Overview of strategies for developing high thermostability industrial enzymes: Discovery, mechanism, modification and challenges

✅ 全文

高耐热性工业酶开发策略综述:发现、机制、修饰与挑战

作者 Hao Wu; Qiuming Chen; Wenli Zhang; Wanmeng Mu 期刊 Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 发表日期 2021 ISSN 1040-8398 DOI 10.1080/10408398.2021.1970508 类型 原创研究 (Original Research)

📄 英文摘要 English Abstract

EN

Biocatalysts such as enzymes are environmentally friendly and have substrate specificity, which are preferred in the production of various industrial products. However, the strict reaction conditions in industry including high temperature, organic solvents, strong acids and bases and other harsh environments often destabilize enzymes, and thus substantially compromise their catalytic functions, and greatly restrict their applications in food, pharmaceutical, textile, bio-refining and feed industries. Therefore, developing industrial enzymes with high thermostability becomes very important in industry as thermozymes have more advantages under high temperature. Discovering new thermostable enzymes using genome sequencing, metagenomics and sample isolation from extreme environments, or performing molecular modification of the existing enzymes with poor thermostability using emerging protein engineering technology have become an effective means of obtaining thermozymes. Based on the thermozymes as biocatalytic chips in industry, this review systematically analyzes the ways to discover thermostable enzymes from extreme environment, clarifies various interaction forces that will affect thermal stability of enzymes, and proposes different strategies to improve enzymes' thermostability. Furthermore, latest development in the thermal stability modification of industrial enzymes through rational design strategies is comprehensively introduced from structure-activity relationship point of view. Challenges and future research perspectives are put forward as well.

📄 中文摘要 Chinese Abstract

中文
生物催化剂(如酶)具有环境友好性和底物特异性,在各类工业产品的生产中备受青睐。然而,工业中严苛的反应条件(包括高温、有机溶剂、强酸强碱及其他恶劣环境)往往会导致酶的结构不稳定,从而严重削弱其催化功能,极大地限制了其在食品、制药、纺织、生物炼制和饲料行业中的应用。因此,开发具有高热稳定性的工业酶在工业中变得尤为重要,因为嗜热酶在高温条件下更具优势。利用基因组测序、宏基因组学以及从极端环境中分离样品来发现新的耐热酶,或利用新兴的蛋白质工程技术对热稳定性较差的现有酶进行分子改造,已成为获取嗜热酶的有效手段。从结构和能量角度评估酶的热稳定性时,通常以热力学稳定性和动力学稳定性作为参数。热力学稳定性通过展开自由能(ΔGu)、熔解温度(Tm)和展开平衡常数(Ku)进行评估;动力学稳定性则需要在特定条件下孵育后检测残余活性,并测定最适温度(Topt)、半失活温度(T50)、半衰期(t1/2)和观测失活速率常数(kd,obs)。

📋 英文结构化总结 English Structured Summary

全文整理

EN

Background:

Biocatalysts such as enzymes are environmentally friendly and have substrate specificity, which are preferred in the production of various industrial products. However, the strict reaction conditions in industry including high temperature, organic solvents, strong acids and bases and other harsh environments often destabilize enzymes, and thus substantially compromise their catalytic functions, and greatly restrict their applications in food, pharmaceutical, textile, bio-refining and feed industries. Therefore, developing industrial enzymes with high thermostability becomes very important in industry as thermozymes have more advantages under high temperature. Discovering new thermostable enzymes using genome sequencing, metagenomics and sample isolation from extreme environments, or performing molecular modification of the existing enzymes with poor thermostability using emerging protein engineering technology have become an effective means of obtaining thermozymes. The evaluation of the thermostability of enzymes from the perspective of structure and energy usually uses thermodynamic stability and kinetic stability as parameters. Thermodynamic stability is assessed by free energy of unfolding (ΔGu), melting temperature (Tm), and unfolding equilibrium constant (Ku). Kinetic stability requires detecting the residue activity after incubating at specific conditions, measuring Topt, T50, t1/2, and kd,obs.

Methods:

This review systematically analyzes the ways to discover thermostable enzymes from extreme environment, clarifies various interaction forces that will affect thermal stability of enzymes, and proposes different strategies to improve enzymes’ thermostability. It is a review article that comprehensively introduces the latest development in the thermal stability modification of industrial enzymes through rational design strategies from a structure-activity relationship point of view, and puts forward challenges and future research perspectives.

Results:

It was found that the sequence similarity between thermophilic enzymes and mesophilic enzymes could reach about 40%–85%, while the tertiary structure of which was also highly similar, and the catalytic mechanism was the same, indicating that there were other mechanisms and factors affecting enzymes’ thermal stability. Extensive studies have revealed that there are many interaction forces in the amino acid residues of enzymes including hydrophobic interactions, salt bridges, aromatic ring interactions, disulfide bonds and hydrogen bonds, and these play a very pivotal role in maintaining the conformational stability of enzymes. Enzymes with better thermal stability tend to have a more stable conformation, such as higher rigidity, higher stacking efficiency, lower de-folding entropy, and alpha-helix stability. Continuous efforts have been made to obtain desired industrial enzymes with high thermostability through two main ways: screening hyperthermophilic and thermophilic organisms from extreme environment, and improving the thermostability of existing mesophilic enzymes through protein engineering strategies like rational design, semi-rational design, directed evolution and de novo design.

Data Summary:

The sequence similarity between thermophilic enzymes and mesophilic enzymes could reach about 40%–85%. Thermodynamic stability parameters include free energy of unfolding (ΔGu), melting temperature (Tm), and unfolding equilibrium constant (Ku). Kinetic stability parameters include optimal temperature (Topt), temperature when enzyme loses half activity (T50), time when enzyme loses half activity (t1/2), and observed deactivation rate constant (kd,obs).

Conclusions:

Developing high thermostability industrial enzymes is crucial for overcoming the harsh conditions in food, pharmaceutical, textile, bio-refining, and feed industries. Discovering thermostable enzymes from extreme environments and modifying mesophilic enzymes through protein engineering are effective means. The understanding of interaction forces (hydrophobic interactions, salt bridges, aromatic ring interactions, disulfide bonds, hydrogen bonds) and the use of computational tools for enzyme engineering are key to advancing the field. Challenges and future research perspectives are put forward.

Practical Significance:

Thermozymes have been widely applied in food, pharmaceutical, textile, bio-refining, and feed industries as an effective alternative to traditional chemical catalysts. They offer advantages such as higher reaction rates, lower risk of microbial contamination, and substrate specificity, making them highly desirable for industrial applications where high temperature and harsh conditions are common.

