The pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies of heat stroke-induced myocardial injury

✅ 全文

热射病诱导心肌损伤的发病机制与治疗策略

作者 Rui Xia; Meng Sun; Yuling Li; Jing Yin; Huan Liu; Jun Yang; Jing Liu; Yanyu He; Bing Wu; Guixiang Yang; Jianhua Li 期刊 Frontiers in Pharmacology 发表日期 2024 ISSN 1663-9812 DOI 10.3389/fphar.2023.1286556 类型 原创研究 (Original Research)

📄 英文摘要 English Abstract

EN

Heat stroke (HS) is a febrile illness characterized by an elevation in the core body temperature to over 40°C, accompanied by central nervous system impairment and subsequent multi-organ dysfunction syndrome. In recent years, the mortality rate from HS has been increasing as ambient temperatures continue to rise each year. The cardiovascular system plays an important role in the pathogenesis process of HS, as it functions as one of the key system for thermoregulation and its stability is associated with the severity of HS. Systemic inflammatory response and endothelial cell damage constitute pivotal attributes of HS, other factors such as ferroptosis, disturbances in myocardial metabolism and heat shock protein dysregulation are also involved in the damage to myocardial tissue in HS. In this review, a comprehensively detailed description of the pathogenesis of HS-induced myocardial injury is provided. The current treatment strategies and the promising therapeutic targets for HS are also discussed.

📄 中文摘要 Chinese Abstract

中文
热射病(HS)是一种以核心体温升高至40°C以上为特征的发热性疾病,伴有中枢神经系统功能障碍及随后出现的多器官功能障碍综合征。近年来,随着环境温度持续升高,热射病的病死率呈逐年上升趋势。心血管系统在热射病的发病机制中发挥着重要作用,它作为体温调节的关键系统之一,其稳定性与热射病的严重程度密切相关。全身炎症反应和内皮细胞损伤是热射病的关键特征;其他因素如铁死亡、心肌代谢紊乱和热休克蛋白表达失调也参与了热射病中心肌组织的损伤。本综述全面详细地阐述了热射病所致心肌损伤的发病机制,并讨论了当前的治疗策略和有前景的治疗靶点。

📋 英文结构化总结 English Structured Summary

全文整理

EN

Background:

Heat stroke (HS) is a febrile illness characterized by an elevation in the core body temperature to over 40°C, accompanied by central nervous system impairment and subsequent multi-organ dysfunction syndrome. In recent years, the mortality rate from HS has been increasing as ambient temperatures continue to rise each year. The cardiovascular system plays an important role in the pathogenesis process of HS, as it functions as one of the key systems for thermoregulation and its stability is associated with the severity of HS. Systemic inflammatory response and endothelial cell damage constitute pivotal attributes of HS; other factors such as ferroptosis, disturbances in myocardial metabolism and heat shock protein dysregulation are also involved in the damage to myocardial tissue in HS. This review provides a comprehensively detailed description of the pathogenesis of HS-induced myocardial injury and discusses current treatment strategies and promising therapeutic targets.

Methods:

N/A - Review article

Results:

HS-induced myocardial injury involves an excessive inflammatory response triggered by dysregulation of the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory balance, leading to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). The pathogenesis of heat stroke is closely similar to that of sepsis. Additionally, endothelial cell damage, ferroptosis, disturbances in myocardial metabolism, and downregulation of HSP90 expression are implicated. During HS, cardiovascular regulatory responses such as increased heart rate, cardiac contractility, and cardiac output lead to hyperthermic dehydration, reduced circulating blood volume, inadequate tissue perfusion, hypoxia, and necrosis of myocardial cells. Electrolyte disturbances from fluid loss alter the heart’s pacing rhythm, signal conduction, and systolic-diastolic function, ultimately causing myocardial ischemia, necrosis, arrhythmia, and heart failure.

Data Summary:

HS is defined by a core temperature over 40°C. Under normal conditions, a 0.3°C increase in core temperature triggers a cardiovascular regulatory response to protect the body from heat damage. The mortality rate from HS has been increasing in recent years due to rising ambient temperatures.

Conclusions:

Elucidation of the mechanism of HS-induced myocardial injury can help in establishing treatment to improve circulatory function and reduce mortality rates of HS. However, the pathogenesis of HS is still to be known, and prevention strategies of myocardial injury during HS are lacking. This review systematically summarizes the pathogenesis and current treatment strategies, providing a reference for future research.

Practical Significance:

Heat-related deaths have increased significantly due to anthropogenic climate change, and the frequency of severe heat waves threatens human health worldwide, posing huge challenges to public health. Understanding the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies of HS-induced myocardial injury is critical for developing interventions to improve circulatory function and reduce mortality rates, thereby addressing the growing public health burden of heat stroke.

📋 中文结构化总结 Chinese Structured Summary

中文

Background:

热射病(HS)是一种以核心体温升高至40°C以上为特征的发热性疾病,伴有中枢神经系统功能障碍及随后出现的多器官功能障碍综合征。近年来,随着环境温度持续升高,热射病的病死率呈逐年上升趋势。心血管系统在热射病的发病机制中发挥着重要作用,它作为体温调节的关键系统之一,其稳定性与热射病的严重程度密切相关。全身炎症反应和内皮细胞损伤是热射病的关键特征;其他因素如铁死亡、心肌代谢紊乱和热休克蛋白表达失调也参与了热射病中心肌组织的损伤。本综述全面详细地阐述了热射病所致心肌损伤的发病机制,并讨论了当前的治疗策略和有前景的治疗靶点。

Methods:

不适用——综述类文章

Results:

热射病所致心肌损伤涉及由促炎与抗炎平衡失调引发的过度炎症反应,导致全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)。热射病的发病机制与脓毒症的发病机制高度相似。此外,内皮细胞损伤、铁死亡、心肌代谢紊乱以及HSP90表达下调也参与其中。在热射病期间,心血管调节反应如心率加快、心肌收缩力增强和心输出量增加,可导致高热性脱水、循环血容量减少、组织灌注不足、缺氧及心肌细胞坏死。体液丢失引起的电解质紊乱会改变心脏的起搏节律、信号传导及收缩-舒张功能,最终导致心肌缺血、坏死、心律失常和心力衰竭。

Data Summary:

热射病的定义为核心体温超过40°C。在正常情况下,核心体温每升高0.3°C即可触发心血管调节反应,以保护机体免受热损伤。近年来,由于环境温度升高,热射病的病死率持续上升。

Conclusions:

阐明热射病所致心肌损伤的机制有助于建立改善循环功能、降低热射病死亡率的治疗方案。然而,热射病的发病机制仍有待进一步明确,且目前缺乏热射病期间心肌损伤的预防策略。本综述系统总结了热射病所致心肌损伤的发病机制及当前治疗策略,为未来研究提供参考。

Practical Significance:

由于人为气候变化,热相关死亡人数显著增加,严重热浪的频率威胁着全球人类健康,给公共卫生带来了巨大挑战。了解热射病所致心肌损伤的发病机制和治疗策略,对于开发改善循环功能、降低死亡率的干预措施至关重要,从而应对热射病日益增长的公共卫生负担。

