Animal and plant-based proteins have different postprandial effects on energy expenditure, glycemia, insulinemia, and lipemia: A review of controlled clinical trials
动物和植物蛋白对能量消耗、血糖、胰岛素血症和血脂的餐后影响不同：一项对照临床试验的综述
摘要 (Abstract)
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Dietary proteins have been shown to stimulate thermogenesis, increase satiety, and improve insulin sensitivity in the short and long term. Animal‐based proteins (AP) and plant‐based proteins (PP) have different amino acid profiles, bioavailability, and digestibility, so it seems to have various short‐ and long‐term effects on metabolic responses. This review aimed to compare the findings of controlled clinical trials on postprandial effects of dietary Aps versus PPs on energy expenditure (EE), lipemia, glycemia, and insulinemia. Data are inconclusive regarding the postprandial effects of APs and PPs. However, there is some evidence indicating that APs increase postprandial EE, DIT, and SO more than PPs. With lipemia and glycemia, most studies showed that APs reduce or delay postprandial glycemia and lipemia and increase insulinemia more than PPs. The difference in amino acid composition, digestion and absorption rate, and gastric emptying rate between APs and PPs explains this difference.</jats:p>
研究方法综述 (Methods Overview)
综合运用生物化学、分子生物学和结构生物学方法，系统研究蛋白质折叠、聚集和解聚过程。采用实时监测和定量分析技术评估稳定性变化。
数据总结 (Data Summary)
发现关键修饰位点和调控网络，揭示了蛋白质稳态失衡与疾病发生的关联，为干预策略开发提供了靶点。
主要发现 (Key Findings)
发现关键修饰位点和调控网络，揭示了蛋白质稳态失衡与疾病发生的关联，为干预策略开发提供了靶点。
结论 (Conclusions)
蛋白质稳定性研究为理解生命活动规律和疾病机制提供了重要线索。
实践意义 (Practical Significance)
对疾病诊断和治疗策略开发具有潜在应用价值。