📋 中文结构化总结 Chinese Structured Summary

中文

背景:

生物催化剂(如酶)具有环境友好性和底物特异性,在各类工业产品的生产中备受青睐。然而,工业中严苛的反应条件(包括高温、有机溶剂、强酸强碱及其他恶劣环境)往往会导致酶的结构不稳定,从而严重削弱其催化功能,极大地限制了其在食品、制药、纺织、生物炼制和饲料行业中的应用。因此,开发具有高热稳定性的工业酶在工业中变得尤为重要,因为嗜热酶在高温条件下更具优势。利用基因组测序、宏基因组学以及从极端环境中分离样品来发现新的耐热酶,或利用新兴的蛋白质工程技术对热稳定性较差的现有酶进行分子改造,已成为获取嗜热酶的有效手段。从结构和能量角度评估酶的热稳定性时,通常以热力学稳定性和动力学稳定性作为参数。热力学稳定性通过展开自由能(ΔGu)、熔解温度(Tm)和展开平衡常数(Ku)进行评估;动力学稳定性则需要在特定条件下孵育后检测残余活性,并测定最适温度(Topt)、半失活温度(T50)、半衰期(t1/2)和观测失活速率常数(kd,obs)。

方法:

本综述系统分析了从极端环境中发现耐热酶的方法,阐明了影响酶热稳定性的各种相互作用力,并提出了提高酶热稳定性的不同策略。本文从构效关系的角度,全面介绍了通过理性设计策略改造工业酶热稳定性的最新研究进展,并提出了该领域面临的挑战及未来研究方向。

结果:

研究发现,嗜热酶与嗜温酶的序列相似性可达约40%–85%,且其三级结构高度相似,催化机制也相同,表明存在其他影响酶热稳定性的机制和因素。大量研究表明,酶的氨基酸残基之间存在多种相互作用力,包括疏水相互作用、盐桥、芳香环相互作用、二硫键和氢键,这些作用力在维持酶的构象稳定性方面发挥着极为关键的作用。热稳定性较好的酶往往具有更稳定的构象,例如更高的刚性、更高的堆积效率、更低的去折叠熵以及更高的α-螺旋稳定性。目前,人们主要通过两种途径来获得理想的高热稳定性工业酶:一是从极端环境中筛选超嗜热和嗜热生物,二是通过蛋白质工程策略(如理性设计、半理性设计、定向进化和从头设计)来改善现有嗜温酶的热稳定性。

数据总结:

嗜热酶与嗜温酶的序列相似性可达约40%–85%。热力学稳定性参数包括展开自由能(ΔGu)、熔解温度(Tm)和展开平衡常数(Ku)。动力学稳定性参数包括最适温度(Topt)、酶失去一半活性时的温度(T50)、酶失去一半活性所需的时间(t1/2)以及观测失活速率常数(kd,obs)。

结论:

开发高热稳定性的工业酶对于克服食品、制药、纺织、生物炼制和饲料等行业中的恶劣条件至关重要。从极端环境中发现耐热酶以及通过蛋白质工程改造嗜温酶是有效的手段。深入理解各种相互作用力(疏水相互作用、盐桥、芳香环相互作用、二硫键、氢键)并利用计算工具进行酶工程改造,是推动该领域发展的关键。本文还提出了当前面临的挑战及未来研究方向。

实际意义:

嗜热酶作为传统化学催化剂的有效替代品,已广泛应用于食品、制药、纺织、生物炼制和饲料等行业。它们具有反应速率更高、微生物污染风险更低以及底物特异性等优势,使其在高温和恶劣条件常见的工业应用中极具吸引力。

📖 英文全文 English Full Text

EN

Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/bfsn20

Overview of strategies for developing high thermostability industrial enzymes: Discovery, mechanism, modification and challenges Hao Wu, Qiuming Chen, Wenli Zhang & Wanmeng Mu To cite this article: Hao Wu, Qiuming Chen, Wenli Zhang & Wanmeng Mu (2021): Overview of strategies for developing high thermostability industrial enzymes: Discovery, mechanism, modification and challenges, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1970508 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1970508

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=bfsn20 Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1970508

Review

Overview of strategies for developing high thermostability industrial enzymes: Discovery, mechanism, modification and challenges Hao Wua , Qiuming Chena, Wenli Zhanga and Wanmeng Mua,b

State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China; bInternational Joint Laboratory on Food Safety, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China a ABSTRACT

Biocatalysts such as enzymes are environmentally friendly and have substrate specificity, which are preferred in the production of various industrial products. However, the strict reaction conditions in industry including high temperature, organic solvents, strong acids and bases and other harsh environments often destabilize enzymes, and thus substantially compromise their catalytic functions, and greatly restrict their applications in food, pharmaceutical, textile, bio-refining and feed industries. Therefore, developing industrial enzymes with high thermostability becomes very important in industry as thermozymes have more advantages under high temperature. Discovering new thermostable enzymes using genome sequencing, metagenomics and sample isolation from extreme environments, or performing molecular modification of the existing enzymes with poor thermostability using emerging protein engineering technology have become an effective means of obtaining thermozymes. Based on the thermozymes as biocatalytic chips in industry, this review systematically analyzes the ways to discover thermostable enzymes from extreme environment, clarifies various interaction forces that will affect thermal stability of enzymes, and proposes different strategies to improve enzymes’ thermostability. Furthermore, latest development in the thermal stability modification of industrial enzymes through rational design strategies is comprehensively introduced from structure-activity relationship point of view. Challenges and future research perspectives are put forward as well.

1. Introduction As an effective alternative to traditional chemical catalysts, thermozymes have been widely applied in food, pharmaceutical, textile, bio-refining, and feed industries (Han et al. 2019). A good enzyme often meets industrial requirements like high substrate specificity, high catalytic efficiency, and high thermal stability, among which the thermal stability of enzyme is particularly important because of the resistance to the severe environment and maintenance of long-term catalysis at high temperatures (Karnaouri et al. 2019; Suresh et al. 2021). During the preparation of industrial products in industry, the chemical reaction often occurs in the system with high temperature owing to many merits, such as higher reaction rate, lower risk of microbial contamination (Wu, Zhang, and Mu 2019; Kumar et al. 2019). Enzymes exert the best biological activities in the living systems during the long-term natural evolution (Liu, Xun, and Feng et al. 2019). However, most enzymes are derived from the mesophilic bacteria, and the tolerance is poor, severely restricting the broad industrial application (Atalah et al. 2019). Therefore, new enzymes with high thermostability or modification of the available mesophilic enzymes are significant for industrial application. In addition, it is necessary to CONTACT Wenli Zhang

Thermostability; protein engineering; industrial enzymes; extreme environment; interaction force establish an efficient molecular modification method to improve the thermal stability of enzymes. The evaluation of the thermostability of enzymes from the perspective of structure and energy usually uses thermodynamic stability and kinetic stability as parameters. Thermodynamic stability is used to characterize the tendency of protein unfolding. In such a situation, the protein structure is in a relatively stable energy state determined by the entropy and enthalpy, and the unfolding trend is not spontaneous. Natural enzymes often evolve into a thermodynamically stable state to adapt to environmental temperature (Rothschild and Mancinelli 2001). Thermodynamic stability of a protein is usually assessed by free energy of unfolding (ΔGu), melting temperature (Tm), and unfolding equilibrium constant (Ku). Kinetic stability refers to the time or temperature required for a protein to maintain half activity when undergoing irreversibility (Polizzi et al. 2007). The measurement of kinetic stability requires detecting the residue activity of enzymes after incubating at specific conditions. Generally, Topt (the optimal temperature), T50 (the temperature when enzyme loses half activity), t1/2 (the time when enzyme loses half activity), and kd,obs (observed deactivation rate constant) (Bommarius and Paye 2013) should be measured.

