Enhanced powder dispersion of dual-excipient spray-dried powder formulations of a monoclonal antibody and its fragment for local treatment of severe asthma

✅ 全文

用于重症哮喘局部治疗的双赋形剂喷雾干燥单克隆抗体及其片段粉体制剂的增强粉末分散性

作者 Harry W. Pan; Jinlin Guo; Lingqiao Zhu; Susan W.S. Leung; Chenghai Zhang; Jenny K.W. Lam 期刊 International Journal of Pharmaceutics 发表日期 2023 ISSN 0378-5173 DOI 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123272 类型 原创研究 (Original Research)

📄 中文摘要 Chinese Abstract

中文
生物制剂的出现为重症哮喘患者带来了新的希望,该疾病因对传统疗法反应不佳以及糖皮质激素依赖导致的不良反应而备受困扰。然而,生物制剂需通过注射给药,因此无法发挥吸入疗法的优势,如提高作用部位的生物利用度、减少全身性副作用、无创性及便于自我给药。本研究将2-羟丙基-β-环糊精(作为蛋白质稳定剂)与ʟ-亮氨酸(作为分散增强剂)以不同重量比共喷雾干燥,制备了一系列制剂平台。对粉末雾化特性及颗粒形态进行了评估,以判断其是否适合肺部递送。选择雾化性能最佳的平台(辅料比例为1:1),将其与靶向IL-4受体α的单克隆抗体或其抗原结合片段结合。双辅料抗体制剂在级联撞击器实验中的发射分数(EF)至少达到80%,细颗粒分数(FPF)超过60%,残余水分含量处于1%至3%的理想范围内。喷雾干燥后抗体的体外抗原结合能力和抑制活性均得到令人满意地保留。本研究结果证实了吸入型固态生物大分子作为哮喘治疗新策略的可行性。

📋 英文结构化总结 English Structured Summary

全文整理

EN

Background:

The advent of biologics has brought renewed hope for patients with severe asthma, a condition notorious for being hampered by poor response to conventional therapies and adverse drug reactions owing to corticosteroid dependence. However, biologics are administered as injections, thereby precluding the benefits inhalation therapy could offer such as increased bioavailability at the site of action, minimal systemic side effects, non-invasiveness, and self-administration. Here, 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin and ʟ-leucine were co-spray-dried, as protein stabiliser and dispersion enhancer, respectively, at various weight ratios to produce a series of formulation platforms. Powder aerosolisation characteristics and particle morphology were assessed for suitability for pulmonary delivery. The selected platform with the best aerosol performance, a 1:1 ratio of the excipients, was then incorporated with a monoclonal antibody directed against IL-4 receptor alpha or its antigen-binding fragment. The dual-excipient antibody formulations exhibited emitted fraction of at least 80% and fine particle fraction exceeding 60% in cascade impactor study, while the residual moisture content was within a desirable range between 1% and 3%. The in vitro antigen-binding ability and inhibitory potency of the spray-dried antibody were satisfactorily preserved. The results from this study corroborate the viability of inhaled solid-state biomacromolecules as a promising treatment approach for asthma.

Methods:

Dual-excipient formulation platforms were prepared by weighing the appropriate amount of leucine and adding it to a concentrated solution of 2HPβCD in ultrapure water according to the proportions stated in Table 1. Antibody concentration of the stock solutions was measured by UV absorbance at 280 nm. To prepare the antibody-containing formulations, the stock antibody solution was added to the excipient-only platform and the resultant mixture was swirled gently. The final solute concentration for all feed solutions was adjusted to 2% w/v with ultrapure water. The feed solutions were pumped peristaltically at a 3% rate (~0.9 mL/min) into a mini spray dryer (B-290, BÜCHI Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland) operated at 100% aspiration rate (corresponding to a gas flow rate of about 35 m3/hour) with nitrogen as the spray gas at a flow rate of 742 L/hour. These operating parameters were adopted from previous studies (Pan et al., 2022; Qiu et al., 2019). The inlet temperature was preset at 150 ◦C for the formulation platforms and 100 ◦C for the antibody-containing formulations. An integrated two-fluid nozzle of 0.7 mm internal diameter was used to atomise the solutions into the spray cylinder. The SD powder was transferred from the product collection vessel into a transparent glass vial and stored in an auto dry box (Eureka Dry Tech, Taipei, Taiwan) at air-conditioned temperature (around 22 ◦C) and a controlled relative humidity of approximately 25%.

Results:

The EF and FPF obtained from the cascade impactor experiments, representing the dispersibility and respirable fraction of a powder formulation, respectively, are shown in Fig. 3. For the excipient platforms, the EF rises from around 54% to 81% as the relative leucine content is gradually increased. Notably, formulation E4 had the highest EF as well as FPF of nearly 70%, therefore a 1:1 leucine-to-2HPβCD ratio was chosen as the excipient foundation for the antibody formulations. The mean EF of all six antibody formulations was above 80%. Apart from M3, which had an FPF of about 61%, the mean FPF of the rest of the antibody formulations was between 72% and 75%. The best aerosolisation characteristics belonged to the formulations containing 25% antibody and 75% excipients, i.e., F2 (EF, 86.5 ± 1.7%; FPF, 75.3 ± 2.7%) and M2 (EF, 85.6 ± 2.4%; FPF, 75.2 ± 4.4%).

Data Summary:

The residual water content of the antibody formulations was determined by TGA after spray drying (Table 2). The Fab formulations contained marginally more moisture compared with the mAb formulations, and the water content was highest in the formulations that had the lowest concentration of leucine (i.e., F3 and M3). Nevertheless, the mean water content of all the powders tested was low and ranged between 1.4 ± 0.2% and 2.6 ± 0.3% w/w, demonstrating the drying efficiency of the formulation and process to keep moisture at bay. The MMAD and GSD values calculated from the aerosolisation performance analysis are also displayed in Table 2. With the exception of formulation E3, the dae of the particles was within the critical size range of 1 to 3 µm that is optimal for pulmonary deposition (Chow et al., 2007; Malcolmson and Embleton, 1998), while the GSD values (≥1.22) indicate a heterodisperse distribution, which is typical for therapeutic aerosols (Labiris and Dolovich, 2003; Laube et al., 2011).

Conclusions:

The results from this study corroborate the viability of inhaled solid-state biomacromolecules as a promising treatment approach for asthma. The dual-excipient antibody formulations exhibited emitted fraction of at least 80% and fine particle fraction exceeding 60% in cascade impactor study, while the residual moisture content was within a desirable range between 1% and 3%. The in vitro antigen-binding ability and inhibitory potency of the spray-dried antibody were satisfactorily preserved.

Practical Significance:

The study demonstrates that co-spray-drying 2HPβCD and leucine at a 1:1 ratio produces a viable powder platform for pulmonary delivery of monoclonal antibodies and their fragments, offering a non-invasive, self-administered alternative to injections for severe asthma treatment.

📋 中文结构化总结 Chinese Structured Summary

中文

背景:

生物制剂的出现为重症哮喘患者带来了新的希望,该疾病因对传统疗法反应不佳以及糖皮质激素依赖导致的不良反应而备受困扰。然而,生物制剂需通过注射给药,因此无法发挥吸入疗法的优势,如提高作用部位的生物利用度、减少全身性副作用、无创性及便于自我给药。本研究将2-羟丙基-β-环糊精(作为蛋白质稳定剂)与ʟ-亮氨酸(作为分散增强剂)以不同重量比共喷雾干燥,制备了一系列制剂平台。对粉末雾化特性及颗粒形态进行了评估,以判断其是否适合肺部递送。选择雾化性能最佳的平台(辅料比例为1:1),将其与靶向IL-4受体α的单克隆抗体或其抗原结合片段结合。双辅料抗体制剂在级联撞击器实验中的发射分数(EF)至少达到80%,细颗粒分数(FPF)超过60%,残余水分含量处于1%至3%的理想范围内。喷雾干燥后抗体的体外抗原结合能力和抑制活性均得到令人满意地保留。本研究结果证实了吸入型固态生物大分子作为哮喘治疗新策略的可行性。

方法:

双辅料制剂平台的制备方法如下:称取适量亮氨酸,按表1所列比例加入2HPβCD的超纯水浓溶液中。通过280 nm紫外吸光度测定原液中的抗体浓度。制备含抗体的制剂时,将抗体原液加入仅含辅料的平台中,轻轻涡旋混匀。所有进料溶液的最终溶质浓度用超纯水调整至2% w/v。进料溶液以3%的泵速(约0.9 mL/min)经蠕动泵输送至微型喷雾干燥仪(B-290,BÜCHI Labortechnik AG,瑞士弗劳恩费尔德),操作参数为100%抽吸率(对应气体流量约35 m³/h),喷雾气体为氮气,流量为742 L/h。上述操作参数参考了先前研究(Pan et al., 2022; Qiu et al., 2019)。制剂平台的进风温度预设为150°C,含抗体制剂的进风温度预设为100°C。使用内径0.7 mm的内置双流体喷嘴将溶液雾化喷入喷雾干燥筒。将喷雾干燥后的粉末从产品收集器转移至透明玻璃瓶中,存放于自动干燥箱(Eureka Dry Tech,台北,台湾),环境温度控制在约22°C,相对湿度控制在约25%。

结果:

级联撞击器实验获得的EF和FPF分别代表粉末制剂的分散性和可呼吸分数,结果如图3所示。对于辅料平台,随着亮氨酸相对含量的逐步增加,EF从约54%上升至81%。值得注意的是,制剂E4的EF最高,FPF接近70%,因此选择亮氨酸与2HPβCD比例为1:1作为抗体制剂的辅料基础。所有六种抗体制剂的平均EF均高于80%。除M3的FPF约为61%外,其余抗体制剂的平均FPF在72%至75%之间。雾化特性最佳的制剂为含25%抗体和75%辅料的制剂,即F2(EF: 86.5 ± 1.7%;FPF: 75.3 ± 2.7%)和M2(EF: 85.6 ± 2.4%;FPF: 75.2 ± 4.4%)。

数据汇总:

喷雾干燥后通过热重分析(TGA)测定了抗体制剂的残余水分含量(表2)。Fab制剂的水分含量略高于mAb制剂,且亮氨酸浓度最低的制剂(即F3和M3)水分含量最高。尽管如此,所有测试粉末的平均水分含量较低,范围为1.4 ± 0.2%至2.6 ± 0.3% w/w,表明该制剂工艺具有良好的干燥效率,能有效控制水分。质量中值空气动力学直径(MMAD)和几何标准偏差(GSD)值由雾化性能分析计算得出,同样列于表2中。除制剂E3外,颗粒的空气动力学直径(dae)均在1至3 µm的最佳肺部沉积临界尺寸范围内(Chow et al., 2007; Malcolmson and Embleton, 1998),而GSD值(≥1.22)表明颗粒呈多分散分布,这是治疗性气溶胶的典型特征(Labiris and Dolovich, 2003; Laube et al., 2011)。

结论:

本研究结果证实了吸入型固态生物大分子作为哮喘治疗新策略的可行性。双辅料抗体制剂在级联撞击器实验中的发射分数(EF)至少达到80%,细颗粒分数(FPF)超过60%,残余水分含量处于1%至3%的理想范围内。喷雾干燥后抗体的体外抗原结合能力和抑制活性均得到令人满意地保留。

实际意义:

本研究表明,以1:1比例共喷雾干燥2HPβCD和亮氨酸可制备出一种适用于单克隆抗体及其片段肺部递送的粉末平台,为重症哮喘治疗提供了一种无创、可自我给药的注射替代方案。

📖 英文全文 English Full Text

EN

International Journal of Pharmaceutics 644 (2023) 123272

Available online 25 July 2023 0378-5173/© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/).

Enhanced powder dispersion of dual-excipient spray-dried powder formulations of a monoclonal antibody and its fragment for local treatment of severe asthma

Harry W. Pan a, Jinlin Guo b, Lingqiao Zhu b, Susan W.S. Leung a, Chenghai Zhang b,*, Jenny K.

W. Lam a,c,* a Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China b R&D Department, Shanghai MabGeek Biotech Co. Ltd., Room 304, No. 1011 Halei Road, Zhangjiang Hi-tech Park, Shanghai, 201203, China c Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39, Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, United Kingdom

A R T I C L E I N F O Keywords:

Antibody fragment Asthma Cyclodextrin Inhalation Leucine

Pulmonary delivery Spray drying A B S T R A C T The advent of biologics has brought renewed hope for patients with severe asthma, a condition notorious for being hampered by poor response to conventional therapies and adverse drug reactions owing to corticosteroid dependence. However, biologics are administered as injections, thereby precluding the benefits inhalation therapy could offer such as increased bioavailability at the site of action, minimal systemic side effects, non- invasiveness, and self-administration. Here, 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin and ʟ-leucine were co-spray- dried, as protein stabiliser and dispersion enhancer, respectively, at various weight ratios to produce a series of formulation platforms. Powder aerosolisation characteristics and particle morphology were assessed for suitability for pulmonary delivery. The selected platform with the best aerosol performance, a 1:1 ratio of the excipients, was then incorporated with a monoclonal antibody directed against IL-4 receptor alpha or its antigen- binding fragment. The dual-excipient antibody formulations exhibited emitted fraction of at least 80% and fine particle fraction exceeding 60% in cascade impactor study, while the residual moisture content was within a desirable range between 1% and 3%. The in vitro antigen-binding ability and inhibitory potency of the spray- dried antibody were satisfactorily preserved. The results from this study corroborate the viability of inhaled solid-state biomacromolecules as a promising treatment approach for asthma.

1. Introduction The number of inflammatory diseases embracing the use of biologics in their arsenal of treatment modalities is expanding, and asthma is no exception. A major chronic disease of the respiratory system, asthma affected more than 260 million individuals across the world in 2019 (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2020). Severe asthma, which accounts for around 3% to 10% of people with asthma, typically depends on a maximal high-dose inhaled corticosteroid with a long- acting beta2-agonist (Chung et al., 2014; Global Initiative for Asthma,

2022). For patients who experience exacerbations or poor symptom control despite a high-dose inhaled therapy, or depend on maintenance oral corticosteroids, which are associated with severe long-term adverse effects (Lefebvre et al., 2015), biologic therapies are an option. Since severe asthma is often driven by type 2 inflammation that is characterised by airway eosinophilia and cytokines secreted by T-helper

2 cells such as interleukins (ILs) 4, 5, and 13 (Israel and Reddel, 2017), immunoglobulins (Ig) in clinical use and research strategically target these pathways.