📖 英文全文 English Full Text

EN

TYPE Review PUBLISHED 08 January 2024 DOI 10.3389/fphar.2023.1286556 OPEN ACCESS EDITED BY Ismail Laher, University of British Columbia, Canada REVIEWED BY

Bisher Abuyassin, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Saudi Arabia Keliang Xie, Tianjin Medical University, China *CORRESPONDENCE Jianhua Li, jianhuali2022@cqu.edu.cn

The pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies of heat stroke-induced myocardial injury Rui Xia 1†, Meng Sun 2†, Yuling Li 3, Jing Yin 4, Huan Liu 1, Jun Yang 1, Jing Liu 1, Yanyu He 1, Bing Wu 1, Guixiang Yang 1 and Jianhua Li 1* 1

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Chongqing University Jiangjin Hospital, Chongqing, China, Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, 3Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China, 4Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China 2

† These authors have contributed equally to this work RECEIVED 01 September 2023 ACCEPTED 20 December 2023 PUBLISHED 08 January 2024 CITATION

Xia R, Sun M, Li Y, Yin J, Liu H, Yang J, Liu J, He Y, Wu B, Yang G and Li J (2024), The pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies of heat strokeinduced myocardial injury. Front. Pharmacol. 14:1286556. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1286556 COPYRIGHT

© 2024 Xia, Sun, Li, Yin, Liu, Yang, Liu, He, Wu, Yang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Heat stroke (HS) is a febrile illness characterized by an elevation in the core body temperature to over 40°C, accompanied by central nervous system impairment and subsequent multi-organ dysfunction syndrome. In recent years, the mortality rate from HS has been increasing as ambient temperatures continue to rise each year. The cardiovascular system plays an important role in the pathogenesis process of HS, as it functions as one of the key system for thermoregulation and its stability is associated with the severity of HS. Systemic inflammatory response and endothelial cell damage constitute pivotal attributes of HS, other factors such as ferroptosis, disturbances in myocardial metabolism and heat shock protein dysregulation are also involved in the damage to myocardial tissue in HS. In this review, a comprehensively detailed description of the pathogenesis of HSinduced myocardial injury is provided. The current treatment strategies and the promising therapeutic targets for HS are also discussed. KEYWORDS

heat stroke, myocardial injury, pathogenesis, therapeutic strategy, inflammation

1 Introduction Heat stroke (HS) is an illness characterized by a rapid rise of core temperature over 40°C with the complication of systemic inflammatory responses and central nervous system dysfunction (Bouchama and Knochel, 2002; Leon and Helwig, 2010; Peiris et al., 2017). In recent years, heat-related deaths have increased significantly due to anthropogenic climate change (Toutant et al., 2011). Frequency of severe heat waves is threatening human health worldwide and poses huge challenges to public health, attracting widespread attention in various research fields (M. Zheng et al., 2020). HS can be divided into classic heat stroke (CHS) and exertional heat stroke (EHS) depending on the involvement of skeletal muscle contraction (Bouchama et al., 2022). CHS often occurs in older people having pre-existing illnesses, while EHS typically occurs in healthy younger individuals during strenuous

Abbreviations: HS, Heat stroke; CHS, Classic heat stroke; EHS, Exertional heat stroke; SIRS, Systemic inflammatory response syndrome; TNF-α, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IL-1β, Interleukin-1β; NLRP3, NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing3; vWF, von Willebrand factor; DIC, Disseminated intravascular coagulation; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; GSH, Glutathione; SLC7A11, Solute carrier family 7 member 11; MDA, Malondialdehyde; ACC, Acyl CoA-carboxylase; FAs, Fatty acids; GLUT4, Glucose transporter 4; HSP, Heat shock protein.

HS-induced myocardial injury is not only associated with an excessive inflammatory response, endothelial cell damage. Ferroptosis, downregulation of HSP90 expression and disturbances in cardiomyocyte metabolism are also involved.

understanding of HS-induced myocardial injury and to provide a reference for future research (Figure 1).

exercise in hot environments (Peiris et al., 2017; Bouchama et al., 2022). HS, regardless of the type, is associated with extensive multiorgan tissue damage as a result of the interaction of cytotoxic, inflammatory, and clotting reactions (Piver et al., 1999). The heart, being a vulnerable organ in heat injury (Low et al., 2011; Lou et al., 2019; Ko et al., 2020), is susceptible to arrhythmia, function failure and focal myocardial necrosis (Argaud et al., 2007; Desai et al., 2023). Abnormalities in temperature regulation, cardiovascular function and tissue perfusion are among the factors involved in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (Low et al., 2011; Cramer et al., 2022). In an effort to dissipate heat, the body increases blood flow to the skin, redistributes blood and eventually develops hypotension and perfusion disorders (S. H. Chen et al., 2006). Thus, the regulation of the cardiovascular system plays a key role in the pathogenesis of HS. Elucidation of the mechanism of HSinduced myocardial injury can help in establishing the treatment to improve circulatory function and reduce mortality rates of HS. However, the pathogenesis of HS is still to be known and prevention strategies of myocardial injury during HS is lacking. This article provides a systematic review to further the

2 Heat stroke and myocardial injury Under normal conditions, a 0.3°C increase in core temperature triggers a cardiovascular regulatory response to protect the body from heat damage. This regulation increases heat dissipation by speeding up the heart rate, enhancing cardiac contractility, raising cardiac output and reducing blood flow and volume in non-skin areas (Crandall et al., 2008; Crandall and González-Alonso, 2010). During HS, when the surrounding hot environment persists, the above regulation continues to function actively. A substantial volume of blood is pumped from the heart towards the peripheral blood vessels to dissipate heat through sweat, but this also results in hyperthermic dehydration of the body, reduced circulating blood volume, inadequate tissue perfusion, hypoxia and necrosis of myocardial cells (Crandall and González-Alonso, 2010; G. D; Chen et al., 2019). At the same time, the loss of body fluids disturbs electrolytes and interrupts the sodium-potassium

3 The related mechanisms of HSinduced myocardial injury signal, thus causing the so-called inflammatory cascade effect (Z. Huang et al., 2016; X; Zhang et al., 2017). TLR4 exhibits its highest expression in cardiac myocytes, and during HS, TLR4/NF-κB signaling controls the production of pro-inflammatory factors to induce myocardial tissue damage (X. Liu et al., 2016). Inhibition of the TLR4 signaling pathway may reduce HS-induced inflammatory responses and improve abnormal cardiac function in rats (Chen et al., 2023).