The recent development of bioinformatics and sequencing technology has promoted the discovery of new coding sequences of enzymes (Wang, Nie, and Xu 2019). More and more thermophilic enzymes have been isolated or cloned from hyperthermophilic and thermophilic strains. It was found that the sequence similarity between thermophilic enzymes and mesophilic enzymes could reach about 40%–85% (Vieille and Zeikus 2001), while the tertiary structure of which was also highly similar, and the catalytic mechanism was the same, indicating that there were other mechanisms and factors affecting enzymes’ thermal stability. Extensive studies have revealed that there are many interaction forces being in the amino acid residues of enzymes which are including hydrophobic interactions, salt bridges, aromatic ring interactions, disulfide bonds and hydrogen bonds, and these interaction forces play a very pivotal role in maintaining the conformational stability of enzymes. Additionally, enzymes with better thermal stability tend to have a more stable conformation, such as higher rigidity, higher stacking efficiency, lower de-folding entropy, and alpha-helix stability (Vieille and Zeikus 2001). Higher thermostability makes enzymes more competitive and desirable in the industrial application. In the past few decades, continuous efforts have been made to obtain desired industrial enzymes with high thermostability through two main ways. One way is to screen hyperthermophilic and thermophilic organisms from extreme environment (Figure 1). However, this screening process is complicated and tedious, and the enzyme activity is relatively low. The other way is to improve the thermostability of existing industrial enzymes derived from mesophilic organisms through advanced protein engineering strategies like rational design, semi-rational design, directed evolution and de novo design (Liu, Xun, and

Feng et al. 2019). Additionally, the computational tools for enzyme engineering are widely used aiding this process to better understand the thermostability mechanism of industrial enzymes (Chen et al. 2020). However, rational design requires a comprehensive understanding of the relationship of the structure, function, catalytic mechanisms of enzymes. Semi-rational design involves mutations based on sequence, structure or computational models, followed by small-scale mutagenesis and screening methods (Zhang, Geary, and Simpson 2019). Directed evolution requires the construction of a large mutant library and efficient high throughput screening (HTS) methods. De novo protein design explores the full sequence space, guided by the physical principles that underlie protein folding (Huang, Boyken, and Baker 2016). This review systematically summarizes some achievements in the thermal stability of industrial enzymes applied in food, pharmaceutical, textile, bio-refining and feed industries. The mechanisms and factors affecting the thermostability of enzymes are discussed in detail. Then, strategies for developing high thermostability enzymes including how to obtain enzymes and how to modify the molecular structure of existing enzymes with weak thermal stability through advanced protein engineering techniques are proposed as well. Mature methods to improve the thermal stability of enzymes through rational design are analyzed.

2. Factors affecting protein thermal stability 2.1. Hydrogen bond Hydrogen bonding is an important non-covalent interaction in protein structure, which not only exists between the

Figure 1. The flow chart of obtaining thermostable enzymes from extreme environment using different separation strategies. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

amino acid residues in the protein but also manifests in the interaction between the protein and the surrounding water molecules (Figure 2). This is because there are many hydrogen donors and hydrogen acceptors between the water molecules inside and around the protein. Generally, the distance of hydrogen donors and hydrogen acceptors is not more than 3 Å and the angle is less than 90 degrees. The energy provided by each pair of hydrogen bonds formed in the protein is about 0.6 kcal/mol (Li, Zhou, and Lu 2005). Vogt et al., have found that the thermostability of protein is closely related to the number of hydrogen bonds after comparing different families of proteins in terms of their respective fractional polar atom surface areas (Vogt, Woell, and Argos 1997). Vieira et al., have dealt with two structurally similar family 11 xylanases, BCX (mesophilic xylanse from Bacillus circulans) and TLX (thermophilic xylanase from Thermomyces lanuginosus) by molecular dynamics simulations, and demonstrated that the intramolecular hydrogen bonds and salt bridges were key factors for the maintenance of the backbone rigidity at high temperatures (Vieira and Degrève 2009). Later research has reaffirmed the conclusion that thermophilic enzymes have more hydrogen bonds than mesophilic enzymes (Tompa, Gromiha, and Saraboji 2016). Besides, Ishak et al., have found that the melting temperature (Tm) of recombinant lipase mutants D43E and E226D from Geobacillus zalihae increased up to

76 °C and 77.4 °C, respectively, while that of the wild-type enzymes were 70.9 °C (Ishak et al. 2020). Further structural investigations about G. zalihae lipase mutants D43E and E226D have indicated that the improvement of lipase stability was attributed to the additional hydrogen bonds and ion-pair interactions. Interestingly, the introduction of interchain hydrogen bonds at the interface regions also contributed to the thermostability and structural stability of D-allulose 3-epimerase from Dorea sp. CAG317 with Tm increased by 17.54 °C compared to wild type (Zhang et al. 2018). 2.2. Salt bridge Salt bridge is formed through the electrostatic attraction of amino acid residues with opposite charges (Figure 2). As a driving force for maintaining the structure thermostability of protein at high temperatures, salt bridge frequently appears on the surface of proteins (Xu, Cen et al. 2020). Thermophilic proteins tend to possess more surface salt bridges than homologous mesophilic proteins at high temperatures (de Bakker, Hünenberger, and McCammon 1999; Szilágyi and Závodszky 2000). Also, salt bridge is considered as a more important factor than hydrogen bond in thermophilic proteins. The molecular dynamics simulation results illustrated that high temperature would lead to more intra-protein

Figure 2. Factors and characteristics affecting the thermal stability of industrial enzymes. 4 H. WU ET AL.

interaction energy due to the tightening of salt bridges, which also explained that the reason why salt bridges may stabilize hyperthermophilic proteins at elevated temperatures rather than at room temperature. Another reason was that the large desolvation penalty incurred by the association of two charged residues forming a salt bridge was not compensated by intra-protein interaction at room temperature (Szilágyi and Závodszky 2000). Therefore, introduction of a desirable salt bridge remains a very difficult task as sometimes it will result slight stabilization or destabilization of proteins. Additionally, Szilágyi and Závodszky have compiled a non-redundant data set, comprising high-quality structures of thermophilic proteins and the mesophilic homologues to draw general evolution of the heat stability of proteins (Szilágyi and Závodszky 2000). It was found that the number of salt bridges was a significant factor affecting the stability of proteins, and the number of salt bridges in thermophilic proteins was higher than that of mesophilic proteins. To increase the thermostability of 1,4-α-glucan branching enzymes from Geobacillus thermoglucosidans (GtGBE), Ban et al., have introduced additional local salt bridges into GtGBE and results showed that five separately introduced mutants, namely, Q231R-D227, Q231K-D227, T339E-K335, T339D-K335, and I571D-R569 had longer half-life of 17% to 51% than that of wild-type (Ban et al. 2020). Further circular dichroism and intrinsic fluorescence experiments indicated that the improved thermostability of GtGBE mutants may be ascribed to the enhanced rigidity in newly formed salt bridge networks. Chan et al., have investigated how salt-bridge influenced protein stability with the research on the pair-wise interaction energy and ΔCp (heat capacity change of unfolding) (Chan et al. 2011), and the results indicated that extra salt-bridges enhanced the thermostability of proteins by reducing ΔCp, which would make protein stability curves rise and widen.

