cells.

Nature 406, 731–734.

Pnueli, L., Carmel-Goren, L., Hareven, D., Gutfinger, T., Alvarez, J.,

Ganal, M., Zamir, D., and Lifschitz, E. (1998). The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1.

Development 125, 1979–1989.

Ryan, C.A. (2000).

The systemin signaling pathway:

Differential activation of plant defensive genes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1477,

112–121.

Sagi, M., and Fluhr, R. (2001). Superoxide production by plant homologues of the gp91(phox) NADPH oxidase. Modulation of activity by calcium and by tobacco mosaic virus infection. Plant Physiol. 126,

1281–1290.

Savaldi-Goldstein, S., Aviv, D., Davydov, O., and Fluhr, R. (2003).

Alternative splicing modulation by a LAMMER kinase impinges on developmental and transcriptome expression. Plant Cell 15, 926–938.

Simon-Plas, F., Elmayan, T., and Blein, J.P. (2002). The plasma membrane oxidase NtrbohD is responsible for AOS production in elicited tobacco cells. Plant J. 31, 137–147.

Strassner, J., Schaller, F., Frick, U.B., Howe, G.A., Weiler, E.W.,

Amrhein, N., Macheroux, P., and Schaller, A. (2002). Characteri- zation and cDNA-microarray expression analysis of 12-oxophyto- dienoate reductases reveals differential roles for octadecanoid biosynthesis in the local versus the systemic wound response. Plant J.

32, 585–601.

Thordal-Christensen, H., Zhang, Z.G., Wei, Y.D., and Collinge, D.B. (1997). Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley-powdery mildew interaction. Plant J. 11, 1187–1194.

Tian, Q., and Reed, J.W. (1999). Control of auxin-regulated root development by the Arabidopsis thaliana SHY2/IAA3 gene. Devel- opment 126, 711–721.

Torres, M.A., Dangl, J.L., and Jones, J.D.G. (2002). Arabidopsis gp91(phox) homologues AtrbohD and AtrbohF are required for accumulation of reactive oxygen intermediates in the plant defense response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 517–522.

Torres, M.A., Onouchi, H., Hamada, S., Machida, C., Hammond- Kosack, K.E., and Jones, J.D.G. (1998). Six Arabidopsis thaliana homologues of the human respiratory burst oxidase (gp91phox). Plant

J. 14, 365–370.

Vranova, E., Atichartpongkul, S., Villarroel, R., Van Montagu, M.,

Inze, D., and Van Camp, W. (2002). Comprehensive analysis of gene expression in Nicotiana tabacum leaves acclimated to oxidative stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10870–10875.

Yoshioka, H., Numata, N., Nakajima, K., Katou, S., Kawakita, K.,

Rowland, O., Jones, J.D., and Doke, N. (2003). Nicotiana ben- thamiana gp91phox homologs NbrbohA and NbrbohB participate in

H2O2 accumulation and resistance to Phytophthora infestans. Plant

Cell 15, 706–718.

628 The Plant Cell DOI 10.1105/tpc.019398 ; originally published online February 18, 2004;

2004;16;616-628 Plant Cell Stratmann and Robert Fluhr

Moshe Sagi, Olga Davydov, Saltanat Orazova, Zhazira Yesbergenova, Ron Ophir, Johannes W.

Lycopersicon esculentum in Plant Respiratory Burst Oxidase Homologs Impinge on Wound Responsiveness and Development

This information is current as of March 10, 2015

Supplemental Data

http://www.plantcell.org/content/suppl/2004/02/27/tpc.019398.DC1.html

References

http://www.plantcell.org/content/16/3/616.full.html#ref-list-1

This article cites 47 articles, 25 of which can be accessed free at:

Permissions

https://www.copyright.com/ccc/openurl.do?sid=pd_hw1532298X&issn=1532298X&WT.mc_id=pd_hw1532298X eTOCs

http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain Sign up for eTOCs at:

CiteTrack Alerts

http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain Sign up for CiteTrack Alerts at:

Subscription Information

http://www.aspb.org/publications/subscriptions.cfm is available at:

Plant Physiology and The Plant Cell Subscription Information for

ADVANCING THE SCIENCE OF PLANT BIOLOGY

© American Society of Plant Biologists

📖 中文全文 Chinese Full Text

中文

# 植物呼吸爆发氧化酶同源物影响番茄的伤口响应和发育

Moshe Sagi^a, Olga Davydov^b, Saltanat Orazova^a, Zhazira Yesbergenova^a, Ron Ophir^c, Johannes W. Stratmann^d, Robert Fluhr^b,1

a 本-古里安大学应用研究所,以色列贝尔谢巴 84105 b 魏茨曼科学研究所植物科学系,以色列雷霍沃特 76100 c 魏茨曼科学研究所生物服务系生物信息学单元,以色列雷霍沃特 76100 d 南卡罗来纳大学生物科学系,美国南卡罗来纳州哥伦比亚 29208