There are a handful of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that have been approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of severe asthma, including omalizumab (IgE antagonist), mepolizumab and reslizumab (IL-5 an­ tagonists), dupilumab (IL-4 receptor antagonist), benralizumab (IL-5 receptor antagonist), and tezepelumab (thymic stromal lymphopoietin antagonist). All of them are administered parenterally, which increases the risk of off-target systemic side effects and may require larger doses compared to local therapy (Borghardt et al., 2018; Irvine et al., 2013). A noninvasive route of delivery is no doubt more popular among patients and healthcare personnel, particularly in the management of a chronic condition like asthma. Exemplified by the array of inhaled products for

* Corresponding authors.

E-mail addresses: chenghai.zhang@mabgeek.com (C. Zhang), jenny.lam@ucl.ac.uk (J.K.W. Lam).

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Pharmaceutics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpharm https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123272

Received 16 March 2023; Received in revised form 18 July 2023; Accepted 24 July 2023

International Journal of Pharmaceutics 644 (2023) 123272

2 asthma on the market, targeted delivery to the lungs through oral inhalation has advantages encompassing rapid onset of action, reduced systemic adverse reactions, high local bioavailability, and potential dose reduction (Liang et al., 2020). Although pulmonary delivery of anti­ bodies has been investigated using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) or neb­ ulisers (Hickey and Stewart, 2022; Matthews et al., 2020), the former group of inhalation devices are more compatible with labile bio­ macromolecules inasmuch as they do not generate heat (Shoyele and

Slowey, 2006) or create a vast air–liquid interface (Fr¨ohlich and Salar- Behzadi, 2021). In nebulisation, proteins are in the liquid state which necessitates the infamous cold chain that increases the manufacturing costs, negatively impacts the environment, and complicates the logis­ tical operations (Sharma et al., 2021). On the other hand, proteins delivered through DPIs are in the solid state which, with proper formulation, can confer prolonged shelf-life and stability (Chang and

Pikal, 2009), given that chemical and physical degradation reactions are driven hydrolytically (Lai and Topp, 1999). It has been proposed that a pressure drop of no less than 1 kPa, produced by the patient’s inspiratory effort, is required to effectively fluidise and disperse the powder from a

DPI (Clark et al., 2020). At the airflow resistances of many commercially available DPIs, the majority of patients with asthma, including those with severe asthma, are able to generate sufficient inspiratory flow rates necessary for adequate drug delivery to the lungs (Laube et al., 2011).

To produce biologics in powder form for inhalation, several particle- engineering technologies are available, including freeze drying-milling, spray freeze drying, and thin-film freeze drying (Chang et al., 2021).

Spray drying was used in this study in view of its scalability on an in­ dustrial level, ability to generate particles with uniform size distribution, and the lower costs involved (Chow et al., 2007; Sharma et al., 2021). It is also an established drying technique to manufacture the now-defunct

Exubera® (human insulin), one of the rare inhaled protein products that had received regulatory authorisation (White et al., 2005). A one-step process, spray drying involves the atomisation of a liquid formulation by means of a nozzle into a chamber of hot gas stream and the solvent in the atomised droplets is removed via evaporation (Ziaee et al., 2019).

The high temperature of the drying gas subjects thermolabile molecules to heat stress while atomisation introduces mechanical shear forces and induces protein adsorption at an extensive air–liquid interface that may destabilise biomacromolecules (Chow et al., 2007). For these reasons, stabilising excipients are incorporated into protein formulations for their protective effects against the various stresses encountered during the dehydration stage (Chang et al., 2021).

Among the well-known classes of solid-state protein stabilisers, which include sugars, polyols, surfactants, and salts (Depreter et al.,

2013), cyclodextrins, in particular, 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (2HPβCD) has gained attention as a promising excipient for both its protein-stabilising abilities (Serno et al., 2011) and capability to pro­ duce inhalable particles for pulmonary delivery (Ramezani et al., 2017).

The mechanisms through which 2HPβCD stabilises proteins have been postulated to include water replacement effect, vitrification, and surface activity (Serno et al., 2011). Like some other cyclodextrin derivatives,

2HPβCD is found in commercialised pharmaceutical products as an excipient for the intramuscular, intravenous, and oral routes (Jansook et al., 2018). Even though it is not yet licenced for the respiratory route, presumably due to insufficient safety data, 2HPβCD administered by intranasal spray to healthy human volunteers was well-tolerated (al- Nakib et al., 1989) and short-term exposure in mice via nebulisation did not lead to overt lung toxicity (Evrard et al., 2004).

Our previous work characterised spray-dried (SD) and spray-freeze- dried (SFD) powder formulations of an anti-IL-4 receptor alpha (IL-4Rα) mAb with 2HPβCD in terms of physicochemical properties, aerosol performance, protein stability, and biological activity (Pan et al., 2022).

Here, we sought to address the issues of high residual moisture content and suboptimal aerosolisation by the incorporation of leucine, which is a very hydrophobic amino acid. Leucine has been investigated as a dispersion enhancer in SD formulations of pharmaceuticals intended for inhalation, including biologics (Alhajj et al., 2021). We aimed to study the physical and aerodynamic characteristics of dual-excipient powder formulation platforms that comprised 2HPβCD and leucine in different weight ratios prepared by spray drying. The excipient ratio that ach­ ieved the most desirable outcomes was then applied to antibody- containing formulations. Besides the intact full-length mAb, the antigen-binding fragment (Fab) would be featured in the formulations as well. In addition, the stability and in vitro bioactivity of the SD antibody were evaluated.

2. Materials and methods 2.1. Materials Humanised anti-IL-4Rα mAb (~18 mg/mL) and the Fab (~16 mg/ mL) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were developed and provided by

Shanghai MabGeek Biotech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and stored at

−80 ◦C. The antibody (IgG4) was generated from mouse hybridoma and expressed by stably-transfected CHO-K1 cells (ATCC® CCL-61™, Man­ assas, VA, USA). The Fab was also expressed by CHO-K1 cells, by tran­ siently transfecting with the Fab sequence of the mAb. 2HPβCD, ʟ- leucine, dithiothreitol (DTT), Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250, trisodium phosphate (Na3PO4), bovine serum albumin (BSA), and Tween® 20 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Recombinant human (rh) IL-4Rα, rhIL-4, rhIL-13, granulocyte–macrophage colony- stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF), and substrate reagent pack (consisting of colour reagents A and B, stabilised hydrogen peroxide and stabilised tetramethylbenzidine, respectively) were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated polyclonal goat F(ab’)2 directed against human IgG (detection antibody), was ob­ tained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Prestained protein ladder (Pag­ eRuler™ Plus), RPMI-1640 medium powder, qualified foetal bovine serum (FBS), and Antibiotic-Antimycotic (penicillin–streptomycin- amphotericin B) were acquired from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham,

MA, USA). Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) was procured from MedChe­ mExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) and Dual-Glo® Luciferase

Assay System was obtained from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) was bought from BDH Chemicals (Poole, England). Ul­ trapure water was retrieved from a laboratory water purification system with a 0.2-µm pore size rating (Barnstead NANOpure Diamond™, APS

Water Services, Van Nuys, CA, USA).

2.2. Formulations and spray drying Dual-excipient formulation platforms were prepared by weighing the appropriate amount of leucine and adding it to a concentrated solution

Table 1 Composition of the feed solutions for spray drying.

Formulation 2HPβCD content (% w/w) ʟ-leucine content (% w/w)

Antibody format Antibody content (% w/w) Excipient-only formulation platforms

E0 100 0 – – E1 95 5 – – E2 90 10 – – E3 80 20 – –

E4 50 50 – – Antibody-containing formulations F1 45

45 Fab 10 F2 37.5 37.5 Fab 25 F3 25 25 Fab 50 M1 45

45 mAb 10 M2 37.5 37.5 mAb 25 M3 25 25 mAb 50 2HPβCD: 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin; Fab: antigen-binding fragment; mAb: full-length monoclonal antibody.

H.W. Pan et al.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics 644 (2023) 123272

3 of 2HPβCD in ultrapure water according to the proportions stated in

Table 1. Antibody concentration of the stock solutions was measured by

UV absorbance at 280 nm. To prepare the antibody-containing formu­ lations, the stock antibody solution was added to the excipient-only platform and the resultant mixture was swirled gently. The final solute concentration for all feed solutions was adjusted to 2% w/v with ul­ trapure water.

The feed solutions were pumped peristaltically at a 3% rate (~0.9 mL/min) into a mini spray dryer (B-290, BÜCHI Labortechnik AG, Fla­ wil, Switzerland) operated at 100% aspiration rate (corresponding to a gas flow rate of about 35 m3/hour) with nitrogen as the spray gas at a flow rate of 742 L/hour. These operating parameters were adopted from previous studies (Pan et al., 2022; Qiu et al., 2019). The inlet temper­ ature was preset at 150 ◦C for the formulation platforms and 100 ◦C for the antibody-containing formulations. An integrated two-fluid nozzle of

0.7 mm internal diameter was used to atomise the solutions into the spray cylinder. The SD powder was transferred from the product collection vessel into a transparent glass vial and stored in an auto dry box (Eureka Dry Tech, Taipei, Taiwan) at air-conditioned temperature (around 22 ◦C) and a controlled relative humidity of approximately

25%.

2.3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) Morphology and geometric size of the SD particles were studied using SEM. Powder samples were sprinkled onto aluminium specimen stubs using adhesive carbon tape. To enhance sample conductivity and prevent overheating, the surface of the mounted samples was coated with approximately 13 nm of gold–palladium for 120 seconds at 30 mA in an argon-rich environment (Q150T ES Plus, Quorum Technologies,

East Sussex, UK). Photomicrographs of the particles were taken by a field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) at 5,000 × and 10,000 × magnifications, an accelerating voltage of 5 kV, and 4.6–6.6 mm working distance.

2.4. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) Thermal behaviour of the SD powders was investigated by DSC.

Approximately 2–3 mg of each powder formulation was weighed into a

5.4 × 2.0 mm aluminium hermetic pan (Jingyi Chemical Materials,

Shanghai, China) and covered with a perforated lid. The pans were sealed before loading onto an indium-calibrated differential scanning calorimeter (DSC 250, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The DSC was programmed to hold isothermal for 10 min at 0 ◦C, followed by heating at a ramp rate of 10 ◦C/min to 300 ◦C. The thermograms were plotted using OriginPro® software (version 2022b, OriginLab®,

Northampton, MA, USA).

2.5. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) Moisture content of the SD antibody formulations was measured using a thermogravimetric analyser (TGA 550, TA Instruments, New

Castle, DE, USA). An open platinum sample pan was loaded with 2 ± 0.5 mg of each powder formulation and heated at a constant rate of 10 ◦C/ min from ambient temperature to 105 ◦C. The weight loss as monitored by a microbalance was deemed to account for the water that had evaporated from the solid sample during heating. Each measurement was done in triplicate.

2.6. Aerosol performance The aerodynamic characteristics of the SD formulations were assessed by a Next Generation Impactor (NGI) attached to a right-angled induction port (Copley Scientific, Nottingham, UK). A size 3 gelatin capsule (Capsugel®, Morristown, NJ, USA) was filled with 10 ± 0.5 mg of powder and placed into a high-resistance handheld RS01 inhaler (Plastiape, Osnago, Italy). The air flow rate was adjusted to approxi­ mately 54 L/min to reach a pressure drop of 4 kPa across the inhaler. The powder was dispersed into the apparatus for 4.4 seconds to allow 4 litres of air to be withdrawn. The assessment was conducted thrice for each formulation.

2HPβCD concentration was quantified by high- performance liquid chromatography (Agilent Technologies, Santa

Clara, CA, USA) and peak integration was performed on OpenLab CDS

ChemStation Edition software (version C.01.06, Agilent Technologies) as previously described (Pan et al., 2022).

The aerosol performance is described by the following metrics: recovered dose (RD), emitted dose (ED), emitted fraction (EF), fine particle dose (FPD), fine particle fraction (FPF), mass median aero­ dynamic diameter (MMAD), and geometric standard deviation (GSD).

With regard to 2HPβCD, the RD is the total mass assayed from the whole

NGI set-up; the ED is the mass discharged from the inhaler; and the FPD is the mass with aerodynamic diameter (dae) < 5 µm. The formulae for

EF and FPF are furnished below. MMAD and GSD were calculated ac­ cording to the methods stipulated in USP on Compounding (The United

States Pharmacopeial Convention, 2014). MMAD is the dae at which half of the aerosolised particle mass lie under, while GSD signifies the width of the dae distribution (Finlay and Darquenne, 2020).

EF = ED RD FPF = FPD RD 2.7. Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS- PAGE)

Electrophoresis was utilised to verify the molecular weight of the antibody and the Fab post-spray drying. Powder formulations of the antibody were reconstituted with ultrapure water and the protein con­ centration was adjusted to 0.2 mg/mL in both non-reducing and reducing (containing 5 mM DTT) SDS buffers. Unprocessed antibodies and aliquots of the feed solutions were included as reference. The sample solutions were boiled at 95 ◦C for 5 min in a dry bath, except for the non- reduced full-length mAb to minimise aggregation. Each well of the 10%

Bis-Tris gels was loaded with 4 µg of antibody. The electrophoresis (Mini-PROTEAN® Tetra System, Bio-Rad), gel staining and destaining, and photography (G:BOX Chemi XR5 gel documentation system, Syn­ gene, Cambridge, UK) steps have been outlined elsewhere (Pan et al.,

2022).

2.8. Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) SEC separates proteins on the basis of molecular size and was employed to monitor the monomer content after spray drying. The chromatography system consisted of a Yarra™ 3 µm SEC-3000 column (phenomenex®, Torrance, CA, USA) connected to a diode array detector (Agilent Technologies) set at a UV wavelength of 214 nm. The flow rate of the mobile phase (150 mM aqueous Na3PO4, pH 6.8) was 0.8 mL/min and the stoptime was 18 min. Unprocessed antibodies were included as controls and 50 µL of each sample, adjusted with the buffer to a protein concentration of 0.2 mg/mL, was injected at 25 ◦C in triplicate. Inte­ gration of the peaks was performed using OpenLab CDS ChemStation

Edition software (version C.01.03, Agilent Technologies) and the percent monomer content was calculated.

