The tardigrade protein CAHS D interacts with, but does not retain, water in hydrated and desiccated systems

pmc Sci Rep Sci Rep 1579 scirep Scientific Reports 2045-2322 Nature Publishing Group PMC10300006 PMC10300006.1 10300006 10300006 37369754 10.1038/s41598-023-37485-3 37485 1 Article The tardigrade protein CAHS D interacts with, but does not retain, water in hydrated and desiccated systems Sanchez-Martinez Silvia Ramirez John F. Meese Emma K. Childs Charles A. Boothby Thomas C. tboothby@uwyo.edu grid.135963.b 0000 0001 2109 0381 Department of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071 USA 27 6 2023 2023 13 425018 10449 16 1 2023 22 6 2023 27 06 2023 29 06 2023 01 07 2023 © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . Tardigrades are a group of microscopic animals renowned for their ability to survive near complete desiccation. A family of proteins, unique to tardigrades, called Cytoplasmic Abundant Heat Soluble (CAHS) proteins are necessary to mediate robust desiccation tolerance in these animals. However, the mechanism(s) by which CAHS proteins help to protect tardigrades during water-loss have not been fully elucidated. Here we use thermogravimetric analysis to empirically test the proposed hypothesis that tardigrade CAHS proteins, due to their propensity to form hydrogels, help to retain water during desiccation. We find that regardless of its gelled state, both in vitro and in vivo, a model CAHS protein (CAHS D) retains no more water than common proteins and control cells in the dry state. However, we find that while CAHS D proteins do not increase the total amount of water retained in a dry system, they interact with the small amount of water that does remain. Our study indicates that desiccation tolerance mediated by CAHS D cannot be simply ascribed to water retention and instead implicates its ability to interact more tightly with residual water as a possible mechanism underlying its protective capacity. These results advance our fundamental understanding of tardigrade desiccation tolerance which could provide potential avenues for new technologies to aid in the storage of dry shelf-stable pharmaceuticals and the generation of stress tolerant crops to ensure food security in the face of global climate change. Subject terms Biochemistry Physiology http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000104 National Aeronautics and Space Administration 21-EXO21-0046 Boothby Thomas C. http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002 National Institutes of Health P20GM103432 Boothby Thomas C. pmc-status-qastatus 0 pmc-status-live yes pmc-status-embargo no pmc-status-released yes pmc-prop-open-access yes pmc-prop-olf no pmc-prop-manuscript no pmc-prop-legally-suppressed no pmc-prop-has-pdf yes pmc-prop-has-supplement yes pmc-prop-pdf-only no pmc-prop-suppress-copyright no pmc-prop-is-real-version no pmc-prop-is-scanned-article no pmc-prop-preprint no pmc-prop-in-epmc yes pmc-license-ref CC BY issue-copyright-statement © Springer Nature Limited 2023 Introduction Ever since the father of microscopy, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek observed tiny desiccated “animalcules” reanimating after the addition of water to dirt he had dried over the course of a summer, understanding how certain animals are able to cope with losing the hydrating water inside their bodies and cells has fascinated scientists. Despite centuries passing, we still only know of four phyla within the Kingdom Animalia containing species that can perform this trick, known as anhydrobiosis (Greek for “life without water”), including some arthropods, nematodes, bdelloid rotifers, and tardigrades 1 – 9 . A mechanistic understanding of how these diminutive, but robust, animals survive the extreme stress of desiccation is one of the enduring mysteries of organismal physiology. Classically, successful anhydrobiosis has been attributed to the accumulation of high levels (~ 20 percent dry mass) of non-reducing disaccharides, such as trehalose 2 , 3 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 . Trehalose is thought to work to protect organisms, their cells, and cellular components through several protective mechanisms including vitrification, water replacement, stabilization of sensitive proteins via reduced preferential binding to their unfolded state, and as a synergistic cosolute 7 , 12 – 17 . Interestingly, despite trehalose being a bonafide mediator of desiccation tolerance, it appears to be made in low levels, or not at all, in some desiccation-tolerant organisms such as tardigrades and rotifers 14 , 18 – 21 . While this does not diminish the role of trehalose in mediating some instances of anhydrobiosis, it does point to the fact that other mediators must exist. A recently emerging paradigm in the desiccation tolerance field is that anhydrobiosis can be mediated not only through the accumulation of massive levels of sugars, but also by the accumulation of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) 14 , 15 , 22 – 29 . IDPs are proteins which lack stable three-dimensional structures, and instead exist in an ensemble of interconverting conformations 30 – 32 . IDPs are ubiquitous features of proteomes ranging from those of viruses to humans, and despite lacking stable three-dimensional structures play vital roles in many cellular and developmental phenomena 30 – 33 . One IDP family that has recently garnered attention from the field of desiccation tolerance is the so-called Cytoplasmic Abundant Heat Soluble (CAHS) protein family 14 , 23 , 34 – 37 . CAHS proteins are unique to tardigrades, are required for these animals to robustly survive desiccation, increase desiccation tolerance when heterologously expressed in simple systems such as yeast and bacteria, and are sufficient to protect desiccation-sensitive enzymes during drying in vitro 14 , 23 , 35 . Like many other anhydrobiotic organisms, tardigrades vitrify when dried, but seemingly only when expressing high levels of CAHS proteins 23 , 38 , 39 . In their purified state, CAHS proteins have been empirically demonstrated to form non-crystalline amorphous (vitrified) solids when dried, as have yeast heterologously expressing these proteins 23 . Vitrified CAHS proteins have been confirmed to plasticize with the addition of water, which is diagnostic, within the polymer field, of a vitrified material 39 – 41 . As mentioned above when discussing trehalose, vitrification is a phenomenon with a long-standing history in the desiccation tolerance field 7 , 12 , 38 , 42 , with proponents of the theory surmising that as an organism dries, the accumulation of vitrifying protectants serves to induce a super-viscous state in which detrimental effects of drying, such as protein unfolding and aggregation, are slowed to a point they do not take place on normal biological timescales. Consistent with this idea, disruption of the