植物呼吸爆发氧化酶同源物(Rboh)是人类中性粒细胞病原体相关gp91phox的同源物。采用反义技术来确定番茄(*Lycopersicon esculentum*)Rboh的生物学功能。Rboh活性降低的株系叶片中活性氧(ROS)水平降低,表明Rboh在建立细胞氧化还原环境中的作用。令人惊讶的是,反义植株获得了高度分枝的表型,从无限生长习性转变为有限生长习性,并且生殖器官出现畸形。伤口诱导的蛋白酶抑制剂II系统性表达在反义株系中受到损害,表明Rboh提供的ROS中间体是这种伤口响应所必需的。通过转录组分析扩展这些观察结果,发现了仅在生殖器官中正常表达的同源异型MADS box基因的异位叶片表达。此外,还检测到Rboh依赖性和非依赖性的伤口诱导基因诱导以及与氧化还原维持相关的转录物变化。这些结果为如何控制ROS的稳态细胞水平提供了新的见解,并描绘了Rboh作为胁迫和发育响应信号转导器的作用。

## 引言

哺乳动物中性粒细胞活化过程中超氧阴离子O₂⁻和H₂O₂的动力学和防御功能已被用作植物中类似过程的模型。哺乳动物NADPH氧化酶由两种质膜蛋白gp91phox和p22phox(phox,吞噬细胞氧化酶)组成,它们共同形成异二聚体黄素细胞色素b558。三种胞质调节蛋白p40phox、p47phox和p67phox在刺激后转位到质膜以形成活性复合物(Bokoch等,1994)。在植物中,可以在病原体攻击的叶材料的微粒体制剂中观察到增强的O₂⁻生成(Doke和Ohashi,1988)。二苯基碘鎓是中性粒细胞NADPH氧化酶和其他含黄素酶的非特异性自杀底物抑制剂(Cross和Jones,1986),可阻断植物的氧化爆发(Doke和Ohashi,1988)。

与中性粒细胞gp91phox的同源性是分子克隆拟南芥(*Arabidopsis thaliana*)植物呼吸爆发氧化酶同源物(Rboh)的基础(Keller等,1998;Torres等,1998)。植物Rboh定义了编码约105至112 kD蛋白质的转录物,其C末端区域与gp91phox显示出显著相似性。Rboh蛋白具有含有钙结合EF手序的胞质N末端结构域,并与人类RanGTPase激活蛋白有一定程度的相似性(Keller等,1998;Simon-Plas等,2002)。随后,鉴定出含有gp91phox核心细胞色素和N末端EF手序的人类NADPH氧化酶5(NOX5)(Banfi等,2001)。植物Rboh的直接钙激活可能对超敏反应期间氧化爆发的快速刺激很重要,并且植物Rboh与哺乳动物gp91phox复合物不同,在没有额外胞质组分的情况下具有活性(Sagi和Fluhr,2001)。有趣的是,人类NOX5也显示出钙依赖性活性(Banfi等,2001)。

活性氧(ROS)的快速生成被认为是植物对病原体攻击的抗性响应的重要组成部分。ROS中间体可以作为直接保护剂,通过其毒性或通过驱动细胞壁交联来限制病原体侵入的能力发挥作用(Baker和Orlandi,1995)。氧化爆发可进一步在超敏反应开始时触发受攻击宿主细胞的崩溃并产生凋亡样信号(Allan和Fluhr,1997)。拟南芥的gp91phox同源物AtrbohD和AtrbohF、烟草(*Nicotiana tabacum*)的NtrbohD以及本氏烟草(*N. benthamiana*)的NbrbohA和NbrbohB被证明是植物防御响应中ROS积累所必需的(Simon-Plas等,2002;Torres等,2002;Yoshioka等,2003)。

ROS可以作为信号分子,介导植物和动物细胞对各种刺激的响应(Neill等,2002a)。伤口响应被认为通过受伤叶片中系统素(一种18个氨基酸的伤口信号)的释放而进行,随后激活早期响应信号传递基因,如多聚半乳糖醛酸酶、丙二烯氧化物合酶和脂氧合酶,并合成长距离信号茉莉酸(JA)。第二波基因诱导随之而来,涉及蛋白酶抑制剂(PIN)和其他防御多肽的合成(Ryan,2000;Lee和Howe,2003)。伤口诱导的H₂O₂水平升高是JA依赖性的且对二苯基碘鎓敏感的,表明NADPH样氧化酶活性是伤口/系统素响应基因激活所必需的(Orozco-Cardenas和Ryan,1999;Orozco-Cardenas等,2001)。ROS的潜在来源包括NADPH氧化酶、细胞壁过氧化物酶、其他含黄素氧化酶和草酸氧化酶(Neill等,2002a,2002b)。因此,伤口诱导的ROS的确切来源仍然未知。