2.9. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) The binding capacity of the antibody of selected formulations was determined by labelled immunoassay. The ELISA protocol is detailed elsewhere (Pan et al., 2022). In brief, the capture antigen, rhIL-4Rα, was coated (50 ng/well) overnight and blocked with reagent diluent (2% w/ v BSA in PBS). The protein concentration of the samples was adjusted to

100 and 1 μg/mL with the reagent diluent and the samples were added in duplicate to the wells. The peroxidase reaction was arrested by the

H.W. Pan et al.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics 644 (2023) 123272

4 addition of 2 N H2SO4. Readings at 570 nm were subtracted from those at 450 nm to correct for optical imperfections in the plate. A total of three replicates were run for the ELISA experiment. The bar chart showing the optical density values was plotted using GraphPad Prism (version 8.2.1, San Diego, CA, USA).

2.10. Cellular antiproliferation assay The inhibitory potency of the SD antibody was evaluated by an antiproliferation assay using human erythroleukaemic TF-1 cells (ATCC® CRL-2003™) in which the antibody competed with IL-4 or IL- 13 for binding to IL-4R, a shared receptor target. Inhibition of consti­ tutive growth factors, such as GM-CSF, IL-4, and IL-13, abates the long- term proliferation of TF-1 cells (Drexler et al., 1997). The cells were cultured in complete growth medium (CGM) composed of RPMI-1640 supplemented with 2.0 g/L NaHCO3, 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 1%

Antibiotic-Antimycotic, and 2 ng/mL rhGM-CSF. For the assay, cells were centrifuged at 100 × g for 10 min and resuspended in the assay medium (CGM less rhGM-CSF) at a concentration of 6.25 × 105 cells/ mL. The harvested cells were added to a flat-bottom 96-well microplate (TPP®, Trasadingen, Switzerland) at a volume of 120 μL per well and starved for 24 hours at 37 ◦C and 5% CO2. The selected antibody for­ mulations were reconstituted in ultrapure water and the solutions, including the unprocessed antibody controls, were serially diluted 3-fold in the assay medium to produce 10 antibody concentrations. Each of these was supplemented with either 30 µL of rhIL-4 or rhIL-13 to salvage the cells, such that the final reaction mixture contained an interleukin at a fixed concentration of 8 ng/mL, with the antibody at a concentration that spanned from 5 ng/mL to 100 μg/mL. The test solutions were added in duplicate and the plate was incubated for a further 48 hours. Three hours prior to the end of this period, 10 μL of CCK-8 was added to each well. At the end of the entire incubation period, the plate was mixed gently on a microplate mixer and the absorbance was read at 450 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Multiskan

GO). The assays were run in triplicate and data fitted with nonlinear regression to a sigmoidal equation using GraphPad Prism. The optical density values were normalised to the best-fit top (100%) and bottom (0%) values of the unprocessed antibody control for each run and plotted as a function of the common logarithm of the antibody con­ centration to obtain the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50).

2.11. Inhibition of STAT6 activation TF-1 cells transfected with a STAT6-driven luciferase (Luc) reporter construct (designated TF-1/STAT6-Luc) were cultured in CGM. Between

12 and 16 hours prior to the experiment, the medium was changed to

RPMI-1640 with 5% FBS and the cells were left to incubate overnight at

37 ◦C. On the day of the experiment, 12 different concentrations of antibody (Fab: 9.41 pg/mL–1.67 µg/mL; full-length antibody: 27.8 pg/ mL–4.93 µg/mL), diluted 3-fold, were added at 50 µL per well to a 96- well microplate in duplicate. The cells were harvested and resus­ pended in RPMI-1640 with 5% FBS, and inoculated at 50 µL into each well. The plate was left in the incubator for 30 min. Thereafter, 50 µL of rhIL-4 or rhIL-13 was added to each well to achieve a final interleukin concentration of 2 (rhIL-4) or 20 ng/mL (rhIL-13) and cell density of 0.5

× 105 cells/mL. This was followed by a five-hour incubation and 50 µL of luciferase substrate was added to each well. After 10 min, the plate was read at 560 nm. The ratio of firefly:Renilla/TK luminescence in relative light units (RLU) for each well was calculated. A four-parameter regression was performed by GraphPad Prism, and the RLU-antibody concentration curves were plotted, from which the IC50 could be ob­ tained. The experiment was performed three times.

2.12. Statistical analysis All data are reported as mean ± standard deviation where applicable. Differences in optical density and IC50 values were assessed using paired two-tailed Student’s t-test on GraphPad Prism. P values <

0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results 3.1. Spray drying The inlet and outlet temperatures for all 11 formulations and their processing yield are shown in Table 2. The processing yield is defined as the percentage of powder weight collected over the total solute mass in the feed solution. The inlet temperature was lowered for the antibody formulations to minimise heat stress. The outlet temperature ranged from 98 to 100 ◦C for the excipient platforms, and from 62 to 63 ◦C for the antibody formulations. Among the excipient platforms, the addition of leucine, even at 5% w/w, increased the production from approxi­ mately 46% to above 60%. The yields for the antibody formulations were higher, between 73% and 84%.

3.2. Particle morphology Representative scanning electron photographs of the SD particles are shown in Fig. 1. The particle morphology exhibited striking variations as the leucine content is increased. At low leucine concentrations of 5% and 10% w/w (E1 and E2), the particles were similar to 100% SD

2HPβCD (E0). However, at higher leucine concentrations, E3 was highly creased with interparticle fibre-like features on a rough surface, whereas the globoid structure was largely absent in E4 and was instead replaced by hollow particles that were heterogeneously irregular in shape. At a high antibody concentration of 50% w/w (F3 and M3), the particles were more globular in shape, with multiple dimple-like features on a rough surface. In contrast, the formulations with lower antibody con­ centrations (F1,2 and M1,2) generally resembled E4; the microparticles manifested a collapsed hollow sphere morphology by enfolding upon themselves. The surface of these particles also appears more rugose.

Most of the visualised particles were smaller than 5 µm in diameter.

3.3. Thermal analyses The DSC thermograms of the leucine-containing powder formula­ tions (all except E0) are distinct from that of the 2HPβCD-only formu­ lation (E0) in respect of the additional endothermic peaks at temperatures between 230 and 270 ◦C, due to the presence of crystalline leucine (Fig. 2). These peaks shift rightwards, closer to the known melting point of leucine (~287 ◦C), and become more pronounced, as the leucine component begins to dominate in the formulations (Yal­ kowsky et al., 2010). The existence of residual water in the powders is evident in the other downward endothermic peaks below 100 ◦C that are much broader. Although this peak is present in all the formulations, it is slightly more prominent in F3 and M3, which contained a lower con­ centration of the hydrophobic leucine.

The residual water content of the antibody formulations was deter­ mined by TGA after spray drying (Table 2). The Fab formulations con­ tained marginally more moisture compared with the mAb formulations, and the water content was highest in the formulations that had the lowest concentration of leucine (i.e., F3 and M3). Nevertheless, the mean water content of all the powders tested was low and ranged be­ tween 1.4 ± 0.2% and 2.6 ± 0.3% w/w, demonstrating the drying ef­ ficiency of the formulation and process to keep moisture at bay.

3.4. Aerosol performance The EF and FPF obtained from the cascade impactor experiments, representing the dispersibility and respirable fraction of a powder formulation, respectively, are shown in Fig. 3. For the excipient plat­ forms, the EF rises from around 54% to 81% as the relative leucine

H.W. Pan et al.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics 644 (2023) 123272

5 content is gradually increased. Notably, formulation E4 had the highest

EF as well as FPF of nearly 70%, therefore a 1:1 leucine-to-2HPβCD ratio was chosen as the excipient foundation for the antibody formulations.

The mean EF of all six antibody formulations was above 80%. Apart from M3, which had an FPF of about 61%, the mean FPF of the rest of the antibody formulations was between 72% and 75%. The best aerosoli­ sation characteristics belonged to the formulations containing 25% antibody and 75% excipients, i.e., F2 (EF, 86.5 ± 1.7%; FPF, 75.3 ±

2.7%) and M2 (EF, 85.6 ± 2.4%; FPF, 75.2 ± 4.4%).

The MMAD and GSD values calculated from the aerosolisation per­ formance analysis are also displayed in Table 2. With the exception of formulation E3, the dae of the particles was within the critical size range of 1 to 3 µm that is optimal for pulmonary deposition (Chow et al., 2007;

Malcolmson and Embleton, 1998), while the GSD values (≥1.22)

Table 2 Spray-drying outcomes: outlet temperature, processing yield, mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD), geometric standard deviation (GSD), and residual moisture content (RMC).

Formulation Inlet temperature (◦C) Outlet temperature (◦C)

Processing yield (%) MMAD (µm) GSD RMC (% w/w) Excipient-only formulation platforms

E0 150 100 46.4 1.83 2.09 – E1 150 99 60.4 2.04 2.26

– E2 150 99 61.6 2.77 1.94 – E3 150 98 71.9 4.19 2.07

– E4 150 98 67.5 1.64 2.34 – Antibody-containing formulations

F1 100 62 73.0 1.46 2.33 2.1 ± 0.3 F2 100 62 78.0 1.68

2.24 1.9 ± 0.3 F3 100 62 83.3 1.95 2.16 2.6 ± 0.3 M1

100 63 73.7 1.50 2.30 1.4 ± 0.2 M2 100 63 76.4 1.59

2.24 1.8 ± 0.1 M3 100 63 84.1 2.38 2.17 2.0 ± 0.3 Fig. 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the (a) excipient-only formulations and (b) antibody-containing formulations. Scale bar = 5 µm.

H.W. Pan et al.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics 644 (2023) 123272

6 indicate a heterodisperse distribution, which is typical for therapeutic aerosols (Labiris and Dolovich, 2003; Laube et al., 2011). In the anti­ body formulations, raising the protein-to-excipient ratio increased the

MMAD, which appears to have a moderate yield-enhancing effect. This is probably related to the separation efficiency of the cyclone, as smaller particles are more difficult to be segregated from the gas stream (Prinn et al., 2002).

Fig. 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms of the (a) excipient platforms and (b) antibody formulations.

Fig. 3. Aerosolisation performance of the excipient platforms and antibody formulations assessed using a Next Generation Impactor (NGI), n = 3. EF: emitted fraction; FPF: fine particle fraction (cutoff aerodynamic diameter < 5 µm).

Fig. 4. SDS-PAGE gel images of the antibody formulations. DTT: dithiothreitol; Fab: antigen-binding fragment; mAb: full-length monoclonal antibody; PM: physical mixture (feed solution); SD: spray-dried; up: unprocessed.

H.W. Pan et al.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics 644 (2023) 123272

7 3.5. Antibody stability Electrophoretic protein separation was used to study the structural integrity of the antibody after spray drying, given that the high tem­ peratures involved in the process could potentially cause thermal degradation, leading to fragmentation (Vlasak and Ionescu, 2011). The gel in the left panel of Fig. 4 shows that the Fab migrated under non- reducing conditions with an apparent molecular weight of ~45 kDa, while a thick band between 115 and 185 kDa was observed for the intact mAb samples. The additional lighter bands at around 20 kDa in the Fab samples were probably due to an extraneous protein contaminant in the stock antibody solution. The disulfide bonds of the antibodies on the gel in the right panel was reduced, which gave rise to a band at approxi­ mately 25 kDa for the Fab formulations (F1–3), and two primary bands at about 50 and 25 kDa for the mAb formulations (M1–3). Importantly, the patterns of the bands of the SD samples are essentially the same as those of the untreated antibody, indicating that there is no evidence of heat-induced fragmentation as a result of the spray-drying process (Nowak et al., 2017).

Stresses during spray drying and storage can destabilise proteins and induce aggregation, which remains a huge challenge in the development of biotechnology products as it can lead to immunogenicity and other adverse effects, batch-to-batch variability, and impaired efficacy (Lowe et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2010). To monitor antibody aggregation, the monomer content of the SD formulations was measured using SEC at two time points, 1 week and 10 months post-spray drying (Fig. 5). Monomer content is a crucial parameter of physical stability as unfolded proteins, even partially, are inherently aggregation-prone (Wu et al., 2014) and this has implications in the safety and efficacy of antibody-based phar­ maceutical products (Hickey and Stewart, 2022). The unprocessed antibody was included at the first time point to discern aggregation attributable to the drying process. One week after spray drying, the average monomer content of the Fab formulations was close to 100% (99.8–99.9% vs. Fab-up 99.8%). For the full-length mAb formulations, the difference in monomer content between SD and unprocessed anti­ bodies was small (86.0–99.0% vs. 93.6%, respectively). At 10 months post-spray drying, the largest decrement in monomer content was detected in F3 (99.9% to 90.0%), whereas the other formulations registered reductions of no more than 2.8%. This is fairly remarkable considering the samples were not frozen or stored under refrigeration throughout the study.

3.6. Antigen-binding ability and inhibitory potency

Two representative formulations, one each from the Fab and intact mAb formulations, advanced to in vitro experiments for assessment of the biological activity of the SD antibodies relative to their respective unprocessed (up) counterparts. Among the six antibody formulations, F2 and M2 were chosen in view of their better aerosol performance, since the other characteristics, such as particle morphology, residual water content, and protein structural integrity, did not demonstrate superior­ ity of any particular formulation. The binding ability of the antibody to plate-coated rhIL-4Rα was assessed by ELISA (Fig. 6) at two empirically selected antibody concentrations, 1 and 100 µg/mL. There was no sta­ tistically significant difference between the Fab-up and F2 (1 µg/mL: p

= 0.4815; 100 µg/mL: p = 0.9904) or between mAb-up and M2 (1 µg/ mL: p = 0.5810; 100 µg/mL: p = 0.1549).

Given that the antibody interferes with the binding of IL-4 and IL-13 to IL-4R, the antiproliferation assay used TF-1 cells that have an absolute dependence on specific growth factors for survival (Drexler et al., 1997) to compare the inhibitory activity of the SD antibody as IC50 with that of the unprocessed (up) antibody. The TF-1 cells were separately exposed to rhIL-4 and rhIL-13, and the antibody concentration–response curves are shown respectively in the top and bottom panels of Fig. 7. In each of the four graphs, the two curves largely overlap each other, underscoring the almost identical inhibitory profiles of the tested antibody samples. In the presence of rhIL-4, the IC50 values were 0.534 ± 0.279 µg/mL (Fab- up), 0.535 ± 0.336 µg/mL (F2), 0.964 ± 0.458 µg/mL (mAb-up), and

1.262 ± 0.248 µg/mL (M2). There was no statistically significant dif­ ference in the IC50 between the SD antibody and the unprocessed anti­ body (F2 vs. Fab-up, p = 0.9861; M2 vs. mAb-up, p = 0.1465). With rhIL- 13, the IC50 values were 0.081 ± 0.006 µg/mL (Fab-up), 0.082 ± 0.024 µg/mL (F2), 0.123 ± 0.055 µg/mL (mAb-up), and 0.134 ± 0.030 µg/mL

Fig. 5. Antibody monomer content of antibody formulations at 1 week and 10 months post-spray drying quantified by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), n = 3.