3.1 Dysregulation of the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory balance 3.2 Endothelial cell damage and dysfunction

In HS, the systemic pro- and anti-inflammatory balance is disturbed, triggering a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) that is thought to be characteristic (Epstein and Yanovich, 2019). The pathogenesis of heat stroke is closely similar to that of sepsis (Roberts et al., 2008). In a hot environment, the dilatation of blood vessels on the body surface due to heat dissipation leads to reduced blood flow to internal organs, especially intestinal mucosa, which causes increased intestinal epithelial permeability and bacterial translocation in the intestine, inducing leakage of intestinal endotoxins through the intestine into the circulation and triggering SIRS, ultimately leading to multi-organ dysfunction and death (Yang et al., 2007; Lambert, 2008; Leon and Helwig, 2010). The systemic inflammation associated with heat stroke plays a key role in myocardial injury. Currently, it is thought that the myocardial inflammatory response may be the primary cause of progressive systolic dysfunction (Dörge et al., 2000; Dörge et al., 2002). A large infiltration of inflammatory cells is usually found within the foci of myocardial infarction. Previous studies have shown that suppression of the inflammatory response is an important tool in the treatment of HS-induced myocardial injury (Lin et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2020). During HS, the body undergoes a state of hypercytokinemia, releasing many cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) (Leon and Helwig, 2010; Z. T; Zhang et al., 2021). TNF-α, a key factor in the inflammatory response, plays an important role in neutrophil recruitment and the inflammatory cascade reaction (Yu et al., 2010). In addition, TNF-α induces the production of other inflammatory cytokines and also stimulates the migration and adhesion of neutrophils, leading to dysregulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory factors and inducing an inflammatory cascade reaction, which results in tissue damage (Yu et al., 2010). At the same time, the injured myocardial tissue also releases proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and IL-6, which further exacerbate the systemic inflammatory response (Shen et al., 2019). The TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway has a major contribution to HS-induced inflammation. TLR4 is an essential member of the TLR family and plays a central role in the recognition and response to microbial pathogens and in maintaining the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier (D. Yao et al., 2019). Rats subjected to heat stress have significantly elevated levels of TLR4 (D. Chen et al., 2023). When rats are affected by heat stress, NF-κB is activated by the induced TLR4, leading to the release of pro-inflammatory factors. The production and release of pro-inflammatory factors further activates NF-κB, which induces the NLRP3 inflammasome, leading to a sustained amplification of the initial inflammatory

Cardiac ultrastructure in HS patients exhibits severe endothelial cell damage (Sohal et al., 1968). Vascular endothelial cells cover the surface of the lumen and maintain the structural integrity and microcirculatory function of the coronary microvasculature (Chang et al., 2021). It also acts as a defensive barrier against the penetration of microorganisms, immune cells and coagulation components, which reduces the risk of thrombosis (Chang et al., 2021). Activated in vivo crosstalk exists between vascular endothelium, inflammation and coagulation during HS (Bouchama et al., 1991; al-Mashhadani et al., 1994; Roberts et al., 2008). Endothelial cell dysfunction plays a key role in the initiation and progression of HS (W. Huang et al., 2022). Endothelial cells possess an anti-inflammatory effect under normal physiological conditions, repelling circulating neutrophils from adhesion (Chang et al., 2021). However, when rat myocardial tissue is damaged by heat stress, endothelial cells upregulate a variety of adhesion molecules that attract pro-inflammatory cells (neutrophils and macrophages) to secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines (Harlan et al., 1991; Wihastuti et al., 2018; Chang et al., 2021). Large amounts of pro-inflammatory factors such as IL-6 and TNF-α can trigger endothelial dysfunction and microvascular damage (F. Chen et al., 2017). Damaged endothelial cells express CD40, and in the presence of CD40 interacting with CD40 ligand (CD40L), endothelial cells actively secrete von Willebrand factor (vWF), which promotes platelet adhesion to endothelial cells and contributes to thrombosis (Keuren et al., 2004; Han et al., 2018). The interaction between CD40 and CD40L also stimulates platelets and endothelial cells to activate macrophages and T cells, which further amplifies the inflammatory response (Urbich et al., 2002). Damage to the endothelium, a natural barrier against thrombosis, upregulates procoagulant factors and downregulates anticoagulant factors, thereby disturbing the dynamic balance between pro- and anti-thrombotic activities and inducing microthrombosis (Koupenova et al., 2017). Obstruction of small vessels contributes to infarction and necrosis of myocardial tissue. The damaged tissue releases plasminogen activator which induces the development of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (Sohal et al., 1968). Hearts of patients with HS show evidence of extensive visual and microscopic haemorrhage (Sohal et al., 1968). Aspirin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, that not only inhibits platelet aggregation but also maintains the integrity of endothelial gap junctions (Zhou et al., 2019). Animal study has shown that the treatment with aspirin significantly improves the morphological damage and related enzyme activity of chicken cardiomyocytes induced by heat stress (Wu et al., 2016).

pump, which alters the heart’s pacing rhythm, signal conduction and systolic-diastolic functional state, ultimately leading to myocardial ischemia, necrosis, arrhythmia and heart failure (Hausfater et al., 2010; Chen, et al., 2019; Tseng et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019).

Frontiers in Pharmacology 03 frontiersin.org Xia et al. 10.3389/fphar.2023.1286556 3.3 Abnormal cardiomyocyte death

pathway (Halestrap, 2009; Bauer and Murphy, 2020). mPTP opening results in a series of cytological effects that lead to the release of cytochrome c, activation of caspase family proteases and apoptosis of cardiomyocytes (H. Yao et al., 2022). The mechanism by which HS induces mPTP opening is not yet clear, and the Fas pathway is an important signaling pathway to consider. It induces caspase-8 activation, which subsequently directly activates caspase-3 and leads to the opening of mPTP (Nakamura et al., 2000). However, whether the Fas pathway is involved in HS-induced mPTP opening remains to be explored.

HS instigates multiple toxic effects on the cardiovascular system, including abnormal cardiomyocyte death (Chen et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2023). The damaged myocardial cells exhibit vacuolar changes and partial necrosis (Fan et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2019). Ferroptosis is an essential form of abnormal cardiomyocyte death caused by HS, resulting from the excessive accumulation of iron-dependent lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells, where lipid peroxidation is a key component in triggering ferroptosis (Del Re et al., 2019; Stockwell et al., 2020). HS disrupts the oxidation-antioxidant balance, as evidenced by a decrease in glutathione (GSH) and solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11), an increase in malondialdehyde (MDA), ROS, and Fe2+. HS also induces shrinkage of mitochondria and an increase in the membrane density, which are key features of ferroptosis (Jiang et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2023). This suggests that ferroptosis is actively involved in HS-induced myocardial injury and causes abnormal cardiomyocyte death. Chen et al. further explored the mechanism of ferroptosis in the HS myocardial injury model (D. Chen et al., 2023). P53 expression levels were closely associated with the triggering of ferroptosis (Lei et al., 2021), and its involvement as a transcriptional repressor of SLC7A11 to ferroptosis significantly reduced the expression of SLC7A11, which in turn inhibited the activity of system Xc−, a component of SLC7A11 (Koppula et al., 2018), thereby inhibiting cysteine uptake and reducing GPX4 activity leading to depletion of GSH biosynthesis (Xu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022). Consequently, lipid peroxide accumulation ensued, ultimately culminating in cellular ferroptosis (Ma et al., 2022). P53, one of the molecules downstream of TLR4, is activated by the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway, which plays an active role in the systemic inflammatory response induced by HS (Zhu et al., 2011). In view of this, Chen et al. suggested that HS may induce ferroptosis through the TLR4/NF-κB/ P53 signaling pathway (Chen et al., 2023). Inhibition of TLR4 and NF-κB under HS conditions downregulated P53 expression, upregulated SLC7A11 and GPX4 levels, improved ferroptosisrelated indicators and attenuated myocardial injury, respectively (Chen et al., 2023). Disruption of mitochondrial structure and function can lead to severe cellular damage and death (Zamzami et al., 1997; D’Orsi et al., 2017). Mitochondria plays a crucial role in maintaining intracellular calcium homeostasis (D’Orsi et al., 2017). From rat cardiomyocytes, we know that heat stress causes mitochondrial changes in cardiac myocytes including mitochondrial swelling, rupture of cristae and disruption of the surrounding membrane (Petit et al., 1998; Qian et al., 2004). Ca2+-ATPase on the mitochondrial membrane serves as critical factor in the regulation of calcium homeostasis. However, disruption by heat stress leads to a decrease in Ca2+-ATPase activity, which results in reduced mitochondrial uptake of calcium ions from the cytoplasm and intracellular calcium overload (McCormack and Denton, 1989; Walkon et al., 2022). Intracellular calcium overload further activates calcium-dependent protein kinases, which promote membrane phospholipid hydrolysis, disrupting the cytoskeleton and damaging the integrity of the nucleus, causing severe damage (Vassalle and Lin, 2004). HS directly induces the opening of mitochondrial mPTP, a pivotal event in triggering the cell death