ROS也可以在植物发育的激素调节中发挥作用,如ROS参与生长素调节的向重力性响应(如根的弯曲)所示(Joo等,2001)。NADPH氧化酶介导的H₂O₂合成参与拟南芥脱落酸(ABA)诱导的信号传导过程(Pei等,2000),并可能参与玉米(*Zea mays*)(Jiang和Zhang,2003)。拟南芥基因AtrbohD和AtrbohF在ROS依赖性ABA信号传导中发挥气孔关闭功能(Kwak等,2003)。拟南芥RbohC缺陷型突变体的Ca²⁺摄取有缺陷,并且在矮化的根上显示出短根毛,表明该Rboh种类调节植物细胞扩张(Foreman等,2003)。

我们希望研究Rboh基因在植物环境响应和发育中的整体作用。我们采用反义技术来下调番茄株系中的Rboh活性。结果表明,Rboh是某些伤口响应基因表达所必需的,而其他伤口响应基因以Rboh非依赖性方式调节。Rboh水平的降低改变了氧化还原相关代谢,对植物发育产生了多种影响,并导致花特异性同源异型基因的异位表达。

## 结果

### 转基因植株中Rboh义转录物和多肽的抑制

AtrbohD和AtrbohF是拟南芥Rboh多基因家族中表达量最高的基因(Torres等,1998)。基于EST的累积汇编,白粉虱诱导的(Wfi1)和Lerboh1是表达量最高的番茄Rboh同源物(分别为AAF73124和AAD25300;基因组研究所[TIGR],9.0版)。它们分别属于NbrbohB和AtrbohD以及NbrbohA和AtrbohF的基因家族(Yoshioka等,2003)。基于Lerboh1和Wfi1之间的序列比较,用于反义调节的区域中最大的连续同源片段为12 bp。其他番茄Rboh基因的序列数据尚不清楚。通过表达在35S启动子控制下的番茄Rboh同源物Wfi1和Lerboh1的3'基因区域的序列组合,生成反义转基因番茄株系(方法,图1A)。对于每个反义构建体(M3、M4、M5和M6/7),每种类型至少四个独立株系达到纯合状态并进行分析。所有番茄株系均表达反义构建体(图1B,反义),并使用肌动蛋白转录物作为表达水平对照,对每种基因类型进行定量逆转录酶(RT)PCR分析。表达Lerboh1和Wfi1反义构建体的株系M4和M5分别抑制了两种类型的转录物,与野生型水平相比(比较循环数,图1B)。类似地,具有反义元件组合的构建体(M3和M6/7)在两种转录物中均显示出义抑制(比较循环数,图1B)。我们得出结论,在所有四个株系中,两组基因都被抑制。缺乏特异性显然可归因于这两个基因之间的残余同源性。

通过使用针对番茄Rboh产生的抗血清进行植物提取物的免疫分析来确定Rboh蛋白水平(Sagi和Fluhr,2001)。针对Wfi1保守C末端的214个氨基酸长度产生多克隆抗体,预计不能区分番茄Rboh家族的成员。野生型叶提取物的免疫印迹分析显示主要的免疫反应性多肽约为112 kD,即Lerboh和Wfi1蛋白的预期大小。相比之下,反义株系中的水平严重降低(图1C)。

Rboh多肽表达水平的降低可能意味着ROS基础水平的降低。尽管已证明番茄Rboh产生超氧自由基(Sagi和Fluhr,2001),但通过超氧自由基内源性歧化产生的H₂O₂的染色已被用于量化Rboh活性(Simon-Plas等,2002;Torres等,2002;Yoshioka等,2003)。将切下的叶片浸入1 mg/mL的3,3'-二氨基联苯胺试剂(DAB)溶液中。DAB在H₂O₂存在下聚合并变为深棕色,可以定性评估着色强度。野生型和转基因番茄叶片中DAB-H₂O₂反应产物的显色如图2A和2B所示。与野生型叶片相比,M4叶片显示出部分ROS显色(约70%),而在M5和M6/7叶片中,大部分DAB-H₂O₂反应产物被消除。因此,基于RT-PCR和蛋白质印迹及活性数据,反义株系含有降低的总Rboh表达和活性水平。

### Rboh表达降低的发育效应

选择Rboh表达降低的番茄株系进行进一步的生理和生长参数分析。所有测试的反义株系的总叶绿素含量比野生型低20%至30%(数据未显示)。用于转化的亲本株系(番茄品种Motelle)表现出无限生长习性,具有轻微的分枝。相比之下,所有转化株系均表现出顶端优势降低,分枝增强,比野生型多2至10倍。这产生了丛生的生长风格,特别是在M3和M4株系中,在M5和M6/7株系中程度较轻(图3A)。亲本株系具有复叶结构。对转化株系的检查显示,小叶通常倾向于具有更平滑的边缘并且看起来不那么浅裂(图2、3B和3C)。此外,小叶倾向于表现出卷曲(图3B)。根据图3B所示的示例计算突变植株与野生型植株相比的叶片卷曲程度:严重程度从边缘轻微卷曲(严重程度1)到完全卷曲表型(严重程度3)。这种现象的统计显示所有株系都受到影响(图3B)。在许多情况下,叶片包含倒置的顶端和次顶端小叶。这种现象的统计显示这是Rboh受损株系的一般稳健特征(图3C)。