Fab: antigen-binding fragment; mAb: full-length monoclonal antibody; up: unprocessed.

Fig. 6. Antigen-binding ability of the antibody in the selected Fab (F2) and mAb (M2) formulations determined by ELISA (n = 3). 96-well plates were coated with rhIL-4Rα. Fab: antigen-binding fragment; mAb: full-length mono­ clonal antibody; up: unprocessed.

H.W. Pan et al.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics 644 (2023) 123272

8 (M2). Again, no statistically significant difference was found between the formulated antibody and the untreated antibody control (F2 vs. Fab- up, p = 0.9822; M2 vs. mAb-up, p = 0.5696).

The TF-1 cells used to study the inhibitory effect of the antibody on

STAT6 signalling pathway (Fig. 8) were stably transfected to express a luciferase reporter gene regulated by a STAT6-responsive promoter.

With rhIL-4-induced STAT6 activation, the IC50 values were 9.79 ±

0.34 ng/mL (Fab-up), 8.75 ± 0.41 ng/mL (F2), 15.93 ± 1.89 ng/mL (mAb-up), and 14.97 ± 0.62 ng/mL (M2). The difference in IC50 be­ tween the formulated and untreated antibodies was not statistically significant (F2 vs. Fab-up, p = 0.0589; M2 vs. mAb-up, p = 0.3229).

When induced by rhIL-13, the IC50 values were 9.79 ± 0.21 ng/mL (Fab- up), 9.60 ± 0.55 ng/mL (F2), 15.09 ± 3.28 ng/mL (mAb-up), and 12.32

± 1.82 ng/mL (M2). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in the IC50 between the SD antibody and the unprocessed antibody (F2 vs. Fab-up, p = 0.5707; M2 vs. mAb-up, p = 0.4350). The

ELISA results, cellular antiproliferation assay, and the inhibition of

STAT6 activity effectively illustrate that the antigen-binding capacity and inhibitory potency of both SD Fab and full-length mAb were retained relative to their initial state before spray drying.

Fig. 7. Concentration-response curves of the inhibitory effect of the antibody in the selected Fab (F2) and intact mAb (M2) formulations on the proliferation of TF-1 cells (n = 3) stimulated by (a) rhIL-4 or (b) rhIL-13. The optical density is normalised with respect to the best-fit top (100%) and bottom (0%) values of the un­ processed antibody curve in the individual runs. [Ab]: concentration of antibody; Fab: antigen-binding fragment; mAb: full-length monoclonal antibody; up: unprocessed.

Fig. 8. Concentration-response curves of the inhibitory effect of the antibody in the selected Fab (F2) and intact mAb (M2) formulations on the activation of the

STAT6 signalling pathway by (a) rhIL-4 or (b) rhIL-13 in TF-1/STAT6-Luc cells (n = 3). [Ab]: concentration of antibody; Fab: antigen-binding fragment; mAb: full- length monoclonal antibody; up: unprocessed.

H.W. Pan et al.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics 644 (2023) 123272

9 4. Discussion In our previous work, the anti-IL-4Rα mAb was spray-dried and spray-freeze-dried with 2HPβCD as the protein stabiliser (Pan et al.,

2022). Although the antibody was decently stabilised and retained its antigen-binding ability and in vitro biological activity, powder dis­ persibility was suboptimal, plausibly impaired by the high residual water content (7–9% w/w) detected. Spray drying at a higher temper­ ature might ameliorate this, since the relative humidity of the drying gas would be increased, leading to a dryer product. Particles with lower moisture content are less likely to be fused together by solid bridges to form larger agglomerates (Li et al., 2016). Nonetheless, excessively high temperatures should be avoided in preparations containing heat- sensitive biologics. Not only is moisture suspected to be a factor affecting the aerosolisation of powder formulations, water can also act as a plasticiser to potently lower the glass transition temperature of the excipient and increase local mobility of the embedded bio­ macromolecules, which destabilises the protein (Mensink et al., 2017).

To enhance drying efficiency and circumvent moisture adsorption, leucine, a hydrophobic amino acid, was co-formulated at different weight ratios with 2HPβCD to investigate whether its incorporation would improve the aerodynamic characteristics of the powders compared with 2HPβCD alone.

Numerous studies have examined amino acid-based multi-compo­ nent SD powder preparations for respiratory administration. They encompassed excipient-only platforms (Mangal et al., 2015; Sou et al.,

2013) and formulations containing small-molecule drugs (Mah et al.,

2019; Seville et al., 2007), small interfering RNA (Chow et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2022), antibodies (Faghihi et al., 2019; Shepard et al., 2021), and vaccines (Gomez et al., 2021; Lovalenti et al., 2016). However, in these studies, the co-excipients applied together with amino acids were pri­ marily trehalose and mannitol, and none included any cyclodextrin. As such, 2HPβCD plus leucine was a novel combination in this regard.

Mannitol crystallises easily (Eedara et al., 2021), which is detrimental to the biomacromolecule due to the combined effects of shear stresses and loss of protein–sugar interactions that are important for protein stabi­ lisation (Izutsu et al., 1994; Mensink et al., 2017). Unlike mannitol, cyclodextrins tend to form amorphous glasses (Serno et al., 2011). Be­ sides, it is usual for spray drying to generate amorphous glassy matrix (Chow et al., 2007), an essential aspect of the vitrification mechanism of protein stabilisation by sugars in the solid state (Mensink et al., 2017).

The first recognisable benefit of including leucine in the formulations was the increase in processing yield, a vital consideration in the scale-up of biopharmaceutical manufacturing (Hernandez, 2016). Although on an industrial level spray drying can attain close to 100% yield, some powder adhesion and accumulation on the interior of the cyclone was visibly noted here, which could explain for the loss of product (Bowey et al., 2013).

The value of leucine in the formulations was clearly in enhancing the aerosolisation of the powder formulations. The mechanisms through which leucine promotes dispersion are multifaceted, from keeping water out to modifying the surface composition and morphology of the SD particles (Alhajj et al., 2021). It has been suggested that powder flow­ ability or dispersibility is influenced by surface corrugation in two ways, altering the contact area between particles and mechanical interlocking or entrapment of adjacent particles (Chew and Chan, 2001; Walton and

Mumford, 1999b). From the SEM images, leucine plus 2HPβCD yielded surface-corrugated microparticles, and the extent of corrugation and collapse of the outer shells increases with the leucine content. These morphological changes were consistent with observations in other studies that employed leucine as a dispersion enhancer (Mangal et al.,

2015; Sou et al., 2013). The higher EF and FPF exhibited by E4 were perhaps ascribed to the high surface rugosity of the irregularly-shaped particles which reduced interparticle contact. Furthermore, the folded and hollow structure of the particles secondary to the inflation, rupture, and collapse of the crystalline crusts formed during the initial phase of drying lowered the density and thus the MMAD (Walton and Mumford,

1999a). However, overcorrugation can cause smaller particles to become embedded in the grooves of larger particles (Sou et al., 2013), and this effect may have ramifications for aerosolisation performance as the interparticulate cohesive forces intensify, inducing agglomeration, and the particles encounter more resistive airflow, which impacts powder fluidisation (Cui et al., 2018).

Another possible explanation for the improved aerosolisation by the addition of leucine into the formulation could be its ability to regulate water content in the powder by anti-hygroscopic effect. Even with the inclusion of a protein up to 50% w/w in the formulation, the residual moisture content of the assessed powders was no greater than 3% by weight. Such aridity is enough to inhibit crystallisation of the amor­ phous components and confer excellent powder flowability (Mah et al.,

2019). Bevacizumab was co-spray-dried with trehalose and leucine (at

40%, 40%, 20% w/w, respectively) for pulmonary delivery in a study and the measured moisture content was between 3% and 4%, while the

FPF (cutoff dae < 5 µm) was 82% (Shepard et al., 2021). Notwith­ standing the somewhat different formulation compositions and experi­ mental conditions, these results were comparable to those obtained here. There are two projected moisture-protective mechanisms, the crystallinity of leucine and its enrichment on the particle surface. With a sufficient concentration of leucine in the feed solution, e.g., greater than

10% w/w, leucine should reach supersaturation early in the spray- drying process and crystallise, considering that it is sparingly soluble in water (~22 mg/mL at room temperature) (Yalkowsky et al., 2010) and migrates to the droplet surface (Mangal et al., 2015; Vehring, 2008).

The moisture uptake by crystalline leucine on SD particle surface is limited (Li et al., 2016). The accumulation of leucine on the surface of

SD particles quantified by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy has previ­ ously been reported (Mah et al., 2019; Mangal et al., 2015; Xu et al.,

2022). The chemical structure of a leucine molecule comprises distinct hydrophilic (amino and carboxylic acid groups) and lipophilic (aliphatic isobutyl side chain) moieties (Chow et al., 2017). This amphiphilicity of leucine predisposes its accretion on the particle surface (Weissbuch et al., 1990). Protein molecules too display the tendency to amass at air- solution interfaces due to their surface-active nature, however, their much larger molecular weight retards diffusion towards the core (Adler et al., 2000; Grasmeijer et al., 2016). Hence, it was hypothesised that leucine would compete with the antibody for accumulation on the sur­ face, decreasing the relative amount of proteins there. This not only enhances protein stability, since adsorption at interfaces promotes unfolding and aggregation of the protein (Wang et al., 2010), but also increases the level of powder dryness.

In the context of dehydrated biopharmaceuticals, a higher level of dryness is usually preferred, however, this is not always the case, as established in studies involving lyophilised excipient-free tissue-type plasminogen activator (Hsu et al., 1992) and plasma-derived IgG with sucrose (Duralliu et al., 2020). Beyond a certain threshold, denaturation resumes, therefore, it can be interpreted that an optimum residual moisture content may exist for each protein. Over-drying (e.g., < 1% water content) can transpire even in the presence of stabilising sugar excipients, especially when large rigid polysaccharides, for instance, some cyclodextrins, are used. This is perhaps due to inefficient hydrogen bonding, which makes local mobility more facile (Mensink et al., 2017).

Moreover, electrostatic charges on particle surfaces may build up in extreme dryness (Elajnaf et al., 2006), facilitating agglomeration and could seriously hinder powder fluidisation (Kaialy, 2016). Nevertheless, based on the physical stability observed in the gel electrophoretic and filtration analyses, the SD antibody formulations here did not appear to be overdried.

The binding ability of the antibody to IL-4Rα was investigated using

ELISA and found to be tantamount to that of the unformulated antibody.

Likewise, in the antiproliferation assays, the cytokine rescue of the starved TF-1 cells that were bereft of essential growth factors was inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner to similar extents by the

H.W. Pan et al.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics 644 (2023) 123272

10 formulated and unprocessed antibodies. These results were construed as adequate stabilisation of the SD antibody. The smaller IC50 values observed in the rhIL-13 assays compared to those in the rhIL-4 could be explained by the existence of an additional signalling pathway, inde­ pendent of STAT6 activation, for the IL-4/IL-4Rα complex to produce growth factors that stimulate TF-1 proliferation. Indeed, this complex recruits the common γc subunit to activate gene transcription through a downstream signalling adaptor molecule, insulin receptor substrate-2 (McCormick and Heller, 2015). At the single cytokine concentration (8 ng/mL) added to the cells, the stimulatory effect was saturated for IL- 4, but not for IL-13, which mediated roughly 60% maximal effect. This could presumably be rationalised by the different binding affinities and proliferative responses reported for IL-4 and IL-13. IL-4 binds to IL-4Rα with a much higher affinity than IL-13 to IL-13Rα1 (LaPorte et al.,

2008). The stimulation index of IL-4 is also higher than that of IL-13 (Drexler et al., 1997). In addition, the number of binding sites on TF-1 cells for IL-4 is double that for IL-13 (Lefort et al., 1995). Consequen­ tially, the EC50 is higher for IL-13 compared with IL-4.

The active ingredients presented in this study included not only a full-length mAb, but also the Fab. In local inhaled therapy, larger bio­ macromolecules may be preferable since unintended absorption from the lung (Patton, 1996) and degradation by lung proteases (Fr¨ohlich and

Salar-Behzadi, 2021) are both inversely related to molecular weight.

However, utilising just the Fab without the crystallisable fragment (Fc) region that is present in the full-length mAb is logical given that the antibody mechanism of action relies on the Fab engaging with IL-4Rα for therapeutic efficacy in asthma. Furthermore, the role of the Fc domain is less pertinent in inhaled therapy where systemic absorption and extended serum half-life is not sought (Chow et al., 2023). Future work might be pursued in two directions. Firstly, the in vivo biological activity of the SD antibody in animal models should be explored, in conjunction with pulmonary toxicity assessment of the excipients in the respiratory tract. Secondly, more comprehensive characterisation of the powder formulations, for example, in relation to the protein-excipient in­ teractions (Chen et al., 2021), antibody-antigen binding kinetics (Yang et al., 2017), and surface area-porosity analysis (Ji et al., 2016), could be undertaken. In spite of their medical utility and applications in phar­ maceutical research, certain relevant physicochemical properties of cyclodextrins, in particular, hygroscopicity and density, remain ambig­ uous (Day et al., 2020), thus a better understanding of these properties would also be useful.

5. Conclusions This study co-formulated 2HPβCD with leucine to produce a dual- excipient platform by spray drying for pulmonary delivery of solid- state biomacromolecules. The incorporation of leucine into the formu­ lation boosted the processing yield and aerosol performance, with a 1:1 weight ratio of both excipients exhibiting the most favourable outcomes among the tested powders. The improvement in powder aerosolisation was imputed to particle surface and morphology modifications as well as water repellent by leucine. Spray-dried powders of an anti-IL-4Rα mAb and its Fab founded upon this excipient ratio emulated the physico­ chemical and aerodynamic characteristics of their formulation platform predecessor. The moisture content of the powder antibody formulations was within an acceptable range of between 1% and 3% w/w, while only minor changes in antibody monomer content over a period of 10 months at ambient storage conditions were detected. The in vitro antigen- binding capability and cellular inhibitory potency of the dehydrated antibody were comparatively well-preserved. Collectively, the results here validate the feasibility of a successful inhaled biologic product for the local treatment of severe asthma.

CRediT authorship contribution statement Harry W. Pan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Jinlin Guo: Investigation. Lingqiao Zhu: Writing

– review & editing. Susan W.S. Leung: Writing – review & editing.