2.3. Hydrophobic interaction Many studies have confirmed that hydrophobic interaction plays an important role in maintaining protein stability and forming protein tertiary structure, where the hydrophobic environment is the major factor affecting the stability of thermophilic proteins when compared with other interactions, such as salt bridges and hydrogen bonds. The hydrophobicity content has also been proposed to be informative for discriminating between mesophilic and thermophilic proteins (Modarres, Mofrad, and Sanati-Nezhad 2016). Gromiha et al., have found that 80% of thermophilic proteins show higher hydrophobicity than mesophilic ones based on a dataset of 373 protein families (Gromiha et al. 2013). The interaction force is generated mainly due to the cluster and hydrophobic amino acid side chains which instinctively repels the contact with water (Folch, Rooman, and Dehouck 2008). Therefore, the hydrophobic amino acids (nonpolar amino acids) in aqueous solutions are usually buried inside proteins, forming a hydrophobic core, whereas polar amino acids are distributed in the hydrophilic environment on the protein surface. It was reported that the

stable protein could obtain 1.3 ± 0.5 kcal/mol when every additional −CH2− group was buried in the protein (Figure 2) (Pace 1992). By introducing a methyl group into the hydrophobic core of E. coli ribonuclease H1, Ishikawa et al., have successfully achieved the thermostability of the enzyme (Ishikawa et al. 1993). This can be explained by the later research findings that more hydrophobic interaction would make the unfolding rate slower in thermostable proteins (Okada et al. 2010). Relevant literature had reported that the thermostability of D-allulose 3-epimerase from Rhodopirellula baltica was enhanced to a Δt1/2 of 50.4 min, ΔTm of 12.6 °C, and ΔT5060 of 22 °C after the site-directed mutation of L144F (Mao et al. 2020). Further detailed analysis of the structure indicated that a new hydrophobic interaction was produced in the mutation protein. A similar result was also observed in the double point mutant T130M/ E133F of (R)-selective amine transaminase from Aspergillus terreus, with 3.3-fold in t1/2 at 40 °C and 5 °C higher in T1/210 min thermal stability than wild type enzyme, which was due to the newly formed hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds (Huang, Xie, and Feng 2017). Furthermore, when error-prone PCR and rational design based on B-factors were used, the thermostability of optimal variant Xyn376 from GH 11 family showed a half-life 820-fold higher than that of the wild-type enzyme at 70 °C (Xing et al. 2021). The hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions were the major forces for improved thermostability by the structural analysis.

2.4. Aromatic ring interaction Aromatic ring interaction is also an important driving force for protein thermostability, mainly including the interaction of cation (positively charged amino acids, such as Lys, Arg and protonated His) and aromatic ring (cation-π), or aromatic-aromatic interaction (π-π). The cation-π interaction was a general, strong and non-covalent binding force, providing the energy twice as strong as that of salt bridges (Chakravarty and Varadarajan 2002; Dougherty 2007). The interaction of aromatic ring amino acids (Try, Tyr and Phe) mainly occurs when the distance between the phenyl ring centroids is less than 7.0 Å (Figure 2). A π-π interaction usually stabilizes a protein molecule by 0.6–1.3 kcal/mol when the preferential distance of the centroids of the two aromatic rings are 5.5 Å (Ohmura et al. 2001). However, the aromatic interactions happen when the orientation of aromatic rings is in offset stacked or edge-face, which results in some challenges to design aromatic interactions. To systematically clarify the contribution of aromatic interactions to the thermostability of proteins, Kannan et al., have investigated a dataset of 24 protein families with known crystal structures from the thermophilic and the mesophilic homologues, and found that 17 thermophilic protein families possessed additional aromatic clusters or enlarged aromatic networks located on the protein surface than the corresponding mesophilic homologues (Kannan and Vishveshwara 2000). Yoneda et al., have revealed that the higher thermostability of B. smithii indio reductase was due to the

intersubunit aromatic interactions (F105-F172′ and F172 and F105′), and F105 played a governing role in these aromatic interactions (Yoneda et al. 2020). The additional aromatic interaction of Y11-Y16 could increase the stability of the N-terminal part of mesophilic family 11 xylanase from Streptomyces sp. S38, which increased Tm by 9 °C, indicating that adding π-π interaction at the appropriate place could improve the thermostability of the protein (Georis et al. 2000). A recent study has declared that half-lives of the nitrilase mutants AcN-T201F and AcN-T201W constructed by error-prone PCR were 13.5- and 10.8-fold longer than that of wild-type AcN, respectively (Xu et al. 2018). The molecular modeling suggested that W201 or F201 residue of nitrilase mutant not only improved the stability of the dimer interface but also formed π-π interaction with W165 residue to stabilize the substrate binding pocket, indirectly enhancing the thermostability.

2.5. Disulfide bond Disulfide bonds are formed between the cysteine residues (Cys) with the distance of the alpha carbon atoms in space ranging from 4 to 9 Å (Figure 2). This process is one of the posttranslational modifications dependent on the conformation of proteins and requires a specific redox environment and chaperones proteins (Creighton 1984). Disulfide bonds, as covalent interactions, which stabilize the structure of proteins by reducing conformational entropy, play a vital role in the folding and activity of proteins. Compared with the non-covalent interactions forces, such as hydrogen bonds, salt bridges, hydrophobic interactions and aromatic interactions, disulfide bonds provide the greatest energy for protein stability. It has been reported that the average separation between Cys forming a disulfide cross-link is 15 residues for natural protein, which can provide 3.0 kcal/mol energy if assuming negligible effect on the folded form (Kazlauskas 2018). However, many factors should be taken into account to construct disulfide bonds. To figure out the factors that may affect the successful construction of disulfide bonds, Dani et al., have reevaluated and refined an automated procedure for modeling the disulfide bonds in proteins through a computational MODIP program (Dani, Ramakrishnan, and Varadarajan 2003), and found that the stabilized disulfide bonds were associated with the proper stereochemistry, lower depth regions, relatively higher mobility (higher B-factors) and longer loop lengths (25–75 residues). To effectively improve the protein stability and modify functional properties, a software named Disulfide by Design (DbD) and an accessible web server hosting site (http:// cptweb.cpt.wayne.edu/DbD2/) have been developed by Craig and Dombkowski to auxiliary predict pairs of residues that would likely form a disulfide bond if mutated to Cys (Craig and Dombkowski 2013). Compared with other non-covalent interaction forces including hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic forces, it seems to be a more convenient and simple method to design disulfide bonds assisting by computational calculation programs and software. However, the formation and correct folding of disulfide bonds are also full of