在番茄的合轴生长期间,营养期和生殖期有规律地交替。因此,在Motelle品种中,花序被三个营养节隔开。当携带自修剪基因隐性等位基因(拟南芥CEN直系同源基因)的纯合有限习性植株时,合轴节段逐渐发育出更少的节,直到枝条被两个连续的花序终止(Pnueli等,1998)。与Motelle亲本品种的无限性质不同,反义植株表现出有限的sp样生长习性(图4C)。对Rboh反义番茄植株的检查显示,花序数量增加了两到三倍(数据未显示),总花数也增加(图4A)。这可能是顶端优势降低和sp样表型的结果。在转基因株系中,很大比例表现出异常花,导致不育或异常果实比例高(图4A至4D)。

转基因株系中的花发育伴随同源异型样变形,其特征是花瓣数量异常(超过六个)以及花柱和子房畸形(图4D)。还观察到畸形样茎(数据未显示)。异常花产生单性结实果实(图4D)。不育种子尺寸减小(1.5至1.2 mm,为野生型种子直径的38%至30%)。M6/7株系还以花端腐病(BER)为特征(约10%的果实),这是一种被认为与钙缺乏相关的生理紊乱(图4D)。BER的发生已在暴露于非生物胁迫(如盐度和干旱)的植物中注意到。它与钙向果实尖端的转运减少有关,因为与叶片的竞争,或由于木质化减少导致的木质部分化不足(Ho等,1993)。后一种可能性与反义植株中检测到的ROS环境降低一致。

### 激素调节Rboh水平

Rboh下调的发育效应,包括叶绿素含量降低、顶端优势丧失和形态变化,可能反映由Rboh活性介导的激素控制发育事件。因此,观察激素对正常植物中Rboh水平的直接影响是有意义的。通过追踪浸入各种激素24小时的叶片中112 kD免疫反应性多肽来监测Rboh蛋白水平。如图5所示,植物激素ABA、吲哚乙酸(IAA)、苄氨基嘌呤(BA)和乙烯前体1-氨基环丙烷-1-羧酸(ACC),但不包括赤霉酸(GA),诱导Rboh积累。因此,激素可能对Rboh产生长期影响。

### 伤口响应中ROS和PIN系统性积累的减少

反义株系中Rboh活性的总体降低为解析伤口ROS来源以及Rboh在伤口和额外细胞响应中的整体管理中的作用提供了机会。为此,对三周龄植株进行伤口处理,在伤口处理后5小时,通过DAB浸润检查受伤植株的未受伤叶片(系统性叶片)和未受伤对照植物的叶片。如图6A和6B所示,未受伤对照植株的野生型叶片具有基础水平的过氧化氢,其在响应伤口时在系统性叶片中增强。相比之下,在M3、M5和M6/7植株中,大部分DAB-H₂O₂反应产物被消除,并且在伤口后在系统性叶片中没有增加。M4植株的叶片显示出较弱的表型,与野生型叶片相比,ROS显色降低约30%。在伤口处理后24小时检查对照和顶端系统性叶片的提取物。使用对PIN II具有特异性的抗血清的免疫印迹显示反义株系中PIN II多肽积累受到抑制(图6C),表明Rboh在伤口信号传递中发挥作用。

### Rboh反义植株的转录组谱

选择M6/7株系进行深入的微阵列分析。使用12K番茄EST探针,对野生型和M6/7未受伤对照以及受伤植株的未受伤系统性叶片的mRNA进行采样。为了提高统计真实性,将所有样品与由所有处理的等量混合RNA提取物组成的参考样品进行比较(Oleksiak等,2002)。选择在至少一种条件下差异表达的转录物(12,000个EST中的1473个;单向方差分析[ANOVA]等方差,P ≤ 0.05),并进行基因和实验条件的双向层次聚类。如图7A所示,M6/7反义对照和伤口处理与野生型对照和伤口处理分别聚类。此外,EST聚类成多种活性组。可以提出以下问题:哪些基因受Rboh蛋白水平降低的构成型影响?Rboh如何影响与发育相关的基因功能?更具体地说,Rboh如何影响伤口响应?我们专注于显示不同行为模式的四个聚类(图7A,箭头和括号)。选择的EST群体如图7B所示,并通过直接定量PCR验证选定的EST(图8)。

第1组和第4组代表由于野生型与转基因植株之间Rboh水平的变化而构成型上调或下调的基因。第1组包含384个EST,其中野生型与突变体的中位倍数变化为1.5,与伤口处理无关。相反,在第4组中,485个EST在野生型株系中的表达水平始终低于反义株系,中位倍数变化为0.59。在这些群体中可能存在反映突变体和野生型植物不同构成型氧化还原状态的转录物。