Chenghai Zhang: Supervision. Jenny K.W. Lam: Conceptualization,

Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Supervision,

Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data availability Data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgements This project was funded by the Seed Funding for Strategic Interdis­ ciplinary Research Scheme, The University of Hong Kong (HKU). H.W.P. is a recipient of the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship, Research Grants

Council, Hong Kong (PF18-13277). The authors thank Mr Ray Lee and

Ms Xinyue Zhang (Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, HKU) for their kind assistance with the TGA measurements.

References Adler, M., Unger, M., Lee, G., 2000. Surface Composition of Spray-Dried Particles of

Bovine Serum Albumin/Trehalose/Surfactant. Pharm Res 17, 863–870.

Alhajj, N., O’Reilly, N.J., Cathcart, H., 2021. Leucine as an excipient in spray dried powder for inhalation. Drug Discov Today 26, 2384–2396.

Al-Nakib, W., Higgins, P.G., Barrow, G.I., Tyrrell, D.A., Andries, K., Bussche, G.V.,

Taylor, N., Janssen, P.A., 1989. Suppression of colds in human volunteers challenged with rhinovirus by a new synthetic drug (R61837). Antimicrob Agents Chemother

33, 522–525.

Borghardt, J.M., Kloft, C., Sharma, A., 2018. Inhaled therapy in respiratory disease: The complex interplay of pulmonary kinetic processes. Can Respir J 2018, 2732017.

Bowey, K., Swift, B.E., Flynn, L.E., Neufeld, R.J., 2013. Characterization of biologically active insulin-loaded alginate microparticles prepared by spray drying. Drug Dev Ind

Pharm 39, 457–465.

Chang, R.Y.K., Chow, M.Y.T., Khanal, D., Chen, D., Chan, H.-K., 2021. Dry powder pharmaceutical biologics for inhalation therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 172, 64–79.

Chang, L., Pikal, M.J., 2009. Mechanisms of protein stabilization in the solid state.

J Pharm Sci 98, 2886–2908.

Chen, Y., Ling, J., Li, M., Su, Y., Arte, K.S., Mutukuri, T.T., Taylor, L.S., Munson, E.J.,

Topp, E.M., Zhou, Q.T., 2021. Understanding the impact of protein-excipient interactions on physical stability of spray-dried protein solids. Mol Pharm 18,

2657–2668.

Chew, N.Y.K., Chan, H.-K., 2001. Use of solid corrugated particles to enhance powder aerosol performance. Pharm Res 18, 1570–1577.

Chow, M.Y.T., Qiu, Y., Lo, F.F.K., Lin, H.H.S., Chan, H.-K., Kwok, P.C.L., Lam, J.K.W.,

2017. Inhaled powder formulation of naked siRNA using spray drying technology with ʟ-leucine as dispersion enhancer. Int J Pharm 530, 40–52.

Chow, M.Y.T., Pan, H.W., Seow, H.C., Lam, J.K.W., 2023. Inhalable neutralizing antibodies – promising approach to combating respiratory viral infections. Trends

Pharmacol Sci 44, 85–97.

Chow, A.H.L., Tong, H.H.Y., Chattopadhyay, P., Shekunov, B.Y., 2007. Particle

Engineering for Pulmonary Drug Delivery. Pharm Res 24, 411–437.

Chung, K.F., Wenzel, S.E., Brozek, J.L., Bush, A., Castro, M., Sterk, P.J., Adcock, I.M.,

Bateman, E.D., Bel, E.H., Bleecker, E.R., Boulet, L.-P., Brightling, C., Chanez, P.,

Dahlen, S.-E., Djukanovic, R., Frey, U., Gaga, M., Gibson, P., Hamid, Q., Jarjour, N.

N., Mauad, T., Sorkness, R.L., Teague, W.G., 2014. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J 43, 343–373.

Clark, A.R., Weers, J.G., Dhand, R., 2020. The confusing world of dry powder inhalers: it is all about inspiratory pressures, not inspiratory flow rates. J Aerosol Med Pulm

Drug Deliv 33, 1–11.

Cui, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, W., Huang, Z., Zhao, Z., Wang, G., Cai, S., Jing, H., Huang, Y.,

Pan, X., Wu, C., 2018. Moisture-Resistant Co-Spray-Dried Netilmicin with ʟ-Leucine as Dry powder inhalation for the treatment of respiratory infections. Pharmaceutics

10, 252.

Day, C.P.F., Miloserdov, A., Wildish-Jones, K., Pearson, E., Carruthers, A.E., 2020.

Quantifying the hygroscopic properties of cyclodextrin containing aerosol for drug delivery to the lungs. Phys Chem Chem Phys 22, 11327–11336.

Depreter, F., Pilcer, G., Amighi, K., 2013. Inhaled proteins: Challenges and perspectives.

Int J Pharm 447, 251–280.

H.W. Pan et al.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics 644 (2023) 123272

11 Drexler, H.G., Zaborski, M., Quentmeier, H., 1997. Cytokine response profiles of human myeloid factor-dependent leukemia cell lines. Leukemia 11, 701–708.

Duralliu, A., Matejtschuk, P., Stickings, P., Hassall, L., Tierney, R., Williams, D.R., 2020.

The Influence of moisture content and temperature on the long-term storage stability of freeze-dried high concentration immunoglobulin G (IgG). Pharmaceutics 12, 303.

Eedara, B.B., Alabsi, W., Encinas-Basurto, D., Polt, R., Mansour, H.M., 2021. Spray-dried inhalable powder formulations of therapeutic proteins and peptides. AAPS

PharmSciTech 22, 185.

Elajnaf, A., Carter, P., Rowley, G., 2006. Electrostatic characterisation of inhaled powders: Effect of contact surface and relative humidity. Eur J Pharm Sci 29,

375–384.

Evrard, B., Bertholet, P., Gueders, M., Flament, M.P., Piel, G., Delattre, L., Gayot, A.,

Leterme, P., Foidart, J.M., Cataldo, D., 2004. Cyclodextrins as a potential carrier in drug nebulization. J Control Release 96, 403–410.

Faghihi, H., Najafabadi, A.R., Daman, Z., Ghasemian, E., Montazeri, H., Vatanara, A.,

2019. Respiratory administration of infliximab dry powder for local suppression of inflammation. AAPS PharmSciTech 20, 128.

Finlay, W.H., Darquenne, C., 2020. Particle Size Distributions. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug

Deliv 33, 178–180.

Fr¨ohlich, E., Salar-Behzadi, S., 2021. Oral inhalation for delivery of proteins and peptides to the lungs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 163, 198–211.

Global Initiative for Asthma, 2022. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and

Prevention. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), Fontana, WI.

Gomez, M., McCollum, J., Wang, H., Bachchhav, S., Tetreau, I., Gerhardt, A., Press, C.,

Kramer, R.M., Fox, C.B., Vehring, R., 2021. Evaluation of the stability of a spray- dried tuberculosis vaccine candidate designed for dry powder respiratory delivery.

Vaccine 39, 5025–5036.

Grasmeijer, N., Frijlink, H.W., Hinrichs, W.L.J., 2016. Model to predict inhomogeneous protein–sugar distribution in powders prepared by spray drying. J Aerosol Sci 101,

22–33.

Hernandez, R., 2016. Scale-Up of Complex Biologics. BioPharm Int 29, 26–30.

Hickey, A.J., Stewart, I.E., 2022. Inhaled antibodies: Quality and performance considerations. Hum Vaccin Immunother 18, 1940650.

Hsu, C.C., Ward, C.A., Pearlman, R., Nguyen, H.M., Yeung, D.A., Curley, J.G., 1992.

Determining the optimum residual moisture in lyophilized protein pharmaceuticals.

Dev Biol Stand 74, 255–270.

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2020. GBD 2019 Cause and Risk Summary:

Asthma—Level 3 cause, 17 Oct 2020 ed. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), Seattle, WA, pp. S108-109. https://www.healthdata.org/results/gbd_s ummaries/2019/asthma-level-3-cause.

Irvine, D.J., Su, X., Kwong, B., 2013. Routes of Delivery for Biological Drug Products. In:

Gad, S.C. (Ed.), Pharmaceutical Sciences Encyclopedia. John Wiley & Sons Inc,

Hoboken, NJ, pp. 1–48.

Israel, E., Reddel, H.K., 2017. Severe and difficult-to-treat asthma in adults. N Engl J Med

377, 965–976.

Izutsu, K.-I., Yoshioka, S., Terao, T., 1994. Effect of mannitol crystallinity on the stabilization of enzymes during freeze-drying. Chem Pharm Bull 42, 5–8.

Jansook, P., Ogawa, N., Loftsson, T., 2018. Cyclodextrins: structure, physicochemical properties and pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm 535, 272–284.

Ji, S., Thulstrup, P.W., Mu, H., Hansen, S.H., van de Weert, M., Rantanen, J., Yang, M.,

2016. Effect of ethanol as a co-solvent on the aerosol performance and stability of spray-dried lysozyme. Int J Pharm 513, 175–182.

Kaialy, W., 2016. A review of factors affecting electrostatic charging of pharmaceuticals and adhesive mixtures for inhalation. Int J Pharm 503, 262–276.

Labiris, N.R., Dolovich, M.B., 2003. Pulmonary drug delivery. Part I: Physiological factors affecting therapeutic effectiveness of aerosolized medications. Br J Clin

Pharmacol 56, 588–599.

Lai, M.C., Topp, E.M., 1999. Solid-state chemical stability of proteins and peptides.

J Pharm Sci 88, 489–500.

LaPorte, S.L., Juo, Z.S., Vaclavikova, J., Colf, L.A., Qi, X., Heller, N.M., Keegan, A.D.,

Garcia, K.C., 2008. Molecular and Structural Basis of cytokine receptor pleiotropy in the interleukin-4/13 system. Cell 132, 259–272.

Laube, B.L., Janssens, H.M., de Jongh, F.H.C., Devadason, S.G., Dhand, R., Diot, P.,

Everard, M.L., Horvath, I., Navalesi, P., Voshaar, T., Chrystyn, H., 2011. What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies. Eur Respir J

37, 1308–1417.

Lefebvre, P., Duh, M.S., Lafeuille, M.-H., Gozalo, L., Desai, U., Robitaille, M.-N.,

Albers, F., Yancey, S., Ortega, H., Forshag, M., Lin, X., Dalal, A.A., 2015. Acute and chronic systemic corticosteroid-related complications in patients with severe asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 136, 1488–1495.

Lefort, S., Vita, N., Reeb, R., Caput, D., Ferrara, P., 1995. IL-13 and IL-4 share signal transduction elements as well as receptor components in TF-1 cells. FEBS Lett 366,

122–126.

Li, L., Sun, S., Parumasivam, T., Denman, J.A., Gengenbach, T., Tang, P., Mao, S.,

Chan, H.-K., 2016. ʟ-Leucine as an excipient against moisture on in vitro aerosolization performances of highly hygroscopic spray-dried powders. Eur J

Pharm Biopharm 102, 132–141.

Liang, W., Pan, H.W., Vllasaliu, D., Lam, J.K.W., 2020. Pulmonary delivery of biological drugs. Pharmaceutics 12, 1025.

Lovalenti, P.M., Anderl, J., Yee, L., Nguyen, V., Ghavami, B., Ohtake, S., Saxena, A.,

Voss, T., Truong-Le, V., 2016. Stabilization of live attenuated influenza vaccines by freeze drying, spray drying, and foam drying. Pharm Res 33, 1144–1160.

Lowe, D., Dudgeon, K., Rouet, R., Schofield, P., Jermutus, L., Christ, D., 2011.

Aggregation, stability, and formulation of human antibody therapeutics. In:

Donev, R. (Ed.), Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology. Academic

Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 41–61.

Mah, P.T., O’Connell, P., Focaroli, S., Lundy, R., O’Mahony, T.F., Hastedt, J.E., Gitlin, I.,

Oscarson, S., Fahy, J.V., Healy, A.M., 2019. The use of hydrophobic amino acids in protecting spray dried trehalose formulations against moisture-induced changes. Eur

J Pharm Biopharm 144, 139–153.

Malcolmson, R.J., Embleton, J.K., 1998. Dry powder formulations for pulmonary delivery. Pharm Sci Technol Today 1, 394–398.

Mangal, S., Meiser, F., Tan, G., Gengenbach, T., Denman, J., Rowles, M.R., Larson, I.,

Morton, D.A.V., 2015. Relationship between surface concentration of ʟ-leucine and bulk powder properties in spray dried formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 94,

160–169.

Matthews, A.A., Ee, P.L.R., Ge, R., 2020. Developing inhaled protein therapeutics for lung diseases. Mol Biomed 1, 11.

McCormick, S.M., Heller, N.M., 2015. Commentary: IL-4 and IL-13 receptors and signaling. Cytokine 75, 38–50.

Mensink, M.A., Frijlink, H.W., van der Voort Maarschalk, K., Hinrichs, W.L.J., 2017. How sugars protect proteins in the solid state and during drying (review): Mechanisms of stabilization in relation to stress conditions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 114, 288–295.

Nowak, C., K. Cheung, J., M. Dellatore, S., Katiyar, A., Bhat, R., Sun, J., Ponniah, G.,

Neill, A., Mason, B., Beck, A., Liu, H., 2017. Forced degradation of recombinant monoclonal antibodies: A practical guide. mAbs 9, 1217-1230. https://doi.org/10.1

080/19420862.2017.1368602.

Pan, H.W., Seow, H.C., Lo, J.C.K., Guo, J., Zhu, L., Leung, S.W.S., Zhang, C., Lam, J.K.W.,

2022. Spray-dried and spray-freeze-dried powder formulations of an anti- interleukin-4Rα antibody for pulmonary delivery. Pharm Res 39, 2291–2304.

Patton, J.S., 1996. Mechanisms of macromolecule absorption by the lungs. Adv Drug

Deliv Rev 19, 3–36.

Prinn, K.B., Costantino, H.R., Tracy, M., 2002. Statistical modeling of protein spray drying at the lab scale. AAPS PharmSciTech 3, 32–39.

Qiu, Y., Man, R.C.H., Liao, Q., Kung, K.L.K., Chow, M.Y.T., Lam, J.K.W., 2019. Effective mRNA pulmonary delivery by dry powder formulation of PEGylated synthetic KL4 peptide. J Control Release 314, 102–115.

Ramezani, V., Vatanara, A., Seyedabadi, M., Nabi Meibodi, M., Fanaei, H., 2017.

Application of cyclodextrins in antibody microparticles: potentials for antibody protection in spray drying. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 43, 1103–1111.