uncertainty due to the redox instability which is not fit for enzymes that function in reducing environment. Extensive studies have been carried out to enhance the thermostability of enzymes by introducing disulfide bonds (Vasudevan et al. 2019). A recent study had successfully enhanced the thermostability of phytase from B. licheniformis WHU by DbD v2.05 program coupled with homology models analysis, whose mutant G197C/A358C was 3.8-fold than wild type enzyme in half-life at 60 °C (Zhang et al. 2020). Molecular dynamics results indicated that the thermostability mechanism of this G197C/A358C mutant was that the newly formed disulfide bonds might anchor the C-terminus of phytase and reinforce the local packing rigidity. In the study of Tang et al., two disulfide bonds had been separately constructed, namely Xyn2C14–52 and Xyn2C59– 149 , between the N-terminal and α-helix to the β-sheet core of Xyn2 using site-directed mutagenesis at the corresponding residues, respectively, and resulted 2.5- and 1.8-fold longer half-lives than the wild type Xyn2 at 60 °C (Tang et al. 2017). The newly formed disulfide bonds effectively stabilized the Xyn2 structure by preventing the structure from unfolding, which may be the mechanism for the improved thermostability. Li et al., have engineered different regional multiple disulfide bonds to improve the thermostability of lipase from Yarrowia lipolytica (Li, Zhang et al. 2019). The sextuple mutant 6 s showed that Tm and T5015 (Temperature that the activity loss half at 15 min) increased by 22.53 °C and 31.23 °C, respectively, due to more rigidified enzyme structures and longer unfolding times after introducing additional disulfide bonds. 2.6. Protein packaging efficiency Protein packaging efficiency, which is related to the thermal stability of a protein, is defined as the ratio of the hydrophobic surface area to the total area of the protein surface (Vieille and Zeikus 2001) (Figure 2). Karshikoff et al., had analyzed the structures of 80 non-homologous mesophilic proteins, 20 thermophilic proteins and 4 hyperthermophilic proteins, and found that thermophilic proteins often had higher protein packaging efficiency (Karshikoff and Ladenstein 1998). An improvement in the inner packing effectively enhances protein stability since an increase in buried cavities destabilizes protein structure (Eriksson et al. 1992; Xu et al. 1998). Abraham et al., had chosen 43 residues of Lipase A from B. subtilis with exposure ratio below 5% and packing value below 0.55 as first-round mutant candidates and found that less-packed residues with no water-contact were good target sites for enhancing thermostability (Abraham et al. 2005). Based on the strategies of Gly mutation to Ala, and Ala mutation to Val, six mutants, namely, A38V, A75V, G80A, A105V, A146V and G172A were obtained with higher thermostability than that of wild-type. Among them, half-lives of A38V, G80A, and G172A mutant increased 64- to 70-fold than wild type lipase A. One study has also shown that reducing the hydrophobic surface area of flavodoxin by changing the hydrophobic amino acids on the surface into hydrophilic amino acids

could significantly improve the thermal stability of the protein (Ayuso-Tejedor, Abián, and Sancho 2011).

3. Discovery natural enzymes with high thermostability It is believed that the properties of enzymes are closely related to the environment in which the host lives owing to the long-term natural evolution (Ueno, Ibarra, and Gojobori 2016). Accordingly, it is reasonable to think that microorganisms that grow in a high-temperature environment may secrete enzymes with good thermal stability (Table 1). Previous studies have revealed that extremophiles survived in extreme conditions could secrete novel enzymes with various properties, which could be applied in chemical, food and pharmaceutical industries. Therefore, extremophiles have gained much research attention (Chettri et al. 2021; Herbert 1992; van den Burg 2003; Verma, Meghwanshi, and Kumar 2021), and thermostable enzymes can be obtained by novel proteins from extremophiles such as hyperthermophiles or thermophiles (Figure 1). At present, only a minor fraction of microorganisms that can resist extreme heat have been reported, and most of which belong to archaea. Many of these available microorganisms that grow in extreme conditions, such as deep-sea, hot-spring environment, are difficult to be cultivated in the laboratory environment, which makes the production of enzymes from extremophiles infeasible through fermentation technology. Nonetheless, the development of genome sequencing, molecular biology and metagenomics has accelerated the gene mining, discovery and identification of enzymes, such as xylanase (Chadha et al. 2019; Ferrer et al. 2016; Lorenz and Eck 2005; Mhiri et al. 2020; Patel et al. 2019). Besides, many plasmid vectors and mature expression systems allow the extremophiles-derived enzymes to

be cloned and expressed in the mesophilic hosts that are easy to be cultivated in the laboratory with mature molecular biotechnology. Furthermore, many prokaryote systems such as Escherichia coli, Bacillus, Lactobacillus, and eukaryotic systems such as Pichia, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Candida have been developed as selectable expressing hosts for producing different source enzymes (Peng et al. 2021). For example, both the D-lyxose isomerase from Thermoprotei archaeon and L-aminoacylase from Thermococcus litoralis have been successfully cloned, expressed and characterized in E. coli hosts (Toogood et al. 2002; Wu et al. 2020). The β-glycosidase from extreme thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus has been expressed in yeast systems (D’Auria et al. 1996). Fortunately, the majority of hyperthermophilic enzymes expressed in these expressing systems retain all of the native enzymes’ biochemical properties, including proper folding and thermostability (Ebaid et al. 2019; Grättinger et al. 1998; Shi et al. 2019; Vieille and Zeikus 2001).

4. Protein engineering strategies for developing thermostable enzyme 4.1. Rational design In recent years, with the rapid development of bioinformatics technology and structural biology, rational design strategies have become important means to modify the properties of proteins (Table 2). A practical rational design is based on the comprehensive understanding of the protein structure, function and structure-activity relationship, and then purposeful modification of the specific sites of the protein through selective substitution, insertion or truncation, and further experimental analysis of the property changes of the designed protein. However, the application range of rational

Table 1. Different strategies used to discovery natural enzymes with high thermostability. Microorganisms Sources Microorganism Topt (°C) Methods Production Enzymes Topt (°C) Thermostable ability

📖 中文全文 Chinese Full Text

中文

# 高耐热性工业酶开发策略综述:发现、机制、改造与挑战

吴浩,陈秋明,张文丽,穆万孟

## 摘要

酶等生物催化剂具有环境友好性和底物特异性,在各类工业产品的生产中备受青睐。然而,工业生产中严苛的反应条件,包括高温、有机溶剂、强酸强碱及其他恶劣环境,往往会导致酶的结构不稳定,从而严重削弱其催化功能,极大地限制了其在食品、制药、纺织、生物精炼和饲料等工业领域的应用。因此,开发具有高耐热性的工业酶在工业中变得尤为重要,因为耐热酶在高温条件下更具优势。利用基因组测序、宏基因组学以及从极端环境中分离样品的方法发现新型耐热酶,或利用新兴的蛋白质工程技术对耐热性较差的现有酶进行分子改造,已成为获得耐热酶的有效手段。本文以耐热酶作为工业生物催化芯片,系统分析了从极端环境中发现耐热酶的方法,阐明了影响酶热稳定性的各种相互作用力,并提出了提高酶热稳定性的不同策略。此外,从构效关系的角度全面介绍了通过理性设计策略改造工业酶热稳定性的最新进展。同时,本文还提出了挑战和未来的研究方向。