第2组和第3组共同代表169个伤口上调转录物。第3组中的转录物仅在野生型受伤植株的系统性叶片中上调,但在反义植株的系统性叶片中不上调,而第2组中的转录物在突变体株系中也显示出不同程度的系统性叶片诱导。我们可以认为当(野生型伤口诱导):(突变体伤口诱导)的比率>1时,Rboh发挥作用。在这种情况下,第2组的94个转录物中有54个受到Rboh水平扰动的影响,程度不一。因此,169个转录物中的129个(第2组的54个和第3组的75个)表现出Rboh需求。其余40个EST在野生型和反义植株中被伤口诱导到相同程度,尽管Rboh水平受损。因此,它们代表Rboh非依赖性途径。所有EST组的活性分布数据可在在线补充表1中获得。

### 伤口响应基因的差异调节

通过RT-PCR证实了Rboh对防御基因转录物水平的影响,如图8所示。表1包括通过微阵列分析揭示的已验证EST及其转录物家族。所有PIN型EST均属于第2组型表达模式(表1)。PIN II和PIN I EST在M6/7和野生型株系的系统性叶片中大量诱导(例如,cLED14D15分别被诱导10倍和51倍)。然而,所有PIN II代表(例如,表1,contig 1;图8,cLED14D15)和一些PIN I EST(例如,EST cLED4O3)在野生型株系中的诱导显著更高(约三倍)(表1,W/M列)。这一结果与伤口响应中PIN表达需要Rboh一致。相比之下,一些PIN I代表(例如,表1,cLET22A6和cLET28M23[contig 2];图8)在M6/7株系的系统性叶片中至少被同等程度地诱导,表明一些PIN I基因成员的伤口诱导不需要Rboh。在光谱的另一端,检查第3组EST(需要Rboh的转录物)揭示了具有推定防御素功能的新型γ-硫素样多肽的大量伤口诱导(表1,第3组;图8,cLED4L7)。该转录物通常在花中组成型表达(Brandstadter等,1996)。

WRKY防御相关转录因子在M7植株中显示出组成型下调(表1,第1组;图8,cLEC7J13)。它们相对于野生型在M6/7株系中的组成型下调可能与这些植物无法建立完全防御状态有关。

### 生长异常反映在转录因子的调节中

这里显示反义株系中Rboh水平的降低对植物生长具有深远影响。第4组聚类的转录组谱的特征是在反义株系的叶片中与野生型株系相比过表达的同源异型型转录物(表1,AvWt/AvMt低于1;图8)。其中包括花同源异型APETALA3转录因子同源物,其指定拟南芥中的花瓣和雄蕊身份,以及花同源异型蛋白PMADS 2同源物,其专门在矮牵牛(*Petunia hybrida*)的花中表达(Immink等,2003)。它们在番茄中的功能未知;然而,检查当前的TIGR数据库证实它们仅从花或cDNA文库中回收。因此,它们在转基因叶片中的上调表明组织特异性调节的丧失。

### 组成型和伤口诱导的氧化还原相关和氨基酸代谢相关转录物变化

抗坏血酸-脱氢抗坏血酸氧化还原对是细胞氧化还原维持的重要指标。转录组谱的检查揭示了胞质单脱氢抗坏血酸还原酶和番茄CIG1(细胞因子诱导基因)的氧化还原相关表达水平的变化,番茄CIG1是番茄Pro氧化酶同源物(表1,图8)。与氨基酸代谢相关的新型转录物发生变化。组氨酸脱羧酶上调(表1,图8)。因为这一酶促步骤会产生升高的组胺水平,其可能的作用可能是抗草食动物活性。天冬酰胺酶(表1,图8)在转基因叶片中相对于野生型下调。因此,Rboh抑制诱导了氮同化相关转录物的变化。有趣的是,前系统素的异位表达被证明能显著增加马铃薯(*Solanum tuberosum*)块茎中的氮积累(Narvaez-Vasquez和Ryan,2002)。

## 讨论

### Rboh作为信号转导器

我们应用反义策略来解除番茄Rboh多基因家族的表达。实现了至少两个基因的同时沉默,Rboh水平的整体降低有助于消除潜在的功能冗余。在这方面,拟南芥AtrbohD和AtrbohF无效系在疾病响应方面显示出功能重叠,并部分损害了对ABA的气孔响应(Torres等,2002;Kwak等,2003)。有趣的是,在反义番茄中未检测到增强的水分流失(通过蒸腾速率和离体叶片的鲜重损失测量),但萌发种子对2 mM ABA的存在不太敏感(数据未显示)。AtrbohC的消除损害了拟南芥中的根毛形成(Foreman等,2003)。这里未检测到这一现象,可能是由于特定番茄Rboh同源物缺乏抑制或番茄与拟南芥生物学之间的差异。