3.4 Metabolic abnormalities The link between metabolic dysregulation and cardiotoxicity has been well established (Russo et al., 2021). Mitochondrial damage caused by HS not only results in abnormal death of cardiomyocytes but also leads to disturbances in energy metabolism (Azevedo et al., 2013). Energy abnormalities in the heart are associated with the development of many heart diseases (X. Wang et al., 2023). Heat stress disrupts the integrity of the mitochondria, which is the basis for normal mitochondrial function, resulting in a suppression of energy production from the oxidative metabolism of cardiomyocytes (Patra and Hay, 2014; Laitano et al., 2020; Deng et al., 2022). However, in response to the high temperatures of the external environment, the heart requires a greater supply of energy to enhance cardiac function, which leads to a significant decrease in the ATP content of the cardiomyocytes and eventual death due to energy deficiency (Qian et al., 2004). Glucose and fatty acids are essential substrates for oxidative phosphorylation. Glucose and lipid metabolism plays an important role in cardiac myocytes by providing energy and maintaining cellular function (H. Tian et al., 2023). However, studies in murine models of EHS have revealed that HS alters cardiomyocyte metabolic pathways, disrupts the glycolytic and oxidative phosphorylation pathways by upregulating glycolysisrelated enzymes, thereby enhancing lactate production to impair cardiomyocyte function (Laitano et al., 2020). The perturbation of glucose and lipid metabolism by HS may be related to the inhibition of the AMPK signaling pathway (Rodríguez et al., 2021). AMPK increases ATP production in cardiomyocytes through stimulation of glucose metabolism and fatty acid oxidation. AMPK phosphorylation at Thr172 induces acyl CoA-carboxylase (ACC) phosphorylation to inhibit the conversion of acetyl-CoA to malonyl-CoA during fatty acids (FAs) synthesis (Carling et al., 2008). Beyond the inhibition of lipid anabolism, p-AMPK also promotes FAs uptake by inducing the activity of the FAs transporter CD36, enhancing β-oxidation (Habets et al., 2009). Glucose metabolism is also regulated by AMPK. p-AMPK increases glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4), which promotes glucose uptake and thus provides a source of energy (D. Zheng et al., 2001). Under HS conditions, phosphorylation of AMPK is inhibited, leading to dysregulation of glucolipid metabolism and disruption of energy metabolism (Roths et al., 2023). This ultimately leads to cell death and impaired cardiac function. Therefore, targeting glucose and lipid metabolism may be an effective way to counteract HS-induced myocardial injury.

Cells from a murine model of myocardial tissue turn on their intrinsic defense mechanisms in the face of heat injury, with a dramatic increase in heat shock protein (HSP) expression being a key part of the heat shock response (Tang et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2016). It can interlock with apoptosis, inflammation and autophagy to regulate cellular homeostasis and prevent tissue damage (Hsu et al., 2013; Shen et al., 2019). It was mentioned earlier that patients with HS can develop severe vascular endothelial cell damage. After heat exposure, strong positive signals for HSP90 and HSP70 are detected in rat cardiac microvascular endothelial cells, helping the vascular endothelium to resist heat injury (X. Zhang et al., 2020). An increase in HSP90 activates the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Phosphorylated Akt negatively regulates the expression of proapoptotic proteins and contributes to cell survival (Zhang et al., 2020). It is known from rat-related experiments that HSP levels vary with the duration of heat stress. In the early stages of HS, HSP rises sharply, and as time progresses, HSP is heavily depleted, resulting in abnormally low HSP levels in the later stages (H. B. Chen et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2020). When HSP90 is crushed, the interaction of HSP90 with Akt is reduced, weakening the protective effect. This results in the vascular endothelium exhibiting a more sensitive state to heat stress and more severe damage (Zhang et al., 2020).

HS involves a complex biochemical cascade of reactions and is caused by a combination of factors. The cardiovascular system is considered to be the first system affected by HS. Circulatory shock occurs in approximately 20%–65% of patients, and an even higher 85% of patients will develop ECG abnormalities (Austin and Berry, 1956; Asmara, 2020). However, a dearth of clinical directives exists regarding the efficacious management of cardiovascular ailments amidst elevated temperatures. A precise comprehension of the fundamental mechanisms whereby heightened temperatures inflict harm upon myocardial tissue is imperative to judiciously formulate preventative and therapeutic strategies. This review summarizes the possible pathogenesis of HS-induced myocardial injury, which can help provide new targets for the treatment of HS. The predominant body of research scrutinizing myocardial impairment due to hyperthermia predominantly comprises animal studies, with a paucity of involvement from clinical cohorts. The acquisition of clinical data assumes heightened significance. A comprehensive database analysis encompassing 27 countries spanning the years 1979–2019 revealed a 7% escalation in mortality among patients with ischemic heart disease during episodes of soaring temperatures (Alahmad et al., 2023). Moreover, a meta-analysis delineated a 2.8% augmentation in the risk of developing coronary heart disease for each 1°C ascent in temperature (J. Liu et al., 2022). Endothelial cell damage within cardiac vasculature due to pyrexia precipitates thrombosis, culminating in acute coronary incidents. Clinical investigations have documented a substantial surge in hospitalizations linked to coronary artery disease following exposure to elevated temperatures (Fuhrmann et al., 2016). Long-term monitoring of hyperthermiastricken patients corroborates the critical role of intact myocardial tissue, with a meager 1-year survival rate of merely 24% observed in cases with markedly elevated troponin levels (Marchand and Gin, 2022). This underscores the profound impact of myocardial impairment on the prognosis of hyperthermia-afflicted individuals. Consequently, the primary focus of research should pivot towards averting myocardial damage induced by HS. The incomplete comprehension of HS pathogenesis, coupled with the absence of evidence-based medical guidance for clinical interventions, has resulted in the inadequacies of current treatment modalities. Predominantly, supportive therapies such as whole-body cooling and fluid resuscitation constitute the primary approach. Regrettably, a lack of standardized endpoint objectives for wholebody cooling persists to date. Furthermore, despite numerous animal studies affirming the favorable efficacy of antiinflammatory and anti-endotoxic agents for HS, their translation into clinical success remains limited. Aspirin, despite demonstrating effectiveness against heat-induced injury in avian cardiac tissues, fails to manifest any clinical benefit and may potentially exacerbate coagulation disorders and hepatic dysfunction (Tek and Olshaker, 1992). Individuals with cardiovascular ailments not only contend with the vulnerability of their cardiac systems in the face of HS but also grapple with an elevated risk due to commonly prescribed cardiac medications. β-blockers impede the capacity to augment cardiac output in response to HS, while diuretics exacerbate hypovolemia and elevate the risk of electrolyte imbalances (Marchand and Gin, 2022). This begs the question of which