vitrified state of CAHS proteins, tardigrades, and other whole organisms has been shown to correlate with a loss of protective function 7 , 23 , 38 . More recently, CAHS proteins have been implicated in the formation of hydrogels 34 , 36 , 37 , 43 , which often exist as non-crystalline, amorphous solids 44 , 45 . This lends further support to the notion that CAHS proteins form non-crystalline amorphous (vitrified) solids and that vitrification could be a mechanism underlying their protective capacity. It should be noted that vitrification, while necessary for anhydrobiosis, is not sufficient, meaning that vitrification must not be mutually exclusive with other possible mechanisms of protection 12 . An alternative or additional mechanism that has been proposed for CAHS proteins is the mechanism of water retention 34 , 46 . The water retention hypothesis posits that a protectant, in this case a CAHS protein, could help protect an organism by retaining water, such that a dried tardigrade expressing CAHS proteins would contain more residual water than a dried tardigrade lacking CAHS proteins 9 , 24 , 47 , 48 . One of the main pieces of putative evidence that proponents of the water retention hypothesis point to is the fact that CAHS proteins form hydrogels 25 , 34 , 37 , with their reasoning being that some hydrogels retain a high level of water and therefore so too might CAHS hydrogels help to retain water when dried 34 , 46 . While there are bonafide examples of water retention serving as a protective mechanism 47 , 48 , to date, the water-retentive capacity of CAHS proteins in mediating stress tolerance remains in question. Here we test the hypothesis that CAHS proteins mediate water retention. To assess whether or not CAHS proteins retain more water than common gelling and non-gelling proteins, as well as whether or not the gelled state of CAHS proteins influences their ability to retain water, we perform thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). TGA conducted on a model CAHS protein, CAHS D (Uniprot: P0CU50 ), in both a hydrated and dry state reveals that this protein retains no more water than common gelling and non-gelling proteins, as well as a variant of CAHS D which cannot gel. Furthermore, we assess the capacity of CAHS D to retain water in vivo and find that cells expressing CAHS D do not retain any more water than control cells, cells expressing a control protein (mVenus), or cells expressing variants of CAHS D which form stronger hydrogels or lack the ability to form gels. However, we do find that water in CAHS D samples evaporates within an elevated range of temperatures relative to common proteins, indicating that while purified CAHS D protein or cells expressing this protein do not contain more water than control proteins or cells, the presence of CAHS D causes water to behave differently. This CAHS D-water interaction appears to be independent of the gelled state of CAHS D. This study rules out water retention as a likely mechanism underlying CAHS-mediated desiccation tolerance. However, our results suggest that instead of retaining water, CAHS proteins interact with and influence the miniscule amounts of water left in dried systems, leaving open the possibility that CAHS-water interactions may underlie additional protective mechanisms. Understanding the mechanisms by which tardigrades protect themselves and their biological macromolecules during desiccation advances our fundamental understanding of the phenomenon of anhydrobiosis. In addition, increased understanding of anhydrobiosis may provide potential avenues for pursuing real-world applications such as the preservation of pharmaceuticals in a dry, rather than cold, state and the generation of stress-tolerant crops and soil amendments for increasing food securing. Results CAHS D retains no more or no less water than common gelling and non-gelling proteins in vitro To begin to assess whether water retention is a mechanism contributing to the protective capacity of CAHS proteins, and whether gelation of CAHS proteins specifically functions in water retention, we expressed and purified CAHS D (Uniprot: P0CU50 ), a model CAHS protein from the tardigrade Hypsibius exemplaris , which is known to form hydrogels and to provide protection during desiccation both in vitro and in vivo 14 , 22 , 23 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 43 . In addition, we purified an engineered variant of CAHS D termed CAHS D Full Length Proline (FL_Pro), which due to the insertion of three prolines in its carboxy-terminus lacks the ability to form hydrogels yet still provides protection to enzymes in vitro 36 . Gelling and non-gelling variants of CAHS D as well as two control proteins, gelatin (a gelling protein) and lysozyme (a non-gelling protein), which are not related to desiccation-tolerance, were tested using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) both in their hydrated and desiccated states. TGA is a widely used material science approach for determining the water content of a sample. Among other information, TGA provides a quantification of how much mass of a sample can be attributed to retained water (% water content) by heating the sample while simultaneously measuring its mass. As water evaporates a corresponding decrease in mass can be observed and a water content for the sample can be obtained. Additionally, this process allows one to measure the temperature at which water begins to be lost (onset), and the temperature at which all detectable water is lost (offset). To begin, samples of gelatin (~ 100 kDa), lysozyme (14.3 kDa), CAHS D (25.6 kDa) and FL_Pro (25.6 kDa) were prepared at 8.7 mg/ml in 0.6 ml of milliQ water. At 8.7 mg/ml both CAHS D and gelatin form robust hydrogels, while FL_Pro and lysozyme do not 36 . Samples were kept in tubes sealed with parafilm to reduce evaporation and were loaded one at a time into a TGA crucible just prior to examination to reduce pre-testing evaporation. Here we use equivalent masses of protein rather than equimolar solutions to ensure that all samples begin with the same water:protein mass ratio. As expected, solutions of all four proteins with the same concentration of protein in the same volume of water showed no statistical difference in water content (Fig.  1 A). Of interest, CAHS D samples showed a modest, but statistically significant, increase in onset and offset temperature compared to gelatin and FL_Pro, but not to lysozyme (Fig.  1 B). However, looking at the size of the temperature range at which water is lost (difference between onset and offset temperatures) we observed no difference between CAHS D and any of the three other proteins tested in a hydrated state (Fig.  1 C). Figure 1 In vitro, CAHS D retains no more or less water than common proteins. ( A ) Quantitative water retention data for hydrated protein samples prepared at the same concentration. ( B ) Quantitative water-loss onset (temperature at which water begins to be lost) and offset (temperature at which all water has been lost) data for hydrated proteins. ( C ) Difference in onset and offset temperatures for hydrated proteins. ( D ) Quantitative water retention data for desiccated proteins dried side-by-side under the same conditions. ( E ) Quantitative water-loss onset and offset data for dried proteins. ( F ) Difference in onset and offset temperatures for desiccated proteins. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test. Comparisons shown are to CAHS D. NS p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005. These results indicate that in a hydrated state, water within mixtures of CAHS D, gelatin, lysozyme, and FL_Pro is not retained differently. CAHS D in a gelled state may interact with water more strongly compared to gelatin and non-gelling FL_Pro as indicated by its increased onset and offset temperature, but overall differences in water retention and interaction between CAHS D and the other proteins are not significant or modest at best. Next, we prepared desiccated samples of gelatin, lysozyme, CAHS D, and FL_Pro and subjected these to TGA analysis to investigate whether CAHS D retains more water during desiccation. The average water content of dried CAHS D samples was 4.03%, which was not significantly different from the water content of dried gelatin (4.62%) or lysozyme (5.07%) (Fig.  1 D). Interestingly, dried non-gelling FL_Pro retained significantly more water (6.77%, p < 0.05) than dried CAHS D (Fig.  1 D). The onset temperature at which water begins to be lost from dry CAHS D samples was observed to be significantly higher than gelatin and lysozyme. However, unlike in the hydrated state, the onset temperature for dried FL_Pro was similar to that of CAHS D (Fig.  1 E). This trend was also observed for offset temperature, where CAHS D held onto water up to a higher temperature relative to gelatin and lysozyme, but not FL_Pro (Fig.  1 E). This trend extends to the size of the range of temperatures over which CAHS D loses water, where a significant increase was observed for CAHS D compared to gelatin and lysozyme, but not FL_Pro (Fig.  1 F). Taken together these data indicate that in vitro CAHS D does not retain any more or any less water than common non-desiccation related gelling and non-gelling protein even during drying. Furthermore, the gelled state of CAHS D does not positively affect its water-retentive properties as the non-gelling FL_Pro retains more water than wild-type CAHS D when dried. Finally, while CAHS D does not retain more water than common proteins, it does appear to interact more tightly with the water molecules that are retained as evidenced by increased onset and offset temperatures. CAHS D retains no more or no less water regardless of gelation in cells Next, we sought to understand if CAHS D retains more water relative to a non-desiccation related protein, mVenus, in cells. To this end, stable lines of human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells were generated expressing mVenus, an N-terminal mVenus:CAHS D fusion, and CAHS D with a small C-terminal 1D4 tag (Fig. S1 A,B) and were either left unperturbed or treated with sorbitol to induce osmotic shock. The 1D4 tag is an epitope from bovine rhodopsin. Here the 1D4 tag serves as a control to ensure that mVenus is not introducing artifacts. Additionally, sorbitol was selected to allow for comparisons to previous work carried out with CAHS proteins in cells 43 , 49 . CAHS proteins are known to form hydrogels in a concentration-dependent fashion in vitro and are suspected to do the same within cells during osmotic shock due to the observation of fiber-like formation and stiffening in vivo 25 , 34 , 43 . Consistent with this, sorbitol treatment resulted in the condensation of mVenus:CAHS D but not of mVenus alone (Fig.  2 ). Figure 2 In vitro gelation of CAHS D and its variants is reflected in vivo by the appearance of fiber-like condensates upon osmotic stress. Maximum intensity projections, and inserts, of HEK cells stability expressing mVenus, mVenus:CAHS, mVenus:FL_Proline, or mVenus:2x Linker. Cells were either cultured and imaged under normal non-stressed conditions, or under osmotically stressed conditions (0.5 M Sorbitol for 4 h). The appearance of fiber-like condensation in mVenus:CAHS D and mVenus:2x Linker, but not mVenus:FL_Proline, under osmotic stress conditions mirrors the gelling properties (or lack thereof) of these proteins in vitro 36 . White arrows indicate fiber-like condensates observed in CAHS D and 2x Linker expressing cells upon osmotic shock. Blue = hoechst (DNA), red = SIR tubulin (microtubules), green = mVenus (monomeric mVenus or protein of interest). Scale bars = 10 µm. In addition, we sought to understand whether the condensed state of CAHS D influences its water retentive properties, since it was previously hypothesized that hydrogel formation of CAHS D would lead to water retention. To assess whether the condensed state of CAHS D influences its water-retentive properties, HEK cell lines stably expressing two variants of CAHS D were generated, mVenus:2x× Linker and mVenus:FL_Pro. As described above, FL_Pro does not form gels in vitro due to the insertion of 3 prolines in its C-terminus. Conversely, the 2x× Linker variant is the result of a tandem duplication of CAHS D’s internal linker region which results in a protein that forms gels at a lower concentration than wild type CAHS D in vitro 36 . Consistent with previous in vitro observations, mVenus:FL_Pro did not form condensates, while mVenus:2x× Linker does, in osmotically shocked cells (Fig.  2 ). TGA analysis of hydrated, non-osmotically shocked cells revealed that CAHS D:1D4 and mVenus:CAHS D expressing cells retain no more water, nor did they have a detectable increase in onset or offset for water loss, relative to control HEK cells or cells expressing mVenus (Fig.  3 A). Figure 3 In vivo, CAHS D retains no more or less water than control cells or cells overexpressing a common protein. ( A ) Quantitative water retention data for hydrated cell lines. ( B )  Quantitative water-loss onset (temperature at which water begins to be lost) and offset (temperature at which all water has been lost) data for hydrated cell lines. ( C ) Difference in onset and offset temperatures for each cell line used in this study in the hydrated state. ( D ) Quantitative water retention data for desiccated cell lines. ( E ) Quantitative water-loss onset and offset data for dried cells expressing mVenus, CAHS D:1D4, mVenus:CAHS D, mVenus:2x Linker, or mVenus:FL_Proline. ( F ) Difference in onset and offset temperatures for each cell line used in this study in the desiccated state. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test. Comparisons shown are to control (HEK) cells. NS p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005. Similar to control cells, hydrated non-osmotically shocked HEK cells expressing mVenus:FL_Pro or mVenus:2x Linker do not retain any more or any less water than CAHS D:1D4 or mVenus:CAHS D (Fig.  3 A), nor did these cells have detectable differences in onset or offset (Fig.  3 B) or did the difference in onset and offset vary between cell lines (Fig.  3 C). Taken together, these data suggest that CAHS D does not alter water levels in hydrated cells. Next, we reasoned that the proposed water-retentive properties of CAHS D might only manifest, or be detectable, at lower water content. To test this, we desiccated osmotically shocked control HEK cells and HEK cell lines stably expressing mVenus, CAHS D:1D4, mVenus:CAHS D, mVenus:2x Linker, or mVenus:FL_Pro and tested these dry cells via TGA (Fig.  3 D,E). Osmotic shock was performed prior to drying to ensure that condensation took place before additional water loss, thus giving our test proteins the greatest chance of showing some difference in water retention. Relative to control HEK cells, none of the cell lines tested retained any more or any less water (Fig.  3 D). The onset and offset temperatures for water loss in control cells did not differ significantly from any other cell line, nor did the difference in onset and offset (Fig.  3 E,F). Taken together, these results demonstrate that CAHS D does not contribute to water retention in cells. Discussion The discovery that CAHS proteins help to mediate desiccation tolerance in tardigrades 23 and form hydrogels 34 , 36 , 37 has led to several studies aimed at identifying the mechanism or mechanisms by which CAHS D acts to promote desiccation tolerance and whether these mechanisms are linked to gelation 34 , 36 . Water retention, in which CAHS proteins might help increase the total residual water left in the dry system, has been proposed as a potential mechanism by which CAHS protein may function as a protectant 34 , 46 . This speculation has formed largely around the thought that hydrogels contain water and therefore might help to retain more water during desiccation 34 . To directly test this theory, we measured the amount of water retained by CAHS D in a gelled/condensed and non-gelled/uncondensed state, both in vitro and in cells via TGA. We find that CAHS D retained no more and no less water than common non-desiccation-related proteins or control cells not expressing CAHS D. The singular observation of increased water retention in our study was for the non-gelling variant of CAHS D, FL_Pro, which in vitro retained ~ 6.77% water when dried relative to CAHS D which retained ~ 4.03% water when dried (p < 0.05). Thus, if anything, our study suggests that gelation of CAHS D may be antagonistic to water retention. Here, we have tested purified proteins in vitro or proteins expressed in cells, but in non-tardigrade cells, leaving open the possibility that the water-retentive properties of CAHS proteins might differ in tardigrades. It should be noted that to date all studies on the gelation of CAHS proteins has been carried out in vitro or in heterologous ex vivo systems. Thus, our study is in line with norms within the field for assessing putative mechanisms of protection. Reverse genetics could serve as an approach to test the mechanistic underpinnings of anhydrobiosis in tardigrades. However, to date RNAi remains the only fully developed methodology of reverse genetics in tardigrades. This methodology requires microinjection of individual animals and given the large amount of sample input (~ 10 mg) required for TGA is impractical in this case. However, TGA analysis on non-conditioned tardigrades, which express CAHS genes at relatively low levels, versus conditioned tardigrades, which express CAHS proteins at high levels, have been performed and shows that dried non-conditioned tardigrades retain more water than conditioned specimens 39 , 46 . This study provides good direct evidence that anhydrobiotic tardigrades do not retain more water than non-anhydrobiotic tardigrades, and good indirect evidence that CAHS proteins do not participate in water retention within these animals themselves. Based on direct empirical evidence (TGA studies on purified protein and cells) and indirect evidence (TGA studies on conditions versus non-conditioned tardigrades), we conclude that hydrated or dry systems containing CAHS proteins do not contain more water than hydrated or dry systems lacking CAHS proteins, and thus water retention is likely not a mechanism underlying their desiccation-protective properties. In addition to measuring the total amount of water in a system, TGA provides insights into the temperature at which water begins to leave (onset) and has detectably fully left a system (offset). Such information can indicate something about the state of water within a system, for example whether it is behaving like free liquid water or is interacting with other components of the system. Of interest is the observation that in vitro dry samples of CAHS D and its non-gelling variant FL_Pro have elevated onset and offset temperatures relative to control gelling and non-gelling proteins (Fig.  1 E). This indicates that while CAHS D does not retain more water in the dry state, it does interact with water in the dry state more tightly. The observation that the non-gelling variant FL_Pro’s onset and offset temperatures were not significantly different from that of gelling CAHS D’s (Fig.  1 E) indicates that this interaction with water is not governed by the gelation state of CAHS D. It should be noted that increased onset/offsets were only observed in dry purified samples. This could be due to several possibilities. First, in hydrated samples vastly more water–water interactions exist than do water–CAHS interactions. TGA may not have the sensitivity to detect these relatively rare water–CAHS interactions under such conditions. However, in the dry state the ratio of water–water to water–CAHS interactions is greatly shifted towards the latter, which TGA now has the power to detect. Secondly, CAHS proteins are known to undergo a structural shift during drying/desolvation 25 , 35 , 36 , going from a largely disordered state to a state with increased helical content. Bioinformatic analysis indicates that the helices that form upon drying in CAHS proteins are strongly amphipathic 25 , 35 , 36 . The rearrangement of hydrophilic residues to one of the faces of this helix could serve to strengthen water–CAHS interactions. Another interesting feature of CAHS gels is that they have been observed to readily go back into solution both in vitro and in vivo 34 , 36 . This lends further credence to the idea that CAHS proteins readily interact with water (as evidenced by increased onset temperatures), but does not imply anything about the proteins water retentive capacity. This study does not rule out the possibility that gelation of CAHS