Rboh水平降低的多效性发育效应的分子基础是什么?Rboh可以作为激素作用的信号转导器。这方面的直接证据可以从Rboh对保卫细胞对ABA响应的依赖性中获得(Kwak等,2003)。然而,如这里所示,Rboh的激素效应可能更为广泛,不仅限于ABA作用,如图5中的结果所暗示。例如,生长素响应的损害部分模拟了这里描述的一些表型,并且向上卷曲和倒置的叶片也被描述为拟南芥生长素IAA突变体的特征(Tian和Reed,1999;Liscum和Reed,2002)。这里观察到的结果将Rboh功能扩展到许多植物器官中的多种发育效应,并暗示涉及一系列激素。因此,激素可能以两种方式调节Rboh。在短期内,激素可能通过促进ROS爆发来影响Rboh,这可能是由含有钙结合EF手的N末端区段和其他未知调节区域中的功能介导的。激素的更持久和长期效应可能通过Rboh水平的上调来实现,如图5所示,这一结果与Kwak等(2003)的报告相对应,表明ABA的应用导致Rboh转录物的积累。

### Rboh活性影响基本细胞过程

Rboh活性和植物发育可以额外方式相关。在突变体叶片中检测到的MADS box基因的异位表达(表1,第4组)及其与叶片卷曲表型的相关性(图3B)特别令人感兴趣。拟南芥卷曲叶突变在表面上与番茄叶卷曲表型相似。卷曲叶被证明由多梳因子编码。多梳组基因活性的抑制有助于异染色质结构的不稳定性和叶片中花特异性MADS box基因的异位表达。它们的表达伴随着卷曲叶片和果实异常的发育(Krizek和Meyerowitz,1996;Goodrich等,1997)。因此,Rboh活性的减弱可能影响染色体结构,在这方面,许多组蛋白3.3变体(属于第1组和第4组表达模式;表1,图8)也被调节是令人感兴趣的。组蛋白H3.3变体在整个细胞周期中沉积,被认为调节基因表达(Ahmad和Henikoff,2002)。氧化还原调节的染色质重塑可以由NAD1依赖性蛋白质和/或组蛋白去乙酰化酶执行(Denu,2003)。或者,重塑中的活性蛋白质可以具有氧化还原敏感性(例如,NPR1,系统抗性的调节因子,经历氧化还原依赖性寡聚化,这是其信号传导属性所必需的)(Mou等,2003)。

### ROS依赖性和非依赖性基因诱导

用于测量基因诱导的微阵列方法使得能够区分需要Rboh的过程和不需要Rboh的过程(表1,图7)。包含PIN多基因家族的第2组转录物显示出不同程度的Rboh依赖性。因此,并非所有PIN成员都被协调调节,扩展了Orozco-Cardenas等(2001)的观察结果。伤口后局部和系统性转录组活性的比较显示出差异响应。通过8.2K拟南芥阵列对直接从受伤组织提取的RNA进行谱分析(Cheong等,2002)。在受伤叶片中诱导的突出转录物是病原体相关(PR)蛋白、EREBP和WRKY转录因子、苯丙烷代谢酶以及JA和乙烯途径的组分。因此,受伤叶片及其同源系统性叶片的转录组谱似乎是不同的。PIN转录物存在于系统性叶片中,但EREBP或PR蛋白转录物不存在。这里提出的结果与JA合成限制在受伤叶片本身且JA作为长距离伤口信号发挥作用一致(Strassner等,2002;Lee和Howe,2003)。

### Rboh活性影响特定的氧化还原相关细胞活性

ROS爆发可以通过许多生理效应物观察到,例如病原体相关效应物或伤口;然而,区分每个爆发实施的转录程序很重要。用过氧化氢处理拟南芥细胞影响热休克蛋白和衰老相关转录物的转录物(Desikan等,2001)。这些类型的转录物在Rboh反义植物中未被检测为显著变化。当烟草圆盘通过应用产生ROS的甲基紫精而遭受氧化胁迫时,诱导了PR蛋白、植保素生物合成基因和脂氧合代谢基因(Vranova等,2002)。这些基因类型未在受伤植物的系统性叶片中被发现上调。显然,起源于超氧阴离子与过氧化氢的爆发可能具有不同的空间、时间和靶标特异性。在这方面,已经报道了快速和特异的亚细胞ROS爆发的可视化(Allan和Fluhr,1997;Coelho等,2002)。

比较野生型和突变体叶片的对照组织使我们能够确定Rboh活性受损的长期效应。Rboh下调导致叶片中过氧化氢积累减少(图2)。这种变化反映在胞质单脱氢抗坏血酸还原酶转录物的上调(表1)。抗坏血酸-脱坏血酸氧化还原对是细胞氧化还原状态的量度,并在植物和动物中与还原型和氧化型谷胱甘肽平衡(Mittler,2002)。在转基因组织中,升高的转录物水平可以促进活性氧产生水平较低的植物中抗坏血酸的调节。番茄Pro氧化酶同源物的相应下调与对NADPH需求减少一致。Pro氧化酶催化Pro氧化为吡咯啉-5-羧酸,同时将电子转移到细胞色素c(Donald等,2001)。在转基因Rboh反义叶片的情况下,通过Pro产生更多还原力的潜在来源显然不是必需的。