4 The treatment strategy for HS The prognosis of patients with heat stroke is directly related to the degree and duration of the increase in core temperature (Hadad et al., 2004). Therefore, whole-body cooling is the current treatment of choice for HS. Following the onset of HS, hypotension and altered cardiac protein profiles are demonstrated, which can be reversed by whole-body cooling (Ko et al., 2020). Temperature reduction is achieved mainly by conduction, evaporation and convection (Hadad et al., 2004). In addition, symptomatic support therapy is an integral part of the treatment. When hypotension occurs in patients, aggressive fluid resuscitation and vasoactive medication should be administered with the avoidance of alpha-adrenergic drugs as they exacerbate peripheral vasoconstriction and inhibit core body temperature reduction (Atha, 2013; Asmara, 2020). Excessive inflammation and coagulation disorders are important pathogenic mechanisms of HS, therefore anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant therapies are also available as treatment options (Y. F. Tian et al., 2013; Kobayashi et al., 2018). For patients who progress to multiorgan dysfunction despite hypothermia treatment, continuous blood purification and plasma exchange are often selected, aiming not only to alleviate the body’s catabolic state but also to eliminate inflammatory mediators from the bloodstream to facilitate the recovery of HS patients (Wakino et al., 2005; K. J; Chen et al., 2014). Given the danger and intractability of HS, prevention strategies are far more beneficial than any present treatment strategies. People at risk of heat exposure should be thermally acclimatized in advance, with consumption of sufficient fluids and adequate nutrition (Asmara, 2020).

area. Fortunately, the rapid development of modern bioinformatics technologies offers us valuable tools to deepen our understanding of the pathogenesis of HS-induced myocardial injury and implement precise treatments.

medications can be initiated or stopped during extreme heat conditions. In cases where the heart receives heat damage, significant changes in cardiac metabolism occur. These changes are not only passive bystanders, but are actual participants in causing heat stress damage to the myocardium. Targeting myocardial metabolism could be the tool for our effective treatment. Interventions in cardiac metabolic processes have been successfully used to reduce infarct size in animal models of myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury (Valls-Lacalle et al., 2018; Zuurbier et al., 2020). However, suitable drug targets for conversion in patients with acute myocardial infarction are still awaited. Cardiometabolic therapies are challenging, but fortunately, recent methodological advances in detecting metabolic changes within the heart will make our efforts more achievable. In conclusion, HS-induced myocardial injury arises from a combination of excessive inflammation, endothelial cell damage, abnormal cardiac metabolism, and heat shock protein dysregulation. In the treatment, in addition to systemic supportive therapy it should also focus on precise targeting of myocardial tissue. Only with a deeper and clearer understanding of the mechanisms underlying the development of HS will there be an opportunity to establish more effective treatment.

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. 6 Future perspective Conflict of interest

Given the increasing mortality rate associated with HS, extensive research has been conducted to explore this condition. A meticulous examination of the literature has revealed potential molecular targets for HS treatment, encompassing TLR4, P53, AMPK, and HSP. Additionally, the Fas signaling pathway presents a novel avenue for HS management. However, the majority of these investigations have been confined to the realm of animal studies, and the therapeutic strategies delineated await clinical validation. Consequently, we should focus more on clinical trials to find relevant drug targets that can serve clinical HS patients. Furthermore, the absence of targeted therapy for HS-induced myocardial injury underscores the need for advancements in this

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Author contributions RX: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. MS: Writing–original draft. YL: Writing–review and editing. JY: Writing–review and editing. HL: Software, Visualization, Writing–review and editing. JY: Software, Visualization, Writing–review and editing. JL: Software, Writing–review and editing. YH: Visualization, Writing–review and editing. BW: Validation, Writing–review and editing. GY: Validation, Writing–review and editing. JL: Supervision, Writing–review and editing.

📖 中文全文 Chinese Full Text

中文

# 热射病诱发心肌损伤的发病机制与治疗策略

**作者:** 夏睿¹†,孙萌²†,李玉玲³,殷静⁴,刘欢¹,杨军¹,刘静¹,何燕宇¹,吴冰¹,杨贵祥¹,李建华¹*

¹ 重庆大学江津医院重症医学科,重庆,中国 ² 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院麻醉科,武汉,中国 ³ 大连医科大学第一附属医院急诊科,大连,中国 ⁴ 南京大学医学院附属金陵医院,南京,中国

† 本文共同第一作者

---

## 摘要

热射病(HS)是一种以核心体温升高至40°C以上为特征的发热性疾病,伴有中枢神经系统功能障碍及随后出现的多器官功能障碍综合征。近年来,随着环境温度持续升高,热射病的死亡率呈上升趋势。心血管系统在热射病的发病机制中发挥重要作用,其作为体温调节的关键系统之一,其稳定性与热射病的严重程度密切相关。全身炎症反应和内皮细胞损伤是热射病的重要特征,而铁死亡、心肌代谢紊乱和热休克蛋白失调等因素也参与了热射病对心肌组织的损伤。本文全面详细地阐述了热射病诱发心肌损伤的发病机制,并讨论了当前的治疗策略及热射病有前景的治疗靶点。

**关键词:** 热射病,心肌损伤,发病机制,治疗策略,炎症

---

## 1 引言

热射病(HS)是一种以核心体温迅速升高至40°C以上为特征的疾病,伴有全身炎症反应和中枢神经系统功能障碍(Bouchama and Knochel, 2002; Leon and Helwig, 2010; Peiris et al., 2017)。近年来,由于人为气候变化,热相关死亡人数显著增加(Toutant et al., 2011)。严重热浪的频率正威胁着全球人类健康,给公共卫生带来巨大挑战,并引起各研究领域的广泛关注(M. Zheng et al., 2020)。根据骨骼肌收缩是否参与,热射病可分为经典型热射病(CHS)和劳力型热射病(EHS)(Bouchama et al., 2022)。CHS常发生于患有基础疾病的老年人群,而EHS通常发生在高温环境下进行剧烈运动的年轻健康人群中(Peiris et al., 2017; Bouchama et al., 2022)。无论何种类型的热射病,均与细胞毒性、炎症和凝血反应相互作用导致的广泛多器官组织损伤有关(Piver et al., 1999)。心脏作为热损伤中的易损器官(Low et al., 2011; Lou et al., 2019; Ko et al., 2020),易发生心律失常、功能衰竭和局灶性心肌坏死(Argaud et al., 2007; Desai et al., 2023)。