Serno, T., Geidobler, R., Winter, G., 2011. Protein stabilization by cyclodextrins in the liquid and dried state. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63, 1086–1106.

Seville, P.C., Learoyd, T.P., Li, H.Y., Williamson, I.J., Birchall, J.C., 2007. Amino acid- modified spray-dried powders with enhanced aerosolisation properties for pulmonary drug delivery. Powder Technol 178, 40–50.

Sharma, A., Khamar, D., Cullen, S., Hayden, A., Hughes, H., 2021. Innovative drying technologies for biopharmaceuticals. Int J Pharm 609, 121115.

Shepard, K.B., Vodak, D.T., Kuehl, P.J., Revelli, D., Zhou, Y., Pluntze, A.M., Adam, M.S.,

Oddo, J.C., Switala, L., Cape, J.L., Baumann, J.M., Banks, M., 2021. Local treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with a spray-dried bevacizumab formulation. AAPS

PharmSciTech 22, 230.

Shoyele, S.A., Slowey, A., 2006. Prospects of formulating proteins/peptides as aerosols for pulmonary drug delivery. Int J Pharm 314, 1–8.

Sou, T., Kaminskas, L.M., Nguyen, T.-H., Carlberg, R., McIntosh, M.P., Morton, D.A.V.,

2013. The effect of amino acid excipients on morphology and solid-state properties of multi-component spray-dried formulations for pulmonary delivery of biomacromolecules. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 83, 234–243.

The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 2014. Aerosols, Nasal Sprays, Metered- Dose Inhalers, and Dry Powder Inhalers, USP on Compounding – A Guide for the

Compounding Practitioner. United States Pharmacopeia (USP), Rockville, MD, pp.

152-178.

Vehring, R., 2008. Pharmaceutical particle engineering via spray drying. Pharm Res 25,

999–1022.

Vlasak, J., Ionescu, R., 2011. Fragmentation of monoclonal antibodies. MAbs 3,

253–263.

Walton, D.E., Mumford, C.J., 1999a. The morphology of spray-dried particles: The effect of process variables upon the morphology of spray-dried particles. Chem Eng Res Des

77, 442–460.

Walton, D.E., Mumford, C.J., 1999b. Spray dried products—characterization of particle morphology. Chem Eng Res Des 77, 21–38.

Wang, W., Nema, S., Teagarden, D., 2010. Protein aggregation—Pathways and influencing factors. Int J Pharm 390, 89–99.

Weissbuch, I., Frolow, F., Addadi, L., Lahav, M., Leiserowitz, L., 1990. Oriented crystallization as a tool for detecting ordered aggregates of water-soluble hydrophobic α-amino acids at the air-solution interface. J Am Chem Soc 112,

7718–7724.

White, S., Bennett, D.B., Cheu, S., Conley, P.W., Guzek, D.B., Gray, S., Howard, J.,

Malcolmson, R., Parker, J.M., Roberts, P., Sadrzadeh, N., Schumacher, J.D.,

Seshadri, S., Sluggett, G.W., Stevenson, C.L., Harper, N.J., 2005. EXUBERA®: pharmaceutical development of a novel product for pulmonary delivery of insulin.

Diabetes Technol Ther 7, 896–906.

Wu, H., Kroe-Barrett, R., Singh, S., Robinson, A.S., Roberts, C.J., 2014. Competing aggregation pathways for monoclonal antibodies. FEBS Lett 588, 936–941.

Xu, Y., Harinck, L., Lokras, A.G., Gerde, P., Selg, E., Sj¨oberg, C.-O., Franzyk, H.,

Thakur, A., Foged, C., 2022. Leucine improves the aerosol performance of dry powder inhaler formulations of siRNA-loaded nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 621,

121758.

H.W. Pan et al.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics 644 (2023) 123272

12 Yalkowsky, S.H., He, Y., Jain, P., 2010. Handbook of Aqueous Solubility Data, 2nd ed.

CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Yang, D., Singh, A., Wu, H., Kroe-Barrett, R., 2017. Determination of High-affinity

Antibody-antigen Binding Kinetics Using Four Biosensor Platforms. J Vis Exp e55659.

Ziaee, A., Albadarin, A.B., Padrela, L., Femmer, T., O’Reilly, E., Walker, G., 2019. Spray drying of pharmaceuticals and biopharmaceuticals: Critical parameters and experimental process optimization approaches. Eur J Pharm Sci 127, 300–318.

H.W. Pan et al.

📖 中文全文 Chinese Full Text

中文

# 双辅料喷雾干燥粉末制剂增强粉末分散性:用于重症哮喘局部治疗的抗体及其片段

## 摘要

生物制剂的出现为重症哮喘患者带来了新的希望。重症哮喘因对传统疗法反应差以及糖皮质激素依赖导致的不良反应而臭名昭著。然而,生物制剂通常以注射方式给药,因此无法发挥吸入疗法的优势,如提高作用部位的生物利用度、最小化全身副作用、无创性及自我给药等。在本研究中,将2-羟丙基-β-环糊精(2HPβCD)与L-亮氨酸以不同重量比共喷雾干燥,分别作为蛋白质稳定剂和分散增强剂,制备了一系列配方平台。对粉末雾化特性和颗粒形态进行了评估,以确定其是否适合肺部递送。选择雾化性能最佳的平台(辅料重量比为1:1),进一步加入靶向白细胞介素-4受体α(IL-4Rα)的单克隆抗体或其抗原结合片段(Fab)。双辅料抗体制剂在级联撞击器实验中表现出至少80%的排出分数(EF)和超过60%的细颗粒分数(FPF),残余水分含量在1%至3%的理想范围内。喷雾干燥后抗体的体外抗原结合能力和抑制活性得到了令人满意的保留。本研究结果证实了吸入固态生物大分子作为哮喘治疗策略的可行性。

## 1. 引言

采用生物制剂作为治疗手段的炎症性疾病范围不断扩大,哮喘也不例外。哮喘是一种主要的慢性呼吸系统疾病,2019年全球有超过2.62亿人受其影响(健康指标与评估研究所,2020)。重症哮喘约占哮喘患者的3%至10%,通常需要最大剂量吸入性糖皮质激素联合长效β2受体激动剂治疗(Chung等,2014;全球哮喘防治创议,2022)。对于尽管接受高吸入剂量治疗仍出现症状加重或症状控制不佳的患者,或依赖维持性口服糖皮质激素(与严重长期不良反应相关)的患者(Lefebvre等,2015),生物制剂疗法是一种选择。由于重症哮喘通常由2型炎症驱动,其特征为气道嗜酸性粒细胞增多及辅助性T细胞2型(Th2)分泌的细胞因子,如白细胞介素(IL)-4、IL-5和IL-13(Israel和Reddel,2017),临床和研究中使用的免疫球蛋白(Ig)有针对性地靶向这些通路。

目前已有数种单克隆抗体(mAb)获美国FDA批准用于治疗重症哮喘,包括奥马珠单抗(IgE拮抗剂)、美泊利珠单抗和瑞利珠单抗(IL-5拮抗剂)、度普利尤单抗(IL-4受体拮抗剂)、贝那利珠单抗(IL-5受体拮抗剂)和tezepelumab(胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素拮抗剂)。这些药物均为胃肠外给药,增加了脱靶全身副作用的风险,且与局部治疗相比可能需要更大剂量(Borghardt等,2018;Irvine等,2013)。无创给药途径无疑更受患者和医护人员的青睐,尤其是在哮喘等慢性疾病的管理中。市场上已有多种哮喘吸入产品,通过口服吸入实现肺部靶向递化的优势包括起效迅速、全身不良反应减少、局部生物利用度高以及潜在剂量降低(Liang等,2020)。尽管已有研究使用干粉吸入器(DPI)或雾化器进行抗体的肺部递送(Hickey和Stewart,2022;Matthews等,2020),但DPI类吸入装置与不稳定的生物大分子更为兼容,因其不会产生热量(Shoyele和Slowey,2006)或产生大面积气-液界面(Fröhlich和Salar-Behzadi,2021)。在雾化过程中,蛋白质处于液态,需要冷链运输,这会增加制造成本、对环境产生负面影响并使物流操作复杂化(Sharma等,2021)。相比之下,通过DPI递送的蛋白质处于固态,通过适当配方可以延长保质期和稳定性(Chang和Pikal,2009),因为化学和物理降解反应主要由水解驱动(Lai和Topp,1999)。研究表明,患者吸气努力产生的压降不低于1 kPa是有效流化和分散DPI中粉末所必需的(Clark等,2020)。在大多数市售DPI的气流阻力下,大多数哮喘患者(包括重症哮喘患者)能够产生足够的吸气流量以实现药物向肺部的充分递送(Laube等,2011)。

为制备用于吸入的生物制剂粉末,可采用多种颗粒工程技术,包括冷冻干燥-研磨、喷雾冷冻干燥和薄膜冷冻干燥等(Chang等,2021)。本研究选择喷雾干燥技术,因其具有工业级可扩展性、能够产生粒径分布均匀的颗粒以及成本较低等优势(Chow等,2007;Sharma等,2021)。喷雾干燥也是制造现已退市的Exubera®(人胰岛素)的成熟干燥技术,Exubera®是少数获得监管批准的吸入蛋白质产品之一(White等,2005)。喷雾干燥为一步法工艺,通过喷嘴将液体配方雾化到热气流室中,雾化液滴中的溶剂通过蒸发除去(Ziaee等,2019)。干燥气体的高温使热敏性分子受到热应力,同时雾化过程引入机械剪切力,并在大面积气-液界面上诱导蛋白质吸附,这可能使生物大分子失稳(Chow等,2007)。因此,在蛋白质配方中加入稳定化辅料,以保护蛋白质在脱水阶段免受各种应力的影响(Chang等,2021)。

在众所周知的固态蛋白质稳定剂类别中,包括糖类、多元醇、表面活性剂和盐类(Depreter等,2013),环糊精,特别是2-羟丙基-β-环糊精(2HPβCD),因其蛋白质稳定能力(Serno等,2011)和制备用于肺部递送的可吸入颗粒的能力(Ramezani等,2017)而作为有前景的辅料受到关注。2HPβCD稳定蛋白质的机制包括水替代效应、玻璃化转变和表面活性(Serno等,2011)。与其他一些环糊精衍生物一样,2HPβCD作为辅料已用于已上市的肌肉注射、静脉注射和口服药物产品中(Jansook等,2018)。尽管由于安全性数据不足尚未获批用于呼吸途径,但健康志愿者经鼻喷雾给予2HPβCD耐受性良好(al-Nakib等,1989),小鼠短期雾化暴露未导致明显的肺毒性(Evrard等,2004)。

我们先前的工作表征了抗IL-4Rα单克隆抗体与2HPβCD的喷雾干燥(SD)和喷雾冷冻干燥(SFD)粉末配方的理化性质、雾化性能、蛋白质稳定性和生物活性(Pan等,2022)。本研究旨在通过加入亮氨酸来解决残余水分含量高和雾化性能不佳的问题,亮氨酸是一种疏水性氨基酸。亮氨酸已被研究作为吸入用药物(包括生物制剂)喷雾干燥配方的分散增强剂(Alhajj等,2021)。我们旨在研究由2HPβCD和亮氨酸以不同重量比通过喷雾干燥制备的双辅料粉末配方平台的物理和空气动力学特性。将实现最理想结果的辅料比例应用于含抗体的配方。除了完整全长单克隆抗体外,抗原结合片段(Fab)也将纳入配方。此外,还评估了喷雾干燥抗体的稳定性和体外生物活性。

## 2. 材料与方法

### 2.1. 材料

人源化抗IL-4Rα单克隆抗体(约18 mg/mL)和Fab片段(约16 mg/mL)溶于磷酸盐缓冲液(PBS),由上海MabGeek生物技术有限公司(中国上海)研发提供,储存于-80°C。该抗体(IgG4)由小鼠杂交瘤产生,经稳定转染的CHO-K1细胞(ATCC® CCL-61™,美国弗吉尼亚州马纳萨斯)表达。Fab也由CHO-K1细胞通过瞬时转染该单克隆抗体的Fab序列表达。2HPβCD、L-亮氨酸、二硫苏糖醇(DTT)、考马斯亮蓝R-250、磷酸三钠(Na₃PO₄)、牛血清白蛋白(BSA)和Tween® 20购自Sigma-Aldrich(美国密苏里州圣路易斯)。重组人(rh)IL-4Rα、rhIL-4、rhIL-13、粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(rhGM-CSF)和底物试剂包(包括显色试剂A和B、稳定化过氧化氢和稳定化四甲基联苯胺)购自R&D Systems(美国明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯)。辣根过氧化物酶偶联的驴抗人IgG F(ab')₂多克隆抗体(检测抗体)购自Abcam(英国剑桥)。预染蛋白分子量标准(PageRuler™ Plus)、RPMI-1640培养基粉末、合格胎牛血清(FBS)和抗生素-抗真菌剂(青霉素-链霉素-两性霉素B)购自Thermo Fisher Scientific(美国马萨诸塞州沃尔瑟姆)。Cell Counting Kit-8(CCK-8)购自MedChemExpress(美国新泽西州蒙茅斯章克申),Dual-Glo®荧光素酶检测系统购自Promega(美国威斯康星州麦迪逊)。硫酸(H₂SO₄)购自BDH Chemicals(英国普尔)。超纯水取自实验室水净化系统(0.2 μm孔径,Barnstead NANOpure Diamond™,美国加利福尼亚州范奈斯APS水务服务公司)。

### 2.2. 配方与喷雾干燥

通过称取适量亮氨酸,按表1所列比例加入2HPβCD的浓溶液中制备双辅料配方平台。通过280 nm紫外吸光度测定原液的抗体浓度。为制备含抗体的配方,将原液抗体加入辅料平台中,轻轻涡旋混匀。所有进料溶液的最终溶质浓度用超纯水调节至2% w/v。

进料溶液以3%速率(约0.9 mL/min)经蠕动泵送入小型喷雾干燥机(B-290,BÜCHI Labortechnik AG,瑞士弗拉维尔),操作条件为100%抽吸速率(对应气体流量约35 m³/h),喷雾气体为氮气,流速742 L/h。这些操作参数来自先前研究(Pan等,2022;Qiu等,2019)。配方平台的进样温度预设为150°C,含抗体配方为100°C。使用内径0.7 mm的双流体喷嘴将溶液雾化到喷雾干燥室中。喷雾干燥粉末从产品收集器转移到透明玻璃瓶中,储存于自动干燥箱(Eureka Dry Tech,台湾台北),控制温度约22°C,相对湿度约25%。