proteins can be mechanistically linked to tardigrade anhydrobiosis, but it is clear that gelation of these proteins is not playing a role in water retention. The formation of a gelled matrix of protein may serve as a desiccation inducible cytoskeleton that helps to maintain the organization and ultrastructure of drying cells, such that during drying membranes do not collapse and fuse. Interestingly, while CAHS D has been observed to undergo a phase transition, going from a solution to gelled state, we did not observe this protein to undergo phase separation. This is not the case for other CAHS proteins, or for some members of another group of desiccation related IDPs known as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, that have been reported to form liquid–liquid phase separation 43 , 50 . Liquid–liquid phase separation of desiccation-related IDPs could serve to promote desiccation tolerance by sequestering and protecting vital proteins and other cellular components or by setting up regions with chemistries, biophysical, or material properties that promote protection 43 , 50 . In the future it will be important to compare and contrast the function consequences of a desiccation-related IDP’s phase transition versus phase separation on protective capacity during drying. While further work will be needed to test whether the interaction between CAHS proteins and water is a mechanism underlying the protective capacity of these proteins during water deficit, one can envision that CAHS proteins might act as water aggregators, concentrating but not increasing the minuscule amounts of residual water left in dried tardigrades. This could help maintain local areas of hydration, which in turn could help to preserve the structure, integrity, and function of essential labile biomolecules. This idea is contrary to the typical mantra that anhydrobiotic organisms are ametabolic in their dry state, however the claim that dried tardigrades and other organisms lack any metabolism has recently been challenged. For example, studies in desiccated yeast show that trehalose degrades over time and that this degradation is dependent on the presence of trehalase, an enzyme required for the breakdown of trehalose 51 . It is important to note that in this study desiccation of yeast was carried out at 60% relative humidity at 23 °C, which is likely insufficient to achieve the commonly recognized level of water in anhydrobiotic organisms (< 0.1 g of water per gram of dry mass), which typically requires drying at 50% relative humidity at 20 °C 52 . Other mechanisms might also underlie CAHS proteins’ protective capacity, such as vitrification or the formation of non-crystalline amorphous solids 23 , 38 , 39 . While vitrification has previously been empirically measured in tardigrades and for CAHS proteins 23 , 38 and confirmed via plasticization assays 39 , the more recent observations that CAHS proteins form gels lend credence to the notion that CAHS proteins undergo vitrification, as gels themselves are often non-crystalline amorphous solids 34 , 36 , 37 , 44 , 45 . It should also be noted that while the vitrification hypothesis is not mutually exclusive with many other putative mechanisms of desiccation tolerance, it is at odds with the water retention hypothesis. This is because water is known to be a strong plasticizer of vitrified materials 53 , 54 , including vitrified CAHS protein 39 , and plasticization of dried systems has been linked to loss of protective capacity 54 , 55 . Taken together, our study suggests that while there is still much to learn about the mechanism(s) underlying tardigrade desiccation tolerance, in the hydrated and dry state water retention is not a measurable property attributable to CAHS proteins in a gelled or non-gelled state. Furthermore, our study suggests that while CAHS D does not retain more water in the dry state, it does appear to interact with and influence the properties of water within some systems, indicating that tighter protein-water interactions may be a mechanism underlying the protective capacity of CAHS proteins. Methods Obtaining proteins used in this study Gelatin and Lysozyme were purchased from Sigma: Cat: G1890-100G and Cat: L6876-5G, respectively. CAHS D (Uniprot: P0CU50 ) and FL_Pro were expressed and purified in house using established protocols 36 . Protein expression and purifications CAHS D and FL_Pro proteins were expressed and purified using established protocols 36 . Briefly, pET28b plasmids containing a codon-optimized gene encoding the protein of interest were transformed into BL21 bacteria. Following outgrowth and plating, a single colony was grown overnight in liquid Luria Broth supplemented with Kanamycin (50 μg/ml). Overnight cultures were used to inoculate 1 L Luria Broth cultures supplemented with Kanamycin (50 μg/ml). Cultures were grown at 37 °C until an optical density of 0.6 was reached. Dense cultures were then induced with 1 mM IPTG and grown for an additional 4 h. After expression, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant was discarded, and cells were resuspended in 5 ml of pellet resuspension buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.5) supplemented with protease inhibitors. Pellets were stored at − 80 °C until use. Pellets were thawed at room temperature and subjected to heat lysis in boiling water for 10 min and allowed to cool to room temperature. Boiled samples were then centrifuged at 10,500 rpm for 45 min at 10 °C, and the supernatant was filter-sterilized through a 0.22 μm syringe filter (EZFlow Syringe Filter, Cat. 388-3416-OEM) to remove any insoluble particles. The filtrate was diluted two times its volume with buffer UA (8 M Urea, 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 4). Diluted lysates were loaded onto a HiPrep SP HP 16/10 cation exchange column (Cytiva) and purified on an AKTA Pure, controlled using the UNICORN 7 Workstation pure-BP-exp. CAHS D and FL_Pro were eluted using 70% UB gradient (8 M Urea, 50 mM sodium acetate, and 1 M NaCl, pH 4) and fractionated over 15 column volumes. Purified protein fractions were confirmed using SDS-PAGE and selected fractions were pooled for dialysis in a 3.5 kDa tubing in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7. This was followed by six rounds of dialysis in Milli-Q water (18.2 MΩcm) at 4 h intervals each. Samples were quantified fluorometrically using Qubit 4 fluorometer, flash frozen, then lyophilized for 48 h (Labconco FreeZone 6, Cat. 7752021) and stored at − 20 °C until further use. Preparation of hydrated protein samples Hydrated protein samples were prepared via resuspension of proteins at 8.7 mg/ml in Milli-Q water (18.2 MΩcm). Samples were heated at 55 °C for 15 min and visually inspected to ensure full solvation. Samples were then subjected to TGA analysis one at a time to avoid evaporation in TGA crucibles (Cat. T221108, TA Instruments) while