体温调节异常、心血管功能障碍和组织灌注异常是多器官功能障碍综合征的相关因素(Low et al., 2011; Cramer et al., 2022)。为散热,机体增加皮肤血流,重新分配血容量,最终发展为低血压和灌注障碍(S. H. Chen et al., 2006)。因此,心血管系统的调节在热射病发病机制中起关键作用。阐明热射病诱发心肌损伤的机制有助于建立改善循环功能、降低热射病死亡率的治疗方案。然而,热射病的发病机制尚不明确,热射病期间心肌损伤的预防策略也尚缺乏。本文旨在系统综述以加深对热射病诱发心肌损伤的认识,并为未来研究提供参考(图1)。

---

## 2 热射病与心肌损伤

在正常情况下,核心体温升高0.3°C即可触发心血管调节反应,以保护机体免受热损伤。该调节通过加快心率、增强心肌收缩力、提高心输出量以及减少非皮肤区域的血流和血容量来增加散热(Crandall et al., 2008; Crandall and González-Alonso, 2010)。在热射病期间,当周围高温环境持续存在时,上述调节功能持续活跃。大量血液从心脏泵向外周血管以通过汗液散热,但这也会导致机体高热性脱水、循环血容量减少、组织灌注不足、心肌细胞缺氧和坏死(Crandall and González-Alonso, 2010; G. D. Chen et al., 2019)。同时,体液丢失扰乱电解质平衡并干扰钠钾泵功能,改变心脏的起搏节律、信号传导和收缩-舒张功能状态,最终导致心肌缺血、坏死、心律失常和心力衰竭(Hausfater et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2019; Tseng et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019)。

---

## 3 热射病诱发心肌损伤的相关机制

### 3.1 促炎与抗炎平衡失调

在热射病中,全身促炎与抗炎平衡被破坏,触发被认为是热射病特征性的全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)(Epstein and Yanovich, 2019)。热射病的发病机制与脓毒症极为相似(Roberts et al., 2008)。在高温环境中,散热导致的体表血管扩张使内脏器官(尤其是肠黏膜)血流减少,引起肠上皮通透性增加和肠道细菌移位,促使肠内毒素渗漏进入循环,触发SIRS,最终导致多器官功能障碍和死亡(Yang et al., 2007; Lambert, 2008; Leon and Helwig, 2010)。与热射病相关的全身炎症在心肌损伤中起关键作用。目前认为,心肌炎症反应可能是进行性收缩功能障碍的主要原因(Dörge et al., 2000; Dörge et al., 2002)。在心肌梗死病灶内通常可发现大量炎症细胞浸润。既往研究表明,抑制炎症反应是治疗热射病诱发心肌损伤的重要手段(Lin et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2020)。

在热射病期间,机体处于高细胞因子血症状态,释放大量细胞因子,如肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)(Leon and Helwig, 2010; Z. T. Zhang et al., 2021)。TNF-α是炎症反应中的关键因子,在中性粒细胞募集和炎症级联反应中发挥重要作用(Yu et al., 2010)。此外,TNF-α诱导其他炎性细胞因子的产生,并刺激中性粒细胞的迁移和黏附,导致促炎和抗炎因子失调,诱发炎症级联反应,从而造成组织损伤(Yu et al., 2010)。同时,受损的心肌组织也释放促炎细胞因子,包括TNF-α和IL-6,进一步加重全身炎症反应(Shen et al., 2019)。

TLR4/NF-κB信号通路在热射病诱发的炎症中起主要作用。TLR4是TLR家族的重要成员,在识别和应答微生物病原体以及维持肠上皮屏障完整性中发挥核心作用(D. Yao et al., 2019)。热应激大鼠的TLR4水平显著升高(D. Chen et al., 2023)。当大鼠受到热应激影响时,NF-κB被诱导的TLR4激活,导致促炎因子释放。促炎因子的产生和释放进一步激活NF-κB,后者诱导NLRP3炎症小体,导致初始炎症信号的持续放大,即所谓的"炎症级联效应"(Z. Huang et al., 2016; X. Zhang et al., 2017)。TLR4在心肌细胞中表达最高,在热射病期间,TLR4/NF-κB信号控制促炎因子的产生以诱导心肌组织损伤(X. Liu et al., 2016)。抑制TLR4信号通路可减轻热射病诱发的炎症反应并改善大鼠异常心功能(Chen et al., 2023)。

### 3.2 内皮细胞损伤与功能障碍

热射病患者的心脏超微结构显示严重的内皮细胞损伤(Sohal et al., 1968)。血管内皮细胞覆盖于管腔表面,维持冠状动脉微血管的结构完整性和微循环功能(Chang et al., 2021)。它还作为防御屏障,阻止微生物、免疫细胞和凝血成分的穿透,降低血栓形成风险(Chang et al., 2021)。在热射病期间,血管内皮、炎症和凝血之间存在体内交互对话(Bouchama et al., 1991; al-Mashhadani et al., 1994; Roberts et al., 2008)。内皮细胞功能障碍在热射病的启动和进展中起关键作用(W. Huang et al., 2022)。

在正常生理条件下,内皮细胞具有抗炎作用,排斥循环中性粒细胞的黏附(Chang et al., 2021)。然而,当大鼠心肌组织受到热应激损伤时,内皮细胞上调多种黏附分子,吸引促炎细胞(中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞)分泌促炎细胞因子(Harlan et al., 1991; Wihastuti et al., 2018; Chang et al., 2021)。大量促炎因子如IL-6和TNF-α可触发内皮功能障碍和微血管损伤(F. Chen et al., 2017)。受损的内皮细胞表达CD40,在CD40与其配体(CD40L)相互作用下,内皮细胞主动分泌血管性血友病因子(vWF),促进血小板黏附于内皮细胞并促成血栓形成(Keuren et al., 2004; Han et al., 2018)。CD40与CD40L的相互作用还刺激血小板和内皮细胞激活巨噬细胞和T细胞,进一步放大炎症反应(Urbich et al., 2002)。内皮作为抗血栓形成的天然屏障,其损伤会上调促凝因子并下调抗凝因子,从而扰乱促血栓与抗血栓活动之间的动态平衡,诱发微血栓形成(Koupenova et al., 2017)。小血管阻塞导致心肌组织梗死和坏死。受损组织释放纤溶酶原激活物,诱发弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)(Sohal et al., 1968)。热射病患者的心脏可见广泛的肉眼和显微镜下出血证据(Sohal et al., 1968)。

阿司匹林是一种非甾体抗炎药,不仅抑制血小板聚集,还维持内皮缝隙连接的完整性(Zhou et al., 2019)。动物研究表明,阿司匹林治疗可显著改善热应激诱导的鸡心肌细胞形态损伤和相关酶活性(Wu et al., 2016)。