### 2.3. 扫描电子显微镜(SEM)

使用SEM研究喷雾干燥颗粒的形态和几何尺寸。粉末样品用导电碳胶带撒在铝样品台上。为提高样品导电性并防止过热,将安装好的样品表面在富氩环境中镀约13 nm金-钯(30 mA,120秒)(Q150T ES Plus,Quorum Technologies,英国东萨塞克斯)。使用场发射扫描电子显微镜(Hitachi S-4800,日本东京)在5,000×和10,000×放大倍数、5 kV加速电压和4.6-6.6 mm工作距离下拍摄颗粒显微照片。

### 2.4. 差示扫描量热法(DSC)

通过DSC研究喷雾干燥粉末的热行为。称取约2-3 mg各粉末配方放入5.4 × 2.0 mm铝密封坩埚(上海精益化学材料),加盖穿孔盖子。密封后装载到铟校准的差示扫描量热仪(DSC 250,TA Instruments,美国特拉华州纽卡斯尔)。DSC程序设定为在0°C等温保持10 min,然后以10°C/min升温速率加热至300°C。使用OriginPro®软件(版本2022b,OriginLab®,美国马萨诸塞州北安普顿)绘制热分析图。

### 2.5. 热重分析(TGA)

使用热重分析仪(TGA 550,TA Instruments,美国特拉华州纽卡斯尔)测量喷雾干燥抗体配方的水分含量。将2 ± 0.5 mg各粉末配方放入敞口铂金样品皿中,以10°C/min的恒定速率从环境温度加热至105°C。通过微量天平监测的重量损失被视为加热过程中从固体样品中蒸发的水分。每次测量重复三次。

### 2.6. 雾化性能

使用连接直角诱导口的新一代撞击器(NGI,Copley Scientific,英国诺丁汉)评估喷雾干燥配方的空气动力学特性。将10 ± 0.5 mg粉末填充到3号明胶胶囊(Capsugel®,美国新泽西州莫里斯敦)中,放入高阻力手持式RS01吸入器(Plastiape,意大利奥斯纳戈)。调节气流速率至约54 L/min,使吸入器两端压降达到4 kPa。粉末分散进入装置4.4秒,抽取4升空气。每种配方评估三次。

2HPβCD浓度通过高效液相色谱(Agilent Technologies,美国加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉)定量,峰积分使用OpenLab CDS ChemStation Edition软件(版本C.01.06,Agilent Technologies)进行,如前所述(Pan等,2022)。

雾化性能通过以下指标描述:回收剂量(RD)、排出剂量(ED)、排出分数(EF)、细颗粒剂量(FPD)、细颗粒分数(FPF)、质量中位空气动力学直径(MMAD)和几何标准偏差(GSD)。关于2HPβCD,RD为整个NGI装置测得的总质量;ED为从吸入器排出的质量;FPD为空气动力学直径(dae)< 5 μm的质量。EF和FPF的计算公式如下。MMAD和GSD根据USP配制规定的方法计算(美国药典委员会,2014)。MMAD为雾化颗粒质量一半以下的dae,GSD表示dae分布的宽度(Finlay和Darquenne,2020)。

$$EF = \frac{ED}{RD}$$

$$FPF = \frac{FPD}{RD}$$

### 2.7. 十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)

利用电泳验证喷雾干燥后抗体和Fab的分子量,因为工艺中涉及的高温可能导致热降解,引起片段化(Vlasak和Ionescu,2011)。抗体粉末配方用超纯水复溶,蛋白质浓度在非还原和还原(含5 mM DTT)SDS缓冲液中均调节至0.2 mg/mL。未处理的抗体和进料溶液等分试样作为参比。样品溶液在95°C干浴中煮沸5 min,全长单克隆抗体非还原样品除外,以尽量减少聚集。10% Bis-Tris凝胶每孔上样4 μg抗体。电泳(Mini-PROTEAN® Tetra System,Bio-Rad)、凝胶染色和脱色以及拍照(G:BOX Chemi XR5凝胶成像系统,Syngene,英国剑桥)步骤已在别处描述(Pan等,2022)。

### 2.8. 体积排阻色谱(SEC)

SEC根据分子大小分离蛋白质,用于监测喷雾干燥后的单体含量。色谱系统由Yarra™ 3 μm SEC-3000柱(phenomenex®,美国加利福尼亚州托兰斯)连接二极管阵列检测器(Agilent Technologies)组成,设定UV波长214 nm。流动相(150 mM Na₃PO₄水溶液,pH 6.8)流速0.8 mL/min,运行时间18 min。未处理的抗体作为对照,每份样品50 μL(用缓冲液调节蛋白质浓度至0.2 mg/mL)在25°C进样三次。使用OpenLab CDS ChemStation Edition软件(版本C.01.03,Agilent Technologies)进行峰积分并计算单体含量百分比。

### 2.9. 酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)

通过标记免疫测定确定所选配方抗体的结合能力。ELISA方案详见文献(Pan等,2022)。简而言之,捕获抗原rhIL-4Rα包被(50 ng/孔)过夜,用试剂稀释剂(PBS中2% w/v BSA)封闭。样品蛋白质浓度用试剂稀释剂调节至100和1 μg/mL,以复孔加入各孔。加入2 N H₂SO₄终止过氧化物酶反应。570 nm读数减去450 nm读数以校正平板光学缺陷。ELISA实验共运行三次重复。显示光密度值的柱状图使用GraphPad Prism(版本8.2.1,美国加利福尼亚州圣迭戈)绘制。

### 2.10. 细胞抗增殖实验

使用人红白血病TF-1细胞(ATCC® CRL-2003™)通过抗增殖实验评估喷雾干燥抗体的抑制活性,其中抗体与IL-4或IL-13竞争结合IL-4R(共同受体靶点)。抑制组成型生长因子(如GM-CSF、IL-4和IL-13)可减弱TF-1细胞的长期增殖(Drexler等,1997)。细胞在完全生长培养基(CGM)中培养,CGM由RPMI-1640补充2.0 g/L NaHCO₃、10%热灭活FBS、1%抗生素-抗真菌剂和2 ng/mL rhGM-CSF组成。实验时,细胞以100 × g离心10 min,重悬于测定培养基(不含rhGM-CSF的CGM)中,浓度为6.25 × 10⁵个/mL。将收获的细胞以120 μL/孔加入平底96孔微孔板(TPP®,瑞士Trasadingen),在37°C、5% CO₂下饥饿24小时。所选抗体配方在超纯水复溶,溶液(包括未处理抗体对照)在测定培养基中系列稀释3倍,产生10个抗体浓度。每份溶液补充30 μL rhIL-4或rhIL-13以挽救细胞,使最终反应混合物中含有固定浓度8 ng/mL的白细胞介素,抗体浓度范围为5 ng/mL至100 μg/mL。测试溶液以复孔加入,继续孵育48小时。结束前3小时,每孔加入10 μL CCK-8。整个孵育期结束后,在微孔板振荡器上轻轻混匀,使用微孔板分光光度计(Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO)在450 nm读取吸光度。实验运行三次,数据使用GraphPad Prism拟合非线性回归S形方程。光密度值归一化为每次运行未处理抗体对照的最佳拟合顶部(100%)和底部(0%)值,绘制为抗体浓度常用对数的函数,获得半数最大抑制浓度(IC₅₀)。

### 2.11. STAT6激活抑制

用STAT6驱动荧光素酶(Luc)报告基因构建体转染的TF-1细胞(命名为TF-1/STAT6-Luc)在CGM中培养。实验前12至16小时,更换培养基为含5% FBS的RPMI-1640,细胞在37°C过夜孵育。实验当天,将12个不同浓度的抗体(Fab:9.41 pg/mL-1.67 μg/mL;全长抗体:27.8 pg/mL-4.93 μg/mL,3倍稀释)以50 μL/孔加入96孔微孔板,复孔。细胞收获后重悬于含5% FBS的RPMI-1640中,以50 μL接种各孔。平板在培养箱中放置30 min。随后,每孔加入50 μL rhIL-4或rhIL-13,使白细胞介素终浓度分别为2 ng/mL(rhIL-4)或20 ng/mL(rhIL-13),细胞密度为0.5 × 10⁵个/mL。继续孵育5小时后,每孔加入50 μL荧光素酶底物。10 min后,在566 nm读取平板。计算各孔萤火虫:Renilla/TK荧光素酶的相对光单位(RLU)比值。使用GraphPad Prism进行四参数回归,绘制RLU-抗体浓度曲线,从中获得IC₅₀。实验重复三次。

### 2.12. 统计分析

所有数据以平均值±标准差表示(如适用)。使用GraphPad Prism进行配对双尾Student t检验评估光密度和IC₅₀值的差异。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学显著性。

## 3. 结果

### 3.1. 喷雾干燥

所有11种配方的进出口温度及工艺收率见表2。工艺收率定义为收集的粉末重量占进料溶液中总溶质质量的百分比。为最小化热应力,抗体配方的进口温度降低。辅料平台的出口温度为98-100°C,抗体配方为62-63°C。在辅料平台中,即使加入5% w/w的亮氨酸,收率也从约46%提高到60%以上。抗体配方的收率更高,在73%-84%之间。

### 3.2. 颗粒形态

喷雾干燥颗粒的代表性扫描电子显微照片如图1所示。随着亮氨酸含量增加,颗粒形态呈现显著变化。在低亮氨酸浓度(5%和10% w/w,E1和E2)下,颗粒与100%喷雾干燥2HPβCD(E0)相似。然而,在较高亮氨酸浓度下,E3高度褶皱,粗糙表面具有颗粒间纤维状特征,而E4中球状结构基本消失,取而代之的是形状不规则的中空颗粒。在高抗体浓度(50% w/w,F3和M3)下,颗粒更呈球状,粗糙表面具有多个凹坑状特征。相比之下,较低抗体浓度的配方(F1、F2和M1、M2)通常类似于E4;微颗粒通过自我折叠呈现塌陷的中空球形态。这些颗粒表面也显得更粗糙。大多数可见颗粒直径小于5 μm。

### 3.3. 热分析

含亮氨酸的粉末配方(除E0外)的DSC热分析图与仅含2HPβCD的配方(E0)不同,在230-270°C温度范围内出现额外的吸热峰,归因于结晶亮氨酸的存在(图2)。随着配方中亮氨酸组分开始占主导地位,这些峰向右移动,接近已知的亮氨酸熔点(约287°C),并变得更加明显(Yalkowsky等,2010)。粉末中残余水的存在在100°C以下较宽的向下吸热峰中显而易见。尽管此峰存在于所有配方中,但在含有较低浓度疏水性亮氨酸的F3和M3中略为显著。

喷雾干燥后通过TGA测定抗体配方的残余水分含量(表2)。Fab配方的水分含量略高于单克隆抗体配方,水分含量在亮氨酸浓度最低的配方(即F3和M3)中最高。然而,所有测试粉末的平均水分含量较低,在1.4 ± 0.2%至2.6 ± 0.3% w/w之间,表明配方和工艺的干燥效率可有效控制水分。

### 3.4. 雾化性能

级联撞击器实验获得的EF和FPF分别代表粉末配方的分散性和可呼吸分数,如图3所示。对于辅料平台,随着亮氨酸相对含量逐渐增加,EF从约54%上升至81%。值得注意的是,配方E4具有最高的EF和近70%的FPF,因此选择1:1的亮氨酸与2HPβCD比例作为抗体配方的辅料基础。所有六种抗体配方的平均EF均在80%以上。除M3的FPF约为61%外,其余抗体配方的平均FPF在72%-75%之间。最佳雾化特性属于含25%抗体和75%辅料的配方,即F2(EF,86.5 ± 1.7%;FPF,75.3 ± 2.7%)和M2(EF,85.6 ± 2.4%;FPF,75.2 ± 4.4%)。

由雾化性能分析计算的MMAD和GSD值也显示在表2中。除配方E3外,颗粒的dae均在1-3 μm的最佳肺部沉积临界尺寸范围内(Chow等,2007;Malcolmson和Embleton,1998),而GSD值(≥1.22)表明为异分散分布,这是治疗性气溶胶的典型特征(Labiris和Dolovich,2003;Laube等,2011)。在抗体配方中,提高蛋白质与辅料比例增加了MMAD,这似乎对收率有中等程度的提升作用。这可能与旋风分离器的分离效率有关,因为较小的颗粒更难从气流中分离(Prinn等,2002)。

### 3.5. 抗体稳定性

利用电泳蛋白质分离研究喷雾干燥后抗体的结构完整性,因为工艺中涉及的高温可能导致热降解,引起片段化(Vlasak和Ionescu,2011)。图4左侧凝胶显示,Fab在非还原条件下迁移,表观分子量约45 kDa,而完整单克隆抗体样品在115-185 kDa之间观察到一条浓条带。Fab样品中约20 kDa处的额外浅条带可能是原液抗体中蛋白质污染物所致。右侧凝胶中抗体的二硫键被还原,Fab配方(F1-F3)在约25 kDa处产生一条带,单克隆抗体配方(M1-M3)在约50和25 kDa处产生两条主带。重要的是,喷雾干燥样品的条带模式与未处理抗体基本相同,表明喷雾干燥过程未产生热诱导片段化的证据(Nowak等,2017)。

喷雾干燥和储存过程中的应力可使蛋白质失稳并诱导聚集,这仍然是生物技术产品开发中的巨大挑战,因为它可能导致免疫原性和其他不良反应、批间变异以及效力降低(Lowe等,2011;Wang等,2010)。为监测抗体聚集,在喷雾干燥后1周和10个月两个时间点使用SEC测量喷雾干燥配方的单体含量(图5)。单体含量是物理稳定性的关键参数,因为即使部分展开的蛋白质也固有地易于聚集(Wu等,2014),这对基于抗体的药品的安全性和有效性有影响(Hickey和Stewart,2022)。第一时间点纳入未处理抗体以区分干燥过程引起的聚集。喷雾干燥1周后,Fab配方的平均单体含量接近100%(99.8%-99.9% vs. Fab未处理99.8%)。对于全长单克隆抗体配方,喷雾干燥与未处理抗体之间的单体含量差异较小(86.0%-99.0% vs. 93.6%)。喷雾干燥10个月后,F3的单体含量下降最大(99.9%至90.0%),而其他配方的降低不超过2.8%。考虑到样品在整个研究过程中未冷冻或冷藏储存,这一结果相当显著。