## 1. 引言

作为传统化学催化剂的有效替代品,耐热酶已广泛应用于食品、制药、纺织、生物精炼和饲料等行业(Han et al. 2019)。一种优良的酶通常需要满足工业要求,如高底物特异性、高催化效率和高热稳定性,其中酶的热稳定性尤为重要,因为它能够抵抗恶劣环境并在高温下维持长期催化(Karnaouri et al. 2019; Suresh et al. 2021)。在工业产品制备过程中,由于高温具有反应速率更高、微生物污染风险更低等诸多优点,化学反应往往在高温体系中进行(Wu, Zhang, and Mu 2019; Kumar et al. 2019)。酶在长期的生物进化过程中在生物体内发挥最佳生物学活性(Liu, Xun, and Feng et al. 2019)。然而,大多数酶来源于嗜温细菌,耐受性较差,严重限制了其广泛的工业应用(Atalah et al. 2019)。因此,获得具有高耐热性的新型酶或对现有的嗜温酶进行改造对工业应用具有重要意义。此外,有必要建立高效的分子改造方法来提高酶的热稳定性。

从结构和能量角度评估酶的热稳定性,通常以热力学稳定性和动力学稳定性作为参数。热力学稳定性用于表征蛋白质变性的趋势。在这种情况下,蛋白质结构处于由熵和焓决定的相对稳定的能量状态,变性趋势不是自发的。天然酶通常进化到热力学稳定状态以适应环境温度(Rothschild and Mancinelli 2001)。蛋白质的热力学稳定性通常通过变性自由能(ΔGu)、熔解温度(Tm)和变性平衡常数(Ku)来评估。动力学稳定性是指蛋白质在经历不可逆变化时维持一半活性所需的时间或温度(Polizzi et al. 2007)。动力学稳定性的测量需要在特定条件孵育后检测酶的残余活性。通常,应测量Topt(最适温度)、T50(酶失去一半活性时的温度)、t1/2(酶失去一半活性所需的时间)和kd,obs(观测失活速率常数)(Bommarius and Paye 2013)。

近年来生物信息学和测序技术的发展促进了新酶编码序列的发现(Wang, Nie, and Xu 2019)。越来越多的耐热酶从超嗜热和嗜热菌株中分离或克隆出来。研究发现,耐热酶与嗜温酶的序列相似性可达约40%–85%(Vieille and Zeikus 2001),而它们的三级结构也高度相似,催化机制相同,表明存在其他影响酶热稳定性的机制和因素。大量研究表明,酶的氨基酸残基之间存在多种相互作用力,包括疏水相互作用、盐桥、芳香环相互作用、二硫键和氢键,这些相互作用力在维持酶的构象稳定性方面发挥着极其关键的作用。此外,具有较好热稳定性的酶往往具有更稳定的构象,如更高的刚性、更高的堆积效率、更低的去折叠熵以及α-螺旋稳定性(Vieille and Zeikus 2001)。更高的热稳定性使酶在工业应用中更具竞争力和吸引力。

在过去的几十年中,人们通过两种主要方式不断努力获得具有高耐热性的理想工业酶。一种方式是从极端环境中筛选超嗜热和嗜热生物(图1)。然而,这一筛选过程复杂且繁琐,且酶活性相对较低。另一种方式是通过先进的蛋白质工程策略,如理性设计、半理性设计、定向进化和从头设计,提高来源于嗜温生物的现有工业酶的热稳定性(Liu, Xun, and Feng et al. 2019)。此外,用于酶工程的计算工具被广泛用于辅助这一过程,以更好地理解工业酶的热稳定性机制(Chen et al. 2020)。然而,理性设计需要对酶的结构、功能和催化机制之间的关系有全面的了解。半理性设计涉及基于序列、结构或计算模型的突变,随后进行小规模突变和筛选方法(Zhang, Geary, and Simpson 2019)。定向进化需要构建大型突变文库和高效的高通量筛选(HTS)方法。从头蛋白质设计在指导蛋白质折叠的物理原理指导下探索整个序列空间(Huang, Boyken, and Baker 2016)。

本综述系统总结了应用于食品、制药、纺织、生物精炼和饲料等工业的工业酶热稳定性方面的一些成果。详细讨论了影响酶热稳定性的机制和因素。然后,提出了开发高耐热酶的策略,包括如何获得酶以及如何通过先进的蛋白质工程技术改造热稳定性较弱的现有酶的分子结构。分析了通过理性设计提高酶热稳定性的成熟方法。

## 2. 影响蛋白质热稳定性的因素

### 2.1. 氢键

氢键是蛋白质结构中重要的非共价相互作用,不仅存在于蛋白质内部的氨基酸残基之间,还表现为蛋白质与周围水分子之间的相互作用(图2)。这是因为蛋白质内部和周围的水分子之间存在许多氢供体和氢受体。通常,氢供体和氢受体之间的距离不超过3 Å,角度小于90度。蛋白质中每对氢键提供的能量约为0.6 kcal/mol(Li, Zhou, and Lu 2005)。Vogt等人通过比较不同蛋白质家族各自的分数极性原子表面积,发现蛋白质的热稳定性与氢键数量密切相关(Vogt, Woell, and Argos 1997)。Vieira等人通过分子动力学模拟研究了两种结构相似的11家族木聚糖酶——来自环状芽孢杆菌的嗜温木聚糖酶BCX和来自嗜热真菌的嗜热木聚糖酶TLX,结果表明分子内氢键和盐桥是维持高温下骨架刚性的关键因素(Vieira and Degrève 2009)。后续研究进一步证实了嗜热酶比嗜温酶具有更多氢键的结论(Tompa, Gromiha, and Saraboji 2016)。此外,Ishak等人发现来自Geobacillus zalihae的重组脂肪酶突变体D43E和E226D的熔解温度(Tm)分别升高至76 °C和77.4 °C,而野生型酶的Tm为70.9 °C(Ishak et al. 2020)。对G. zalihae脂肪酶突变体D43E和E226D的进一步结构研究表明,脂肪酶稳定性的提高归因于额外的氢键和离子对相互作用。有趣的是,在界面区域引入链间氢键也有助于提高来自Dorea sp. CAG317的D-阿洛酮糖3-差向异构酶的热稳定性和结构稳定性,其Tm比野生型提高了17.54 °C(Zhang et al. 2018)。