### 3.3 异常心肌细胞死亡

热射病对心血管系统引发多种毒性效应,包括异常心肌细胞死亡(Chen et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2023)。受损的心肌细胞呈现空泡样改变和部分坏死(Fan et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2019)。铁死亡是热射病引起的异常心肌细胞死亡的重要形式,源于细胞内铁依赖性脂质活性氧(ROS)的过度积累,其中脂质过氧化是触发铁死亡的关键环节(Del Re et al., 2019; Stockwell et al., 2020)。热射病破坏氧化-抗氧化平衡,表现为谷胱甘肽(GSH)和溶质载体家族7成员11(SLC7A11)减少,丙二醛(MDA)、ROS和Fe²⁺增加。热射病还诱导线粒体缩小和膜密度增加,这是铁死亡的关键特征(Jiang et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2023)。这表明铁死亡积极参与热射病诱发的心肌损伤,导致异常心肌细胞死亡。Chen等进一步探讨了铁死亡在热射病心肌损伤模型中的机制(D. Chen et al., 2023)。P53表达水平与铁死亡的触发密切相关(Lei et al., 2021),其作为SLC7A11的转录抑制因子参与铁死亡,显著降低SLC7A11的表达,进而抑制SLC7A11组成的系统Xc⁻的活性(Koppula et al., 2018),从而抑制半胱氨酸摄取并降低GPX4活性,导致GSH生物合成耗竭(Xu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022)。最终导致脂质过氧化物积累,最终引发细胞铁死亡(Ma et al., 2022)。P53是TLR4下游分子之一,被TLR4/NF-κB信号通路激活,在热射病诱导的全身炎症反应中发挥积极作用(Zhu et al., 2011)。鉴于此,Chen等提出热射病可能通过TLR4/NF-κB/P53信号通路诱导铁死亡(Chen et al., 2023)。在热射病条件下抑制TLR4和NF-κB可下调P53表达,上调SLC7A11和GPX4水平,改善铁死亡相关指标并减轻心肌损伤(Chen et al., 2023)。

线粒体结构和功能的破坏可导致严重的细胞损伤和死亡(Zamzami et al., 1997; D'Orsi et al., 2017)。线粒体在维持细胞内钙稳态中发挥关键作用(D'Orsi et al., 2017)。从大鼠心肌细胞中可知,热应激引起心肌细胞线粒体改变,包括线粒体肿胀、嵴断裂和周围膜破坏(Petit et al., 1998; Qian et al., 2004)。线粒体膜上的Ca²⁺-ATP酶是调节钙稳态的关键因素。然而,热应激对其的破坏导致Ca²⁺-ATP酶活性降低,使线粒体对细胞质中钙离子的摄取减少,导致细胞内钙超载(McCormack and Denton, 1989; Walkon et al., 2022)。细胞内钙超载进一步激活钙依赖性蛋白激酶,促进膜磷脂水解,破坏细胞骨架并损伤细胞核完整性,造成严重损伤(Vassalle and Lin, 2004)。热射病直接诱导线粒体通透性转换孔(mPTP)开放,这是触发细胞死亡通路的关键事件(Halestrap, 2009; Bauer and Murphy, 2020)。mPTP开放导致一系列细胞学效应,包括细胞色素c释放、半胱天冬酶家族蛋白酶激活和心肌细胞凋亡(H. Yao et al., 2022)。热射病诱导mPTP开放的机制尚不清楚,Fas通路是值得考虑的重要信号通路。它诱导半胱天冬酶-8激活,随后直接激活半胱天冬酶-3并导致mPTP开放(Nakamura et al., 2000)。然而,Fas通路是否参与热射病诱导的mPTP开放仍有待探索。

### 3.4 代谢异常

代谢失调与心脏毒性之间的联系已被充分证实(Russo et al., 2021)。热射病引起的线粒体损伤不仅导致异常心肌细胞死亡,还引起能量代谢紊乱(Azevedo et al., 2013)。心脏能量异常与多种心脏疾病的发生发展有关(X. Wang et al., 2023)。热应激破坏线粒体完整性,而线粒体完整性是正常线粒体功能的基础,导致心肌细胞氧化代谢的能量产生受到抑制(Patra and Hay, 2014; Laitano et al., 2020; Deng et al., 2022)。然而,为应对外界高温环境,心脏需要更多的能量供应以增强心功能,这导致心肌细胞ATP含量显著降低,最终因能量缺乏而死亡(Qian et al., 2004)。

葡萄糖和脂肪酸是氧化磷酸化的必需底物。糖和脂质代谢通过提供能量和维持细胞功能在心肌细胞中发挥重要作用(H. Tian et al., 2023)。然而,EHS小鼠模型研究表明,热射病改变心肌细胞代谢途径,通过上调糖酵解相关酶来扰乱糖酵解和氧化磷酸化途径,从而增强乳酸产生以损害心肌细胞功能(Laitano et al., 2020)。热射病对糖脂代谢的干扰可能与AMPK信号通路抑制有关(Rodríguez et al., 2021)。AMPK通过刺激葡萄糖代谢和脂肪酸氧化来增加心肌细胞ATP产生。AMPK在Thr172位点的磷酸化诱导乙酰辅酶A羧化酶(ACC)磷酸化,抑制脂肪酸(FAs)合成过程中乙酰辅酶A向丙二酰辅酶A的转化(Carling et al., 2008)。除了抑制脂质合成代谢外,p-AMPK还通过诱导脂肪酸转运蛋白CD36的活性促进FAs摄取,增强β-氧化(Habets et al., 2009)。葡萄糖代谢也受AMPK调节。p-AMPK增加葡萄糖转运蛋白4(GLUT4),促进葡萄糖摄取从而提供能量来源(D. Zheng et al., 2001)。在热射病条件下,AMPK磷酸化受到抑制,导致糖脂代谢失调和能量代谢紊乱(Roths et al., 2023)。这最终导致细胞死亡和心功能受损。因此,靶向糖脂代谢可能是对抗热射病诱发心肌损伤的有效途径。

### 3.5 热休克蛋白失调

面对热损伤,小鼠心肌组织细胞启动其内在防御机制,热休克蛋白(HSP)表达急剧增加是热休克反应的关键组成部分(Tang et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2016)。HSP可与凋亡、炎症和自噬相互关联,调节细胞稳态并防止组织损伤(Hsu et al., 2013; Shen et al., 2019)。前文已提及,热射病患者可出现严重的血管内皮细胞损伤。热暴露后,在大鼠心脏微血管内皮细胞中可检测到HSP90和HSP70的强阳性信号,帮助血管内皮抵抗热损伤(X. Zhang et al., 2020)。HSP90的增加激活PI3K/Akt信号通路。磷酸化的Akt负调控促凋亡蛋白的表达,有助于细胞存活(Zhang et al., 2020)。从大鼠相关实验可知,HSP水平随热应激持续时间而变化。在热射病早期,HSP急剧升高,随着时间推移,HSP被大量消耗,导致后期HSP水平异常低下(H. B. Chen et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2020)。当HSP90被耗竭时,HSP90与Akt的相互作用减弱,保护作用降低。这导致血管内皮对热应激表现出更敏感的状态和更严重的损伤(Zhang et al., 2020)。