因此,Rboh在体内可能产生持续的ROS通量,这与在分离的膜中存在Rboh基础活性水平的事实一致(Sagi和Fluhr,2001)。因此,植物Rboh在决定ROS通量的细胞环境方面是定量的参与者,预计它们的调节将需要代谢调整,如通过转录组谱中的补偿性微调所测量的。Rboh似乎是发育和环境信号的高度调节、敏感和通用的介质。根据来自植物、病原体或环境的传入信号,氧化还原状态可能会发生改变,从而控制旨在在变化环境中最大化植物适应性的转录响应。未来的工作应该描绘控制Rboh活性的分子组分和由ROS爆发调节的主要下游靶标。

## 方法

### 植物材料

将番茄品种Motelle野生型和转基因植株种植在填充有泥炭和蛭石(4:1 [v/v])混合物的盆中,含有缓释高氮multicote 4和微量元素(0.3% [w/w];海法化学品,以色列海法湾)。生长期间温室平均温度在18至25°C之间波动。温室中中午光合光子通量密度为300至500 μmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹。

### 质粒构建体

使用跨越两种番茄gp91phox NADPH氧化酶植物同源物Lerboh1(AAD25300)和Wfi1(AF73124)C末端的番茄EST 244804和243389作为来源。构建T-DNA构建体,其在花椰菜花叶病毒35S启动子下游表达EST的亚克隆,以有义/反义方向使用E9终止子(Savaldi-Goldstein等,2003)。M4以反义方向表达Lerboh片段。它是用EST的345-bp Asp718/Asp718片段构建的。M5以反义方向表达Wfi1片段,是用EST的665-bp EcoRI/EcoRI片段构建的。M3分别以反义和有义方向表达Lerboh和Wfi1片段,而M6/7以反义方向表达Lerboh和Wfi1片段。M3和M6/7都是通过将番茄EST 243389的665-bp EcoRI/EcoRI片段插入到M4构建体的345-bp插入片段下游的EcoRI/EcoRI位点而构建的。通过电穿孔将所得构建体转移到根癌农杆菌EHA105中。如前所述进行稳定转化到番茄(品种Motelle)中(Ori等,1997)。在卡那霉素上测试T2植株的分离,并选择独立株系进行进一步分析并生长至T3纯合植株。使用SL8克隆作为探针,通过限制性片段多态性长度确认亲本野生型和衍生的反义品种Motelle株系的纯度(Ori等,1997)。

### RT-PCR探针

对于定量RT-PCR,使用RNeasy植物mini试剂盒(Qiagen,Valencia,CA)提取总RNA。将1.5 μg RNA用于使用SuperScript II逆转录酶(Gibco BRL,Cleveland,OH)进行第一链合成,按照制造商的程序使用oligo(dT)作为引物。在没有酶的平行反应中作为对照。在十分之一的反应上进行PCR扩增。使用的引物如下:对于Lerboh,正向5'-GTCAGGCTTCTACAGAAAAC-3'和反向5'-GTTGATTACAGTAGCCGGTTC-3',产生270-bp PCR产物;对于Wfi1,正向5'-CTGCTTGGAAGAAGAAATC-3'和反向5'-GAATTTTGCATCGCTACAATAG-3',产生213-bp PCR产物;对于Tom41肌动蛋白基因(U60480),正向5'-ATGCCATTCTCCGTCTTGACTTG-3'和反向5'-GAGTTGTATGTAGTCTCGTGGATT-3',产生325-bp PCR产物。

使用正向引物5'-CAAGATCTATCGATTCCCG-3'(与二元载体的多克隆位点互补)和cDNA插入片段的反向引物扩增反义/有义特异性片段,如下所示:对于M3,5'-GCGTTTGTAGACGTTTCT-3'(810 bp的PCR产物);对于M4,5'-GGGGTTGATATTGTATCAG-3'(293 bp的PCR产物);对于M5和M6/7,5'-GAGGTGGTTTTATTGGTGG-3'(分别为648和927 bp的PCR产物)。在含有溴化乙锭(10 mg/mL)的1%至2%琼脂糖凝胶上分离PCR产物,并通过生物成像系统(型号202D;DNR成像系统,以色列Kiryat Anavim)可视化。从凝胶中切下PCR产物并进行测序验证。

### 植物生长和发育特征

在100天龄的植株中测量一次和二次分枝(长度>5 cm)的花序数量、花型和数量(融合的花和花瓣数量不等于六的被指定为异常)。如前所述,在第一片完全展开的叶片提取物中测量总叶绿素含量(Graan和Ort,1984)。在100天龄的植株中测量卷曲程度,指定如下:0,无卷曲;1,>50%的叶片轻微卷曲;2,>50%的叶片半卷曲;3,>50%的叶片完全卷曲。倒置小叶水平指定如下:1,无倒置小叶;2,在一片叶片中至少有一个或多个顶端小叶倒置;3,两到三片叶片有倒置小叶;4,四到五片叶片有倒置小叶;5,超过六片叶片有倒置小叶。异常果实被指定为显示不对称形状、畸形、猫脸、软木表皮或闭花受精样果实的畸形果实。在150天龄的植株中测量直径>2 cm的异常和正常果实的数量。