analysis runs. If not being tested on the TGA, samples were kept in tubes sealed with parafilm to further reduce the risk of evaporative loss. Stored samples were always tested within 4 h of preparation. All stored samples were briefly heated for 5 min at 55 °C prior to loading on TGA pans since gelling proteins (CAHS D and gelatin) require this for ease of handling. Preparation of desiccated protein samples Protein samples were prepared at 8.7 mg/ml as indicated above. Samples were transferred to 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes and desiccated for 16 h in a vacuum concentrator (Savant SpeedVac Vacuum Concentrator Model SC110-120). After desiccation samples were stored in tubes sealed with parafilm in a glass desiccating chamber filled with Indicating Drierite (Cat. 23005). Just prior to TGA analysis, samples were removed from tubes and manually broken into a powder-like state on a weight boat with a spatula to ensure homogenization of the sample. Generation of stable cell lines Full-length CAHS D (Uniprot P0CU50 , CAHS 94063), CAHS D variants FL_proline and 2x Linker with mVenus protein fused in their N-termini, mVenus and Full-length CAHS D (Uniprot P0CU50 , CAHS 94063) with 1D4 epitope fused in its C-termini were cloned into pTwist-cmv-WPRE-Neo between HindIII and BamHI and sequence verified (TwistBioscience Inc.). 1 µg of plasmid DNAs expressing CAHS D:1D4, mVenus, mVenus:CAHS D, mVenus:FL_ proline and mVenus:2x Linker proteins were transfected into Hek293 cells (Cat. CRL-1573, ATCC) with lipofectamine 3000 transfection reagent (Cat. L3000008, Thermo Fisher Scientific). 24 h post-transfection, cells that had successfully integrated CAHS D:1D4, mVenus, mVenus:CAHS D, mVenus:FL_proline and mVenus-2x Linker were selected with 0.7 µg/µl G418 (Cat. G64500.20.0, Research products international). Cell lines were passed twice before expanding and flash-cooling. Stable cell lines were maintained supplementing Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Cat. 10567014, Gibco) media with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), (Cat. 900-108, GeminiBio Products), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Cat. 400-109, Gemini Bio products) and 0.3 µg/µl G418 (Cat. G64500.20.0, Research products international) at 37 °C with 5% CO 2 atmosphere. Fluorescence imaging of cell lines 8-well glass bottom dishes (Cat. 80826, Ibidi) were pre-coated with 0.1 mg/ml poly- d lysine (Cat. A3890401, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at 37 °C. Cells expressing mVenus, mVenus:CAHS D, mVenus:FL_Proline mVenus:2x Linker and CAHS D:1D4 were seeded in duplicate at a density of 2.5 × 10 5 cells/ml and allowed to recover overnight. After one day, one set of the cells were treated with 0.5 M sorbitol in growth media for 4 h while the other set was fluid changed in growth media. After the 4 h incubation the medium from both sets was replaced with an imaging medium (FluoroBrite DMEM, Cat. A1896701, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 0.5 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 dye (Cat. 62249, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1 µM SIR Tubulin dye/10 µM verapamil (Cat. CY-SC006, Cytoskeleton inc.) for the mVenus fusion proteins and with 0.5 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 dye (Cat. 62249, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for CAHS D: 1D4, then they were incubated for 30 min with the dyes prior imaging. Images were acquired using a Zeiss 980 Laser Scanning Confocal microscope equipped with a Plan-Apochromat 63 × oil objective, 40 × multi-immersion LD LCI Plan-Apochromat objective and a 20x air Plan-Apochromat objective (Zeiss Instruments). Data acquisition used ZEN 3.1 Blue software (Zeiss Instruments). Hoechst 33342 dye (Cat. 62249, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was excited by 405 nm laser light and the spectral detector set to 409–481 nm. mVenus protein was excited by 488 nm laser light and the spectral detector set to 490–550 nm. SIR Tubulin dye (Cat. CY-SC006, Cytoskeleton inc.) was excited with 639 nm laser light and the spectral detector set to 640–720 nm, CAHS D:1D4 protein was excited by 561 nm laser and the spectral detector set to 573–627 nm. Images were processed using ZEN 3.1 Blue software airyscan tool. Data analysis was performed in fiji. Preparation of hydrated cell samples Hydrated and desiccated cells were seeded, treated and collected in parallel the same days. Cells expressing CAHS D:1D4, mVenus, mVenus:CAHS D, mVenus:FL_Proline and mVenus:2x Linker were each seeded in three T-75 flasks (Cat. SP81186, Bio-Basic) at a density of 1.0 × 10 6 cells/ml and grown until confluency. Once the cells reached confluency, the media was changed and cells were trypsinized and collected by centrifugation at 100× g for 10 min, media was removed by aspiration and cell pellets were transferred directly into TGA crucibles (Cat. T221108, TA Instruments) that had been pre-massed on TA Instruments TGA5500 device using TA Instruments Trios software (v5.5.0.232). Preparation of desiccated cell samples Cells expressing mVenus, mVenus:CAHS D, mVenus:FL_Proline and mVenus 2x Linker were each seeded in three T-75 flasks (Cat. SP81186, Bio-Basic) at a density of 1.0 × 10 6  cells/ml and grow until confluency. Once the cells reached confluency, the three T-75 flasks were treated with 0.5 M sorbitol in growth media for 4 h. After the sorbitol incubation the cells were trypsinized and collected by centrifugation at 100× g for 10 min, media was removed by aspiration and cell pellets were transferred directly into TGA crucibles (Cat. T221108) that had been pre-massed on TA Instruments TGA5500 device using TA Instruments Trios software (v5.5.0.232). Crucibles with samples were transferred to a sealed glass desiccating chamber filled with Indicating Drierite (Cat. 23005) for 16 h. Thermogravimetric analysis (determination of % water, onset, and offset) Samples were loaded into TA instrument TGA crucibles (Cat T221108). TGA was conducted using a TA Instruments TGA5500 device using TA Instruments Trios (v5.5.0.232). For all samples, our TGA protocol consisted of an equilibration at 30 °C, followed by a 10 °C/min ramp to 200 °C. Percent water content, onset, and offset temperatures were determined using TA Instruments Trios software (v5,5,0.232) Intelligent, Onset, and Endset tools, respectively. Western blot Naive Hek 293 cells and cells expressing CAHS D:1D4 were each seeded in a T-75 flasks (Cat. SP81186, Bio-Basic) at a density of 1.0 × 10 6 cells/ml and grown until confluency. Once the cells reached confluency, the media was changed and cells were trypsinized and collected by centrifugation at 100× g for 10 min, media was removed by aspiration and cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4. 100 μl of the cell lysates were set aside and mixed with 2x Laemmli sample buffer (cell lysate sample). 