---

## 4 热射病的治疗策略

热射病患者的预后与核心体温升高的程度和持续时间直接相关(Hadad et al., 2004)。因此,全身降温是目前热射病的首选治疗方法。热射病发作后,可出现低血压和心肌蛋白谱改变,这些均可通过全身降温逆转(Ko et al., 2020)。降温主要通过传导、蒸发和对流实现(Hadad et al., 2004)。此外,对症支持治疗是治疗的重要组成部分。当患者出现低血压时,应积极进行液体复苏和使用血管活性药物,同时避免使用α-肾上腺素能药物,因其会加重外周血管收缩并抑制核心体温降低(Atha, 2013; Asmara, 2020)。过度炎症和凝血障碍是热射病的重要发病机制,因此抗炎和抗凝治疗也可作为治疗选择(Y. F. Tian et al., 2013; Kobayashi et al., 2018)。对于尽管接受低温治疗但仍进展为多器官功能障碍的患者,常选择连续性血液净化和血浆置换,目的不仅在于缓解机体分解代谢状态,还在于清除血流中的炎症介质以促进热射病患者康复(Wakino et al., 2005; K. J. Chen et al., 2014)。鉴于热射病的危险性和难治性,预防策略远比任何现有治疗策略更为有益。有热暴露风险的人群应提前进行热习补,摄入充足的液体和足够的营养(Asmara, 2020)。

---

## 5 讨论

热射病涉及复杂的生化级联反应,由多种因素共同引起。心血管系统被认为是首先受累的系统。约20%–65%的患者发生循环休克,更高比例(85%)的患者会出现心电图异常(Austin and Berry, 1956; Asmara, 2020)。然而,目前缺乏关于高温环境下有效管理心血管疾病的临床指南。准确理解高温对心肌组织造成损伤的基本机制,对于合理制定预防和治疗策略至关重要。本文总结了热射病诱发心肌损伤的可能发病机制,有助于为热射病治疗提供新的靶点。

大多数研究高热所致心肌损伤的研究以动物实验为主,临床队列的参与较少。获取临床数据具有重要意义。一项涵盖1979–2019年27个国家的综合数据库分析显示,在气温飙升期间,缺血性心脏病患者的死亡率增加了7%(Alahmad et al., 2023)。此外,一项荟萃分析显示,温度每升高1°C,冠心病的发生风险增加2.8%(J. Liu et al., 2022)。发热引起的心脏血管内皮损伤可引发血栓形成,最终导致急性冠脉事件。临床研究表明,高温暴露后冠心病相关住院人数大幅增加(Fuhrmann et al., 2016)。对高热患者的长期监测证实了完整心肌组织的重要性,肌钙蛋白水平显著升高的患者1年生存率仅为24%(Marchand and Gin, 2022)。这凸显了心肌损伤对高热患者预后的深远影响。因此,研究的首要重点应转向预防热射病诱发的心肌损伤。

对热射病发病机制的认识不充分,加上缺乏循证医学指导的临床干预措施,导致当前治疗方式存在不足。主要以全身降温和液体复苏等支持治疗为主。遗憾的是,目前仍缺乏全身降温的标准化终点目标。此外,尽管大量动物研究证实了抗炎剂和抗内毒素制剂对热射病的良好疗效,但其临床转化仍然有限。阿司匹林虽然在禽类心脏组织中显示出抗热损伤的效果,但在临床上未能表现出任何益处,甚至可能加重凝血障碍和肝功能不全(Tek and Olshaker, 1992)。患有心血管疾病的患者不仅面临心脏系统在热射病面前的脆弱性,还面临常用心脏药物带来的更高风险。β受体阻滞剂削弱了热射病时增加心输出量的能力,而利尿剂加重低血容量并增加电解质紊乱的风险(Marchand and Gin, 2022)。这就引出了一个问题:在极端高温条件下,哪些药物可以开始使用或停用?

当心脏受到热损伤时,心脏代谢会发生显著变化。这些变化不仅是被动的旁观者,实际上还参与了热应激对心肌的损伤。靶向心肌代谢可能是我们有效治疗的工具。心脏代谢干预已成功用于减少心肌缺血-再灌注损伤动物模型的梗死面积(Valls-Lacalle et al., 2018; Zuurbier et al., 2020)。然而,适用于急性心肌梗死患者的合适药物靶点仍有待发现。心脏代谢治疗具有挑战性,但幸运的是,检测心脏内代谢变化的最新方法学进展将使我们的努力更加可行。

总之,热射病诱发心肌损伤源于过度炎症、内皮细胞损伤、心脏代谢异常和热休克蛋白失调的综合作用。在治疗中,除全身支持治疗外,还应关注对心肌组织的精准靶向。只有更深入、更清晰地理解热射病发生发展的机制基础,才有机会建立更有效的治疗方案。

---

## 6 未来展望

鉴于热射病相关死亡率的上升,已有大量研究对这一疾病进行了深入探索。通过对文献的细致梳理,已发现热射病治疗的潜在分子靶点,包括TLR4、P53、AMPK和HSP。此外,Fas信号通路为热射病管理提供了新途径。然而,这些研究大多局限于动物实验领域,所描述的治疗策略尚需临床验证。因此,我们应更多地关注临床试验,寻找可为热射病临床患者服务的相关药物靶点。此外,热射病诱发心肌损伤缺乏靶向治疗,凸显了这一领域需要进一步发展的迫切性。幸运的是,现代生物信息技术的快速发展为我们提供了宝贵的工具,以加深对热射病诱发心肌损伤发病机制的认识并实施精准治疗。

---

**利益冲突声明:** 作者声明本研究在不存在任何可能被解释为潜在利益冲突的商业或财务关系的情况下进行。

**作者贡献:** RX:撰写初稿,审阅编辑。MS:撰写初稿。YL:审阅编辑。JY:审阅编辑。HL:软件,可视化,审阅编辑。JY:软件,可视化,审阅编辑。JL:软件,审阅编辑。YH:可视化,审阅编辑。BW:验证,审阅编辑。GY:验证,审阅编辑。JL:指导,审阅编辑。

**基金资助:** 作者声明本研究未获得任何资金支持。

---

**引用格式:** Xia R, Sun M, Li Y, Yin J, Liu H, Yang J, Liu J, He Y, Wu B, Yang G and Li J (2024), The pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies of heat stroke-induced myocardial injury. Front. Pharmacol. 14:1286556. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1286556

**版权声明:** © 2024 Xia, Sun, Li, Yin, Liu, Yang, Liu, He, Wu, Yang and Li. 这是一篇根据知识共享署名许可协议(CC BY)分发的开放获取文章。在其他论坛使用、分发或复制是被允许的,前提是注明原作者和版权所有者,并且引用本期刊的原始出版物,符合公认的学术实践。不符合这些条件的使用、分发或复制是不被允许的。