### 处理、蛋白质和RNA提取

如前所述对野生型和反义植株进行Rboh免疫印迹(Sagi和Fluhr,2001)。对于激素处理,将28天龄植株的茎切下并放入含有50 mM ABA、GA、IAA、BA或乙烯前体ACC的溶液中24小时后,从第二片上部叶片提取并进行免疫印迹。对于伤口诱导,用止血钳在较低叶片顶端小叶的远端垂直于中脉挤压三次,对21至28天龄植株(含三片叶片)的叶片进行伤口处理,在伤口处理后24小时,对上部未受伤叶片(系统性信号)进行RNA或蛋白质提取。未受伤植株中相同大小和位置的叶片作为对照。通过SDS-PAGE分级分离蛋白质提取物,12.5%(w/v)聚丙烯酰胺分离胶和4%(w/v)浓缩胶,并使用针对番茄PIN II的抗体(华盛顿州立大学生物化学系Clarence A. Ryan的礼物)进行免疫印迹和显色。

### 伤口和ROS检测

如前所述,通过DAB染色原位检测H₂O₂(Thordal-Christensen等,1997)。从野生型和Rboh转基因45天龄植株中采集第一片完全展开叶片的顶端小叶。收集小叶并真空浸润DAB溶液(1 mg/mL,pH 3.8;Sigma,St. Louis,MO)。将采集的叶片置于高湿度塑料盒中直至观察到棕色沉淀(5至6小时),然后用3:1:1乙醇:乳酸:甘油溶液固定并拍照。通过使用Image Quant 3.19.4软件(Molecular Dynamics,Sunnyvale,CA)的计算机激光密度计扫描叶片来进行DAB染色叶片的定量分析。为了确定伤口后的H₂O₂水平,将21至28天龄植株(含三至四片叶片)的叶片在基部用剃刀切下,并在伤口前浸入含有DAB的溶液中3小时。如上所述,用止血钳挤压叶片进行伤口处理。在伤口处理后5小时,如上所述采集上部未受伤叶片(系统性叶片)。未受伤植株中相同大小和位置的叶片作为对照。通过使用Image Quant 3.19.4软件(Molecular Dynamics)的计算机激光密度计扫描叶片来进行定量分析。

### 微阵列分析和RT-PCR

如上所述,在野生型和反义植株中进行伤口处理,在伤口处理后24小时,采集上部未受伤叶片(系统性叶片),而未受伤野生型和反义植株中相同位置的叶片作为对照。每种条件是两至三个独立生物学重复的平均结果,如下所示:突变体对照叶片,两个重复;突变体系统性叶片,三个重复;野生型对照叶片,三个重复;野生型系统性叶片,两个重复。使用RNeasy mini试剂盒(Qiagen)提取总RNA,并使用T7聚合酶(Ambion,Austin,TX)进行逆转录和体外转录扩增。将扩增的RNA产物进行逆转录,然后通过间接氨基烯丙基方法用Cy3和Cy5标记。使用12K番茄EST探针作为探针(Boyce Thompson研究所基因表达谱中心,http://bti.cornell.edu/CGEP/CGEP.html)。对于每个生物学重复,进行两次交换染料标记的杂交。使用ScanArray 4000软件(Packard BioScience,Meridan,CT)以每像素10 μm的分辨率获取每种荧光的单独图像,调整光电倍增管和激光功率以实现最佳信号分布且最小饱和。使用QuantArray 3软件使用直方图方法进行初始图像分析(Packard BioScience)。应用每点和每芯片标准化(GeneSpring 5.1;Silicon Genetics,Redwood City,CA)进行数据分析。对差异表达的基因(单向ANOVA等方差,P ≤ 0.05)进行双向层次聚类,使用Pearson相关相似性度量。使用平方和同时检验程序检验聚类的给定零假设。如Savaldi-Goldstein等(2003)所述,对aRNA进行RT-PCR分析。使用的引物对见在线补充表2。从1%至2%凝胶中切下并分离PCR产物,并进行测序验证。

完整的表达数据集可在Gene Expression Omnibus中获得,登录号为GPL788、GSM13872至GSM13881和GSE917,http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo。

## 致谢

这项工作得到了佩雷斯和平中心、以色列科学基金会资助417/03、德国米涅瓦基金会、魏茨曼-阿根廷安塔奇斯基金和雷蒙德·伯顿植物基因组研究基金的部分感谢。我们感谢Neta Rines、Dinah Miller、Moshe Ventura和Akalu Pascha的技术协助。

收稿日期:2003年11月23日;接受日期:2003年12月19日。