### 3.6. 抗原结合能力与抑制活性

选择两种代表性配方(Fab和完整单克隆抗体各一种)进行体外实验,评估喷雾干燥抗体相对于未处理(up)对照的生物活性。在六种抗体配方中,选择F2和M2是因为其雾化性能更佳,而其他特性(如颗粒形态、残余水分含量和蛋白质结构完整性)未显示任何特定配方的优越性。通过ELISA评估抗体与平板包被rhIL-4Rα的结合能力(图6),使用两个经验选择的抗体浓度(1和100 μg/mL)。Fab未处理与F2(1 μg/mL:p = 0.4815;100 μg/mL:p = 0.9904)或单克隆抗体未处理与M2(1 μg/mL:p = 0.5810;100 μg/mL:p = 0.1549)之间无统计学显著差异。

鉴于抗体干扰IL-4和IL-13与IL-4R的结合,抗增殖实验使用对特定生长因子有绝对依赖性的TF-1细胞(Drexler等,1997),比较喷雾干燥抗体与未处理(up)抗体作为IC₅₀的抑制活性。TF-1细胞分别暴露于rhIL-4和rhIL-13,抗体浓度-反应曲线分别显示在图7的上下图中。在每组四条曲线中,两条曲线在很大程度上重叠,表明测试抗体样品的抑制谱几乎相同。在rhIL-4存在下,IC₅₀值分别为0.534 ± 0.279 μg/mL(Fab未处理)、0.535 ± 0.336 μg/mL(F2)、0.964 ± 0.458 μg/mL(单克隆抗体未处理)和1.262 ± 0.248 μg/mL(M2)。喷雾干燥抗体与未处理抗体之间的IC₅₀无统计学显著差异(F2 vs. Fab未处理,p = 0.9861;M2 vs. 单克隆抗体未处理,p = 0.1465)。在rhIL-13存在下,IC₅₀值分别为0.081 ± 0.006 μg/mL(Fab未处理)、0.082 ± 0.024 μg/mL(F2)、0.123 ± 0.055 μg/mL(单克隆抗体未处理)和0.134 ± 0.030 μg/mL(M2)。同样,配方抗体与未处理抗体对照之间无统计学显著差异(F2 vs. Fab未处理,p = 0.9822;M2 vs. 单克隆抗体未处理,p = 0.5696)。

用于研究抗体对STAT6信号通路抑制作用的TF-1细胞(图8)经稳定转染,表达由STAT6响应启动子调控的荧光素酶报告基因。在rhIL-4诱导的STAT6激活下,IC₅₀值分别为9.79 ± 0.34 ng/mL(Fab未处理)、8.75 ± 0.41 ng/mL(F2)、15.93 ± 1.89 ng/mL(单克隆抗体未处理)和14.97 ± 0.62 ng/mL(M2)。配方抗体与未处理抗体之间的IC₅₀差异无统计学显著性(F2 vs. Fab未处理,p = 0.0589;M2 vs. 单克隆抗体未处理,p = 0.3229)。在rhIL-13诱导下,IC₅₀值分别为9.79 ± 0.21 ng/mL(Fab未处理)、9.60 ± 0.55 ng/mL(F2)、15.09 ± 3.28 ng/mL(单克隆抗体未处理)和12.32 ± 1.82 ng/mL(M2)。同样,喷雾干燥抗体与未处理抗体之间的IC₅₀无统计学显著差异(F2 vs. Fab未处理,p = 0.5707;M2 vs. 单克隆抗体未处理,p = 0.4350)。ELISA结果、细胞抗增殖实验和STAT6活性抑制实验有效证明了喷雾干燥Fab和全长单克隆抗体的抗原结合能力和抑制活性相对于喷雾干燥前初始状态得以保留。

## 4. 讨论

在我们先前的研究中,抗IL-4Rα单克隆抗体与2HPβCD作为蛋白质稳定剂进行喷雾干燥和喷雾冷冻干燥(Pan等,2022)。尽管抗体得到了良好稳定并保留了抗原结合能力和体外生物活性,但粉末分散性不佳,可能受到检测到的较高残余水分含量(7%-9% w/w)的影响。在更高温度下喷雾干燥可能会改善这一点,因为干燥气体的相对湿度会增加,从而产生更干燥的产物。水分含量较低的颗粒不太可能通过固体桥融合在一起形成更大的团聚体(Li等,2016)。然而,应避免在含有热敏性生物制剂的制剂中使用过高的温度。水分不仅被认为是影响粉末配方雾化的因素,还可作为增塑剂有效降低辅料的玻璃化转变温度并增加包埋生物大分子的局部流动性,从而使蛋白质失稳(Mensink等,2017)。

为提高干燥效率并避免水分吸附,将疏水性氨基酸亮氨酸与2HPβCD以不同重量比共配方,研究其加入是否会改善粉末的空气动力学特性(与单独使用2HPβCD相比)。

众多研究已检查了用于呼吸给药的基于氨基酸的多组分喷雾干燥粉末制剂。这些研究包括仅辅料平台(Mangal等,2015;Sou等,2013)和含有小分子药物(Mah等,2019;Seville等,2007)、小干扰RNA(Chow等,2017;Xu等,2022)、抗体(Faghihi等,2019;Shepard等,2021)和疫苗(Gomez等,2021;Lovalenti等,2016)的配方。然而,在这些研究中,与氨基酸共同使用的共辅料主要是海藻糖和甘露醇,未包括任何环糊精。因此,2HPβCD加亮氨酸是一种新颖的组合。

甘露醇易结晶(Eedara等,2021),由于剪切应力和蛋白质-糖相互作用丧失的综合效应,这对生物大分子不利,而蛋白质-糖相互作用对蛋白质稳定很重要(Izutsu等,1994;Mensink等,2017)。与甘露醇不同,环糊精倾向于形成无定形玻璃态(Serno等,2011)。此外,喷雾干燥通常产生无定形玻璃态基质(Chow等,2007),这是糖类在固态中通过玻璃化机制稳定蛋白质的重要方面(Mensink等,2017)。

配方中加入亮氨酸的第一个明显好处是提高了工艺收率,这是生物制药规模化生产的重要考虑因素(Hernandez,2016)。尽管在工业水平上喷雾干燥可达到接近100%的收率,但这里明显观察到一些粉末粘附和积聚在旋风分离器内部,这可解释产品损失的原因(Bowey等,2013)。

亮氨酸在配方中的价值显然在于增强粉末配方的雾化性能。亮氨酸促进分散的机制是多方面的,从防水到改变喷雾干燥颗粒的表面组成和形态(Alhajj等,2021)。研究表明,粉末流动性或分散性受表面褶皱的影响有两种方式:改变颗粒之间的接触面积以及相邻颗粒的机械互锁或嵌顿(Chew和Chan,2001;Walton和Mumford,1999b)。从SEM图像看,亮氨酸加2HPβCD产生了表面褶皱的微颗粒,外层褶皱和塌陷程度随亮氨酸含量增加而增加。这些形态变化与使用亮氨酸作为分散增强剂的其他研究中的观察结果一致(Mangal等,2015;Sou等,2013)。E4表现出的较高EF和FPF可能归因于不规则形状颗粒的高表面粗糙度,这减少了颗粒间接触。此外,在干燥初始阶段形成的结晶外壳膨胀、破裂和折叠导致颗粒呈折叠中空结构,降低了密度从而降低了MMAD(Walton和Mumford,1999a)。然而,过度褶皱可能导致较小颗粒嵌入较大颗粒的凹槽中(Sou等,2013),这种效应对雾化性能有影响,因为颗粒间内聚力增强引起团聚,颗粒遇到更多阻力气流,影响粉末流化(Cui等,2018)。

加入亮氨酸改善雾化的另一个可能解释是其通过抗吸湿作用调节粉末水分含量的能力。即使配方中加入高达50% w/w的蛋白质,所评估粉末的残余水分含量也不超过3%(重量比)。这种干燥程度足以抑制无定形组分的结晶并赋予优异的粉末流动性(Mah等,2019)。在一项研究中,贝伐珠单抗与海藻糖和亮氨酸共喷雾干燥(分别为40%、40%、20% w/w)用于肺部递送,测得水分含量在3%-4%之间,FPF(截止dae < 5 μm)为82%(Shepard等,2021)。尽管配方组成和实验条件有所不同,这些结果与本研究获得的结果具有可比性。存在两种预期的水分保护机制:亮氨酸的结晶性和其在颗粒表面的富集。进料溶液中亮氨酸浓度足够高(如大于10% w/w)时,考虑到亮氨酸微溶于水(室温下约22 mg/mL)(Yalkowsky等,2010),应在喷雾干燥过程早期达到过饱和并结晶,并向液滴表面迁移(Mangal等,2015;Vehring,2008)。结晶亮氨酸在喷雾干燥颗粒表面的水分吸收有限(Li等,2016)。X射线光电子能谱已报道亮氨酸在喷雾干燥颗粒表面的积累(Mah等,2019;Mangal等,2015;Xu等,2022)。亮氨酸分子的化学结构包含不同的亲水(氨基和羧酸基团)和亲脂(脂肪族异丁基侧链)基团(Chow等,2017)。亮氨酸的两亲性使其倾向于在颗粒表面聚集(Weissbuch等,1990)。蛋白质分子也因其表面活性而倾向于在气-液界面聚集,但其大分子量阻碍了向核心的扩散(Adler等,2000;Grasmeijer等,2016)。因此,假设亮氨酸会与抗体竞争在表面的积聚,从而降低蛋白质的相对含量。这不仅增强了蛋白质稳定性(因为界面吸附促进蛋白质展开和聚集),还提高了粉末干燥度。

在脱水生物制药的背景下,通常优选更高的干燥度,但情况并非如此,如涉及无辅料冻干组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(Hsu等,1992)和含蔗糖血浆来源IgG(Duralliu等,2020)的研究所示。超过一定阈值后变性恢复,因此可以解释为每种蛋白质可能存在最佳残余水分含量。过度干燥(如水分含量<1%)即使在存在稳定糖辅料的情况下也可能发生,特别是当使用大的刚性多糖(如某些环糊精)时。这可能是由于氢键效率低,使局部流动性更容易(Mensink等,2017)。此外,在极端干燥条件下颗粒表面积累静电电荷(Elajnaf等,2006),促进团聚并可能严重阻碍粉末流化(Kaialy,2016)。然而,基于凝胶电泳和过滤分析中观察到的物理稳定性,本研究的喷雾干燥抗体配方似乎并未过度干燥。

使用ELISA研究了抗体与IL-4Rα的结合能力,发现其与未配方化抗体的结合能力相当。同样,在抗增殖实验中,缺乏必需生长因子的饥饿TF-1细胞的细胞因子拯救受到配方化和未处理抗体以浓度依赖性方式同等程度的抑制。这些结果被解释为喷雾干燥抗体得到了充分稳定。与rhIL-4相比,rhIL-13实验中观察到的IC₅₀值较小,可通过以下事实解释:IL-4/IL-4Rα复合物存在额外的独立于STAT6激活的信号通路,以产生刺激TF-1增殖的生长因子。实际上,该复合物募集共同γc亚基,通过下游信号适配分子胰岛素受体底物-2激活基因转录(McCormick和Heller,2015)。在加入细胞的单一细胞因子浓度(8 ng/mL)下,IL-4的刺激作用已达到饱和,但IL-13未达到,后者介导约60%的最大效应。这可以合理地解释为IL-4和IL-13不同的结合亲和力和增殖反应。IL-4与IL-4Rα的结合亲和力远高于IL-13与IL-13Rα1的结合亲和力(LaPorte等,2008)。IL-4的刺激指数也高于IL-13(Drexler等,1997)。此外,TF-1细胞上IL-4的结合位点数量是IL-13的两倍(Lefort等,1995)。因此,IL-13的EC₅₀高于IL-4。

本研究中的活性成分不仅包括全长单克隆抗体,还包括Fab。在局部吸入治疗中,较大的生物大分子可能更优选,因为从肺部的意外吸收(Patton,1996)和肺蛋白酶的降解(Fröhlich和Salar-Behzadi,2021)均与分子量呈反比。然而,仅使用Fab而不使用全长单克隆抗体中存在的可结晶片段(Fc)区域是合理的,因为抗体的作用机制依赖于Fab与IL-4Rα的结合以实现哮喘的治疗效果。此外,在吸入治疗中,Fc结构域的作用不太相关,因为不需要全身吸收和延长的血清半衰期(Chow等,2023)。未来工作可从两个方向展开。首先,应在动物模型中探索喷雾干燥抗体的体内生物活性,同时评估辅料在呼吸道的肺毒性。其次,可对粉末配方进行更全面的表征,例如关于蛋白质-辅料相互作用(Chen等,2021)、抗体-抗原结合动力学(Yang等,2017)和表面积-孔隙率分析(Ji等,2016)。尽管环糊精在医学和制药研究中具有用途,但其某些相关理化性质,特别是吸湿性和密度,仍不明确(Day等,2020),因此更好地了解这些性质也将是有益的。

## 5. 结论

本研究将2HPβCD与亮氨酸共配方,通过喷雾干燥制备双辅料平台,用于固态生物大分子的肺部递送。将亮氨酸加入配方中提高了工艺收率和雾化性能,两种辅料重量比为1:1的粉末表现出最有利的结果。粉末雾化的改善归因于颗粒表面和形态的改变以及亮氨酸的疏水性。基于该辅料比例的抗IL-4Rα单克隆抗体及其Fab的喷雾干燥粉末再现了其配方平台前体的理化和空气动力学特性。粉末抗体配方的水分含量在1%-3% w/w的可接受范围内,在环境储存条件下10个月内抗体单体含量仅检测到微小变化。脱水抗体的体外抗原结合能力和细胞抑制活性得到了较好的保留。总之,这些结果验证了用于重症哮喘局部治疗的吸入生物制剂产品成功的可行性。

---

**作者贡献声明(CRediT)**

Harry W. Pan:概念化、方法论、验证、形式分析、调查、初稿撰写、审阅编辑、可视化。Jinlin Guo:调查。Lingqiao Zhu:审阅编辑。Susan W.S. Leung:审阅编辑。Chenghai Zhang:监督。Jenny K.W. Lam:概念化、方法论、资源、审阅编辑、监督、项目管理、资金获取。

**利益冲突声明**

作者声明不存在已知的可能影响本研究报告的竞争经济利益或个人关系。

**数据可用性

数据可根据要求提供。

**致谢**

本项目由香港大学(HKU)战略跨学科研究计划种子基金资助。H.W.P.是香港研究资助局香港博士研究生奖学金计划(PF18-13277)的获得者。作者感谢Ray Lee先生和张新悦女士(香港大学药理学与药剂学系)在TGA测量方面的友好协助。