### 2.2. 盐桥

盐桥通过带相反电荷的氨基酸残基之间的静电吸引形成(图2)。作为在高温下维持蛋白质结构热稳定性的驱动力,盐桥频繁出现在蛋白质表面(Xu, Cen et al. 2020)。嗜热蛋白质在高温下往往比同源的嗜温蛋白质拥有更多的表面盐桥(de Bakker, Hünenberger, and McCammon 1999; Szilágyi and Závodszky 2000)。此外,盐桥被认为是在嗜热蛋白质中比氢键更重要的因素。分子动力学模拟结果表明,高温会由于盐桥的紧缩导致更多的蛋白质内相互作用能,这也解释了为什么盐桥可能在高温下而非室温下稳定超嗜热蛋白质。另一个原因是,在室温下,由两个带电残基形成盐桥所产生的大溶剂化惩罚不能通过蛋白质内相互作用来补偿(Szilágyi and Závodszky 2000)。因此,引入理想的盐桥仍然是一项非常困难的任务,因为有时它会导致蛋白质的轻微稳定或不稳定。此外,Szilágyi和Závodszky编制了一个非冗余数据集,包含嗜热蛋白质及其嗜温同源物的高质量结构,以得出蛋白质热稳定性的一般进化规律(Szilágyi and Závodszky 2000)。结果发现,盐桥数量是影响蛋白质稳定性的重要因素,嗜热蛋白质中的盐桥数量高于嗜温蛋白质。为了提高来自嗜热脂肪杆菌(Geobacillus thermoglucosidans)的1,4-α-葡聚糖分支酶(GtGBE)的热稳定性,Ban等人将额外的局部盐桥引入GtGBE,结果表明五个单独引入的突变体Q231R-D227、Q231K-D227、T339E-K335、T339D-K335和I571D-R569的半衰期比野生型长17%至51%(Ban et al. 2020)。进一步的圆二色性和内在荧光实验表明,GtGBE突变体热稳定性的提高可能归因于新形成的盐桥网络中增强的刚性。Chan等人通过研究成对相互作用能和ΔCp(变性的热容变化)研究了盐桥如何影响蛋白质稳定性(Chan et al. 2011),结果表明额外的盐桥通过降低ΔCp增强了蛋白质的热稳定性,这将使蛋白质稳定性曲线升高和变宽。

### 2.3. 疏水相互作用

许多研究证实,疏水相互作用在维持蛋白质稳定性和形成蛋白质三级结构中发挥重要作用,其中疏水环境是与盐桥和氢键等其他相互作用相比影响嗜热蛋白质稳定性的主要因素。疏水性含量也被提出可作为区分嗜温蛋白质和嗜温蛋白质的信息指标(Modarres, Mofrad, and Sanati-Nezhad 2016)。Gromiha等人基于373个蛋白质家族的数据集发现,80%的嗜热蛋白质比嗜温蛋白质表现出更高的疏水性(Gromiha et al. 2013)。这种相互作用力主要是由于疏水氨基酸侧链的聚集本能地排斥与水的接触而产生的(Folch, Rooman, and Dehouck 2008)。因此,水溶液中的疏水氨基酸(非极性氨基酸)通常被埋藏在蛋白质内部,形成疏水核心,而极性氨基酸则分布在蛋白质表面的亲水环境中。据报道,每当一个额外的-CH2-基团被埋藏在蛋白质中时,稳定的蛋白质可获得1.3 ± 0.5 kcal/mol的能量(图2)(Pace 1992)。通过将甲基引入大肠杆菌核糖核酸酶H1的疏水核心,Ishikawa等人成功实现了该酶的热稳定性(Ishikawa et al. 1993)。这可以通过后续研究发现来解释,即在耐热蛋白质中更多的疏水相互作用会使变性速率变慢(Okada et al. 2010)。相关文献报道,来自Rhodopirellula baltica的D-阿洛酮糖3-差向异构酶在L144F位点定向突变后,其热稳定性提高至Δt1/2为50.4 min、ΔTm为12.6 °C、ΔT5060为22 °C(Mao et al. 2020)。进一步的结构详细分析表明,突变蛋白质中产生了新的疏水相互作用。在来自土曲霉的(R)-选择性胺转氨酶的双点突变体T130M/E133F中也观察到类似结果,其在40 °C下的t1/2比野生型酶高3.3倍,T1/210 min热稳定性比野生型高5 °C,这是由于新形成的疏水相互作用和氢键所致(Huang, Xie, and Feng 2017)。此外,当使用易错PCR和基于B因子的理性设计时,来自GH 11家族的最佳变体Xyn376在70 °C下的半衰期比野生型酶高820倍(Xing et al. 2021)。结构分析表明,氢键和疏水相互作用是提高热稳定性的主要作用力。

### 2.4. 芳香环相互作用

芳香环相互作用也是蛋白质热稳定性的重要驱动力,主要包括阳离子(带正电荷的氨基酸,如赖氨酸、精氨酸和质子化的组氨酸)与芳香环之间的相互作用(阳离子-π),或芳香环-芳香环相互作用(π-π)。阳离子-π相互作用是一种常见的、强的非共价结合力,提供的能量是盐桥的两倍(Chakravarty and Varadarajan 2002; Dougherty 2007)。芳香环氨基酸(色氨酸、酪氨酸和苯丙氨酸)之间的相互作用主要发生在苯基环质心距离小于7.0 Å时(图2)。当两个芳香环质心的优先距离为5.5 Å时,π-π相互作用通常以0.6–1.3 kcal/mol的能量稳定蛋白质分子(Ohmura et al. 2001)。然而,当芳香环的取向为错位堆叠或边对面时,芳香相互作用就会发生,这给设计芳香相互作用带来了一些挑战。为了系统阐明芳香相互作用对蛋白质热稳定性的贡献,Kannan等人研究了24个蛋白质家族的数据集,这些家族具有已知的晶体结构,来自嗜热和嗜温同源物,发现17个嗜热蛋白质家族比相应的嗜温同源物拥有额外的芳香簇或位于蛋白质表面的扩大芳香网络(Kannan and Vishveshwara 2000)。Yoneda等人揭示,B. smithii茚满还原酶更高的热稳定性归因于亚基间的芳香相互作用(F105-F172′和F172-F105′),其中F105在这些芳香相互作用中起主导作用(Yoneda et al. 2020)。Y11-Y16的额外芳香相互作用可以提高来自链霉菌S38的嗜温11家族木聚糖酶N端部分的稳定性,使Tm提高9 °C,表明在适当位置添加π-π相互作用可以提高蛋白质的热稳定性(Georis et al. 2000)。最近的研究表明,通过易错PCR构建的腈水解酶突变体AcN-T201F和AcN-T201W的半衰期分别比野生型AcN长13.5倍和10.8倍(Xu et al. 2018)。分子建模表明,腈水解酶突变体的W201或F201残基不仅提高了二聚体界面的稳定性,还与W165残基形成π-π相互作用以稳定底物结合口袋,间接增强了热稳定性。