900 μl of the cell lysates were heat solubilized by boiling them for 10 min. After heat solubilization samples were centrifuged at 13,000× g for 30 min to separate the soluble components from the insoluble components. The supernatants were transferred to clean Eppendorf tubes and 100 μl of each were set aside and mixed with 2x Laemmli sample buffer (supernatant sample). The insoluble fractions were resuspended in 900 μl of mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4 buffer, 100 μl were set aside and mixed with 2x Laemmli sample buffer (pellet samples). 10 μl of samples were loaded in a 4–20% Criterion TGX Precast protein gel (catalog; 5671094, Bio-Rad) and separated by running the gel at 150 V for 45 min. Precision Plus Protein Dual Xtra prestained protein Ladder (Catalog 1610377, Bio-Rad) was used as the size standards. Samples were transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane activated with methanol using the Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad). Membranes were probed with mouse Rho-1D4 antibody (Catalog 40020, Cube Biotech) diluted 1:3000 in Western Breeze Chromogenic Immunodetection kit's (Catalog WB7103, Thermo Fisher Scientific) primary antibody diluent. For Rho-1D4 detection Western Breeze Chromogenic Immunodetection kit instructions were followed. Statistical analysis of data Data was compiled in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using R. For all figures presented one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tests were used to determine significance. Further analysis using Tukey’s post-hoc tests were used to determine statistical differences between experimental groups. Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information 1. Supplementary Information 2. Supplementary Figure 1. Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-023-37485-3. Acknowledgements This work was supported by NASA award 21-EXO21-0046 and an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from NIH grant (P20GM103432) to TCB. We are grateful to members of the Boothby Lab for helpful discussions and review of this manuscript. We thank members of the Water and Life Interface Institute (WALII), supported by NSF DBI grant #2213983, for helpful discussions. Author contributions S.S.M.: Investigation, Methodology, Writing—Original Draft, Review, and Editing. J.F.R.: Investigation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing—Original Draft, Review, and Editing. E.K.M.: Formal Analysis, Visualization, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft, Review, and Editing. C.C.: Investigation, Resources, Writing—Original Draft, Review, and Editing. T.C.B.: Investigation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Data Curation, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition, Writing—Original Draft, Review, and Editing, Supervision, Conceptualization. Data availability All raw data and analyzed plots used here are provided in File S1 .zip. All scripts and code used here are provided in File S2 .zip. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. References 1. Boothby TC Mechanisms and evolution of resistance to environmental extremes in animals EvoDevo 2019 10 30 10.1186/s13227-019-0143-4 31827759 PMC6862762 2. Erkut C Trehalose renders the dauer larva of Caenorhabditis elegans resistant to extreme desiccation Curr. Biol. 2011 21 1331 1336 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.064 21782434 3. Hand SC Menze MA Molecular approaches for improving desiccation tolerance: Insights from the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana Planta 2015 242 379 388 10.1007/s00425-015-2281-9 25809151 PMC4498972 4. Boschetti C Pouchkina-Stantcheva N Hoffmann P Tunnacliffe A Foreign genes and novel hydrophilic protein genes participate in the desiccation response of the bdelloid rotifer Adineta ricciae J. Exp. Biol. 2011 214 59 68 10.1242/jeb.050328 21147969 5. Whitney DD The desiccation of rotifers Am. Nat. 1908 42 665 671 10.1086/278991 6. Clegg JS Free glycerol in dormant cysts of the brine shrimp artemia salina, and its disappearance during development Biol. Bull. 1962 123 295 301 10.2307/1539275 7. Sakurai M Vitrification is essential for anhydrobiosis in an African chironomid, Polypedilum vanderplanki Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008 105 5093 5098 10.1073/pnas.0706197105 18362351 PMC2278217 8. Giovannini I Production of reactive oxygen species and involvement of bioprotectants during anhydrobiosis in the tardigrade Paramacrobiotus spatialis Sci. Rep. 2022 12 1938 10.1038/s41598-022-05734-6 35121798 PMC8816950 9. Wright JC Desiccation tolerance and water-retentive mechanisms in tardigrades J. Exp. Biol. 1989 142 267 292 10.1242/jeb.142.1.267 10. Crowe JH Trehalose and anhydrobiosis: The early work of JS Clegg J. Exp. Biol. 2008 211 2899 2900 10.1242/jeb.012476 18775926 11. Tapia H Young L Fox D Bertozzi CR Koshland D Increasing intracellular trehalose is sufficient to confer desiccation tolerance to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2015 112 6122 6127 10.1073/pnas.1506415112 25918381 PMC4434740 12. Crowe JH Carpenter JF Crowe LM The role of vitrification in anhydrobiosis Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1998 60 73 103 10.1146/annurev.physiol.60.1.73 9558455 13. Golovina EA Golovin A Hoekstra FA Faller R Water replacement hypothesis in atomic details: Effect of trehalose on the structure of single dehydrated POPC bilayers Langmuir 2010 26 11118 11126 10.1021/la100891x 20550154 14. Nguyen K Kc S Gonzalez T Tapia H Boothby TC Trehalose and tardigrade CAHS proteins work synergistically to promote desiccation tolerance Commun. Biol. 2022 10.1038/s42003-022-04015-2 36182981 PMC9526748 15. Kim SX Çamdere G Hu X Koshland D Tapia H Synergy between the small intrinsically disordered protein Hsp12 and trehalose sustain viability after severe desiccation Elife 2018 7 e38337 10.7554/eLife.38337 30010539 PMC6054528 16. Elliott B Haltiwanger RS Futcher B Synergy between trehalose and Hsp104 for thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics 1996 144 923 933 10.1093/genetics/144.3.923 8913738 PMC1207632 17. Xie G Timasheff SN The thermodynamic mechanism of protein stabilization by trehalose Biophys. Chem. 1997 64 25 43 10.1016/S0301-4622(96)02222-3 9127936 18. Lapinski J Tunnacliffe A Anhydrobiosis without trehalose in bdelloid rotifers FEBS Lett. 2003 553 387 390 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)01062-7 14572656 19. Hengherr S Heyer AG Köhler H-R Schill RO Trehalose and anhydrobiosis in tardigrades—Evidence for divergence in responses to dehydration FEBS J. 2008 275 281 288 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06198.x 18070104 20. Westh P Ramløv H Trehalose accumulation in the tardigrade Adorybiotus coronifer during anhydrobiosis J. Exp. Zool. 1991 258 303 311 10.1002/jez.1402580305 21. IngemarJönsson K Persson O Trehalose in three species of desiccation tolerant tardigrades Open Zool. J. 2010 3 1 5 10.2174/1874336601003010001 22. Piszkiewicz S Protecting activity of desiccated enzymes Protein Sci. 2019 28 941 951 10.1002/pro.3604 30868674 PMC6459994 23. Boothby TC Tardigrades use intrinsically disordered proteins to survive desiccation Mol. Cell 2017 65 975 984.e5 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.018 28306513 PMC5987194 24. Boothby TC Pielak GJ Intrinsically disordered proteins and desiccation tolerance: Elucidating functional and mechanistic underpinnings of anhydrobiosis BioEssays 2017 39 1700119 10.1002/bies.201700119 28901557 25. Hesgrove C Boothby TC The biology of tardigrade disordered proteins in extreme stress tolerance Cell Commun. Signal. 