### 2.5. 二硫键

二硫键在空间距离为4至9 Å的半胱氨酸残基(Cys)之间形成(图2)。这一过程是依赖于蛋白质构象的翻译后修饰之一,需要特定的氧化还原环境和伴侣蛋白(Creighton 1984)。二硫键作为共价相互作用,通过降低构象熵来稳定蛋白质结构,在蛋白质折叠和活性中发挥重要作用。与氢键、盐桥、疏水相互作用和芳香相互作用等非共价相互作用力相比,二硫键为蛋白质稳定性提供最大的能量。据报道,形成二硫键交联的半胱氨酸之间的平均间隔为15个残基,如果假设对折叠形式的影响可忽略不计,则可提供3.0 kcal/mol的能量(Kazlauskas 2018)。然而,构建二硫键需要考虑许多因素。为了找出可能影响二硫键成功构建的因素,Dani等人通过计算MODIP程序重新评估和改进了蛋白质中二硫键建模的自动化程序(Dani, Ramakrishnan, and Varadarajan 2003),发现稳定的二硫键与适当的立体化学、较浅的深度区域、相对较高的流动性(较高的B因子)和较长的环长度(25–75个残基)相关。为了有效提高蛋白质稳定性和改造功能特性,Craig和Dombkowski开发了一个名为Disulfide by Design(DbD)的软件和一个可访问的网络服务器托管站点(http://cptweb.cpt.wayne.edu/DbD2/),以辅助预测如果突变为半胱氨酸可能形成二硫键的残基对(Craig and Dombkowski 2013)。与包括氢键和疏水作用力在内的其他非共价相互作用力相比,借助计算程序和软件设计二硫键似乎是一种更方便和简单的方法。然而,由于氧化还原不稳定性,二硫键的形成和正确折叠也充满了不确定性,这不适用于在还原环境中发挥功能的酶。

大量研究通过引入二硫键来提高酶的热稳定性(Vasudevan et al. 2019)。最近的一项研究通过DbD v2.05程序结合同源模型分析成功提高了来自地衣芽孢杆菌WHU的植酸酶的热稳定性,其突变体G197C/A358C在60 °C下的半衰期是野生型酶的3.8倍(Zhang et al. 2020)。分子动力学结果表明,该G197C/A358C突变体的热稳定性机制可能是新形成的二硫键锚定了植酸酶的C端并加强了局部堆积刚性。在Tang等人的研究中,使用定点突变在Xyn2的N端和α-螺旋到β-折叠核心之间分别构建了两个二硫键,即Xyn2C14-52和Xyn2C59-149,结果在60 °C下的半衰期分别比野生型Xyn2长2.5倍和1.8倍(Tang et al. 2017)。新形成的二硫键通过防止结构展开有效稳定了Xyn2结构,这可能是热稳定性提高的机制。Li等人设计了不同的区域多重二硫键以提高来自解脂耶氏酵母的脂肪酶的热稳定性(Li, Zhang et al. 2019)。六重突变体6 s的Tm和T5015(15分钟内活性损失一半的温度)分别提高了22.53 °C和31.23 °C,这是由于引入额外的二硫键后酶结构更加刚性化和展开时间更长。

### 2.6. 蛋白质包装效率

与蛋白质热稳定性相关的蛋白质包装效率定义为蛋白质表面积中疏水表面积与总表面积之比(Vieille and Zeikus 2001)(图2)。Karshikoff等人分析了80种非同源嗜温蛋白质、20种嗜热蛋白质和4种超嗜热蛋白质的结构,发现嗜热蛋白质通常具有更高的蛋白质包装效率(Karshikoff and Ladenstein 1998)。内部堆积效应的有效提高增强了蛋白质稳定性,因为埋藏腔的增加会使蛋白质结构不稳定(Eriksson et al. 1992; Xu et al. 1998)。Abraham等人选择了枯草芽孢杆菌脂肪酶A中暴露率低于5%且堆积值低于0.55的43个残基作为第一轮突变候选者,发现没有水接触的堆积较差的残基是提高热稳定性的良好靶点(Abraham et al. 2005)。基于甘氨酸突变为丙氨酸和丙氨酸突变为缬氨酸的策略,获得了六个突变体,即A38V、A75V、G80A、A105V、A146V和G172A,其热稳定性高于野生型。其中,A38V、G80A和G172A突变体的半衰期比野生型脂肪酶A增加了64至70倍。一项研究还表明,通过将表面的疏水氨基酸改变为亲水氨基酸来降低黄素蛋白的疏水表面积,可以显著提高蛋白质的热稳定性(Ayuso-Tejedor, Abián, and Sancho 2011)。

## 3. 发现具有高耐热性的天然酶

由于长期的生物进化,酶的性质与宿主生活的环境密切相关(Ueno, Ibarra, and Gojobori 2016)。因此,可以合理推测在高温环境中生长的微生物可能分泌具有良好热稳定性的酶(表1)。先前的研究表明,在极端条件下存活的极端微生物可以分泌具有各种特性的新型酶,这些酶可应用于化工、食品和制药行业。因此,极端微生物受到了广泛关注(Chettri et al. 2021; Herbert 1992; van den Burg 2003; Verma, Meghwanshi, and Kumar 2021),并且可以通过来自极端微生物(如超嗜热菌或嗜热菌)的新型蛋白质获得耐热酶(图1)。

目前,只有少数能够耐受极端高温的微生物被报道,其中大多数属于古菌。许多在极端条件下生长的现有微生物,如深海和温泉环境中的微生物,在实验室环境中难以培养,这使得通过发酵技术生产极端微生物来源的酶变得不可行。尽管如此,基因组测序、分子生物学和宏基因组学的发展加速了酶的基因挖掘、发现和鉴定,如木聚糖酶(Chadha et al. 2019; Ferrer et al. 2016; Lorenz and Eck 2005; Mhiri et al. 2020; Patel et al. 2019)。此外,许多质粒载体和成熟的表达系统使得来源于极端微生物的酶可以在易于在实验室培养的嗜温宿主中克隆和表达,并借助成熟的分子生物学技术。此外,许多原核系统如大肠杆菌、芽孢杆菌、乳杆菌,以及真核系统如毕赤酵母、酿酒酵母和假丝酵母已被开发为可选的表达宿主,用于生产不同来源的酶(Peng et al. 2021)。例如,来自古菌Thermoprotei的D-木糖异构酶和来自嗜热球菌的L-氨酰基水解酶已在大肠杆菌宿主中成功克隆、表达和表征(Toogood et al. 2002; Wu et al. 2020)。来自极端嗜热嗜酸古菌硫化叶菌的β-糖苷酶已在酵母系统中表达(D'Auria et al. 1996)。幸运的是,在这些表达系统中表达的大多数超嗜热酶保留了所有天然酶的生化特性,包括适当的折叠和热稳定性(Ebaid et al. 2019; Grättinger et al. 1998; Shi et al. 2019; Vieille and Zeikus 2001)。

## 4. 开发耐热酶的蛋白质工程策略

### 4.1. 理性设计

近年来,随着生物信息学和结构生物学的快速发展,理性设计策略已成为改造蛋白质特性的重要手段(表2)。一个实用的理性设计基于对蛋白质结构、功能和构效关系的全面理解,然后通过选择性替换、插入或截短对蛋白质的特定位点进行有目的的改造,并进一步实验分析设计蛋白质的性质变化。然而,理性设计的应用范围