2020 18 178 10.1186/s12964-020-00670-2 33148259 PMC7640644 26. Koubaa S Bremer A Hincha DK Brini F Structural properties and enzyme stabilization function of the intrinsically disordered LEA_4 protein TdLEA3 from wheat Sci. Rep. 2019 9 3720 10.1038/s41598-019-39823-w 30842512 PMC6403280 27. Knox-Brown P Similar yet different-structural and functional diversity among Arabidopsis thaliana LEA_4 proteins Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 21 2794 10.3390/ijms21082794 32316452 PMC7215670 28. Shih M-D Hoekstra FA Hsing Y-IC Kader J-C Delseny M Late embryogenesis abundant proteins Advances in Botanical Research 2008 Academic Press 211 255 29. Koshland D Tapia H Desiccation tolerance: An unusual window into stress biology Mol. Biol. Cell 2019 30 737 741 10.1091/mbc.E17-04-0257 30870092 PMC6589773 30. Wright PE Dyson HJ Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015 16 18 29 10.1038/nrm3920 25531225 PMC4405151 31. Das RK Ruff KM Pappu RV Relating sequence encoded information to form and function of intrinsically disordered proteins Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2015 32 102 112 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.03.008 25863585 PMC4512920 32. Das RK Pappu RV Conformations of intrinsically disordered proteins are influenced by linear sequence distributions of oppositely charged residues Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013 110 13392 13397 10.1073/pnas.1304749110 23901099 PMC3746876 33. Uversky VN Oldfield CJ Dunker AK Intrinsically disordered proteins in human diseases: Introducing the D2 concept Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2008 37 215 246 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125924 18573080 34. Tanaka A Stress-dependent cell stiffening by tardigrade tolerance proteins that reversibly form a filamentous network and gel PLoS Biol. 2022 20 e3001780 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001780 36067153 PMC9592077 35. Yamaguchi A Two novel heat-soluble protein families abundantly expressed in an anhydrobiotic tardigrade PLoS One 2012 7 e44209 10.1371/journal.pone.0044209 22937162 PMC3429414 36. Hesgrove, C. S. et al . Tardigrade CAHS proteins act as molecular Swiss army knives to mediate desiccation tolerance through multiple mechanisms. bioRxiv 2021–2008 (2021). 37. Malki A Intrinsically disordered tardigrade proteins self-assemble into fibrous gels in response to environmental stress Angew. Chem. Int. Ed Engl. 2022 61 e202109961 34750927 10.1002/anie.202109961 PMC9299615 38. Hengherr S Worland MR Reuner A Brümmer F Schill RO High-temperature tolerance in anhydrobiotic tardigrades is limited by glass transition Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2009 82 749 755 10.1086/605954 19732016 39. Boothby TC Water content influences the vitrified properties of CAHS proteins Mol. Cell 2021 81 411 413 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.12.009 33545054 40. Farahnaky A Badii F Farhat IA Mitchell JR Hill SE Enthalpy relaxation of bovine serum albumin and implications for its storage in the glassy state Biopolymers 2005 78 69 77 10.1002/bip.20265 15759289 41. Blasi P D’Souza SS Selmin F DeLuca PP Plasticizing effect of water on poly(lactide- co -glycolide) J. Control. Release 2005 108 1 9 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.07.009 16098624 42. Sun WQ Leopold AC Cytoplasmic vitrification and survival of anhydrobiotic organisms Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 1997 117 327 333 10.1016/S0300-9629(96)00271-X 43. Yagi-Utsumi M Desiccation-induced fibrous condensation of CAHS protein from an anhydrobiotic tardigrade Sci. Rep. 2021 11 21328 10.1038/s41598-021-00724-6 34737320 PMC8569203 44. Gupta PK Non-crystalline solids: Glasses and amorphous solids J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1996 195 158 164 10.1016/0022-3093(95)00502-1 45. Horkay F Douglas JF Del Gado E Gels and Other Soft Amorphous Solids 2019 American Chemical Society 46. Arakawa K Numata K Reconsidering the ‘glass transition’ hypothesis of intrinsically unstructured CAHS proteins in desiccation tolerance of tardigrades Mol. Cell 2021 81 409 410 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.12.007 33545053 47. Vieira EA Water retention and metabolic changes improve desiccation tolerance in Barbacenia graminifolia (Velloziaceae) Physiol. Plant. 2022 174 e13783 10.1111/ppl.13783 36123313 48. Balsamo RA Vander Willigen C Boyko W Farrant J Retention of mobile water during dehydration in the desiccation-tolerant grass Eragrostis nindensis Physiol. Plant. 2005 124 336 342 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00501.x 49. Tanaka A Stress-dependent cell stiffening by tardigrade tolerance proteins through reversible formation of cytoskeleton-like filamentous network and gel-transition bioRxiv 2022 10.1101/2021.10.02.462891 PMC9592077 36067153 50. Belott C Janis B Menze MA Liquid-liquid phase separation promotes animal desiccation tolerance Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2020 117 27676 27684 10.1073/pnas.2014463117 33077592 PMC7959570 51. Tapia H Koshland DE Trehalose is a versatile and long-lived chaperone for desiccation tolerance Curr. Biol. 2014 24 2758 2766 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.005 25456447 52. Alpert P The limits and frontiers of desiccation-tolerant life Integr. Comp. Biol. 2005 45 685 695 10.1093/icb/45.5.685 21676818 53. Ballesteros D Pritchard HW Walters C Dry architecture: Towards the understanding of the variation of longevity in desiccation-tolerant germplasm Seed Sci. Res. 2020 30 142 155 10.1017/s0960258520000239 54. Buitink J Leprince O Glass formation in plant anhydrobiotes: Survival in the dry state Cryobiology 2004 48 215 228 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2004.02.011 15157771 55. Sun WQ Dielectric relaxation of water and water-plasticized biomolecules in relation to cellular water organization, cytoplasmic viscosity, and desiccation tolerance in recalcitrant seed tissues Plant Physiol. 2000 124 1203 1216 10.1104/pp.124.3.1203 11080297 PMC59219